adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:30:47 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:32:50 PM |
|
If you lack the capacity for abstract thought, you may find the world confusing.
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:35:35 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
Suggesting that improvements can be made is one thing... Pretending that you have it all figured out and that with a couple coding twist we can improve the load of the network by 250x when we have PHDs & decades of cryptography & computer science mind share actually working on these issues rather than posturing about their "solutions" on a forum is just inviting critique...
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:35:42 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
If scalability problems can be overcome, then why aren't they being overcome? That's the 64 billion dollar question.
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:36:15 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
nah i wish i where getting something from them tho. doing the dirty work. contradict them reddit fools. but im just concern about my bitcoins in the end. not heating things up, im merely passing time here. altho as a 'trusted bitcoiner' i might be a bit disappointed when you say "bitcoin is not a holy ledger".
|
|
|
|
inca
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:37:30 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
Suggesting that improvements can be made is one thing... Pretending that you have it all figured out and that with a couple coding twist we can improve the load of the network by 250x is just inviting critique. Given you are unwilling to listen to any arguments from anyone at all about increasing the blocksize that is a slightly hypocritical statement.
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:39:47 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
Suggesting that improvements can be made is one thing... Pretending that you have it all figured out and that with a couple coding twist we can improve the load of the network by 250x is just inviting critique. Given you are unwilling to listen to any arguments from anyone at all about increasing the blocksize that is a slightly hypocritical statement. I've listened to most arguments and have not been convinced by any. How is this hypocritical?
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:39:53 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
If scalability problems can be overcome, then why aren't they being overcome? That's the 64 billion dollar question.oh why the rush then? you dont mess with 64billion dollars question do you? number picking and social rambling does not count too. besides, yet again (and forever-ever), scalability and block size are two different things.
|
|
|
|
bButtercup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:42:25 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
The problem of scaling has already been addressed by 21 Inc's Bitcoin computer, which provides a complete turnkey solution with its fully pre-installed software stack. Which reminds me, have you considered pre-ordering 21 Inc's revolutionary Bitcoin computer?
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:42:45 PM |
|
Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now. If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised. Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:43:47 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
The problem of scaling has already been addressed by 21 Inc's Bitcoin computer, which provides a complete turnkey solution with its fully pre-installed software stack. Which reminds me, have you considered pre-ordering 21 Inc's Bitcoin computer? fuck no.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:49:52 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
There are such things as assholes in this world.
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:52:27 PM |
|
Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now. If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised. Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.
Yes, miners want more income through fees, but less transactions doesn't equal more income. You could have more transactions (more revenue) and less profit per transaction but in the end higher profit. Its a question of balance. In other words the logic smaller blocks = higher mining profits doenst work. Otherwise you could choose a 50kb blocksize, but i am sure thats not what miners want.
|
|
|
|
infofront (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2793
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:52:48 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
There are such things as assholes in this world. If something like 15% of the real world population is an asshole, the number must be approaching at least 40% on the internet.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 09:57:10 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
There are such things as assholes in this world. If something like 15% of the real world population is an asshole, the number must be approaching at least 40% on the internet. And in this forum?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 10:01:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
doc12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1042
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 10:01:56 PM |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
There are such things as assholes in this world. If something like 15% of the real world population is an asshole, the number must be approaching at least 40% on the internet. And in this forum? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) nice one ...
|
|
|
|
mr angry
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 10:03:49 PM |
|
Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now. If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised. Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.
Yes, miners want more income through fees, but less transactions doesn't equal more income. You could have more transactions (more revenue) and less profit per transaction but in the end higher profit. Its a question of balance. In other words the logic smaller blocks = higher mining profits doenst work. Otherwise you could choose a 50kb blocksize, but i am sure thats not what miners want. Every now and again there are blocks mined with no transactions included in them. Whoever mines them doesn't care about the transaction fees, they only want their 25 Bitcoins for mining a block. Zero transactions = more profit for them. The rest of the blocks mined have varying numbers of transactions, but some are close to the 1 MB limit. If the number of transactions doubles a solution will be forced on the community.
|
|
|
|
bButtercup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 10:04:43 PM Last edit: November 06, 2015, 10:15:03 PM by bButtercup |
|
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.
you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...
The problem of scaling has already been addressed by 21 Inc's Bitcoin computer, which provides a complete turnkey solution with its fully pre-installed software stack. Which reminds me, have you considered pre-ordering 21 Inc's Bitcoin computer? fuck no. Remember how you bought BTC @ $420 even though kind people warned you not to? That was your mistake #1. Mistake #2 is failing to pre-order the 21 Bitcoin Computer, the first computer with native hardware and software support for the Bitcoin protocol, which you should do right now by going to https://21.co/buy/And never buy another bitcoin again! 21 Inc's revolutionary Bitcoin computer will make them for you, automatically! Invisibly, in the background, while you work, download pornography, or buy goods & services on Mysterious Dark Net Markets! "Plug in your 21 Bitcoin Computer to get a stream of bitcoin on your Mac, Windows, or Linux laptop." *Ask me about 21 Inc's patented Trinary Logic at the next 21 Inc meetup!
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2015, 10:05:29 PM |
|
Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now. If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised. Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.
Yes, miners want more income through fees, but less transactions doesn't equal more income. You could have more transactions (more revenue) and less profit per transaction but in the end higher profit. Its a question of balance. In other words the logic smaller blocks = higher mining profits doenst work. Otherwise you could choose a 50kb blocksize, but i am sure thats not what miners want. You are preaching to the choir, Brother. I could go even further and add that the block reward will be greater if the price of BTC goes up, which is more likely with larger network capacity, but it's not me you need to convince.
|
|
|
|
|