realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
August 09, 2019, 03:42:05 PM |
|
Banks, not cryptos?
Notably, the Fed’s announcement starts with an emphasis on “the rapid evolution of technology,'' which enables the Federal Reserve and the payment industry “to modernize the nation's payment system and establish a safe and efficient foundation for the future.” However, neither the press release nor the enclosed FAQs make a single mention of Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, Libra, blockchain or even digital currencies at large.
Indeed, it seems that FedNow wants to topple large banking institutions rather than cryptocurrencies. In fact, banking giants Citigroup, Bancorp and JPMorgan Chase have already started fighting the government’s new effort, as it seems to overlap with their own real-time payments system, the Clearing House, which the banks launched in 2017, following a cumulative $1 billion investment injection from those participating
It is RIDICULOUS how bullish this is for Bitcoin. I watched this happen in the music industry with the advent of lossy compressed audio (MP3s). The RIAA started doing things like taxing blank CDs and suing napster users while the likes of Apple, and eventually Spotify built the rails for the new music delivery system for the world. By the time it was all over the music industry had been changed from the outside in. This is what Bitcoin will be doing to the financial systems of the world over the next 5 years. They are actually IMPROVING Mahatma's old saw: First they ignore you... Then they laugh at you... Then they fight you... Then they lose focus , forget about you briefly, and start cannibalizing each other and themselves...Then you win. That's not what this is. It's the kikes trying to do an exact repeat the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, centralizing all power and control over everything. In the process of this centralization of power, many people who thought they were rich or important wind up dead in a ditch, so they're all fighting over who gets to be at the top rather than the mid level people who wind up stripped of all their assets and laying in a ditch. Virtually nobody benefits from Jewish communism. All the mid level people who thought they were part of the team just get robbed and murdered by the kikes at the top to consolidate their power.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
August 09, 2019, 03:56:55 PM Last edit: August 09, 2019, 05:06:16 PM by jbreher |
|
Sixteenth Amendment ratification arguments have been rejected in every court case where they have been raised and have been identified as legally frivolous.[3]
Yes, they have been rejected. Without ever addressing the facts of the matter. At least in every case I have reviewed. Whaddaya expect? Statists gonna state. You live under a common law system. Judges make the law by interpreting the constitution, legislation and previous cases. If a judge says it, it’s law until overturned. That’s just how it works. If you want to tip over that particular apple cart, you are going to have to go back to the Norman Conquest in 1066. I think we are in violent agreement on this part. However... If the courts were to respect the law -- especially common law -- they would be able to trace their decisions through the precedents to the point where any matter of law was considered and judged upon. The basis of the income tax is a matter that cannot be traced back to a source decision. Because there exists none. United States v Thomas carefully trawls through the ratification argument. This is clearly a source decision that the 16th Amendment has been properly ratified. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protester_Sixteenth_Amendment_argumentsThanks. I'll absorb it when time permits. Though from a superficial glance, I have the following comments: - lower court decision not necessarily applicable to courts other than 7th Circuit Illinois jurisdiction - timing of 1986 is kind of too little too late (I guess better late than never) - seems to cover only the contention that enactment of differing texts is still valid for the amendment process - most germane, as a rebuttal to my points, completely ignores the lack legislative and regulatory authority and misapplication
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:01:17 PM |
|
There's no point for the FED to posa a "threat to banks" or "topple large banking institutions".
Quite. Especially in light of the fact the the FED is actually a private corporation owned by the banks.
|
|
|
|
gallianooo
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:23:22 PM |
|
LFC_Bitcoin & micgoossens - Amsterdam ENJOY GUYS !
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13197
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
|
|
|
fillippone
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2338
Merit: 16656
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:28:45 PM |
|
Ah, this is called Bitcoin Dominance!
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785
Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:33:10 PM |
|
How did you tell?? I know the tattoo 🤪
|
|
|
|
VB1001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 2540
<<CypherPunkCat>>
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:33:26 PM |
|
If there is any kind of escape, bye, she would have to be protected with a mask.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 2785
Bitcoingirl 2 joined us 💓
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:35:15 PM |
|
Ah, this is called Bitcoin Dominance!
Not good for the ecosystem 🤪
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
August 09, 2019, 04:58:05 PM |
|
Kyle Torpey at least knows how to edit. Yeah, I dunno. What do the last three paragraphs have to do with Blockstream having large mining power?
|
|
|
|
SuperTA
|
|
August 09, 2019, 05:22:19 PM |
|
I checked some Bitcoin summer activities from 2012 untill now 2019. Year 2012 to 2018 (2014 excluded). Bottoms from july to 25th august, (1x june, but it's at the very end of june)
Bitcoin local bottoms included, (2012-2019)
18th august 2012
6th july 2013
25th august 2015
1st august 2016
16th july 2017
29th june 2018
17th july 2019 (for now)
P.S. In the 2014 there was no bottom in the summer, falling until january next year.
|
|
|
|
VB1001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 2540
<<CypherPunkCat>>
|
|
August 09, 2019, 05:22:22 PM |
|
Fiat Currencies on ‘Cliff of Death’ While Recessionary Pressures GrowA recent tweet from Raoul Pal of Global Macro Investor highlighted weaknesses in several major world currencies:
When the long-term charts all start pointing to a single event risk, I pay attention. When those charts are at the KEY level, I focus. And when they break, it is time for action… Something really BIG is going on…
And one currency, after another, is approaching, and then falling off, the CLIFF of DEATH…
Ultimately, these negative trends in fiat currencies have unfolded as bitcoin valuations have rallied. All of these recessionary warning signs suggest a paradigm shift into cryptos might be unfolding right before our eyes. https://bitcoinist.com/fiat-currencies-on-cliff-of-death-while-recessionary-pressures-grow/
|
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3528
Merit: 3617
born once atheist
|
|
August 09, 2019, 05:34:54 PM |
|
At 1st glance, wasn't sure if there was a bitcoin bottom meme/joke in there somewhere. You know, like "the bottom is in... ...that poor kid's face"
|
|
|
|
fillippone
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2338
Merit: 16656
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
|
|
August 09, 2019, 05:38:25 PM |
|
Kyle Torpey at least knows how to edit. Yeah, I dunno. What do the last three paragraphs have to do with Blockstream having large mining power? I think it's a PR stunt for BetterHash. I think the rhetoric here is: you mine, you profit but also you can decide not to follow the Chinese pools in taking directions you don't like. You can mine the transactions you want. Here a brief description of what bettterHAsh is: BetterHash Protocol Lets Pool Miners Regain Control Over Their Hash Power
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
August 09, 2019, 05:58:26 PM |
|
Kyle Torpey at least knows how to edit. Yeah, I dunno. What do the last three paragraphs have to do with Blockstream having large mining power? I think it's a PR stunt for BetterHash. I think the rhetoric here is: you mine, you profit but also you can decide not to follow the Chinese pools in taking directions you don't like. You can mine the transactions you want. Here a brief description of what bettterHAsh is: BetterHash Protocol Lets Pool Miners Regain Control Over Their Hash PowerAgain, I fail to see what the last three paragraphs have to do with Blockstream having large mining power. Reproduced below: Even with these concerns around Bitcoin mining centralization, some U.S. lawmakers are convinced they would not be able to ban Bitcoin.
On the other hand, Facebook’s Libra cryptocurrency project would be much easier to manipulate, regulate, and control. That said, multiple members of the Bitcoin industry have pointed out the roundabout ways Bitcoin could benefit Facebook’s Libra.
That said, even if improvements are made to the decentralization and censorship resistance of Bitcoin from a technical level, the reality is the digital cash system still faces a serious regulatory issue in terms of its use as a payments mechanism due to the way in which the crypto asset is taxed.
Kind of a funny way to conclude an article on Blockstream's mining activities, no?
|
|
|
|
SuperTA
|
|
August 09, 2019, 06:02:51 PM |
|
Bitcoin is outperforming altcoins because the big investors are buying bitcoin and not alts. They can't buy a big amount of altcoins because of a low liquidity. Chinese currency, yuan devaluation and trading wars makes chinese to invest in assets that can store their value. Those assets are gold, silver and bitcoin. But bitcoin is the best performing major asset this year.
If you look at the usd/yuan chart you can see similarity in bitcoin/usd chart. That shows us that some of yuan (chinese currency) is entering in bitcoin. But they are not the only one investing in bitcoin.
There are many nervous stock holders right now. The stock market doesn't look promissing at this moment. Many indicators are showing for a potential recession in the next months. So probably some of their money will go in bitcoin as well. Even if it's only 1% of the stock market money, it will be quite a boost for a small marketcap asset like bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Globb0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
|
|
August 09, 2019, 06:20:37 PM |
|
At 1st glance, wasn't sure if there was a bitcoin bottom meme/joke in there somewhere. You know, like "the bottom is in... ...that poor kid's face" Imagine the morning after baked bean night!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
August 09, 2019, 06:22:55 PM |
|
I checked some Bitcoin summer activities from 2012 untill now 2019. Year 2012 to 2018 (2014 excluded). Bottoms from july to 25th august, (1x june, but it's at the very end of june)
Bitcoin local bottoms included, (2012-2019)
18th august 2012
6th july 2013
25th august 2015
1st august 2016
16th july 2017
29th june 2018
17th july 2019 (for now)
P.S. In the 2014 there was no bottom in the summer, falling until january next year.
I believe that bitcoin is not really on a calendar year pattern, even though frequently guys try to find some correlation patterns therein. They are loosely correlated at best, and could even be somewhat random.
|
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
August 09, 2019, 06:45:20 PM |
|
Kind of a funny way to conclude an article on Blockstream's mining activities, no?
I'm not sure how Blockstream even attempts to justify their existence. Bitcoin is supposed to be open source, then a CORPORATION - corporations are private, for profit entities not based on open source - attempts to hijack the protocol as the only possible valid way to send transactions LOL. So it's not really open source at all if Bitcoin is entirely controlled by a corporation and their proprietary, vendor lock-in solution. It's as bad of a scam as crisis actor Donald Trump pretending to be a patriot while attempting to ban the 2nd amendment.
|
|
|
|
|