Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 07:47:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 8023 8024 8025 8026 8027 8028 8029 8030 8031 8032 8033 8034 8035 8036 8037 8038 8039 8040 8041 8042 8043 8044 8045 8046 8047 8048 8049 8050 8051 8052 8053 8054 8055 8056 8057 8058 8059 8060 8061 8062 8063 8064 8065 8066 8067 8068 8069 8070 8071 8072 [8073] 8074 8075 8076 8077 8078 8079 8080 8081 8082 8083 8084 8085 8086 8087 8088 8089 8090 8091 8092 8093 8094 8095 8096 8097 8098 8099 8100 8101 8102 8103 8104 8105 8106 8107 8108 8109 8110 8111 8112 8113 8114 8115 8116 8117 8118 8119 8120 8121 8122 8123 ... 33342 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26381906 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
empowering
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 03:49:37 PM
Last edit: September 01, 2014, 04:19:01 PM by empowering

Edit [Suspicious link removed]jj.com/articles/fbi-probes-possible-computer-hacking-incident-at-j-p-morgan-1409168480
1715456842
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715456842

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715456842
Reply with quote  #2

1715456842
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715456842
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715456842

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715456842
Reply with quote  #2

1715456842
Report to moderator
1715456842
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715456842

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715456842
Reply with quote  #2

1715456842
Report to moderator
grappa_barricata
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

playing pasta and eating mandolinos


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 03:54:43 PM


Very nice. Text is cryptic, voice is appropriate, music is pleasant.  Smiley.  The video, well...  Saturatiooon
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 03:55:23 PM


Don't sell to rebuy (unless the underlying is overvalued).
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 03:59:20 PM


Explanation
grappa_barricata
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

playing pasta and eating mandolinos


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:01:28 PM

[Suspicious link removed]jj.com/articles/fbi-probes-possible-computer-hacking-incident-at-j-p-morgan-1409168480

If you look the video here, notice how they stress about the possibilities of 'frauds'. Notice also that in the article at that url they stress that EU banks too have been attacked. They also do allegations about Russia being behind it.

But why?
Because the USG is desperate to keep EU on their side, and are looking to cover the upcoming financial shenanigans in their country.


Edit:
This apparently innocent sentence can be found at the end of the article:
"The threshold for a military response is either massive economic harm or potential loss of life, he said."
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:02:45 PM



text, anyone ?
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:04:34 PM

my theory is that ww3 is short-term bearish, long-term bullish
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:08:29 PM

my theory is that ww3 is short-term bearish, long-term bullish

For whom or what? Bitcoin?
empowering
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:11:54 PM


Edit: not sure what is up with that link... I clicked it oppps... (no problem for me though)

The FBI is investigating a possible computer-hacking attack on J.P. Morgan & Co., in what people familiar with the situation described as a highly serious breach of corporate computer security. WSJ's Emily Glazer joins Simon Constable on the News Hub with more on this.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is probing a computer-hacking attack on J.P. Morgan Chase JPM +0.49% & Co. and as many as four other banks, in what people familiar with the probe described as a significant breach of corporate computer security.

The timing and extent of the hacking attacks weren't immediately clear, though cybersecurity experts began probing the possible J.P. Morgan breach earlier this month, according to people familiar with the investigation.

J.P. Morgan said Thursday morning it isn't seeing "unusual fraud" and it is working closely with law enforcement to determine the scope of the attack. The largest U.S. bank by assets added that it is taking "additional steps" to safeguard sensitive or confidential information and will contact relevant parties as it learns more about who may have been impacted.


It stressed customers should contact the bank -- as always -- if any suspicious activity on their accounts is detected and they will not be liable for fraud.

People familiar with the investigation said the evidence gathered so far suggested hackers were able to make a significant foray into J.P. Morgan's computer system. People with knowledge of the probe said it appeared between two and five U.S. financial institutions may have been affected. The names of all targeted banks couldn't be immediately determined.

J.P. Morgan and federal cyber investigators are in discussions as they examine the apparent attack on the bank's computer system.

"Companies of our size unfortunately experience cyberattacks nearly every day," said Trish Wexler, a J.P. Morgan spokeswoman said Wednesday. "We have multiple layers of defense to counteract any threats and constantly monitor fraud levels."

The FBI said Wednesday it is "working with the United States Secret Service to determine the scope of recently reported cyber attacks against several American financial institutions."


The attack appears to have been caused by malicious computer code, known as malware, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Thefts of U.S. corporate data have in the past often come from hackers based in China, Russia or the former Soviet Union, though that doesn't mean the cyberattacks involve those governments. Just as in the U.S., hackers in those countries can act on their own and sell stolen data to other organizations.

The style of the attacks and the targets—large U.S. financial institutions—have led some people briefed on the investigation to suspect a possible Russian or Eastern European link. Russian organized crime often targets large financial institutions. But several people with knowledge of the investigation cautioned it is too early to tell who was behind the attacks.

Hackers appear to have originally breached J.P. Morgan's network via an employee's personal computer, a person close to the investigation said. From there, the intruders were able to move further into the bank's inner systems. Employees often use software to tap in to corporate networks from home through what are known as virtual private networks.

Such an attack would mark the latest instance in which a large corporate network was breached by a weak external link. When hackers stole 40 million payment-card numbers from Target Corp. TGT -0.46% last year, they originally infiltrated the retailer by stealing a ventilation contractor's password.

J.P. Morgan Chase's corporate headquarters in New York City. Getty Images

In mid-August, cybercriminals hacked in to nearly 1,000 grocery stores around the U.S. The common link: Supervalu Inc. SVU -0.93% of Eden Prairie, Minn., which managed the stores' technology services and had remote access to those locations, people familiar with that incident have said.

In recent weeks, J.P. Morgan called numerous security vendors with concerns it had a problem, people close to the investigation said. The bank in recent months hired a number of employees with Defense Department experience because the firm treats cybersecurity as a problem akin to military security, people familiar with the matter said.

Cybersecurity has been a chief concern—and cost—for large banks over the past few years.

J.P. Morgan, along with other banks, has been vulnerable to attacks in the past, particularly so-called distributed denial of service threats, known as DDoS. These attacks knock websites offline by flooding them with useless traffic. Iranian hackers aimed a DDoS attack at J.P. Morgan, U.S. Bancorp, PNC Financial Services Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. in 2012, according to U.S. officials.

James Dimon, chairman and chief executive of J.P. Morgan, wrote in his annual shareholder letter this year that the bank will spend more than $250 million annually and have about 1,000 people focused on cybersecurity by the end of 2014. That includes building and running three Cybersecurity Operations Centers in its regional headquarters to coordinate incoming information, identify threats, create response procedures and coordinate security of its buildings world-wide, he wrote.

"Cyberattacks are growing every day in strength and velocity across the globe," he wrote. "It is going to be a continual and likely never-ending battle to stay ahead of it—and, unfortunately, not every battle will be won."

Write to Danny Yadron at danny.yadron@wsj.com, Emily Glazer at emily.glazer@wsj.com and Devlin Barrett at devlin.barrett@wsj.com
empowering
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:13:33 PM

[Suspicious link removed]jj.com/articles/fbi-probes-possible-computer-hacking-incident-at-j-p-morgan-1409168480

If you look the video here, notice how they stress about the possibilities of 'frauds'. Notice also that in the article at that url they stress that EU banks too have been attacked. They also do allegations about Russia being behind it.

But why?
Because the USG is desperate to keep EU on their side, and are looking to cover the upcoming financial shenanigans in their country.


Edit:
This apparently innocent sentence can be found at the end of the article:
"The threshold for a military response is either massive economic harm or potential loss of life, he said."

Yeah I noticed the anti russian rhetoric,  hard not to , not just in this piece.

Edit: not sure what is up with that link.

wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:13:59 PM


Getting articles from wsj is pretty simple. In a anonymous browser (e.g. Chrome incognito) paste the exact title into google and open the wsj link directly from there. Then you'll be able to read the article.
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:49:35 PM

Wrong. The hashrate has decreased in the past ... if you cared to take a look and can read a plot.

I saw it stagnate at the last reward halving, maybe I did not look far back enough?

It self-regulate. If mining is unprofitable people stop mining, hash rate drop and mining became profitable again. If prices remain at these levels hash rate MUST drop, unless vast majority of hash power is controlled by entities that have no economic interests in mining per se.

So just jumped back into mining, here is a rough breakdown per TH/s:  (my electricity costs ($0.08/kWh)
Cost $2.18 per day; income @ $480/BTC = $8.80. (I.e. I am paid to heat my house this winter.)
So one of 3 things are going to happen next.

The price will fall to or below marginal cost of production.
Or
The hashing rate will increase until infrastructure grows to meet marginal cost of production.
Or
A combination of the above.

So no drop in hash predicted, and if the price drops to my marginal cost we may see old hardware from mining farmers go offline, which will be good for decentralization.

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 04:59:18 PM


Explanation
grappa_barricata
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

playing pasta and eating mandolinos


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:08:10 PM

Wrong. The hashrate has decreased in the past ... if you cared to take a look and can read a plot.

I saw it stagnate at the last reward halving, maybe I did not look far back enough?

It self-regulate. If mining is unprofitable people stop mining, hash rate drop and mining became profitable again. If prices remain at these levels hash rate MUST drop, unless vast majority of hash power is controlled by entities that have no economic interests in mining per se.

So just jumped back into mining, here is a rough breakdown per TH/s:  (my electricity costs ($0.08/kWh)
Cost $2.18 per day; income @ $480/BTC = $8.80. (I.e. I am paid to heat my house this winter.)
So one of 3 things are going to happen next.

The price will fall to or below marginal cost of production.
Or
The hashing rate will increase until infrastructure grows to meet marginal cost of production.
Or
A combination of the above.

So no drop in hash predicted, and if the price drops to my marginal cost we may see old hardware from mining farmers go offline, which will be good for decentralization.


About your situation: if the hash rate keep going up then you will have to replace your hardware with a more efficient one in 3 months.
This is quite an addition to the cost of mining, that one must factor in. So, even if you have very cheap energy and very efficient hardware you still can't be on positive cash flow for the next 3 month, let alone recover the initial investment in the hardware. Correct?
79b79aa8d5047da6d3XX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 660
Merit: 101


Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:16:10 PM

my theory is that ww3 is short-term bearish, long-term bullish

For whom or what? Bitcoin?

i take it he means that ww3 not going to happen anytime soon, but eventual breakdown of current world order is more than likely.
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 4482


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:18:02 PM

we may see old hardware from mining farmers go offline, which will be good for decentralization.

In addition, there should be many small independent miners in the northern hemisphere (myself included) pulling their outdated mining rigs out of the mothballs in time for the heating season.

This should also be good for decentralization.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:18:35 PM

my theory is that ww3 is short-term bearish, long-term bullish
For whom or what? Bitcoin?

This being the bitcoin price movement tracking and discussion thread, that was my intention, yes.

Russia has gradually escalated the invasion of the Donbass to the point (estimated 3 to 5 thousand uniformed) where the Ukrainian government considers it an outright invasion.  European governments (except for Honnecker Merkel) agree. Europe has a backbone composed of over-cooked pasta, but they do remember Hitler, and the parallels to Putin are pervasive, profound, and indicative. I am wishing that I did not have so much New York travel planned, at this point:  A pre-emptive strike by Putin against the allied west is the likely end of any military escalation track.  I should acquire an off-shore life insurance policy in case my domestic one should prove unsuited to the circumstances of my death.

All of this, I consider bearish in the short-term, on risk-aversion, and bullish in the long-term on the fundamental technical capability of crypto to provide value storage and liquidity transfer when other systems break down.

JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:25:46 PM

So just jumped back into mining, here is a rough breakdown per TH/s:  (my electricity costs ($0.08/kWh)
Cost $2.18 per day; income @ $480/BTC = $8.80. (I.e. I am paid to heat my house this winter.)

Does that cost include the hardware cost?  (I note that 365.25*(8.80 - 2.18) = 2418 $/year/TH/s, correct?)

Quote
So no drop in hash predicted, and if the price drops to my marginal cost we may see old hardware from mining farmers go offline, which will be good for decentralization.

Why? I would think that the bigger farms are able to keep their equipment more up-to-date than small miners, and threfore have better efficiency.  Is it the other way around?
grappa_barricata
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

playing pasta and eating mandolinos


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:27:15 PM

This being the bitcoin price movement tracking and discussion thread, that was my intention, yes.

Russia has gradually escalated the invasion of the Donbass to the point (estimated 3 to 5 thousand uniformed) where the Ukrainian government considers it an outright invasion.  European governments (except for Honnecker Merkel) agree. Europe has a backbone composed of over-cooked pasta, but they do remember Hitler, and the parallels to Putin are pervasive, profound, and indicative. I am wishing that I did not have so much New York travel planned, at this point:  A pre-emptive strike by Putin against the allied west is the likely end of any escalation.  I should acquire an off-shore life insurance policy in case my domestic one should prove unsuited to the circumstances of my death.

All of this, I consider bearish in the short-term, on risk-aversion, and bullish in the long-term on the fundamental technical capability of crypto to provide value storage and liquidity transfer when other systems break down.



You are very wrong. USD is about to being dropped as a reserve currency in international trades (among nation-states).
This has serious implications for the US economy, because it is just an house of cards. They are a vampire economy. I'm sorry but that is what it is.

The people that run the USG at the moment want to trigger a war somewhere, to gain a few years of time.
Meanwhile the rest of the world, including the EU and Russia, just do not give a fuck. They will not be tricked in a war.
The US media (and UK, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Australia) are doing their worst to scare their inhabitants into docile fear. But, well, there is the INTERNET.
There will be no war because the american public is not receptive to the idea, even if a casus belli is fabricated. You'll see.
There is no 'allied west'. Its a jungle out there. There are only power relations.

Of course this is bullish for bitcoin Smiley
79b79aa8d5047da6d3XX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 660
Merit: 101


Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl


View Profile
September 01, 2014, 05:33:54 PM
Last edit: May 20, 2015, 05:28:42 AM by 79b79aa8d5047da6d3XX

i have to agree that the red baiting is ridiculous. it is trivial to see which country is bent on geopolitical domination. it seems also clear that it shall fail, and go broke in the attempt.
Pages: « 1 ... 8023 8024 8025 8026 8027 8028 8029 8030 8031 8032 8033 8034 8035 8036 8037 8038 8039 8040 8041 8042 8043 8044 8045 8046 8047 8048 8049 8050 8051 8052 8053 8054 8055 8056 8057 8058 8059 8060 8061 8062 8063 8064 8065 8066 8067 8068 8069 8070 8071 8072 [8073] 8074 8075 8076 8077 8078 8079 8080 8081 8082 8083 8084 8085 8086 8087 8088 8089 8090 8091 8092 8093 8094 8095 8096 8097 8098 8099 8100 8101 8102 8103 8104 8105 8106 8107 8108 8109 8110 8111 8112 8113 8114 8115 8116 8117 8118 8119 8120 8121 8122 8123 ... 33342 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!