dissident
|
|
May 29, 2017, 01:00:01 AM |
|
Thank you for the newsletter. Little stuff like this and keeping the information up to date makes a big difference.
|
|
|
|
Fourwinds117
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
May 29, 2017, 03:20:10 AM |
|
Yes! Thank you for the newsletter 😊
|
|
|
|
realistic1
|
|
May 29, 2017, 05:24:20 AM |
|
Newsletter is good. Nicely done, simple but effective.
This coin 'should' be at 1000 sat by now.
I dont know whats holding it back, but I suspect over the next week a push for 1000 sat and beyond is inevitable.
Probably just being on low vol exchanges I expect. Easy to manipulate price down. Even at this early development stage we would be much higher on a Bittrex or similar exchange.
|
|
|
|
Fourwinds117
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
May 29, 2017, 09:41:19 AM |
|
As soon as the price gets higher with more news those manipulating pros at yobit and cc wont be able to suppress the price.
|
|
|
|
coin-investor
|
|
May 29, 2017, 10:02:42 AM |
|
As soon as the price gets higher with more news those manipulating pros at yobit and cc wont be able to suppress the price.
People are starting to notice it now,glad that we have a new exchange in cryptopia,we should and cannot rely in Yobit because it will not reflect the real value of XtraBYtes,I hope to see 2 or 4 more exchange to get the price going and not just for pump and dumps.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
realistic1
|
|
May 29, 2017, 11:19:26 AM |
|
Pumps are also just as destructive, if we didn't have that extreme peak we would probably steadily got to 500 sats right now which is about what the charts suggests we should be at now.
|
|
|
|
|
Fatoshi
|
|
May 29, 2017, 02:03:49 PM |
|
Started as a failed ICO? umm no a scam. You could argue this is a good feedback and wakeup call hearing what they understood from the project after reading the ANN. They mainly got the idea it was 1 sats (not something you boast about) It comes across as the community just pumped a scam ICO. I get the back story so I understand no one was interested and was dumping what they thought was a scam but still. Nothing about the tech other than we have Masternodes? Not good.
|
|
|
|
Sylw83
|
|
May 29, 2017, 02:16:53 PM |
|
This is one of my favourite coin. Cost XBY was high around $0.04 two weeks ago and I hope that coin come back soon and price will be higher and higher.
|
|
|
|
robelneo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3402
Merit: 1225
|
|
May 29, 2017, 02:29:41 PM |
|
Pumps are also just as destructive, if we didn't have that extreme peak we would probably steadily got to 500 sats right now which is about what the charts suggests we should be at now.
So many investors are coming in now in Xtrabytes,as we can also in it's daily volume some whales are picking this coin and they play it for profit so we need more exchange for this and always gets update on this project.
|
|
|
|
Cuthbert_Toshi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2017, 04:04:08 PM |
|
Started as a failed ICO? umm no a scam. You could argue this is a good feedback and wakeup call hearing what they understood from the project after reading the ANN. They mainly got the idea it was 1 sats (not something you boast about) It comes across as the community just pumped a scam ICO. I get the back story so I understand no one was interested and was dumping what they thought was a scam but still. Nothing about the tech other than we have Masternodes? Not good. Well I think that they just don't know nothing about XBY before, was a "user request" made in their thread on Cryptopia forum, Alts section (by me, I'm fan of the show). I think, that reading this thread actually can be kind of confusing and XBY are in a phase of development of a total new technology, so it's normal that when you for the first time know of a coin that revert the concept of "proof of -" it's not so easy to understand (you know that there's no a whitepaper yet?). As a result of that I see in Cryptopia a new high price today, 499 sats, in yobit it's 370 today. And an increase of volume of XBY on this exchange. At this stage more people talk about this coin better, if a dev or someone with higher technicals knowledges then me, can contact the show on twitter or cryptopia forum and explain deeply and correctly what XBY do and why it's a revolutionary thing in crypto world. I'm sure the Blockchain Dynamics guys will analyze again the coin in one of the next shows.
|
|
|
|
bikerleszno
|
|
May 29, 2017, 04:16:12 PM |
|
WE will go over 500 satoshi again today I am sure. When genesis will hit in few adys price will be above 1000 satoshi for sure and i feel 1500-2000. Great time to invest.
|
|
|
|
Fatoshi
|
|
May 29, 2017, 04:17:43 PM |
|
Started as a failed ICO? umm no a scam. You could argue this is a good feedback and wakeup call hearing what they understood from the project after reading the ANN. They mainly got the idea it was 1 sats (not something you boast about) It comes across as the community just pumped a scam ICO. I get the back story so I understand no one was interested and was dumping what they thought was a scam but still. Nothing about the tech other than we have Masternodes? Not good. Well I think that they just don't know nothing about XBY before, was a "user request" made in their thread on Cryptopia forum, Alts section (by me, I'm fan of the show). I think, that reading this thread actually can be kind of confusing and XBY are in a phase of development of a total new technology, so it's normal that when you for the first time know of a coin that revert the concept of "proof of -" it's not so easy to understand (you know that there's no a whitepaper yet?). As a result of that I see in Cryptopia a new high price today, 499 sats, in yobit it's 370 today. And an increase of volume of XBY on this exchange. At this stage more people talk about this coin better, if a dev or someone with higher technicals knowledges then me, can contact the show on twitter or cryptopia forum and explain deeply and correctly what XBY do and why it's a revolutionary thing in crypto world. I'm sure the Blockchain Dynamics guys will analyze again the coin in one of the next shows. The truth is some people are stupid and often miss the point of something and also this tech is a bit new so some might just try to understand in terms of what has gone before. But assuming they aren't any of these imthink the take away is more are we communicating this project well? Personally I would say no, just in terms of the ANN and website material. I remember doing some module at college a few years ago about effective communication and basically it was saying IF the receiver of a message doesn't understand then through feedback i.e. Checking they understood the responsibility is always with the giver of information. I would say WE need to be more clear and simple, I Would say 80% of the ANN for example is just white noise, hopefully a rewrite will be focused and clear and will ditch all the secondary stuff no one needs to know about. I am so confident about this idea that the day the ANN or at least the week it is communicated clearly the important stuff of this coin we would see a big rally. It's taken a shockingly long time to sort out so far. I could make an ANN in 30 minutes if I had a logo and a banner.
|
|
|
|
LostWords
|
|
May 29, 2017, 04:56:47 PM |
|
Started as a failed ICO? umm no a scam. You could argue this is a good feedback and wakeup call hearing what they understood from the project after reading the ANN. They mainly got the idea it was 1 sats (not something you boast about) It comes across as the community just pumped a scam ICO. I get the back story so I understand no one was interested and was dumping what they thought was a scam but still. Nothing about the tech other than we have Masternodes? Not good. Well I think that they just don't know nothing about XBY before, was a "user request" made in their thread on Cryptopia forum, Alts section (by me, I'm fan of the show). I think, that reading this thread actually can be kind of confusing and XBY are in a phase of development of a total new technology, so it's normal that when you for the first time know of a coin that revert the concept of "proof of -" it's not so easy to understand (you know that there's no a whitepaper yet?). As a result of that I see in Cryptopia a new high price today, 499 sats, in yobit it's 370 today. And an increase of volume of XBY on this exchange. At this stage more people talk about this coin better, if a dev or someone with higher technicals knowledges then me, can contact the show on twitter or cryptopia forum and explain deeply and correctly what XBY do and why it's a revolutionary thing in crypto world. I'm sure the Blockchain Dynamics guys will analyze again the coin in one of the next shows. The truth is some people are stupid and often miss the point of something and also this tech is a bit new so some might just try to understand in terms of what has gone before. But assuming they aren't any of these imthink the take away is more are we communicating this project well? Personally I would say no, just in terms of the ANN and website material. I remember doing some module at college a few years ago about effective communication and basically it was saying IF the receiver of a message doesn't understand then through feedback i.e. Checking they understood the responsibility is always with the giver of information. I would say WE need to be more clear and simple, I Would say 80% of the ANN for example is just white noise, hopefully a rewrite will be focused and clear and will ditch all the secondary stuff no one needs to know about. I am so confident about this idea that the day the ANN or at least the week it is communicated clearly the important stuff of this coin we would see a big rally. It's taken a shockingly long time to sort out so far. I could make an ANN in 30 minutes if I had a logo and a banner. I think the developers have explained more then once that explaining the tech will happen once the tech is done: that means, tested and up and running so the information given is proven to be right and succesful. So having the ANN page clear and filled with usefull technical info is great but if the information of tech isn't available or not correct at this point, it has no use. I don't understand the impatience...what are weeks on a project that aims to be changing crypto forever? Hell, what are months...?
|
|
|
|
Fatoshi
|
|
May 29, 2017, 04:59:29 PM |
|
I would go as far as saying leave it out, why plant a negative idea in people's heads, that kind of back story gets talked about anyway, it's not a feature or anything a later investor needs to know. If you must I would say a blog post is the only appropriate place for that kind of thing.
|
|
|
|
Fatoshi
|
|
May 29, 2017, 05:02:00 PM Last edit: May 29, 2017, 05:12:03 PM by Fatoshi |
|
Started as a failed ICO? umm no a scam. You could argue this is a good feedback and wakeup call hearing what they understood from the project after reading the ANN. They mainly got the idea it was 1 sats (not something you boast about) It comes across as the community just pumped a scam ICO. I get the back story so I understand no one was interested and was dumping what they thought was a scam but still. Nothing about the tech other than we have Masternodes? Not good. Well I think that they just don't know nothing about XBY before, was a "user request" made in their thread on Cryptopia forum, Alts section (by me, I'm fan of the show). I think, that reading this thread actually can be kind of confusing and XBY are in a phase of development of a total new technology, so it's normal that when you for the first time know of a coin that revert the concept of "proof of -" it's not so easy to understand (you know that there's no a whitepaper yet?). As a result of that I see in Cryptopia a new high price today, 499 sats, in yobit it's 370 today. And an increase of volume of XBY on this exchange. At this stage more people talk about this coin better, if a dev or someone with higher technicals knowledges then me, can contact the show on twitter or cryptopia forum and explain deeply and correctly what XBY do and why it's a revolutionary thing in crypto world. I'm sure the Blockchain Dynamics guys will analyze again the coin in one of the next shows. The truth is some people are stupid and often miss the point of something and also this tech is a bit new so some might just try to understand in terms of what has gone before. But assuming they aren't any of these imthink the take away is more are we communicating this project well? Personally I would say no, just in terms of the ANN and website material. I remember doing some module at college a few years ago about effective communication and basically it was saying IF the receiver of a message doesn't understand then through feedback i.e. Checking they understood the responsibility is always with the giver of information. I would say WE need to be more clear and simple, I Would say 80% of the ANN for example is just white noise, hopefully a rewrite will be focused and clear and will ditch all the secondary stuff no one needs to know about. I am so confident about this idea that the day the ANN or at least the week it is communicated clearly the important stuff of this coin we would see a big rally. It's taken a shockingly long time to sort out so far. I could make an ANN in 30 minutes if I had a logo and a banner. I think the developers have explained more then once that explaining the tech will happen once the tech is done: that means, tested and up and running so the information given is proven to be right and succesful. So having the ANN page clear and filled with usefull technical info is great but if the information of tech isn't available or not correct at this point, it has no use. I don't understand the impatience...what are weeks on a project that aims to be changing crypto forever? Hell, what are months...? Because you have to communicate what the project is so far and hopes to be in the future, this isn't a secret project, just saying what are doing, do it more clearly. I mean cause you spent a load of time asking questions etc so you know the project well I assume so why deny that to others? I think you are confused with going all out in terms of marketing and exchanges, no one said don't tell people about the project, we have a slack with 500 people, Twitter, FB, Reddit and a newsletter. Lol
|
|
|
|
onedeveloper
|
|
May 29, 2017, 05:17:18 PM |
|
I think a new ANN thread will be in order when launching the new blockchain or the second wave of STaTics (minor statics, maybe?) (linking with this one, of course)
|
|
|
|
Fatoshi
|
|
May 29, 2017, 05:23:44 PM |
|
I think a new ANN thread will be in order when launching the new blockchain or the second wave of STaTics (minor statics, maybe?) (linking with this one, of course) Let's just call this coin ANN coin with the new tech proof of ANN, every 2 minutes the ANN is updated and signs the blocks.
|
|
|
|
onedeveloper
|
|
May 29, 2017, 05:37:20 PM |
|
I think a new ANN thread will be in order when launching the new blockchain or the second wave of STaTics (minor statics, maybe?) (linking with this one, of course) Let's just call this coin ANN coin with the new tech proof of ANN, every 2 minutes the ANN is updated and signs the blocks. Looooolllll
|
|
|
|
gluedog
|
|
May 29, 2017, 06:06:31 PM |
|
Hey guys, I just bought some XtraBytes because this seems like a successful project in the making.
I have noticed the fee for sending any amount of XtraBytes is 100 coins.
Let's say the coin reaches 10 cents, which is very realistic, probably going to happen by the end of the year - that would mean the fee for sending some XtraBytes is 10$. Do you plan on reducing this fee? What's the idea? People won't really like paying such high fees.
|
|
|
|
|