Bitcoin Forum
September 22, 2023, 12:24:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 25.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will we break out from this range to the upside or downside?
Upside - 69 (65.1%)
Downside - 37 (34.9%)
Total Voters: 106

Pages: « 1 ... 24477 24478 24479 24480 24481 24482 24483 24484 24485 24486 24487 24488 24489 24490 24491 24492 24493 24494 24495 24496 24497 24498 24499 24500 24501 24502 24503 24504 24505 24506 24507 24508 24509 24510 24511 24512 24513 24514 24515 24516 24517 24518 24519 24520 24521 24522 24523 24524 24525 24526 [24527] 24528 24529 24530 24531 24532 24533 24534 24535 24536 24537 24538 24539 24540 24541 24542 24543 24544 24545 24546 24547 24548 24549 24550 24551 24552 24553 24554 24555 24556 24557 24558 24559 24560 24561 24562 24563 24564 24565 24566 24567 24568 24569 24570 24571 24572 24573 24574 24575 24576 24577 ... 32555 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26176657 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 5 users with 9 merit deleted.)
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3486
Merit: 8911


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
August 13, 2019, 11:15:35 PM

I already responded both that your facts are not correct and also,

So you're asserting that the charts I posted links to contain fraudulent figures? Interesting. I don't believe your assertion is correct, so I will tentatively conclude that you are delusional on these additional matters of fact.

I'll be happy to rescind my conclusion of delusional, just as soon as you post links to credible evidence of corrected data.

... and even if you might be using some actual facts ... emphasizing facts (if true) in your favor

I know that at one time, in about late 2017, you and your buddy, PeterR were advocating 50/50 or some baloney like that

Nope. You misrememberate. I think Peter suggested just not divesting your other Bitcoins. For my part, I have divulged several times that I have several times the number of BCH, and of BSV, than I do of BTC, though the dollar value of my BTC exceeds the rest of my holdings. And no, I do not feel stupid about it. I fully expect total vindication upon the onset of Blockalypse II. Even if not, I am doing just fine, thankyouverymuch.

That is not much materially different than I had remembered, and of course, you are trying to say that you have some different holding and allocations phylosophy from PeterR.

Nonetheless, it sure it is good to figure out some of these stakes from time to time (even for the benefits of other readers of this thread who might read some of you frequently bitcoin naysaying posts), and surely even though I disagree with you opinions in terms of your choice to hold onto those two shitcoins (bcash variants ABC and SV), I disagree with you pumpening baloney Bcash crap here, but it is laudable that you, at least, to give us some ideas about the approximate ratios of your bcash bag holdings, especially if you are going to be making certain kinds of uptalking attempts of those bcash variants and attempting to suggest that such talk is somehow relevant to this thread, including your ongoing bitcoin neggings..

By the way, even though you are saying that your dollar value held in BTC is greater than BCH and BSV, that would not be too difficult to accomplish by even holding 10x more of each of those stupid ass shit coins, based on current BTC dollar values, but yeah, perhaps there will be some kind of pumpening of those coins, but I doubt that long term holding of those coins would be prudent, nor vindication likely, as you are suggesting, but surely if your money is where your mouth is, then perhaps that is some kind of credibility... even if still seeming to stretch the concept of relevance, here, especially when a kind of meaningful vindication, such as either of those shit projects gaining meaningful network effects to supplant bitcoin (which seems to be what you are suggesting to be not only plausible but likely) seems to be quite a long shot - maybe even in the less than 1% scenarios of likelihood, similar to roach's seeming planning and preparing for Armageddon.....
1695342280
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1695342280

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1695342280
Reply with quote  #2

1695342280
Report to moderator
1695342280
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1695342280

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1695342280
Reply with quote  #2

1695342280
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1695342280
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1695342280

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1695342280
Reply with quote  #2

1695342280
Report to moderator
1695342280
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1695342280

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1695342280
Reply with quote  #2

1695342280
Report to moderator
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 10746


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
August 13, 2019, 11:24:25 PM

HODLsleep!!!
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1350


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
August 13, 2019, 11:31:34 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

I already responded both that your facts are not correct and also,

So you're asserting that the charts I posted links to contain fraudulent figures? Interesting. I don't believe your assertion is correct, so I will tentatively conclude that you are delusional on these additional matters of fact.

I'll be happy to rescind my conclusion of delusional, just as soon as you post links to credible evidence of corrected data.

... and even if you might be using some actual facts ... emphasizing facts (if true) in your favor

I know that at one time, in about late 2017, you and your buddy, PeterR were advocating 50/50 or some baloney like that

Nope. You misrememberate. I think Peter suggested just not divesting your other Bitcoins. For my part, I have divulged several times that I have several times the number of BCH, and of BSV, than I do of BTC, though the dollar value of my BTC exceeds the rest of my holdings. And no, I do not feel stupid about it. I fully expect total vindication upon the onset of Blockalypse II. Even if not, I am doing just fine, thankyouverymuch.

That is not much materially different than I had remembered, and of course, you are trying to say that you have some different holding and allocations phylosophy from PeterR.

Nonetheless, it sure it is good to figure out some of these stakes from time to time (even for the benefits of other readers of this thread who might read some of you frequently bitcoin naysaying posts), and surely even though I disagree with you opinions in terms of your choice to hold onto those two shitcoins (bcash variants ABC and SV), I disagree with you pumpening baloney Bcash crap here, but it is laudable that you, at least, to give us some ideas about the approximate ratios of your bcash bag holdings, especially if you are going to be making certain kinds of uptalking attempts of those bcash variants and attempting to suggest that such talk is somehow relevant to this thread, including your ongoing bitcoin neggings..

By the way, even though you are saying that your dollar value held in BTC is greater than BCH and BSV, that would not be too difficult to accomplish by even holding 10x more of each of those stupid ass shit coins, based on current BTC dollar values, but yeah, perhaps there will be some kind of pumpening of those coins, but I doubt that long term holding of those coins would be prudent, nor vindication likely, as you are suggesting, but surely if your money is where your mouth is, then perhaps that is some kind of credibility... even if still seeming to stretch the concept of relevance, here, especially when a kind of meaningful vindication, such as either of those shit projects gaining meaningful network effects to supplant bitcoin (which seems to be what you are suggesting to be not only plausible but likely) seems to be quite a long shot - maybe even in the less than 1% scenarios of likelihood, similar to roach's seeming planning and preparing for Armageddon.....

IF jbreher would make public his actual holding figures maybe his position would be more understandable. He is basically hedging a more than winning bet in either case. He probably doesn't even "need" (as in won't ever spend) as much Bitcoins as he actually still have. And he is somewhat deluded into thinking that the possibility of a "blockapocallipse" is much higher than it really is... so he does hedge his chances knowing that even if he is wrong in his stance about BCH/BSV he will do (very) well. It will just be a small and almost unnoticeable dent on his total net worth. And if he is (he won't) right then double win.

This is a clear case of YMMV and "don't try this at home". His situation is not the average Bitcoiner one. Again, don't fucking try to do this unless you have so much BTC you feel like you need to do something about it... and recklessly blowing it all on lambos, whores and coke is not your thing.

Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3584
Merit: 4418


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
August 13, 2019, 11:33:58 PM


So he can he be charged for these fraudulent actions?
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1187


View Profile
August 13, 2019, 11:45:45 PM

If there is no trust with actual 1.1mil btc and by actual I mean btc for which the trust has private keys for, then it is even more idiotic than i thought.
Let's toast to this!

Highly unlikely such a trust actually exists.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 4042


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
August 13, 2019, 11:48:23 PM

Here is nothing free in this world.

Quote
If something is free, YOU are the product
Can't remember where i got this from, but it's true most of the time.

old Adbusters slogan from the 90s at least
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 12:21:12 AM


Theoretically possible but unlikely

CSW will probably end up losing the law suit and have to pay the costs of Ira Kleiman.  But Ira Kleiman is suing to recover something that doesn’t exist so Ira can’t win in any meaningful sense.

So it will all wash away in a wave of bullshit and the BSV shillboys will proclaim it a miracle for BSV.

Someone will jump on something the judge says in the judgement and hold it up as proof that a US court has ruled that CSW is Satoshi.  Of course it won’t say that, but shillboys will believe anything.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3584
Merit: 4418


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 12:27:25 AM


Theoretically possible but unlikely

CSW will probably end up losing the law suit and have to pay the costs of Ira Kleiman.  But Ira Kleiman is suing to recover something that doesn’t exist so Ira can’t win in any meaningful sense.

So it will all wash away in a wave of bullshit and the BSV shillboys will proclaim it a miracle for BSV.

Someone will jump on something the judge says in the judgement and hold it up as proof that a US court has ruled that CSW is Satoshi.  Of course it won’t say that, but shillboys will believe anything.

Yeah, this sounds likely.  there is something about being charged for frivolous lawsuits but that would fall on the plaintiff I think. Which is ironic considering csw is the king of those...well trump is really. Smiley
rebal15
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 6


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 12:29:18 AM

https://www.coindesk.com/goldman-sachs-analysts-note-says-nows-a-good-time-to-buy-bitcoin
Do you see stupid manipulation? Where were they when btc was $4k.
Goldman sachs bullish on what they called scam. Dump it.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1620


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 12:56:19 AM

I already responded both that your facts are not correct and also,

So you're asserting that the charts I posted links to contain fraudulent figures? Interesting. I don't believe your assertion is correct, so I will tentatively conclude that you are delusional on these additional matters of fact.

I'll be happy to rescind my conclusion of delusional, just as soon as you post links to credible evidence of corrected data.

... and even if you might be using some actual facts ... emphasizing facts (if true) in your favor

I know that at one time, in about late 2017, you and your buddy, PeterR were advocating 50/50 or some baloney like that

Nope. You misrememberate. I think Peter suggested just not divesting your other Bitcoins. For my part, I have divulged several times that I have several times the number of BCH, and of BSV, than I do of BTC, though the dollar value of my BTC exceeds the rest of my holdings. And no, I do not feel stupid about it. I fully expect total vindication upon the onset of Blockalypse II. Even if not, I am doing just fine, thankyouverymuch.

<<... deflection continues ...>>

Lest we forget which facts JJG asserted are incorrect:

Quote
From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more precisely, Blockalypse I.

OK, actually only the first two were facts. The last paragraph was merely a rational conclusion based upon those preceding facts.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1620


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 12:59:29 AM

And he is somewhat deluded into thinking that the possibility of a "blockapocallipse" is much higher than it really is...

You may wish to ponderate upon this trend line: https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=all
smartcomet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 78


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:21:55 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

https://twitter.com/gravitywave2/status/1161270170003955712
Quote
Prediction based on past performance gets harder with this new front-running paradigm we're seeing in bitcoin. Here demonstrated by how the present bull market won't let price act within a nice channel at a less steep slope than the previous (yet at least).
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3486
Merit: 8911


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:26:43 AM

no green pump today

Another digital shitcoin scammer vanquished by the savage sword of r0ach the physical silver barbarian.



You gotta zoom out a bit, Roach.

Yeah, maybe some of your old-school PMs are doing relatively well in the short-term; however, if you come at the matter from a broader angle, those PMs have not faired too well, relative to bitcoin, and the future is likely to show a similar history in which, relatively speaking, bitcoin out performs them, by leaps and bounds.

So, yeah, revel while it lasts in some of your short-term pumpenings of various PMs including gold and silver.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:35:54 AM

I already responded both that your facts are not correct and also,

So you're asserting that the charts I posted links to contain fraudulent figures? Interesting. I don't believe your assertion is correct, so I will tentatively conclude that you are delusional on these additional matters of fact.

I'll be happy to rescind my conclusion of delusional, just as soon as you post links to credible evidence of corrected data.

... and even if you might be using some actual facts ... emphasizing facts (if true) in your favor

I know that at one time, in about late 2017, you and your buddy, PeterR were advocating 50/50 or some baloney like that

Nope. You misrememberate. I think Peter suggested just not divesting your other Bitcoins. For my part, I have divulged several times that I have several times the number of BCH, and of BSV, than I do of BTC, though the dollar value of my BTC exceeds the rest of my holdings. And no, I do not feel stupid about it. I fully expect total vindication upon the onset of Blockalypse II. Even if not, I am doing just fine, thankyouverymuch.

<<... deflection continues ...>>

Lest we forget which facts JJG asserted are incorrect:

Quote
From end of 2017 Feb to mid 2017 Jun, BTC dominance plunged from over 85% to below 40%.
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage

The beginning of 2017 is when blocks started becoming persistently full.
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-size.html

The loss of dominance was due neither to BCH nor ICOs. 'Twas the Blockalypse. Or more precisely, Blockalypse I.

OK, actually only the first two were facts. The last paragraph was merely a rational conclusion based upon those preceding facts.

My dear bear, correlation does not equal causation

A crypto bull market will shrink Bitcoin market dominance

A crypto bull market will also increase Bitcoin transactions

Guess what: both of these things happened
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:38:58 AM

For fucks sake JJG.  We discussed this yesterday. I asked you quite nicely not to quote Roach.

Ignored for a week for quoting Roach.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1350


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:40:27 AM

And he is somewhat deluded into thinking that the possibility of a "blockapocallipse" is much higher than it really is...

You may wish to ponderate upon this trend line: https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=all



Nothing to worry just yet. Segwit and tx batching doing its job to increase capacity. And nothing a moderate (ie 2x) additional block size increase plus some LN adoption couldn't solve.

I never said we won't need SOME block size increase. Quite the contrary. But forking to go full retarded on 1GB blocks is... well... just retarded.

That being said, I understand your hedging.  If you believe there is a significant chance for a "blockapocallipse" severely hitting Bitcoin in the near future then... well... maybe your putting (some) of your money when your beliefs are...

Even if that were the case, crypto (as a whole) would be severely (if not deadly) hurt.

Ouch... third dumping leg... probably time to BTFD.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:45:33 AM

For fucks sake JJG.  We discussed this yesterday.

Ignored for a week for quoting Roach.



jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 4042


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 01:50:23 AM



You gotta zoom out a bit, Roach.

Yeah, maybe some of your old-school PMs are doing relatively well in the short-term; however, if you come at the matter from a broader angle, those PMs have not faired too well, relative to bitcoin, and the future is likely to show a similar history in which, relatively speaking, bitcoin out performs them, by leaps and bounds.

So, yeah, revel while it lasts in some of your short-term pumpenings of various PMs including gold and silver.

Well, we almost made it 48 hours without another ignore...
aesma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 857


fly or die


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 02:04:47 AM

Posting seriously is hard enough, I don't understand how someone can troll that much, unless paid for it, and even then, I wouldn't want that job !
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3486
Merit: 8911


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
August 14, 2019, 02:09:18 AM

OK Wall Observers!
[pumping shitcoins]

You are sounding desperate, RoomBot?

Did you not have enough BTC dip in the past year and a half to be able to accumulate some more BTC without having to resort to shitcoin pumpenings?

Is there no shame, anymore?


Pages: « 1 ... 24477 24478 24479 24480 24481 24482 24483 24484 24485 24486 24487 24488 24489 24490 24491 24492 24493 24494 24495 24496 24497 24498 24499 24500 24501 24502 24503 24504 24505 24506 24507 24508 24509 24510 24511 24512 24513 24514 24515 24516 24517 24518 24519 24520 24521 24522 24523 24524 24525 24526 [24527] 24528 24529 24530 24531 24532 24533 24534 24535 24536 24537 24538 24539 24540 24541 24542 24543 24544 24545 24546 24547 24548 24549 24550 24551 24552 24553 24554 24555 24556 24557 24558 24559 24560 24561 24562 24563 24564 24565 24566 24567 24568 24569 24570 24571 24572 24573 24574 24575 24576 24577 ... 32555 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!