JayJuanGee
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4438
Merit: 14402
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
January 11, 2016, 02:21:44 AM |
|
That post surely smells like bullshit.
If you were constructively contributing (like arguably could be the above post) by stating an opinion and backing it up, then why the fuck would you get banned. Likely something else was going on.
The fact that you believe that you are going to be banned, probably lends credence to the fact that you are engaging in bullshit in the above post.
I have a suggestion that maybe you try meaningful contributions, 3-5 posts or more per week, and then see where it goes. You are unlikely to be banned, unless you are contributing a bunch of bullshit.
Actually, I will make one more point from my own experience. Over the last couple of years, I have posted nearly 5300 posts, and probably only about 10% or fewer received some kind of direct response.
We can still contribute, and we do not need to expect a response to any high percentage of our posts. Sure some readers may hate me, but that is likely their issue, so I can still make a personal decision to attempt to contribute in whatever way I deem most within my preference...and as long as I am not engaging in a bunch of disingenuous bullshit, then it's pretty unlikely that my account will be suspended.
So, if you are genuine, try posting in the forum (and this thread - and don't expect people to trust you from the start, until they get to know you a bit) otherwise your above post description of what supposedly happened to you is a bunch of bullshit... and you are just trying to get attention by making things up.
You have your experience I have mine. If it smells bullshit to you... well then thats my experience here. I was making valid points and posted sometimes some charts and many times my predictions turned out right. I don't blame to be some hotshot trader Im just learning. But in the end of my short life in this thread I got into a conversation where somebody was very heavy and attacking others and calling names. I was just more or less saying that its not cool and calm down. After that I was banned and I think everyone who took part of that conversation because I haven't seen them here after that either. I guess that was some how a reason for a ban. I understand that for the moderators its a heavy job to fight with trolling but get me banned because of that. Because of what exactly? Just for trying to say that this attitude is not cool here? Ok you make a mistake but then I haven't received any reply for my appeal emails over a month now. So I give up. I just continue quietly following although it would be nice to contribute a bit once in a while. O.k. well just get involved then, if you want. No reason to get all caught up in the past regarding some previous account that may not have ended well.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 11, 2016, 03:02:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
spiderbrain
Legendary
Activity: 889
Merit: 1013
|
|
January 11, 2016, 03:32:15 AM |
|
So I give up. I just continue quietly following although it would be nice to contribute a bit once in a while.
You sound so reasonable! Stick around  |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:02:03 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
lottery248
Legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
beware of your keys.
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:29:22 AM |
|
nothing major.  would powerball jackpot fund affect bitcoin price if the funds were gone to buy bitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:40:55 AM |
|
nothing major. would powerball jackpot fund affect bitcoin price if the funds were gone to buy bitcoin? I was thinking I would buy ~200k bitcoin if I won so that would move the price a little. |
|
|
|
|
mymenace
Legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:45:17 AM |
|
china's effect still working australian markets in freefall today next 24 hours should see similar across the world as markets open expecting BTC rise |
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:46:28 AM |
|
nothing major. would powerball jackpot fund affect bitcoin price if the funds were gone to buy bitcoin? I was thinking I would buy ~200k bitcoin if I won so that would move the price a little. |
|
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:50:18 AM |
|
nothing major. would powerball jackpot fund affect bitcoin price if the funds were gone to buy bitcoin? I was thinking I would buy ~200k bitcoin if I won so that would move the price a little. Still only ~20% of the Powerball winnings to buy 1% of the coins there will ever be at bargain basement prices. Still plenty of money for hookers and cocaine. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:51:53 AM |
|
nothing major. would powerball jackpot fund affect bitcoin price if the funds were gone to buy bitcoin? I was thinking I would buy ~200k bitcoin if I won so that would move the price a little. Still only ~20% of the Powerball winnings to buy 1% of the coins there will ever be at bargain basement prices. Still plenty of money for hookers and cocaine. Pepper for liftoff gentlemen. |
|
|
|
|
PoolMinor
Legendary
Activity: 1845
Merit: 1348
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
|
|
January 11, 2016, 04:54:22 AM |
|
nothing major. would powerball jackpot fund affect bitcoin price if the funds were gone to buy bitcoin? If I won, I would donate a pallet toward the blockchain. http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/calculations.html |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 11, 2016, 05:02:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 11, 2016, 06:02:05 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 11, 2016, 07:01:58 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 11, 2016, 07:14:21 AM |
|
They better publish a proof of solvency after this. You never thought someone would order a plate of onion rings, eat them, and walk out the door? Think again... |
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 11, 2016, 07:55:20 AM |
|
They better publish a proof of solvency after this. You never thought someone would order a plate of onion rings, eat them, and walk out the door? Think again... whoulda thunk huh?  if it can be broken it will be broken, it's the mechanism by which an anti-fragile system evolves. Coinbase has a deficient business model based on fictional technology that doesn't exist, the sooner they find out the better, they should be thanking petertodd. |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 11, 2016, 08:02:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 11, 2016, 08:07:19 AM |
|
They better publish a proof of solvency after this. You never thought someone would order a plate of onion rings, eat them, and walk out the door? Think again... whoulda thunk huh? if it can be broken it will be broken, it's the mechanism by which an anti-fragile system evolves. Coinbase has a deficient business model based on fictional technology that doesn't exist, the sooner they find out the better, they should be thanking petertodd. Of course it could be done, it's been that way all along. Chief Scientist Viacoin just made it a little easier. Before he makes it really easy. For larger amounts Coinbase waits for 3 confirmations. It's just like a restaurant, the majority of honest customers will pick up the slack on the dine'n'dashers. If the burden of fraud is too great, they'll eliminate the option. Peter and you thinking this is a surprise is the "whoulda thunk it" part. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
