BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 2783
Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓
|
|
May 28, 2019, 10:33:11 PM |
|
I hope I was providing the right direction to this newbie guy to recover his 21 BTC which was stuck on blockchain.com wallet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148345.msg51256949#msg51256949Man! 21 BTC and seems like the OP is really confuse about everything. There are a lot to learn about Bitcoin, a lot of people really in need of education to safely handle their bitcoins. Observing @ $8,712
|
|
|
|
cryptjh
|
|
May 28, 2019, 10:36:05 PM |
|
The Youtuber Colin Talks Crypto, thinks that bitcoin will get a 66X increase from this bull run low and can go up to $218.000 in January 2021 Screenshot from youtube video https://youtu.be/mHMt82Rsul0?t=519
|
|
|
|
Lambie Slayer
|
|
May 28, 2019, 10:40:58 PM |
|
Aren't japanese getting the LEAST sex in OECD? Something does not compute. maybe bc they censor genitals out of their porn? probably also all the QE, it seems the more money your nation prints the lower the birth rate which would mean less sex. Birth rates were way higher before central banking in every first world country. Not much time to smash when you are busy wage cucking to afford ever rising costs as your masters debase your wages. Women work. Double the workers means half the wages. Basic bitch supply and demand THIS IS NOT ANY KIND OF RIDDLE. Women can be productive, or reproductive. Not both. Yes, good point, when the man cant support a woman and or children with his wage cuckery due to wages debased every day via money printing, the woman must become a wagecuck as well. Sound money means women will have more time to look hot and practice blow job skills. More blow jobs mean men are more productive and society improves drastically.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
May 28, 2019, 10:44:02 PM |
|
Aren't japanese getting the LEAST sex in OECD? Something does not compute. maybe bc they censor genitals out of their porn? probably also all the QE, it seems the more money your nation prints the lower the birth rate which would mean less sex. Birth rates were way higher before central banking in every first world country. Not much time to smash when you are busy wage cucking to afford ever rising costs as your masters debase your wages. Women work. Double the workers means half the wages. Basic bitch supply and demand THIS IS NOT ANY KIND OF RIDDLE. Women can be productive, or reproductive. Not both. Yes, good point, when the man cant support a woman and or children with his wage cuckery due to wages debased every day via money printing, the woman must become a wagecuck as well. Sound money means women will have more time to look hot and practice blow job skills. More blow jobs mean men are more productive and society improves drastically. No. Wages went down BECAUSE women work, they are not a reaction to it.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13187
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
May 28, 2019, 11:20:28 PM |
|
***** HODLsleep***** Goodnight WO's
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13187
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
May 28, 2019, 11:23:33 PM |
|
Earlier this month Congress Rep. Sherman said the US should outlaw owning and buying cryptocurrencies. $BTC is up 50% since. Bitcoin is anti-fragile. The more they try to stop it the stronger it becomes. https://twitter.com/VentureCoinist/status/1133441378917277697
|
|
|
|
rattle_rattle
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 43
|
|
May 28, 2019, 11:24:19 PM |
|
***** HODLsleep***** Goodnight WO's Good night micgoossens! We see it’s end of the months as post meriting is scarce! Waiting for refill!
|
|
|
|
|
JohnUser
|
|
May 28, 2019, 11:40:40 PM |
|
8 500 Toronto days!!. Never trust them.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
May 28, 2019, 11:46:43 PM |
|
6-If this would to happen, BTC would just fork, adjusting difficulty and freezing his coins (you gotta be pretty retarded to think that people who believe in BTC would just give up and switch to BSV to blindly follow the leader "Satoshi"). This is bitcoin, we trust in math not in deities.
Let me see if I have this correct. You think that, should Satoshi start cashing in some amount of his Bitcoins, that the community should fork to deny Satoshi the fruit of his labor? Divorce the question from whether or not CSW has any relation to Satoshi - that's irrelevant. But I really want to know if you think such an action by the community is warranted.
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
May 29, 2019, 12:12:41 AM |
|
In other words, you will continue to respond with irrelevancies that have nothing whatsoever to do with what I am typing. Funny way to have a ... 'discussion'. I guess I'm out.
What was irrelevant? All of it. Shall we review? Yeah, for the nth time. 1) I dunno. The pervasive narrative in this here space is that everything out of Craig's mouth is either: a lie, or; simply wrong. As such, how could anything he say undermine the legitimacy of the sector?
You forgot to mention fraud & plagiarism. He gives BTC a bad reputation with all these lies. BTC, OK?OTOH, if he has the capability to carry out such a threat, how would his huge advance warning not be a good thing?
Advantage my ass, it's just FUD. Advance warning for what? His lies?2) I dunno again. Before vanishing, Satoshi revealed very little of his personal proclivities. I see no evidence therein to support the notion that he might not use his substantial war chest in order to tilt the market in favor of what he perceives as the more faithful rendition of his ideals. What exactly am I missing in his writings?
Fuck his writings, check out his videos & ..... admire the clown. Do you understand that would be the end of it all? Nod if you do.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinaire
|
This chart has some great info!$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback? Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
May 29, 2019, 12:54:21 AM |
|
This chart has some great info!$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback? Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808 It had that pullback on bitstamp only. all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19% average of 17.5% It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall. It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho.
|
|
|
|
DaRude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2902
Merit: 1914
In order to dump coins one must have coins
|
|
May 29, 2019, 01:06:27 AM |
|
6-If this would to happen, BTC would just fork, adjusting difficulty and freezing his coins (you gotta be pretty retarded to think that people who believe in BTC would just give up and switch to BSV to blindly follow the leader "Satoshi"). This is bitcoin, we trust in math not in deities.
Let me see if I have this correct. You think that, should Satoshi start cashing in some amount of his Bitcoins, that the community should fork to deny Satoshi the fruit of his labor? Divorce the question from whether or not CSW has any relation to Satoshi - that's irrelevant. But I really want to know if you think such an action by the community is warranted. You took the quote out of context, but let me see if i can spell this out for you "cashing in some amount" is different from crashing the price and then 51% attacking it to destroy the network. Did you watch the video at all? BTC is not a cult and has grown beyond Satoshi. If any entity attempts to destroy BTC, an appropriate action must be taken, even if that entity is "Satoshi". Personally i can live with the idea of Satoshi gone cuckoo or that he wasn't a perfect person (sold guns drugs etc...) Now to answer your question as phrased, personally i don't have an issue with Satoshi responsibly cashing out and even endorsing BSV (I support ideas not people). But as i previously wrote on this topic, realistically speaking, it'll be very hard for someone to conclusive prove that they're Satoshi. Especially in case of CSW, who couldn't have distanced himself further from Satoshi if he tried. So if CSW has private keys, we would most definitely fork, and then market would decide (but if he kills off one fork [to force people to follow his new chain] he'd make everyone's decision that much easier)
|
|
|
|
dyask
|
|
May 29, 2019, 01:11:11 AM |
|
This chart has some great info!$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback? Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808 It had that pullback on bitstamp only. all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19% average of 17.5% It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall. It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho. I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position. There are way too many homeless folks already.
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
May 29, 2019, 01:41:53 AM |
|
This chart has some great info!$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback? Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808 It had that pullback on bitstamp only. all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19% average of 17.5% It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall. It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho. I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position. There are way too many homeless folks already. my home is quite safe. and I don't think it's people going short that need to worry. https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5268
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
|
|
May 29, 2019, 01:43:28 AM |
|
But it's being bandied around by all the usual shillspects on twitter recently.. perhaps in advance of the SV Shindig.
I have been meaning to answer back your responce to me... but busy.. life... etc.
That said, without going "Aussie man bad" do you not think that warning/threat is
1. Horrible. Horrible. Horrible. Bad game theory. Does decades of damage to the entire sector. Undermines the legitimacy of the Bitcoin and the entire crypto sector. Shows that it's all being controlled by a madman etc.
2. The most un-Satoshi like thing possible considering his writings that we have.
So we have evil, out of character, and possibly all a lie. Right?
Well.... 1) I dunno. The pervasive narrative in this here space is that everything out of Craig's mouth is either: a lie, or; simply wrong. As such, how could anything he say undermine the legitimacy of the sector? This is not an argument. Well it's a circular one. Do not use the reverse of something I did not say to refute what I said. Let us assume he has access to original blocks in the "tulip trust" and plans to sell them. How is this not going to ruin the legitimacy of Bitcoin probably forever. Let's say he sells every last one of his millions of bitcoins and buys every last one of the BSV coins with the proceeds. Bitcoin will crash, as will all the alts. BSV will skyrocket, and then the entire world will see that the "new money system" was invented by a megalomaniac willing to ruin lives and destroy fortunes. Trust in BSV will be virtually nill. Central banks will create a competing, and equally centralized coin and the world will flock to the devil the know and away from the devil they do not know. They will be HONEST in their creation of a centralized system (let's not kid ourselves BSV with a single actor holding probably 25% of the coins after the sale of BTC and purchase of BSV, running on a network designed to centralized will be... ta da... a centralized system) and their centralized system will use good centralized databases and will have no need to provide security through POW. OTOH, if he has the capability to carry out such a threat, how would his huge advance warning not be a good thing?
If I planned to release a doomsday virus onto a continent and gave them a year and a half notice... And then shrugged my shoulders pointing to a 4chan post as that continent was ravaged by that virus, would I have not acted as a saint? C'mon. Another non argument. Warnings are nice. What he says he would DO is terrible. 2) I dunno again. Before vanishing, Satoshi revealed very little of his personal proclivities. I see no evidence therein to support the notion that he might not use his substantial war chest in order to tilt the market in favor of what he perceives as the more faithful rendition of his ideals. What exactly am I missing in his writings?
His posts on this forum reveal so much about his character. He certainly did not see bitcoin as the panopticon for the State that Wright is trying to sell. By the way he is not trying to sell it to those of us with a brain because we are too smart to buy that shit. He is trying to sell it to his armies of <=100 IQ shills looking for their daddy and too dumb to realize that the mantra of "do you own research" is a hand wave trick to make them assume that they might be able to piggy back on something they are probably too dumb to see on their own. But MUCH more than them he is trying to sell it to the CENTRAL FUCKING BANKS. He wants the state and those the state is owned by to pick this thing up. All the while making the argument that this is what blockstream is doing. "Everything on the blockchain". Law! Transparency! Privacy is for criminals! You are a smart guy. You have designed hardware storage controllers. How on earth do you not see the amazing bullshit happening right before your eyes??? And FWIW My bet is he is clearly full of shit. But he and Calvin are actually pretty good at engineering this bullshit. At the very least they will make some BTC fleecing the idiots. (See I am willing to argue back... I just need the time)
|
|
|
|
DaRude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2902
Merit: 1914
In order to dump coins one must have coins
|
|
May 29, 2019, 01:55:04 AM |
|
This chart has some great info!$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback? Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808 It had that pullback on bitstamp only. all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19% average of 17.5% It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall. It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho. I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position. There are way too many homeless folks already. my home is quite safe. and I don't think it's people going short that need to worry. https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/Not sure where they source their data from but bitfinex has BTC32.200 over $280MM shorted https://www.bitfinex.com/stats
|
|
|
|
jonoiv
|
|
May 29, 2019, 02:14:23 AM |
|
This chart has some great info!$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback? Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808 It had that pullback on bitstamp only. all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19% average of 17.5% It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall. It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho. I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position. There are way too many homeless folks already. my home is quite safe. and I don't think it's people going short that need to worry. https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/Not sure where they source their data from but bitfinex has BTC32.200 over $280MM shorted https://www.bitfinex.com/statsit's from the BFX api, same as this site https://datamish.com/d/000000004/btcusd?refresh=20s&orgId=1the stats page on bitfinex doesn't seem to update, not sure if it's hourly, daily, weekly but the API is live afaik.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 4615
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
May 29, 2019, 02:17:53 AM |
|
It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho.
dude you are seriously bumming me out man
|
|
|
|
|