[ANN] [ICO] [WGR] | Wagerr | The Betting Blockchain | Bounties

[Cryptadonis]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

[Sowik]

Can someone who is not a paid shill explain why it's the 30th, and we still do not have our tokens?

Not looking good if they can't stick to a basic deadline. Shouldn't have ignored all of the red flags with this project.

And now we might end up with a memecoin on Waves... not sure if that's worse than Yobit yet.

Speaking about paid shills and you are using a Sock-Puppet account.  

Let me guess, you have been a reader on BCT for a long time and just now started posting.  lol

Would it be better if I using an account with 5000 shitposts, and a Wagerr signature? This forum is cancer.

Bounties and the shills participating in them are the real socks, since they're literally being paid to promote (aka shill) a coin.

Are you actually introducing yourself?  

I'm not begging scum... so I'd never participate in a shill campaign aka bounties. I'm guessing the person who replied to me, and you, are ones who have contributed nothing useful to this thread and have either smokescreened or trainwrecked legitimate questions from actual investors, as you're doing right now. And I'm guessing you both participated with Wagerr signatures, doing nothing but praising a coin that has offered literally nothing so far, not even tokens on the Waves platform. Anyone who has experience in this would know how disappointing that truly is.

No one has answered my question yet, so I'll repeat it:

Why haven't they they stuck to the deadline to deliver the tokens owed to us? Or have at least informed us, their investors, why they couldn't?

Looking at their website, which seems to be the only form of communication, they even went out of their way to change/edit/modify the original deadline for June 26th (how many more times will they do this in the future?).

It now reads:

Signature campaign ends
June 26th (11:59GMT), 2017

The bitcointalk signature campaign ends and all qualifying users are paid within the following week.

When originally it said, before the edit:

ICO token issuance
June 26th, 2017

All users are issued any Wagerr they have purchased, earned, or won as a reward or bonus. The blockchain network starts, and participants can withdraw Wagerr from wagerr.com accounts.

Now please, take David Mah out of your mouth. This should be worrying to anyone. I'd appreciate a response explaining my concerns, preferably not from the hivemind (of obvious shills).

Guys, is you seek this?

Try to remote

Nice try, but it was just edited yet again:

Here's the original...



Looking even more like a scam now.

You are starting to sound dumb now.
Take a look at the Google Cache from 26 June: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://wagerr.com/roadmap

As you can see the arrow is there, the arrow is there even in your pic. You were just too blind to see it or too dumb to click it I guess.

[Cryptadonis]

Can someone who is not a paid shill explain why it's the 30th, and we still do not have our tokens?

Not looking good if they can't stick to a basic deadline. Shouldn't have ignored all of the red flags with this project.

And now we might end up with a memecoin on Waves... not sure if that's worse than Yobit yet.

Speaking about paid shills and you are using a Sock-Puppet account.  

Let me guess, you have been a reader on BCT for a long time and just now started posting.  lol

Would it be better if I using an account with 5000 shitposts, and a Wagerr signature? This forum is cancer.

Bounties and the shills participating in them are the real socks, since they're literally being paid to promote (aka shill) a coin.

Are you actually introducing yourself?  

I'm not begging scum... so I'd never participate in a shill campaign aka bounties. I'm guessing the person who replied to me, and you, are ones who have contributed nothing useful to this thread and have either smokescreened or trainwrecked legitimate questions from actual investors, as you're doing right now. And I'm guessing you both participated with Wagerr signatures, doing nothing but praising a coin that has offered literally nothing so far, not even tokens on the Waves platform. Anyone who has experience in this would know how disappointing that truly is.

No one has answered my question yet, so I'll repeat it:

Why haven't they they stuck to the deadline to deliver the tokens owed to us? Or have at least informed us, their investors, why they couldn't?

Looking at their website, which seems to be the only form of communication, they even went out of their way to change/edit/modify the original deadline for June 26th (how many more times will they do this in the future?).

It now reads:

Signature campaign ends
June 26th (11:59GMT), 2017

The bitcointalk signature campaign ends and all qualifying users are paid within the following week.

When originally it said, before the edit:

ICO token issuance
June 26th, 2017

All users are issued any Wagerr they have purchased, earned, or won as a reward or bonus. The blockchain network starts, and participants can withdraw Wagerr from wagerr.com accounts.

Now please, take David Mah out of your mouth. This should be worrying to anyone. I'd appreciate a response explaining my concerns, preferably not from the hivemind (of obvious shills).

Guys, is you seek this?
http://fastpic.co/image/PCYYxr
Try to remote

Nice try, but it was just edited yet again:

Here's the original...

https://i.imgur.com/M2Y4kpn.png

Looking even more like a scam now.

You are starting to sound dumb now.
Take a look at the Google Cache from 26 June: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://wagerr.com/roadmap

As you can see the arrow is there, the arrow is there even in your pic. You were just too blind to see it or too dumb to click it I guess.

Alright then, the date says 26 June and it's now the 30th. So where the fuck are our tokens?

[Deinemama]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Please respond

[lucidwater]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Haha! Yeah! They can simply wait for a day or two to piss off their stakes at Waves if they have no faith in it.

But I don't think one who is able to sabotage his own ship does actually have any coins!  

[kilo17]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Please respond

I have 9 BTC worth, how much are you paying?  

or 239,000 tokens

[Cryptadonis]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Haha! Yeah! They can simply wait for a day or two to piss off their stakes at Waves if they have no faith in it.

But I don't think one who is able to sabotage his own ship does actually have any coins!  

It's been four so far, with no updates from the team. Doesn't give much confidence and lacks any professionalism. I'd even accept an email where they apologize for not sticking to their first important deadline, and that they were working on it with an explanation on why they're behind. Are they going to manually be giving out tokens, going through each account separately? They have funds now, they should at least hire someone competent enough to handle distribution. Or even pay someone to keep us updated, for that matter.

Also, since no one seems to point out the following inconsistency: "The blockchain network starts", which is listed on the 26th... but their TestNet releases late Q4 2017. I mean what blockchain network? They don't even have one... and we don't even know if anything is even in development because their github is still empty. Again, red flags everywhere, but I'll let you guys make your own judgement from now on because I really don't care if you end up losing from this.


This is all we literally have on the code side of things:

 # HTML5-Wallet
-Wagerr HTML5 Wallet Develeopment
+Wagerr HTML5 Wallet Development

A 2 lined readme... which needed typo fixing.

[Deinemama]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Please respond

I have 9 BTC worth, how much are you paying?  

or 239,000 tokens

Send you PM

[lucidwater]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Haha! Yeah! They can simply wait for a day or two to piss off their stakes at Waves if they have no faith in it.

But I don't think one who is able to sabotage his own ship does actually have any coins!  

It's been three so far, with no updates from the team. Doesn't give much confidence and lacks any professionalism. I'd even accept an email where they apologize for not sticking to their first important deadline, and that they were working on it with an explanation on why they're behind. Are they going to manually be giving out tokens, going through each account separately? They have funds now, they should at least hire someone competent enough to handle distribution. Or even pay someone to keep us updated, for that matter.

Also, since no one seems to point out the following inconsistency: "The blockchain network starts", which is listed on the 26th... but their TestNet releases late Q4 2017. I mean what blockchain network? They don't even have one... and we don't even know if anything is even in development because their github is still empty. Again, red flags everywhere, but I'll let you guys make your own judgement from now on because I really don't care if you end up losing from this.


This is all we literally have on the code side of things:

 # HTML5-Wallet
-Wagerr HTML5 Wallet Develeopment
+Wagerr HTML5 Wallet Development

A 2 lined readme... which needed typo fixing.

Hahahaha! Obvious distortion! A stupid liar shit!

No "The blockchain network starts on the 26th" mentioned in the roadmap. "TestNet release - late Q3 2017" clearly stated.

The demo wallet is an encrypted exe. How do you know if it is written in HTML5?

Are you ambushing on GitHub all days for their source code for clone project? You better don't waste your shit!

 

[Cryptadonis]

Click to right arrow. It is 2 (two) stages on 26 june. Or I don't understand a problem?
Are you say about withdraw?

The original page, in my screenshot, did not have an "extra arrow" or blip for a second 26 June entry... There was just one until I pointed it out on here.

Why even have 2 blips for the same date anyways? That makes no sense... it was added afterwards.

This coin is sketchy and I'll be getting out as soon as a possibly can. Good luck to anyone else who's invested even more than have.

PM me I'll buy your coins.

Sure. Add me on Skype: CryptoAnna

Haha! Yeah! They can simply wait for a day or two to piss off their stakes at Waves if they have no faith in it.

But I don't think one who is able to sabotage his own ship does actually have any coins!  

It's been three so far, with no updates from the team. Doesn't give much confidence and lacks any professionalism. I'd even accept an email where they apologize for not sticking to their first important deadline, and that they were working on it with an explanation on why they're behind. Are they going to manually be giving out tokens, going through each account separately? They have funds now, they should at least hire someone competent enough to handle distribution. Or even pay someone to keep us updated, for that matter.

Also, since no one seems to point out the following inconsistency: "The blockchain network starts", which is listed on the 26th... but their TestNet releases late Q4 2017. I mean what blockchain network? They don't even have one... and we don't even know if anything is even in development because their github is still empty. Again, red flags everywhere, but I'll let you guys make your own judgement from now on because I really don't care if you end up losing from this.


This is all we literally have on the code side of things:

 # HTML5-Wallet
-Wagerr HTML5 Wallet Develeopment
+Wagerr HTML5 Wallet Development

A 2 lined readme... which needed typo fixing.

Hahahaha! Obvious distortion! A stupid liar shit!

No "The blockchain network starts on the 26th" mentioned in the roadmap. "TestNet releast - late Q3 2017" clearly stated.

The demo wallet is an encrypted exe. How do you know if it is written in HTML5?

Are you ambushing on GitHub all days for their source code for clone project? You better don't waste your shit!

 

Click the second 26 June blip and read it. I understand why having two blips for no reason is causing confusion, because it did the same for me... which yes, I jumped the gun on, but I'm a little concerned about what's happening with our tokens.

The demo wallet is an encrypted exe. How do you know if it is written in HTML5?

Because of this: https://github.com/wagerr/HTML5-Wallet

And lol, not ambushing anyone's github to steal their code, bud. Just stating a few facts... At this point in time, playing roulette is a better investment.

[lucidwater]

The demo wallet is an encrypted exe. How do you know if it is written in HTML5?

Because of this: https://github.com/wagerr/HTML5-Wallet

And lol, not ambushing anyone's github to steal their code, bud. Just stating a few facts... At this point in time, playing roulette is a better investment.

Haha! You may try to null the exe wallet if you can!

You have not even read through the Wagerr website properly before launching this sabotage. Why must your boss pay you?  

[Cryptadonis]

The demo wallet is an encrypted exe. How do you know if it is written in HTML5?

Because of this: https://github.com/wagerr/HTML5-Wallet

And lol, not ambushing anyone's github to steal their code, bud. Just stating a few facts... At this point in time, playing roulette is a better investment.

Haha! You may try to null the exe wallet if you can!

You have not even read through the Wagerr website properly before launching this sabotage. Why must your boss pay you?  

The exe wallet was a non-functional demo. And they'll need their own blockchain before they can issue their own tokens... which is nowhere in site.

https://i.imgur.com/WV3xkqV.png

See you at the roulette table.

[Mr.Charlie]

good grief, chill out people!

All you complainers better hope to strike it rich in cryptoland because you are not worth a shit in real life.

[lucidwater]

The demo wallet is an encrypted exe. How do you know if it is written in HTML5?

Because of this: https://github.com/wagerr/HTML5-Wallet

And lol, not ambushing anyone's github to steal their code, bud. Just stating a few facts... At this point in time, playing roulette is a better investment.

Haha! You may try to null the exe wallet if you can!

You have not even read through the Wagerr website properly before launching this sabotage. Why must your boss pay you?  

The exe wallet was a non-functional demo. And they'll need their own blockchain before they can issue their own tokens... which is nowhere in site.



See you at the roulette table.

Fucking obvious distortion again!

"Head to Head Betting      Q4 2017

The blockchain mediates bets between two players taking opposite sides on upcoming sporting events. The fee for an executed contract is 2% of the payout. 1% goes to the processing Oracle and 1% gets burned." clearly stated.

Take your time to read through the whole website and come back later! Bye ~

[Cryptadonis]

Eh, that's what you/we get for investing into a company which has literally nothing but a 1) flashy website 2) empty promises 3) and zero code, I mean absolutely zero code.

Enjoy the bags, dumbfucks  

[Mrjitter]

Hey guys .. news

I see in my wagerr account the withdraw button ...  :-) so,  we can send the tokens to waves wallet

[lucidwater]

Hey guys .. news

I see in my wagerr account the withdraw button ...  :-) so,  we can send the tokens to waves wallet

But it is still recommended to wait for the announcement for proper instruction to avoid messy incidents happened on Waves. Haha! However we are all new!

Good Luck fellows!

It's okay for urgency if you need it. Don't feel sorry for yourself.

[Mrjitter]

Hey guys .. news

I see in my wagerr account the withdraw button ...  :-) so,  we can send the tokens to waves wallet

But it is still recommended to wait for the announcement for proper instruction to avoid messy incidents happened on Waves. Haha! However we are all new!

Good Luck fellows!

It's okay for urgency if you need it. Don't feel sorry for yourself.

i agree, better wait for the official announcement.

[marcelocoin]

Anyone know when it will be listed Wagerr in Coinmarketcap thank you!

[Mr.Charlie]

Eh, that's what you/we get for investing into a company which has literally nothing but a 1) flashy website 2) empty promises 3) and zero code, I mean absolutely zero code.

Enjoy the bags, dumbfucks  

Hey Cryptadick, say this out loud for hanging in a thread you hate you loser.

eye wee todd did