rebal15
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 527
Merit: 6
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:08:53 AM |
|
the market is full with fake orders both side buy ans sell. order book shows walls, when you check on full book, you don't see them executed. bots should be regulated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
goldkingcoiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1684
Verified Bitcoin Hodler
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:10:23 AM |
|
It hit me just how scary the world is now when I saw that every single democrat presidential candidate supports Universal Basic Income Communism. People need to refuse to play the kike's games of using their fake buzzwords and just call it what it is. It's not "basic income", it's just reworded communism. Then something like half or more support "green new deal".
This seems to be the final Jewish communist push where they use their shabbos goyim servants to try and ram it all through at once. They will force this war kinetic soon. I doubt the kikes will win this time. The odds are higher their push for communism (which they control and rule over everyone as slaves) will end with not a single Jew left standing after it's all over.
We must accept our jewish master. We live to serve them. If they say we should accept extreme socialistic (not communistic mind you) regime changes then thats what we must do. You know, there is a russian saying: Don't fall before the shot. You seem to be too concentrated on paranoid "what if" scenarios. Relax roach, eat some pie. Sell your silver. Buy more pie. Relax.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10210
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:13:11 AM |
|
JJG? W00ps, not Thursday anymoreI was trying to figure out the substantive connection to me, and then I forgot that there were a few dumbasses, including yourself, that have been suggesting that I am AI. That is one of the dumbest frameworks... but if being dumb floats your boat, then so be it... Please lurn troll more better.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:15:45 AM |
|
We must accept our jewish master. We live to serve them.
Micgoossens has that tattoo.
|
|
|
|
goldkingcoiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1684
Verified Bitcoin Hodler
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:21:30 AM |
|
We must accept our jewish master. We live to serve them.
Micgoossens has that tattoo. And it's not the worst one.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:38:39 AM |
|
2. Australian Tax Office. Why haven’t they caught him and extradited him? Dunno.
'Last you heard'. Right. What - the crown is not honoring the tax office of the crown? I rather doubt it. 3. I am not claiming specific patents are invalid.
MmmHmm... And the following is just skepticism, rather than outright ignorant slander? : He can't simultaneously have a mound of patents (for which core sycophants regularly excoriate him), and not have any patents.
There is no impediment to him having a mound of invalid patents.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:45:13 AM |
|
Aren't patent trolls "losers," even if they make money?
How so? There is a realistic debate to be had centering on the legitimacy of the concept of patents. But 'winners' and 'losers' are only identifiable as such within the context of the rules of the system. So, no: patent owners are by definition winners. At least to the extent to which others may want to employ the patented idea (i.e., even if they make money). I think that I already explained my position. If you want to value winners based on their ability to get rich by any means, then you can do that. It ain't _me_ doing the valuing. Getting rich is how society as a whole values the contribution made thereto. That's kind of the way market economies work. You are the one bringing it up and arguing that if CSW is able to get rich, then he is a wonderful "winner"... Really!? You are the one who inserted the winners/losers concept into the discourse (see quote above). All I'm saying is that your characterization of 'loser' is categorically and diametrically in-fucking-correct.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:50:10 AM |
|
Jbreher shilling for Craight Wright - check Luke Jr inventor of flat earth theory - check r0ach only sane person in bitcoin forum - check
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:57:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10210
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
February 16, 2019, 01:59:41 AM |
|
Aren't patent trolls "losers," even if they make money?
How so? There is a realistic debate to be had centering on the legitimacy of the concept of patents. But 'winners' and 'losers' are only identifiable as such within the context of the rules of the system. So, no: patent owners are by definition winners. At least to the extent to which others may want to employ the patented idea (i.e., even if they make money). I think that I already explained my position. If you want to value winners based on their ability to get rich by any means, then you can do that. It ain't _me_ doing the valuing. Getting rich is how society as a whole values the contribution made thereto. That's kind of the way market economies work. You are the one bringing it up and arguing that if CSW is able to get rich, then he is a wonderful "winner"... Really!? You are the one who inserted the winners/losers concept into the discourse (see quote above). All I'm saying is that your characterization of 'loser' is categorically and diametrically in-fucking-correct. O.k. Our opinions differ on this topic. I consider one category of a loser to be someone like craigwright who is lacking in integrity and who is largely a scam artist who is hostile to bitcoin while fraudulently proclaiming himself to be satoshi, and you consider that same person to be a winner, so long as he is rich or able to become rich. We differ.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4892
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:05:54 AM |
|
1st one but he needs to have a gun!
What about this picture? Now your talking, I'm outta sM+ myself so IOU 1.
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4004
Merit: 4469
You're never too old to think young.
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:07:05 AM |
|
Are you back for those few days in mid-February because you need more cash? Is it safe to buy now? Will the price crash in a few days when you go back?
No. I'm still in the jungle. Got someone who owed me money to put some on my credit card. Hopefully more will follow. Probably won't head back up until the end of March. I'm not in the mood for winter and I'm busy upgrading the infrastructure and security here. As for buying, it's always a good time to buy as long as you don't sell. I wish I could magically cause the price to go up and down by flying back and forth. If I could I'd be rich already instead of just comfortable. As it is, I'll have to wait a few years just like everybody else.
|
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:07:25 AM |
|
Right answer for all the wrong reasons
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4892
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:08:28 AM |
|
Would you be honest enough to criticize Craig, if you knew he was wrong?
Sure. He's already made a lot of bone headed statements already. No, I'm not going to enumerate them. Let's do some of them anyway https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Craig_Wright Wright's claimed PGP key was provably backdated. [1][2] He was paid millions of dollars by nTrust to 'reveal' himself as Satoshi (this is for those who think he lacked motive)[3] Signature claimed to prove him to be Satoshi was worthless. [4] Second claimed "signature" was also an obvious forgery. [5] N-th claimed "signature" was yet another obvious forgery. [6] Faked blog posts showing his early involvement in bitcoin. [7] Craig Wright is apparently using his fame to run an advance-fee scam.[8] Incorrectly calling it "Bit Coin" several times in 2011. [9] Gross technical incompetence. [10][11][12] No evidence of any C++ proficiency. Plagiarizism[13] If Craig Wright really was the creator of Bitcoin, the proof would be trivial. We see an example by Charlie Lee the creator of Litecoin[14] And 2020 is right around the corner and he isn't gonna unlock shit.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:09:26 AM |
|
What central banks can't control is the whirlwind that will be the inevitable result from the stupid policies adopted back in the 1910-1913 timeframe. All they will be able to do is react to the debt-fueled collapse of the world economic system.
If you are waiting for the ‘inevitable’ result of something that happened over 100 years ago, you may be waiting a wee while longer. Perhaps a few more hundred years. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg49697938#msg49697938
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 4892
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:10:38 AM |
|
JJG? W00ps, not Thursday anymoreI was trying to figure out the substantive connection to me, and then I forgot that there were a few dumbasses, including yourself, that have been suggesting that I am AI. That is one of the dumbest frameworks... but if being dumb floats your boat, then so be it... Please lurn troll more better. When used to simply generate new text, GPT2 is capable of writing plausible passages that match what it is given in both style and subject. It rarely shows any of the quirks that mark out previous AI systems, such as forgetting what it is writing about midway through a paragraph, or mangling the syntax of long sentences.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:15:14 AM |
|
I dunno. I was agreeing that it could be best. How does one pick The Best?
pit pat piffy wing wang wong
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:20:07 AM |
|
hey hey HEY! you're working Gentlemand's schtick
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 16, 2019, 02:24:54 AM |
|
I dunno. I was agreeing that it could be best. How does one pick The Best?
pit pat piffy wing wang wong Which Corvette is best Corvette? https://youtu.be/GvkJzYHCdHI
|
|
|
|
|