Krezz2017
|
|
September 02, 2017, 05:27:35 PM |
|
A coin develops abruptly. Probably many people took this coin as a joke. But no. It seems to be a good bargain. Where did so many lovers of this distinctive sport come from?
|
|
|
|
billaue
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
September 03, 2017, 11:13:11 AM |
|
A coin develops abruptly. Probably many people took this coin as a joke. But no. It seems to be a good bargain. Where did so many lovers of this distinctive sport come from?
You are right. Most coins are seen as joke or even scam at first stage.
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
September 03, 2017, 11:41:47 AM |
|
Well, i guess one could say that sumo is quite a nice coin. Even at this young stage
|
|
|
|
JC1DA
|
|
September 03, 2017, 11:53:53 AM |
|
Well, i guess one could say that sumo is quite a nice coin. Even at this young stage You can help it by mining to fight the botnet
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
September 03, 2017, 12:22:59 PM |
|
Well, i guess one could say that sumo is quite a nice coin. Even at this young stage You can help it by mining to fight the botnet As long as there is no mobile miner I can't... I don't have my computer running at the moment
|
|
|
|
JC1DA
|
|
September 03, 2017, 12:40:25 PM |
|
Well, i guess one could say that sumo is quite a nice coin. Even at this young stage You can help it by mining to fight the botnet As long as there is no mobile miner I can't... I don't have my computer running at the moment Last time I checked, mobile mining is about 20H/s on Samsung S7 ) but it drained the battery very fast.
|
|
|
|
bzyzny
|
|
September 03, 2017, 04:37:48 PM |
|
Reasons I like Sumokoin: 1) No ICO! Not a fan of premines either, but is better than ICO. I see ICO as a money grab and catering to traders instead of focusing on development and proving/earning the coins worth thru solid development. At least with premine the devs still have to work to make those coins worth something. Also late adopters have a fair chance to obtain sumo thru mining for many years.
2) High level of privacy from the beginning with ring size of 12. Monero is great but the fact that the transactions prior to 2017 aren't really private is not ideal. Also xmr has a low minimum ring size (I believe ring size 0 is still allowed, which is definitely not ideal). Higher ring size reduces the effectiveness of Sybil attacks.
3) Devs do not hype or make unrealistic claims about the coin, but instead they have shown they are more concerned with steady quality development.
4) Despite the large amount of hash rate that is either a private mining farm or botnet, it is still possible for the average person to mine a reasonable amount with 1 or 2 GPU/ CPU. Also cryptonight isn't brutally stressful on my GPU, unlike many other algorithms.
5) Great community so far, the thread is not full of "to the moon" BS or trolls. Everyone here seems genuinely interested to see how development will progress.
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
September 03, 2017, 04:44:22 PM |
|
Well, i guess one could say that sumo is quite a nice coin. Even at this young stage You can help it by mining to fight the botnet As long as there is no mobile miner I can't... I don't have my computer running at the moment Last time I checked, mobile mining is about 20H/s on Samsung S7 ) but it drained the battery very fast. I got a S8 so.... probably 2mh coming ... Just kidding. As soon my pc is running I'll let it mine on the main pool. As bzynzy said: even a none-pro miner can get a fair share of sumo. And it's fun to fill up the wallet
|
|
|
|
RomanV
|
|
September 04, 2017, 04:18:05 PM Last edit: September 04, 2017, 04:31:37 PM by RomanV |
|
I understand that the exchange was closed due to a botnet. But he's not going anywhere. Need something to do. More exchanges, more investors, more miners. However, the botnet owner has mined over 350.000 somo. This fact killing trade(
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
September 04, 2017, 04:32:33 PM |
|
I understand that the exchange was closed due to a botnet. But he's not going anywhere. Need something to do. More exchanges, more investors, more miners. As soon as the exchanges come, the investors and miners will follow. We have to be patient, due to the redesign dev are not supplying to new exchanges at the moment (at least that is what I think now). As soon as they are done (probably mid september) new exchanges will follow. (Please not that I'm not a dev and that those thoughts are my own)
|
|
|
|
RomanV
|
|
September 04, 2017, 04:46:47 PM |
|
As soon as the exchanges come, the investors and miners will follow. We have to be patient, due to the redesign dev are not supplying to new exchanges at the moment (at least that is what I think now). As soon as they are done (probably mid september) new exchanges will follow.
(Please not that I'm not a dev and that those thoughts are my own)
Yes, I'm patient. But after a month the botnet can pump out almost million coins in total. This very very bad..
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
September 04, 2017, 04:53:36 PM |
|
As soon as the exchanges come, the investors and miners will follow. We have to be patient, due to the redesign dev are not supplying to new exchanges at the moment (at least that is what I think now). As soon as they are done (probably mid september) new exchanges will follow.
(Please not that I'm not a dev and that those thoughts are my own)
Yes, I'm patient. But after a month the botnet can pump out almost million coins in total. This very very bad.. You're right, someone (we don't know if it is only one or a few) has lots of coins. I don't like this ether... But there was no dump the last weeks. Even though the price was quite ok. So I believe (or hope) that who ever has a big number of coins - won't dump them. Even though xmr would be more profitable to mine now, the botnet sticks to sumo. I'm not quite sure what this means... let's see...
|
|
|
|
RomanV
|
|
September 04, 2017, 05:39:06 PM |
|
You're right, someone (we don't know if it is only one or a few) has lots of coins. I don't like this ether... But there was no dump the last weeks. Even though the price was quite ok. So I believe (or hope) that who ever has a big number of coins - won't dump them.
Even though xmr would be more profitable to mine now, the botnet sticks to sumo. I'm not quite sure what this means... let's see...
Yes. But I think it unlikely. Prior to this, he just drops the coins on exchange. Can be just isn't there the ability to remotely control the bots. But, yes, i think will see soon..
|
|
|
|
Germining
|
|
September 04, 2017, 06:51:09 PM |
|
Let us wait and check what will happen. I bought my first sumo on 29/05 this year for almost 1.700 sat (and btc was about 2.000€ back then).
I'm quite relaxed about the current situaton. Sumo DEV are still great guys (even though they are a little bit quiet here). I think sumo has a big future. Let's wait and see... I won't sell my sumos in the next 12 to 24 month, that I'm sure of.
|
|
|
|
startsts
|
|
September 04, 2017, 11:37:11 PM |
|
I can not compile it on Ubuntu with libboost1.61, any ideas?
|
|
|
|
sumogr
|
|
September 05, 2017, 04:09:44 AM |
|
I can not compile it on Ubuntu with libboost1.61, any ideas?
What are you trying to compile my friend?
|
|
|
|
startsts
|
|
September 05, 2017, 06:03:58 AM |
|
I can not compile it on Ubuntu with libboost1.61, any ideas?
What are you trying to compile my friend? Sumo wallet the error output: [ 87%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/sumo-wallet-rpc /tmp/ccE8FuFF.ltrans2.ltrans.o: In function `__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > boost::re_detail_106100::re_is_set_member<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> >, unsigned int>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, boost::re_detail_106100::re_set_long<unsigned int> const*, boost::re_detail_106100::regex_data<char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> > > const&, bool)': <artificial> .text+0x5122): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform_primary(char const*, char const*) const' <artificial> .text+0x533d): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform(char const*, char const*) const' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status src/wallet/CMakeFiles/wallet_rpc_server.dir/build.make:128: recipe for target 'bin/sumo-wallet-rpc' failed
|
|
|
|
sumogr
|
|
September 05, 2017, 06:34:00 AM |
|
I can not compile it on Ubuntu with libboost1.61, any ideas?
What are you trying to compile my friend? Sumo wallet the error output: [ 87%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/sumo-wallet-rpc /tmp/ccE8FuFF.ltrans2.ltrans.o: In function `__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > boost::re_detail_106100::re_is_set_member<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> >, unsigned int>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, boost::re_detail_106100::re_set_long<unsigned int> const*, boost::re_detail_106100::regex_data<char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> > > const&, bool)': <artificial> .text+0x5122): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform_primary(char const*, char const*) const' <artificial> .text+0x533d): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform(char const*, char const*) const' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status src/wallet/CMakeFiles/wallet_rpc_server.dir/build.make:128: recipe for target 'bin/sumo-wallet-rpc' failed No need to compile it my friend. Its already compiled Since you are using an ubuntu terminal update your system with sudo apt-get update Download the wallet and the daemon with wget https://www.sumokoin.org/downloads/v0.1.2.0/sumokoin.linux.x64.v0-1-2-0.tar.bz2untar the files with tar jxfv sumokoin.linux.x64.v0-1-2-0.tar.bz2 run a screen (type screen) Press Ctrl + a and the Shift + S to split the screen Run on the upper terminal the daemon with ./sumokoind Go down now with Ctrl + a and then tab Press Ctrl + a and then c to get a prompt Type ./sumo-wallet-cli Follow the steps to create a new wallet Wait for the daemon to synchronise Type refresh on your wallet You are ready Nothing to compile
|
|
|
|
RomanV
|
|
September 05, 2017, 06:52:29 AM |
|
I can not compile it on Ubuntu with libboost1.61, any ideas?
What are you trying to compile my friend? Sumo wallet the error output: [ 87%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/sumo-wallet-rpc /tmp/ccE8FuFF.ltrans2.ltrans.o: In function `__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > boost::re_detail_106100::re_is_set_member<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> >, unsigned int>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, boost::re_detail_106100::re_set_long<unsigned int> const*, boost::re_detail_106100::regex_data<char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> > > const&, bool)': <artificial> .text+0x5122): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform_primary(char const*, char const*) const' <artificial> .text+0x533d): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform(char const*, char const*) const' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status src/wallet/CMakeFiles/wallet_rpc_server.dir/build.make:128: recipe for target 'bin/sumo-wallet-rpc' failed Need compile correct boost version, i think.
|
|
|
|
sumogr
|
|
September 05, 2017, 07:00:47 AM |
|
I can not compile it on Ubuntu with libboost1.61, any ideas?
What are you trying to compile my friend? Sumo wallet the error output: [ 87%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/sumo-wallet-rpc /tmp/ccE8FuFF.ltrans2.ltrans.o: In function `__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > boost::re_detail_106100::re_is_set_member<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> >, unsigned int>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char const*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, boost::re_detail_106100::re_set_long<unsigned int> const*, boost::re_detail_106100::regex_data<char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> > > const&, bool)': <artificial> .text+0x5122): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform_primary(char const*, char const*) const' <artificial> .text+0x533d): undefined reference to `boost::re_detail_106100::cpp_regex_traits_implementation<char>::transform(char const*, char const*) const' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status src/wallet/CMakeFiles/wallet_rpc_server.dir/build.make:128: recipe for target 'bin/sumo-wallet-rpc' failed Need compile correct boost version, i think. Roman indeed he needs to reinstall the dependencies but why try to compile something that is already compiled?
|
|
|
|
|