Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Cryptotourist]

Have a look at this 3 minute video:
https://assets.infowarsmedia.com/videos/8fa41f36-317b-4375-83c6-5dfb8763d0f2.mp4

Loved the doctor's earrings.
Stoned hangover frogs, sex transiting down in Houston. Okay.

Houston, we have a problem:

[mindrust]

This is still very slow.

I am very tired of my wage job, and McAfee promised me to be retired before the end of 2020, and I believed him. But we are still 88% off track for btc to reach 1m until that date 

Also checking dickline from time to time and it is frustrating to watch that shit.

Not on a wage job, running my own business but it is still boring and tiring af.

It doesn't really matter much whether you are a wage slave or a business owner, both have to go to work in the end.

Getting retired before 2021 feels like a dream, I wish we all get it. Gotta buy more corns.

[Wilhelm]

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Haha took a last decission fly for Some purpose..... WTF am I??

Few google searches ....
Place Massena, Nice, France 

[serveria.com]

For example, it seems that if I had some meaningful inclinations that the BTC price was going to go down before it goes up, I could describe my feelings, and it seems that I already have. 

Several weeks ago, I said that I would not be surprised if BTC corrected below $7k, especially after we had peaked at $13,880 in such a short period of time.  I cannot recall anyone with any serious credibility around here questioning my BTC bullishness, and I also felt NO need to assert my long term bullish qualifications.

That's the thing Jiggy, when someone makes a bullish post - there are no disputes or confrontations - ever.
On the other hand if a member (non-legendary usually) makes a bearish remark, he can find himself been accused of lying, manipulating or trying to influence newbies, & even as far as trying to discredit other members that might have the same opinion. That's what serveria did, and that's why I felt that I had to explain myself. Also that's why he is a liar in my book.

In any other case, of course there is no need to explain anything regarding an opinion/position.

Pfff... since when expressing your point of view = lying? Could you please post a quote of me lying here? Just to make sure you're not making things up ok?

Why should bulls "make bearish remarks" and what could be the reason of doing so?  

[Cryptotourist]

Don't want to jinx it, but it would seem that our resident cock-r0ach has gone AWOL.
He could be on holidays of course, but .... where? The 1930's?

Sort of having a Stockholm syndrome experience here I suppose - him loosing the troll awards & all, but I could easily get used to his absence & the lack of that constantly repeating full of hatred, shilling propaganda.

[El duderino_]

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Temptation Island (a dumb reality show my GF follows)

[El duderino_]

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Haha took a last decission fly for Some purpose..... WTF am I??

Few google searches ....
Place Massena, Nice, France 

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Wooooooow

[Cryptotourist]

Pfff... since when expressing your point of view = lying? Could you please post a quote of me lying here? Just to make sure you're not making things up ok?

Expressing your view point does not equal to accusing others, & trying - willingly - to distort things.
Check your post history for further details.

Why should bulls "make bearish remarks" and what could be the reason of doing so? 

Good question. What's the time frame?

[STT]

Heh, I remember JayJuanGee denounces me as a bear once, even tho my posts were actually bullish.

To say BTC will only go up would be ironic because it would be calling for the end to BTC, as this scenario surely leads to collapse.   It has to pull back and its positive for the market to do that.    The parabolic formation fits alongside the commentary of those who would call Bitcoin a ponzi, corrupt or fake scheme.    Debating back and forth = actually positive and ditto the market that buys and sells and regularly circulates currency.

There's a 50/50 chance r0ach is Jamie Dimon

I think Jamie is more positive on BTC.    Bankers respect results even if they hate the underlying product they'll go with it anyway in some shape or form.   Plenty of banks ready to back pop or rap music production studios even if the old men on the board hate the product, they respect the market potential I reckon.

[Cryptotourist]

To say BTC will only go up would be ironic because it would be calling for the end to BTC, as this scenario surely leads to collapse.   It has to pull back and its positive for the market to do that.    The parabolic formation fits alongside the commentary of those who would call Bitcoin a ponzi, corrupt or fake scheme.    Debating back and forth = actually positive and ditto the market that buys and sells and regularly circulates currency.

Thanks.
That totally answers serveria's second question above.

[bkbirge]

Interesting article...

While cryptocurrencies may not have replaced the dollar, they have three important positive areas of impact on the existing monetary system, the authors note.

First, citizens secure welfare gains from the existence of cryptocurrencies because they offer diversification; moreover, private digital currencies serve as competition for local investment and thus restrain monetary policy, thereby generating lower inflation.

Second, the authors argue that cryptocurrencies encourage local investment and serve as a complement — not as a substitute — for that investment. In offering an alternative to local fiat, they discipline monetary policy — again reducing inflation — leading to higher returns from investment and thus more investment overall.

Third, the government itself gains from permitting the use of cryptocurrencies within the local economy, given that it extracts revenue through taxation and thus benefits from the higher levels of local investment.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-simply-existing-positively-impacts-monetary-policy-research

[Biodom]

sex thinking is closing on bitcoin...oh, no.

those horny otc desks guys/gals are picking up the slack...  /s

[jojo69]

https://www.infowars.com/snopescom-lies-continues-the-911-cover-up/

[Wekkel]

That's the thing Jiggy, when someone makes a bullish post - there are no disputes or confrontations - ever.
On the other hand if a member (non-legendary usually) makes a bearish remark, he can find himself been accused of lying, manipulating or trying to influence newbies, & even as far as trying to discredit other members that might have the same opinion. That's what serveria did, and that's why I felt that I had to explain myself. Also that's why he is a liar in my book.

In any other case, of course there is no need to explain anything regarding an opinion/position.

He he, you found the WO-formula ... 

Bitcoin maximalism is rampant. Twitter is also full of virtue signalling idiots.

Luckily, Honey Badger does not care for NPCs.

[nutildah]

One of the best meme templates of all time, captured during one of the most honest moments of Alex Jones' career.

[Biodom]

Ivanontech (swedish Ivan that is) on the tube:

https://youtu.be/Fp1V031y8qo?t=541

[bkbirge]

Nope. Looks like you are serious.  Have fun with that stuff.  Keep an eye out for the lizard people.  

LOL, out of sMerit, otherwise I'd give you all of 'em.

Snopes may not always be correct but I'd trust them far more than infowars. Also, the person who was objecting to the snopes link can always go there and verify *their* sources. The infowars type of places never seem to have verifiable sources, for obvious reasons.

I find this graphic to be useful as a gut check when reading online...


Source: https://www.adfontesmedia.com/

[Wilhelm]

Nope. Looks like you are serious.  Have fun with that stuff.  Keep an eye out for the lizard people.  

LOL, out of sMerit, otherwise I'd give you all of 'em.

Snopes may not always be correct but I'd trust them far more than infowars. Also, the person who was objecting to the snopes link can always go there and verify *their* sources. The infowars type of places never seem to have verifiable sources, for obvious reasons.

I find this graphic to be useful as a gut check when reading online...


Source: https://www.adfontesmedia.com/

Nice graph. Saved it.
Looking at CNN and FOX NEWS and it seems to be spot on 👍🏻

[bkbirge]

Nice graph. Saved it.
Looking at CNN and FOX NEWS and it seems to be spot on 👍🏻

I think the Y-axis is equally, or maybe more, important to look at too. I think it's hard to remove all bias completely as journalists are human too but it should be a lot easier to find sources that at least don't make shit up.

[nutildah]

I find this graphic to be useful as a gut check when reading online...

I think NBC, ABC and CBS are a bit more left leaning than the chart proposes (by at least half a quadrant), but other than that I largely agree with it. I made one small addition, see if you can spot it.