Bitcoin Forum
July 17, 2019, 11:25:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will bitcoin reach the top of this bull market (i.e. when will it moon)?
Topped at $13,880 in June - 10 (6.8%)
H2 2019 - 15 (10.3%)
H1 2020 - 27 (18.5%)
H2 2020 - 26 (17.8%)
H1 2021 - 12 (8.2%)
H2 2021 - 28 (19.2%)
H1 2022 - 6 (4.1%)
H2 2022 - 4 (2.7%)
H1 2023 - 0 (0%)
H2 2023 - 3 (2.1%)
2024 or Later - 15 (10.3%)
Total Voters: 146

Pages: « 1 ... 20316 20317 20318 20319 20320 20321 20322 20323 20324 20325 20326 20327 20328 20329 20330 20331 20332 20333 20334 20335 20336 20337 20338 20339 20340 20341 20342 20343 20344 20345 20346 20347 20348 20349 20350 20351 20352 20353 20354 20355 20356 20357 20358 20359 20360 20361 20362 20363 20364 20365 [20366] 20367 20368 20369 20370 20371 20372 20373 20374 20375 20376 20377 20378 20379 20380 20381 20382 20383 20384 20385 20386 20387 20388 20389 20390 20391 20392 20393 20394 20395 20396 20397 20398 20399 20400 20401 20402 20403 20404 20405 20406 20407 20408 20409 20410 20411 20412 20413 20414 20415 20416 ... 24579 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21287734 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (102 posts by 19 users deleted.)
Dunkelheit667
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1005
Merit: 1066


no degradation


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 12:14:40 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Talking about death... one of my Ledger wallets have died. It has a burn mark near the LCD (deforming the plastic case) as if it had internally shortcircuited or something....

Anyone knows if there is some warranty replacement or something?

Has it happened to anyone else?

There is no guarantee of money back, but if you fill out the linked form they might talk to you about the problem.

https://support.ledgerwallet.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000608113

Quote
What to do if my Ledger Nano S has screen, buttons, USB port issues

If you have issues with your buttons (stuck buttons, broken buttons…), damaged screen or pixelated screen, or a loose USB port, then please fill out this form. There is no guarantee of a refund or exchange, but this form must be filled out in order to begin the process.


Well, I guess I have nothing to lose to try. Thanks!
And if they are not willing to replace it  Embarrassed, you might send the dead body for an autopsy and sake of education to Dave, he might be interested. Move your coins to another Ledger first, of course.
1563362740
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563362740

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563362740
Reply with quote  #2

1563362740
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1563362740
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563362740

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563362740
Reply with quote  #2

1563362740
Report to moderator
1563362740
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563362740

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563362740
Reply with quote  #2

1563362740
Report to moderator
1563362740
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563362740

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563362740
Reply with quote  #2

1563362740
Report to moderator
vapourminer
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2388
Merit: 1213


what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 12:30:15 AM
Merited by bitserve (1)

Talking about death... one of my Ledger wallets have died. It has a burn mark near the LCD (deforming the plastic case) as if it had internally shortcircuited or something....

Anyone knows if there is some warranty replacement or something?

Has it happened to anyone else?

check this reddit thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7riczy/melted_ledger_nano_s/

sounds exactly like what happened to yours. deformed spot neer the screen.
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 763


HODL.


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 12:32:08 AM
Last edit: May 07, 2018, 12:58:01 AM by bitserve

Talking about death... one of my Ledger wallets have died. It has a burn mark near the LCD (deforming the plastic case) as if it had internally shortcircuited or something....

Anyone knows if there is some warranty replacement or something?

Has it happened to anyone else?

check this reddit thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7riczy/melted_ledger_nano_s/

WOW! That is EXACTLY like mine looks like. Same burn mark in the same corner! I wouldn't be able to distinguish that one to mine!

Gotta read it Smiley Thanks!

P.S.: Looks like there is not much to learn there except I am not the first one with that same problem so maybe there is hope for a replacement.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 12:45:52 AM

Join us in the next episode of Sesame Street where young goyim TERA learns the miracle of spoofing to harness the power of the fact humans have a finite lifespan, so there really is a sucker born every minute.
Spoofing and such is over-diagnosed here.

What is a goyim?

Don't feed the trolls.

Unfortunately TERA learned that he is the goyim.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1182



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:05:01 AM

Well, this is why you use multiple types of storage devices. Don't trust anything you didn't built or vet yourself. Got a ledger myself, so yeah.
Derpinheimer2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:07:13 AM

You know, that login captcha really tests me sometimes.

I often start to wonder, "Well could I be a robot and not know it?"

Wouldn't be surprised if we sideways between $8-9k all summer.

https://www.coindesk.com/short-ether-bitcoin-says-citrons-andrew-left/

"I Would Short Ether Before Bitcoin", Says Citron's Andrew Left

I've been wondering why someone has been buying truckloads of ETH at gemini's auction for weeks now. This could be the answer, a HUGE ETH short position coming. Especially if the SEC rules that ETH is in fact a security.

Also Andrew Left is a tool.

I also have a hard time solving captchas sometimes. It is reaching ridiculous levels. Soon it will be above human "processing" ability and only a new generation of very specialized bots will be able to solve them. Ironic, isn't it?

I think it is too soon to figure out what price range we would be at summer. OTOH, this struggling below $10K is exactly how we all supposed it would be when reaching this levels for the first time instead of the cut-through-$10K-as-if-it-were-butter we experienced in december.
We always thought $10K would be a MAJOR resistance/psycological price point, didn't we?

What are those Gemini auctions? OTC? How do you get those figures?

I wonder if ETH would be considered a security... would that apply to ETC too or it would make for some kind of flippening between the two? I mean, would it be a security because it was initially ICO'ed -then ETC also was- or would it be because of all the ICO's that have been launched from ETH?



So it does look like I am not the only one who thought about it. What other reason there would be for ETC rising alone now?
You... you quoted yourself in agreement.

Also, I fail to see why someone would buy loads of ETH to short it. I can't see a way for that to be profitable. You can't short your own position and make money.
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1963


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:20:48 AM
Merited by mindrust (1)

Why is btrash doing so well ?
Probably because of the upcoming fork.
...
Quote
Proponents are looking forward to a 32 MB block size increase and op-code additions that could bring ethereum-like characteristics to the BCH network.

Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ.

The cancer that is BCash cannot die soon enough, along with Roger Ver.

---

Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1182



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:22:27 AM
Merited by Searing (2), edgar (1), RayX12 (1)

Why is btrash doing so well ?
Probably because of the upcoming fork.
...
Quote
Proponents are looking forward to a 32 MB block size increase and op-code additions that could bring ethereum-like characteristics to the BCH network.

Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ.

The cancer that is BCash cannot die soon enough, along with Roger Ver.
Bigger blocks is a good thing. The problem is that they are being deceptive cunts. If we had chosen big blocks and they had chosen segwit, we would still think the same thing about them, and for the same reason. And be applauding ourselves for making the correct choice.

It's the people, not the tech.
Derpinheimer2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:27:29 AM

Why is btrash doing so well ?
Probably because of the upcoming fork.
...
Quote
Proponents are looking forward to a 32 MB block size increase and op-code additions that could bring ethereum-like characteristics to the BCH network.

Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ.

The cancer that is BCash cannot die soon enough, along with Roger Ver.
Bigger blocks is a good thing. The problem is that they are being deceptive cunts. If we had chosen big blocks and they had chosen segwit, we would still think the same thing about them, and for the same reason. And be applauding ourselves for making the correct choice.

It's the people, not the tech.
Bigger blocks are a bandaid. I was all for 2x when we needed the capacity. It is not a scaling solution. Its for people who spend 10 minutes researching crypto and think they're geniuses.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1182



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:30:40 AM

Why is btrash doing so well ?
Probably because of the upcoming fork.
...
Quote
Proponents are looking forward to a 32 MB block size increase and op-code additions that could bring ethereum-like characteristics to the BCH network.

Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ.

The cancer that is BCash cannot die soon enough, along with Roger Ver.
Bigger blocks is a good thing. The problem is that they are being deceptive cunts. If we had chosen big blocks and they had chosen segwit, we would still think the same thing about them, and for the same reason. And be applauding ourselves for making the correct choice.

It's the people, not the tech.
Bigger blocks are a bandaid. I was all for 2x when we needed the capacity. It is not a scaling solution. Its for people who spend 10 minutes researching crypto and think they're geniuses.
It's necessary. Just a matter of when.
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1963


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:42:37 AM
Merited by edgar (1), Karartma1 (1)

It's necessary. Just a matter of when.

I'm not saying BTC doesn't need to eventually move over to larger blocks, but I support their slower, safer, forward-thinking, incremental approach to things.

BCH is just fucking retards running around in a China Shop, breaking and buying everything in sight, because they have more money than brains.

It's shameful, amateurish behavior, and it's fucking with BTC-proper.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1182



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:44:40 AM
Merited by Peter R (2)

It's necessary. Just a matter of when.

I'm not saying BTC doesn't need to eventually move over to larger blocks, but I support their slower, safer, forward-thinking, incremental approach to things.

BCH is just fucking retards running around in a China Shop, breaking and buying everything in sight, because they have more money than brains.

It's shameful, amateurish behavior, and it's fucking with BTC-proper.
I'm not convinced that segwit was the better choice. In general, doing something in a simple way is better than doing it in a complicated way. But it is what we have now.
RewFrew
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 110


Give me your tips for free.. And yes thanks.


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:45:19 AM

Those little dumps below 10K are very healthy for the next bitcoin ups.

Support this time: 9200$

We are not going below 9200$.
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 763


HODL.


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:46:58 AM
Last edit: May 07, 2018, 02:04:12 AM by bitserve

You... you quoted yourself in agreement.

Also, I fail to see why someone would buy loads of ETH to short it. I can't see a way for that to be profitable. You can't short your own position and make money.

Yeah, it makes total sense I do agree with myself, doesn't it?

Now seriously, I quoted it because I posted it several days ago before ETC started to pump and that's the reason I guess some people also thought the same. Or maybe it's just a random pump... who knows.

About the shorting ETH thing... well, that's how pump and dumps work.... some people pump it from point A, then more people FOMO in and keep raising the price to point B or C. Now the initial pumpers dump (or short) on the later.. profit! At least theoretically.
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1963


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 01:57:36 AM
Merited by Torque (1)

I'm not convinced that segwit was the better choice. In general, doing something in a simple way is better than doing it in a complicated way. But it is what we have now.

SegWit was needed for Layer 2 stuff, and did add effectively another 1MB to the blocksize.

It was win-win for everyone IMO.

I saw it as the more elegant way forward.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 02:13:04 AM

Who's dumping all the rat poison squared? Is there a flippening drama unfolding?
I hate flippening drama Roll Eyes
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1501



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 02:18:02 AM
Merited by infofront (1), Rosewater Foundation (1)

Segwit is working. LN is working. Transaction confirmation times are low, and fees are the lowest they've been in a long time. On LN they are non-existent. And the whole solution is supporting decentralization in the best way possible.

And yet people STILL want to bitch and find something wrong with the solution. And still bring up the block size shit like it even matters right now.

I'm so tired of the bullshit and I will call out anyone who brings that tired argument up again.

Sorry BCash shilling fucktards, but your goose is cooked. You lost. It's over. In fact, BCash never stood a chance. It was DOA.

Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
May 07, 2018, 02:21:22 AM

PS. I only merited fake r0ach when he outed himself to fake Tera Roll Eyes


Ever seen a roach get squeezed?

It was the whiteness of r0ach the silver whale and the color of his bullion above all things that appalled me.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1299


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 02:28:47 AM

It's necessary. Just a matter of when.

I'm not saying BTC doesn't need to eventually move over to larger blocks, but I support their slower, safer, forward-thinking, incremental approach to things.

I'll grant that Core's approach to scaling is slower than Cash's, but it certainly ain't safer.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1299


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 07, 2018, 02:30:52 AM

I'm not convinced that segwit was the better choice.

I'm pert-near certain it wasn't.

Quote
In general, doing something in a simple way is better than doing it in a complicated way.

Abso-frickin-lutely.

Quote
But it is what we have now.

PorqueNoLosDos.png
Pages: « 1 ... 20316 20317 20318 20319 20320 20321 20322 20323 20324 20325 20326 20327 20328 20329 20330 20331 20332 20333 20334 20335 20336 20337 20338 20339 20340 20341 20342 20343 20344 20345 20346 20347 20348 20349 20350 20351 20352 20353 20354 20355 20356 20357 20358 20359 20360 20361 20362 20363 20364 20365 [20366] 20367 20368 20369 20370 20371 20372 20373 20374 20375 20376 20377 20378 20379 20380 20381 20382 20383 20384 20385 20386 20387 20388 20389 20390 20391 20392 20393 20394 20395 20396 20397 20398 20399 20400 20401 20402 20403 20404 20405 20406 20407 20408 20409 20410 20411 20412 20413 20414 20415 20416 ... 24579 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!