fonzie
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:06:51 AM |
|
We haven't made any new lows here. I'm not sure what you're complaining about. My own analysis shows we could go down as low as 420 before the exponential rise. Any lower and then I start to worry.
Let´s hope that 420$ holds!
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:09:32 AM |
|
what happened to mega wall of death and glory?
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:10:47 AM |
|
i should take my own advice and not be manipulated by market depth charts
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:13:54 AM |
|
Why the sudden gloom? Price is falling a bit but still way up from April.
Some bad news that I did not see? Karpelès bought GHash.io? The FBI seized the blockchain? Satoshi committed seppuku?
|
|
|
|
|
MNDan
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:16:45 AM |
|
I can't figure out how fonzie got off my ignore list. Remedied now...
|
|
|
|
Raystonn
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:18:49 AM |
|
I can't figure out how fonzie got off my ignore list. Remedied now...
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:20:21 AM |
|
FUCK!
that is all.
goodnight.
|
|
|
|
Raystonn
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:21:16 AM |
|
FUCK!
that is all.
goodnight.
I'd give you a beer, but all my coins are in cold storage...
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:31:50 AM |
|
No, but São Paulo universities are (partly) on strike right now because the management overrun the budget last year with excessive pay rises for profs, and now the State Accounting Tribunal woke up and claimed that payroll should be cut by 30% to comply with statutory limits. We'll see. But I don't think that will have an impact on bitcoin price, so still can't see why the sudden gloom. Bad TA?
|
|
|
|
Raystonn
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:34:11 AM |
|
Typical Bitcoin. Up 50 points and it's going to the moon. Down 50 points and Bitcoin is dead. Certainly you've been around long enough to see this? The worse the gloom, the bigger the bounce will be.
|
|
|
|
KFR
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:35:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTCfan1
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:39:47 AM |
|
"And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’" nice!
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1820
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:00:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Wolf Rainer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:17:23 AM |
|
Down again? This never ends, i want just a little stable price.
|
|
|
|
nwfella
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Well hello there!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:02:54 AM |
|
also withholding blocks, to manipulate the perceived hashrate and effectively attack other mining pools, is a problem The block withholding attack might actually end up being what limits the size of pools in the end. If it's no longer safe to accept random members of the public into a pool, then the pool membership needs to be limited to trusted hashers. This means a larger number of pools for a given number of hashers. +1 Block withholding attack far more serious issue I think than people realize.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1820
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:03:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
smiley123
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:16:55 AM |
|
also withholding blocks, to manipulate the perceived hashrate and effectively attack other mining pools, is a problem The block withholding attack might actually end up being what limits the size of pools in the end. If it's no longer safe to accept random members of the public into a pool, then the pool membership needs to be limited to trusted hashers. This means a larger number of pools for a given number of hashers. +1 Block withholding attack far more serious issue I think than people realize. @justusranvier, it doesn't work that way. It's the pool that is holding back the blocks not the members.
|
|
|
|
rocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1153
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:17:23 AM |
|
Another round of dumps. this is getting old Any particular reason this time, all just 51% attack, selling Silk Road coins, and reiteration of China ban? It´ain´t over till it´s over which is BTC / USD = 0$ It ain't over till it's over which is BTC/USD = $0 USD/BTC = $0 FIFY
|
|
|
|
|