Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ShroomsKit_Disgrace]

Explanation

LOVELY.

[Wary]

Does betting a kidney qualify for "blood in the streets"?  IMO, it's really bullish!

[Newbie1022]

Does betting a kidney qualify for "blood in the streets"?  IMO, it's really bullish!

I think only if I lose... I'll have to consult the oracle about that, though.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[mooncake]

Trading pattern on Stamp for the past 6 hours:
1. Small and incremental buying of less than 0.5 BTC with occasional medium-size buy of less than 10 BTC
2. Sudden huge sell of more than 50 BTC, followed by small sells.

Unsubstantiated conclusion: Deliberate and possibly concerted manipulation among the big boys to keep the price down.

[Mervyn_Pumpkinhead]

I find myself visiting this forum just to cheer myself up.
All those desperate posts about a rise that will beging anyminute now and how manipulation is causing the lack of buying interest.
I know that it's kind of cruel, but I can't help myself. Desperation among the get-rich-quick folks is humorous in a classical sense :-)

[mladen00]

Does betting a kidney qualify for "blood in the streets"?  IMO, it's really bullish!

I think only if I lose... I'll have to consult the oracle about that, though.

Google market cap is almost 400.000.000.000,00 USD, so when BTC value will be equal to walue of
Google, BTC value will be approx. 28.000 USD

[grappa_barricata]

I find myself visiting this forum just to cheer myself up.

[bassclef]

EDIT: Em, if you haven't already, you should read this post by AnonyMint --
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400235.msg8649126#msg8649126 -- I think this provides some more substantial reasoning as to why getting fund managers involved in the BTC eco-system will eventually lead to disaster.

So AnonyMint claims a couple of things here:

-Bitcoin was created by the NWO to lure in techno-libertarians/anarchists; soon it will be slammed down by ETFs and other mainstream investment vehicles. There is no evidence of this except what can be assumed and extrapolated from other conspiratorial evidence, which is not without merit but is often... dubious.

-Bitcoin's adoption will slow because it has exhausted its demographics. If innovation continues, it will open up other adoption avenues, right? Not just the basement-dwelling libertarians who surf the internet all day? There seems to be a whole world out there that likes money and might enjoy using a digital ownership protocol.

His first post on this forum was suggesting how Bitcoin could change to reflect his expert analysis of its flaws. I have a hard time taking a doomsdayer with a self-professed IQ of 160 (or something like that) very seriously. I think he takes himself pretty seriously, but I had to unignore him to read his post. I perform with egotistical, self-righteous people all day, on and off the stage, and I cannot abide the narrow "all about me" attitude. It gets old real fast.

[flipperfish]

Google market cap is almost 400.000.000.000,00 USD, so when BTC value will be equal to walue of
Google, BTC value will be approx. 28.000 USD

*shhhh* Stop posting all this bullish facts! How much further do you want to drag out this capitulation phase? 

[grappa_barricata]

So AnonyMint claims a couple of things here:

-Bitcoin was created by the NWO to lure in techno-libertarians/anarchists; soon it will be slammed down by ETFs and other mainstream investment vehicles. There is no evidence of this except what can be assumed and extrapolated from other conspiratorial evidence, which is not without merit but is often... dubious.

-Bitcoin's adoption will slow because it has exhausted its demographics. If innovation continues, it will open up other adoption avenues, right? Not just the basement-dwelling libertarians who surf the internet all day? There seems to be a whole world out there that likes money and might enjoy using a digital ownership protocol.

His first post on this forum was suggesting how Bitcoin could change to reflect his expert analysis of its flaws. I have a hard time taking a doomsdayer with a self-professed IQ of 160 (or something like that) very seriously. I think he takes himself pretty seriously, but I had to unignore him to read his post. I perform with egotistical, self-righteous people all day, on and off the stage, and I cannot abide the narrow "all about me" attitude. It gets old real fast.

I think his idea is very simplistic. And any one with an IQ of 160 will not take the IQ test too seriously.

[Asrael999]

Google market cap is almost 400.000.000.000,00 USD, so when BTC value will be equal to walue of
Google, BTC value will be approx. 28.000 USD

*shhhh* Stop posting all this bullish facts! How much further do you want to drag out this capitulation phase? 

or at least use the word IF, instead of when, there is no guarantee

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Bittings]

Credit Card Breach at Home Depot
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/09/banks-credit-card-breach-at-home-depot/

God dammnit trolls and manipulators! 

Can't you just let Bitcoin take over already so we can stop with all these credit hacks?

[grappa_barricata]

Credit Card Breach at Home Depot
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/09/banks-credit-card-breach-at-home-depot/

God dammnit trolls and manipulators! 

Can't you just let Bitcoin take over already so we can stop with all these credit hacks?

Hobgoblins. Fucking hobgoblins everywhere.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[roslinpl]

Explanation

I feel like I went into some time traveling machine. ...

April again?? Come on ... Or maybe better - October 2013

RALLY WILL START SOON !!! FASTEN YOUR SEATBELTS.

[grappa_barricata]

I think his idea is very simplistic.

Yeah, really.
I doubt you even understand a quarter of his posts -- much better to just keep chanting.

I can agree with this: Markets always move in the direction to hurt the most investors.
I didn't read all his posts, only the first one. Seems that you think his scenario has some serious brain power behind. I disagree.



Edit:
The fact that you can't accept that someone disagree with you on this subject is a mechanism of self-defence.
As your point of view is at least partially based on the opinions of others, any critics can set that point of view toward the path to re-evaluation.
That is something that your mind will resist at any cost, until possible. Let then this post be the trigger.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[grappa_barricata]

Remember: ego inhibits the exploration of ideas that run contrary to your own.

This behavior is quite interesting. I've explored that idea, judged it and expressed my opinion.
This opinion of mine can be called an idea on its own. An idea that run contrary to your. I hope you gasp the subtle irony.