Bitcoin Forum
October 26, 2020, 07:35:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Oct. 23 Closing Price:
<$8,000 - 2 (3%)
$8,000-$8,500 - 0 (0%)
$8,500-$9,000 - 0 (0%)
$9,000-$9,500 - 0 (0%)
$9,500-$10,000 - 0 (0%)
$10,000-$10,500 - 1 (1.5%)
$10,500-$11,000 - 0 (0%)
$11,000-$11,500 - 3 (4.5%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 5 (7.6%)
$12,000-$12,500 - 16 (24.2%)
$12,500-$13,000 - 12 (18.2%)
$13,000-$13,500 - 8 (12.1%)
$13,500-$14,000 - 5 (7.6%)
>$14,000 - 14 (21.2%)
Total Voters: 66

Pages: « 1 ... 22097 22098 22099 22100 22101 22102 22103 22104 22105 22106 22107 22108 22109 22110 22111 22112 22113 22114 22115 22116 22117 22118 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 22127 22128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22134 22135 22136 22137 22138 22139 22140 22141 22142 22143 22144 22145 22146 [22147] 22148 22149 22150 22151 22152 22153 22154 22155 22156 22157 22158 22159 22160 22161 22162 22163 22164 22165 22166 22167 22168 22169 22170 22171 22172 22173 22174 22175 22176 22177 22178 22179 22180 22181 22182 22183 22184 22185 22186 22187 22188 22189 22190 22191 22192 22193 22194 22195 22196 22197 ... 27414 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 23496045 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (148 posts by 37 users deleted.)
Arriemoller
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 852


Justitia arma requirit


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:46:03 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  

Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.
1603697723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603697723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603697723
Reply with quote  #2

1603697723
Report to moderator
1603697723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603697723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603697723
Reply with quote  #2

1603697723
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1603697723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603697723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603697723
Reply with quote  #2

1603697723
Report to moderator
1603697723
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1603697723

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1603697723
Reply with quote  #2

1603697723
Report to moderator
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1869



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:52:09 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  

Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.

 Roll Eyes

nikauforest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 146



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:20:09 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1)

Well I am happy to make money off of the 97% pushing there climate agenda.
https://www.carbonfund.co.nz/

What I do find much more interesting is the so called 3% who don't quite agree with the consensus. Many scientists are shut out of the debate. Here is one scientist who spoke at the Global Warming Policy Forum and many scientists wanted to shut her up.

I think she is interesting, she connects the solar out put of the suns energy to climate change over long periods of time. She is calling for a return of a mini ice age.

https://www.thegwpf.com/professor-valentina-zharkova-the-solar-magnetic-field-and-the-terrestrial-climate/

If you want to believe the 97% go ahead, but it might still be wise to listen to the 3% ( I doubt these numbers, 97% sounds like propaganda, climate change is now an institutionalized big business. ) For instance, if you want to study red squirrels and their mating habits add the line " as it relates to global warming" you will get the funding.

Remember "97%" of scientists thought the sun revolved around the earth. (Way back in the 1400's - 1500's)

Best to keep an open mind. Sure ...does human activity affect the climate. I would say yes, however is it the main driver? What about that giant yellow ball in the sky?
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3346
Merit: 1509



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:22:11 AM


Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.

 Roll Eyes



here let me just update that for you since conveniently for your argument left out the last two years of the chart data ... always happens that way huh?



 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1962


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:22:25 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  

Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.


It’s not a vote.  It’s 97% agreement.  Try getting 97% of bitcoiners to agree on something.  
nikauforest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 146



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:24:51 AM

Well I am happy to make money off of the 97% pushing their climate agenda.
https://www.carbonfund.co.nz/

What I do find much more interesting is the so called 3% who don't quite agree with the consensus. Many scientists are shut out of the debate. Here is one scientist who spoke at the Global Warming Policy Forum and many scientists wanted to shut her up.

I think she is interesting, she connects the solar out put of the suns energy to climate change over long periods of time. She is calling for a return of a mini ice age.

https://www.thegwpf.com/professor-valentina-zharkova-the-solar-magnetic-field-and-the-terrestrial-climate/

If you want to believe the 97% go ahead, but it might still be wise to listen to the 3% ( I doubt these numbers, 97% sounds like propaganda, climate change is now an institutionalized big business. ) For instance, if you want to study red squirrels and their mating habits add the line " as it relates to global warming" you will get the funding.

Remember "97%" of scientists thought the sun revolved around the earth. (Way back in the 1400's - 1500's)

Best to keep an open mind. Sure ...does human activity affect the climate. I would say yes, however is it the main driver? What about that giant yellow ball in the sky?

The problem I see is that scientists who disagree are being pushed out of the debate. Which leads to dogma and very little science.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1962


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:34:46 AM

The problem I see is that scientists who disagree are being pushed out of the debate. Which leads to dogma and very little science.

We had that issue in my country.  Some background checks were done on the scientists that disagreed with the 97%.  It turns out they were funded by an independent policy think tank. Whose largest donor was a large coal company.

Sometimes even scientists are corrupt. 
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:39:48 AM

Can any of you shitcoiners explain the following phenomenon?  One of the main aspects of a Ponzi are the supposed guaranteed gains just by participating at all.  You can argue whether bitcoin itself is a Ponzi or not, but that's tangential to this subject.  The subject is people that use the word "hodl" imply the gains are guaranteed.  If bitcoin is marketed as a hodl ponzi - and face it, that is the only way bitcoin is marketed to the public, it's not marketed in any other way - how is it not a Ponzi by default? lol.

A Ponzi scheme: "Maintaining the illusion of a sustainable business as long as there continue to be new investors willing to contribute new funds, and as long as most of the investors do not demand full repayment and are willing to believe in the non-existent assets that they are purported to own."
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3346
Merit: 1509



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:40:15 AM

... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.

"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:45:55 AM

they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Stop using the rat kike Ben Shapiro definition of communism and socialism.  Communism is a Jewish monetary scam to centralize all the wealth, power, and assets so the Jews can steal it all and rule over the populace as slaves like they did in Russia.  Then when the system inevitably implodes, the assets are all transfered off to the Yiddish controllers.  Why do you think just about every single Russian Oligarch who ended up with the stolen wealth of Russia is Jewish?
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1962


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:05:52 AM

... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.

"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?



I’m a socialist.  Happy to chat further.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2552


no FOMO


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:07:23 AM

Just because the globalists are using a crisis to expand their power it does not necessarily follow that the crisis does not exist.

This is sloppy logic Marcus, try harder.

Hairy, you are essentializing and verging on name calling, try harder.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:08:51 AM

I’m a socialist.  Happy to chat further.

Did I mention both HairyMaclairy and Jojo69 are Jew shills?
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1962


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:13:07 AM

Just because the globalists are using a crisis to expand their power it does not necessarily follow that the crisis does not exist.

This is sloppy logic Marcus, try harder.

Hairy, you are essentializing and verging on name calling, try harder.

To be fair, I am drunk.  On Edinburgh Christmas Gin. Quite nice.

Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1869



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:13:30 AM


here let me just update that for you since conveniently for your argument left out the last two years of the chart data ... always happens that way huh?

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.

"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?



weak sauce

This is why I advocate inter-disciplinary training. Cherry picking one data point and crafting it to a narrative is old hat. However if you stand back and take a look at the whole picture it is much more obvious...to some. Be that as it may..I have the feeling Marcus that you are half into your cup and just looking for a punching bag. So be it.

Peace

p.s. the chart was of a model that was projected in 2006 I believe with actual data well within the 2 sigma delta. these models have been refined and are even more highly accurate today but i could not be arsed to find the latest. the more concerning threat is not climate change anyway its rising co2 levels.
Syke
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3444
Merit: 1066


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:17:55 AM

To be fair, I am drunk.  On Edinburgh Christmas Gin. Quite nice.

In Scotland drinking gin? Hopefully some good stuff like The Botanist.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1962


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:20:04 AM

To be fair, I am drunk.  On Edinburgh Christmas Gin. Quite nice.

In Scotland drinking gin? Hopefully some good stuff like The Botanist.

Yes and yes. And yes.   https://www.edinburghgin.com/shop/gins/christmas-gin?p=shop/gins/christmas-gin
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1869



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:28:25 AM

At maximum resistance. Tenken sen encountering cloud. Lagging span at edge of cliff. Crossed MACD. Interesting times.


#stronghands2019
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:42:12 AM

At maximum resistance. Tenken sen encountering cloud. Lagging span at edge of cliff. Crossed MACD. Interesting times.

#NonAggregateMarketSolelyComposedOfCliffFaceRisesAndFalls

These are hardcore, pure faggot-scam markets.

jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2552


no FOMO


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:46:48 AM
Merited by kurious (1)

the more concerning threat is not climate change anyway its rising co2 levels.

ocean acidification, species loss, collapsing fisheries stocks, depleting fresh water aquifers, the list goes on

I really have to take issue with the implied idea that there is some specific lever we can throw, in this case co2, and continue on our merry way.

We need to completely rethink our relationship with our, very finite, biome and stop behaving like petulant valley girls with daddy's credit card.
Pages: « 1 ... 22097 22098 22099 22100 22101 22102 22103 22104 22105 22106 22107 22108 22109 22110 22111 22112 22113 22114 22115 22116 22117 22118 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 22127 22128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22134 22135 22136 22137 22138 22139 22140 22141 22142 22143 22144 22145 22146 [22147] 22148 22149 22150 22151 22152 22153 22154 22155 22156 22157 22158 22159 22160 22161 22162 22163 22164 22165 22166 22167 22168 22169 22170 22171 22172 22173 22174 22175 22176 22177 22178 22179 22180 22181 22182 22183 22184 22185 22186 22187 22188 22189 22190 22191 22192 22193 22194 22195 22196 22197 ... 27414 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!