Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2019, 01:20:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 28:
$0 - 5 (3.2%)
<$7,000 - 4 (2.5%)
$7,000-$7,499 - 0 (0%)
$7,500-$7,999 - 0 (0%)
$8,000-$8,499 - 1 (0.6%)
$8,500-$8,999 - 3 (1.9%)
$9,000-$9,499 - 4 (2.5%)
$9,500-$9,999 - 27 (17.1%)
$10,000-$10,499 - 24 (15.2%)
$10,500-10,999 - 12 (7.6%)
$11,000-$11,499 - 14 (8.9%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 15 (9.5%)
>$12,000 - 36 (22.8%)
>$20,000 - 13 (8.2%)
Total Voters: 158

Pages: « 1 ... 22204 22205 22206 22207 22208 22209 22210 22211 22212 22213 22214 22215 22216 22217 22218 22219 22220 22221 22222 22223 22224 22225 22226 22227 22228 22229 22230 22231 22232 22233 22234 22235 22236 22237 22238 22239 22240 22241 22242 22243 22244 22245 22246 22247 22248 22249 22250 22251 22252 22253 [22254] 22255 22256 22257 22258 22259 22260 22261 22262 22263 22264 22265 22266 22267 22268 22269 22270 22271 22272 22273 22274 22275 22276 22277 22278 22279 22280 22281 22282 22283 22284 22285 22286 22287 22288 22289 22290 22291 22292 22293 22294 22295 22296 22297 22298 22299 22300 22301 22302 22303 22304 ... 24333 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21243674 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (66 posts by 16 users deleted.)
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 1010



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:12:06 AM
Merited by kurious (1)

... ever seen what happens ...
-snipped-

Sorry..ain't buying it. I think you know something is happening and is continuing to happen this century. The data is sound and has been reviewed many times.

While I agree with you that the Earth will continue its orbit regardless of what humanity does I think it naive to doubt what hard science has proven. Co2 levels are rising at a extraordinary rate. Pumping billions of barrels of hydrocarbons from beneath the ground and then burning it just does not sound like a good idea any more. Are innovation and change difficult? Yes..  Is it expensive to be a first mover in a nascent market?  Yes..extremely so.. 
Things change and we grow wiser.

https://nypost.com/2018/12/28/climate-change-expert-aaron-doering-charged-with-choking-his-fiance/

... when the lying and shilling becomes too much in the face of cool factual analysis, all that is left is demented rage and violent incoherence I guess.

... climate science never is and never will be a 'hard science', it's full of charlatans and political appointees. It's basically a renegade academic cult masquerading as a branch of science now, with fully-developed propaganda and PR smearing units targetting dissenters ("deniers").

That escalated quickly...

en garde

Do not put words into my mouth, I never said or implied that. I said and was implying that scientific principles have been brought to bear on these problem's and the results are pretty conclusive in my "humble" opinion. If you wish to use incendiary rhetoric and some non-tangential quote from the Post(the Post for God's sake man!) be my guest. If you think my responses are demented and incoherent feel free to ignore me. Otherwise, perhaps listen to what I am saying because not only can I(and have) pull up reams of accredited papers by the worlds leading scientists. I have seen it with mine own eye's. 30+ years in the field in not only hazardous remediation but the energy sector as well. It's not a pretty site. The cavalier attitude many people seem to have towards responsible, sustainable shepherding of this planet..this Earth we call home is sickening to me on a fundamental level.

1561512032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561512032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561512032
Reply with quote  #2

1561512032
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1561512032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561512032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561512032
Reply with quote  #2

1561512032
Report to moderator
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:22:48 AM

Co2 levels are rising at a extraordinary rate

I wonder who was burning all that gasoline 600 million years ago to send c02 through the roof which didn't even seem to have a correlation with temperature, but it did cause plants to be more efficient, create more oxygen, and caused some insects like dragonflys to be the size of cars.

HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1410


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:28:13 AM
Merited by kurious (1)

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:30:47 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Got it.  The govt does not lie.  Everything on CNN is true.  And even though the media, banking system, and most powerful govt lobbies are all Jewish controlled, Jews do not control the govt either.  And "climate change science" that does not directly align with the govt pre-scripted conclusion is not immediately defunded and refused to be published either.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1949
Merit: 1361



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:34:18 AM



https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1078682801954799617.html

So BUY BTC skip ETH for some enthusiasts.


Great tweetstorm on the current state of ETH.  

I didn’t buy into the ETH ICO @ 2,000 ETH/BTC because I thought ETH was a scam. Turns out I was right. Doesn’t help that I could have been rich along the way.  

Nice thread indeed.

Top comment on Reddit... Undecided

Quote
He's trying too hard. Tuur, just a many other 'influencers', got lucky because they invested early in Bitcoin. Now they are self-proclaimed experts

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/aac4hr/tuurs_criticism_discussion_thread/
Arriemoller
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 896
Merit: 622



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:46:03 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  

Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 1010



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 05:52:09 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  

Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.

 Roll Eyes

nikauforest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 253
Merit: 124



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:20:09 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1)

Well I am happy to make money off of the 97% pushing there climate agenda.
https://www.carbonfund.co.nz/

What I do find much more interesting is the so called 3% who don't quite agree with the consensus. Many scientists are shut out of the debate. Here is one scientist who spoke at the Global Warming Policy Forum and many scientists wanted to shut her up.

I think she is interesting, she connects the solar out put of the suns energy to climate change over long periods of time. She is calling for a return of a mini ice age.

https://www.thegwpf.com/professor-valentina-zharkova-the-solar-magnetic-field-and-the-terrestrial-climate/

If you want to believe the 97% go ahead, but it might still be wise to listen to the 3% ( I doubt these numbers, 97% sounds like propaganda, climate change is now an institutionalized big business. ) For instance, if you want to study red squirrels and their mating habits add the line " as it relates to global warming" you will get the funding.

Remember "97%" of scientists thought the sun revolved around the earth. (Way back in the 1400's - 1500's)

Best to keep an open mind. Sure ...does human activity affect the climate. I would say yes, however is it the main driver? What about that giant yellow ball in the sky?
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1162



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:22:11 AM


Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.

 Roll Eyes



here let me just update that for you since conveniently for your argument left out the last two years of the chart data ... always happens that way huh?



 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1410


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:22:25 AM

You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA.  

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Quote
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you.  

Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote?
The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.


It’s not a vote.  It’s 97% agreement.  Try getting 97% of bitcoiners to agree on something.  
nikauforest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 253
Merit: 124



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:24:51 AM

Well I am happy to make money off of the 97% pushing their climate agenda.
https://www.carbonfund.co.nz/

What I do find much more interesting is the so called 3% who don't quite agree with the consensus. Many scientists are shut out of the debate. Here is one scientist who spoke at the Global Warming Policy Forum and many scientists wanted to shut her up.

I think she is interesting, she connects the solar out put of the suns energy to climate change over long periods of time. She is calling for a return of a mini ice age.

https://www.thegwpf.com/professor-valentina-zharkova-the-solar-magnetic-field-and-the-terrestrial-climate/

If you want to believe the 97% go ahead, but it might still be wise to listen to the 3% ( I doubt these numbers, 97% sounds like propaganda, climate change is now an institutionalized big business. ) For instance, if you want to study red squirrels and their mating habits add the line " as it relates to global warming" you will get the funding.

Remember "97%" of scientists thought the sun revolved around the earth. (Way back in the 1400's - 1500's)

Best to keep an open mind. Sure ...does human activity affect the climate. I would say yes, however is it the main driver? What about that giant yellow ball in the sky?

The problem I see is that scientists who disagree are being pushed out of the debate. Which leads to dogma and very little science.
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1410


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:34:46 AM

The problem I see is that scientists who disagree are being pushed out of the debate. Which leads to dogma and very little science.

We had that issue in my country.  Some background checks were done on the scientists that disagreed with the 97%.  It turns out they were funded by an independent policy think tank. Whose largest donor was a large coal company.

Sometimes even scientists are corrupt. 
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:39:48 AM

Can any of you shitcoiners explain the following phenomenon?  One of the main aspects of a Ponzi are the supposed guaranteed gains just by participating at all.  You can argue whether bitcoin itself is a Ponzi or not, but that's tangential to this subject.  The subject is people that use the word "hodl" imply the gains are guaranteed.  If bitcoin is marketed as a hodl ponzi - and face it, that is the only way bitcoin is marketed to the public, it's not marketed in any other way - how is it not a Ponzi by default? lol.

A Ponzi scheme: "Maintaining the illusion of a sustainable business as long as there continue to be new investors willing to contribute new funds, and as long as most of the investors do not demand full repayment and are willing to believe in the non-existent assets that they are purported to own."
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1162



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:40:15 AM

... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.

"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 06:45:55 AM

they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Stop using the rat kike Ben Shapiro definition of communism and socialism.  Communism is a Jewish monetary scam to centralize all the wealth, power, and assets so the Jews can steal it all and rule over the populace as slaves like they did in Russia.  Then when the system inevitably implodes, the assets are all transfered off to the Yiddish controllers.  Why do you think just about every single Russian Oligarch who ended up with the stolen wealth of Russia is Jewish?
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1410


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:05:52 AM

... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.

"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?



I’m a socialist.  Happy to chat further.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1770


no FOMO


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:07:23 AM

Just because the globalists are using a crisis to expand their power it does not necessarily follow that the crisis does not exist.

This is sloppy logic Marcus, try harder.

Hairy, you are essentializing and verging on name calling, try harder.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 296


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:08:51 AM

I’m a socialist.  Happy to chat further.

Did I mention both HairyMaclairy and Jojo69 are Jew shills?
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1410


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:13:07 AM

Just because the globalists are using a crisis to expand their power it does not necessarily follow that the crisis does not exist.

This is sloppy logic Marcus, try harder.

Hairy, you are essentializing and verging on name calling, try harder.

To be fair, I am drunk.  On Edinburgh Christmas Gin. Quite nice.

Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 1010



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 07:13:30 AM


here let me just update that for you since conveniently for your argument left out the last two years of the chart data ... always happens that way huh?

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.

"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.

Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?



weak sauce

This is why I advocate inter-disciplinary training. Cherry picking one data point and crafting it to a narrative is old hat. However if you stand back and take a look at the whole picture it is much more obvious...to some. Be that as it may..I have the feeling Marcus that you are half into your cup and just looking for a punching bag. So be it.

Peace

p.s. the chart was of a model that was projected in 2006 I believe with actual data well within the 2 sigma delta. these models have been refined and are even more highly accurate today but i could not be arsed to find the latest. the more concerning threat is not climate change anyway its rising co2 levels.
Pages: « 1 ... 22204 22205 22206 22207 22208 22209 22210 22211 22212 22213 22214 22215 22216 22217 22218 22219 22220 22221 22222 22223 22224 22225 22226 22227 22228 22229 22230 22231 22232 22233 22234 22235 22236 22237 22238 22239 22240 22241 22242 22243 22244 22245 22246 22247 22248 22249 22250 22251 22252 22253 [22254] 22255 22256 22257 22258 22259 22260 22261 22262 22263 22264 22265 22266 22267 22268 22269 22270 22271 22272 22273 22274 22275 22276 22277 22278 22279 22280 22281 22282 22283 22284 22285 22286 22287 22288 22289 22290 22291 22292 22293 22294 22295 22296 22297 22298 22299 22300 22301 22302 22303 22304 ... 24333 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!