cryptopepe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2017, 04:39:51 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Xaba05xaba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2017, 04:58:52 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. 65mh/s on ccminer 2.2.2 +100core/+300mem/100Pl
|
|
|
|
cryptopepe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2017, 05:04:55 AM |
|
I have MSI Afterburner set up 78% PL, Core +150, Mem +400 and they still mining over 70Mh/s.
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
|
October 19, 2017, 05:16:52 AM |
|
i been using MPH, seems like they do not too bad, hit some blocks. i was using zpool, but their pools all of puttered out now, no more miners Keep in mind if its just suprnova pool reporting 50% efficiency that's a known visual bug in the MpoS pool system, as long as your miner isn't showing that many rejects your smiling Thanks, this one really looks better. How long does it takes for your coins to become confirmed? Mine are showing Unconfirmed for about 20 hours already zcoin's "coinbase maturity" is quite high, like 120 confirms, mixed with the block time of like 10-15 mininutes, ya, it takes like 24 hours for coins to be confirmed, if not 36 That's just how the coin is coded tho, BTC itself needs 50 confirms before you can spend fresh mined coins Im mining some DGB again, it's easy to mine, and low in market, maybe see 600 again ;p
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool!
|
|
|
mak013
|
|
October 19, 2017, 06:26:33 AM Last edit: October 19, 2017, 07:54:22 AM by mak013 |
|
zcoin's "coinbase maturity" is quite high, like 120 confirms, mixed with the block time of like 10-15 mininutes, ya, it takes like 24 hours for coins to be confirmed, if not 36 That's just how the coin is coded tho, BTC itself needs 50 confirms before you can spend fresh mined coins Im mining some DGB again, it's easy to mine, and low in market, maybe see 600 again ;p if u want to main zcoin for long time - it`s not a big problem. just if u want to sell quick but if u minig DGB - this isn`t your choice to trade
|
|
|
|
daboehla
|
|
October 19, 2017, 08:37:24 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. I think you don't have latest ccminer. I use the ccminer from OneClickMiner. Here it says version: "ccminer 1.8.3". Here I get about 71Mh/s https://github.com/vertcoin/One-Click-Miner/releases
|
|
|
|
tpd09
|
|
October 19, 2017, 08:41:08 AM |
|
Tries so far: - Monacoin @ Suprnova, instead of +- 400MH/s that was shown on miner I was getting 250 to 320 on pool, so not worth at all. - Dual mining ETH + Lbry @ Ethminer / Nicehash, profit almost as good as ZEC (-10% more or less), much less stress over the GPU ( ?) as the temps dropped a lot during this tests (+- 5 to 10ºC less than ZEC mining). 205 MH/s @ ETH and 480 to 5500 MH/s @ LBRY with -dcri 100, lowering dcri for me didn't changed earnings on ETH a lot (205 to 208 +-) but reduced LBRY considerably, being dcri 30 equal to 250 MH/s @ LBRY. can you please share your command line? for some reason nicehash only shows eth as being mined with my line
|
|
|
|
hyet24
|
|
October 19, 2017, 09:24:12 AM |
|
i been using MPH, seems like they do not too bad, hit some blocks. i was using zpool, but their pools all of puttered out now, no more miners Keep in mind if its just suprnova pool reporting 50% efficiency that's a known visual bug in the MpoS pool system, as long as your miner isn't showing that many rejects your smiling Thanks, this one really looks better. How long does it takes for your coins to become confirmed? Mine are showing Unconfirmed for about 20 hours already zcoin's "coinbase maturity" is quite high, like 120 confirms, mixed with the block time of like 10-15 mininutes, ya, it takes like 24 hours for coins to be confirmed, if not 36 That's just how the coin is coded tho, BTC itself needs 50 confirms before you can spend fresh mined coins Im mining some DGB again, it's easy to mine, and low in market, maybe see 600 again ;p Zcoin's 120 confirms is nothing compare to my strategy. Mining now is knowledge, patience, and luck. I decided to go Monacoin after looking at the past charts that it did hit 28k before. So I calculate ahead at 28k. I would make about $18 per day with 4x 1080ti. I got lucky by holding those coins. lol All those days mining Monacoin calculated around $50-$60 a day from 4x 1080ti. Instead of cashing out within 1 day. I cash out every time I see a good sell and it could take weeks. It's risky but very rewarding. Also reason Monacoin instead of others. Past charts did gave me a pattern that was easy to figure out. Again I can't guarantee. SIGT was one of my picks but I cash out half just in case.
|
|
|
|
AY000804
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2017, 10:25:32 AM |
|
when it come to mining , holding coin is really important. if you don't have the patient and luck , mining is really not that profitable compare to other investment.
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
|
October 19, 2017, 11:18:07 AM |
|
i been using MPH, seems like they do not too bad, hit some blocks. i was using zpool, but their pools all of puttered out now, no more miners Keep in mind if its just suprnova pool reporting 50% efficiency that's a known visual bug in the MpoS pool system, as long as your miner isn't showing that many rejects your smiling Thanks, this one really looks better. How long does it takes for your coins to become confirmed? Mine are showing Unconfirmed for about 20 hours already Im mining some DGB again, it's easy to mine, and low in market, maybe see 600 again ;p thats a terrible move. Mine something more profitable , sell it and buy your DGB, you will have a lot more.
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
|
October 19, 2017, 11:21:24 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. use the old ccminer from 2015 if you dont want to use OCM and pay their silly 2% fee for a miner they didnt made. Also, run your own p2pool and remove the 1% network fee. How much VTC are you geting per day with your 1080Ti ?
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
|
October 19, 2017, 11:22:38 AM |
|
when it come to mining , holding coin is really important. if you don't have the patient and luck , mining is really not that profitable compare to other investment.
many people need the money to pay the gear they bought and the electricity bill.
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
|
October 19, 2017, 11:28:19 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. I think you don't have latest ccminer. I use the ccminer from OneClickMiner. Here it says version: "ccminer 1.8.3". Here I get about 71Mh/s https://github.com/vertcoin/One-Click-Miner/releasesthis one has a 2% fee even if 99%of the code is from someone else, rather pathetic IMO. I use the old one from 2015, its the same they are using (you can find a link on reddit) but it doesnt have any fee and it is also open source. A tad slower but no fees. I cant see the difference over a week.
|
|
|
|
cryptopepe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2017, 11:32:10 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. I think you don't have latest ccminer. I use the ccminer from OneClickMiner. Here it says version: "ccminer 1.8.3". Here I get about 71Mh/s https://github.com/vertcoin/One-Click-Miner/releasesLatest official ccminer is 2.2.1
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
|
October 19, 2017, 11:37:40 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. I think you don't have latest ccminer. I use the ccminer from OneClickMiner. Here it says version: "ccminer 1.8.3". Here I get about 71Mh/s https://github.com/vertcoin/One-Click-Miner/releasesLatest official ccminer is 2.2.1 2.2.1 (official) is really not that great for VTC and he was talking about the latest from the VTC dev team, a fork of a 2015 version.
|
|
|
|
zimmix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2017, 01:15:25 PM |
|
Tries so far: - Monacoin @ Suprnova, instead of +- 400MH/s that was shown on miner I was getting 250 to 320 on pool, so not worth at all. - Dual mining ETH + Lbry @ Ethminer / Nicehash, profit almost as good as ZEC (-10% more or less), much less stress over the GPU ( ?) as the temps dropped a lot during this tests (+- 5 to 10ºC less than ZEC mining). 205 MH/s @ ETH and 480 to 5500 MH/s @ LBRY with -dcri 100, lowering dcri for me didn't changed earnings on ETH a lot (205 to 208 +-) but reduced LBRY considerably, being dcri 30 equal to 250 MH/s @ LBRY. can you please share your command line? for some reason nicehash only shows eth as being mined with my line Sure, there it goes: -wd 1 -r 1 -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal $walletETH.$rigName -epsw x -asm 0 -dpool stratum+tcp://lbry.br.nicehash.com:3356 -dwal <your_btc_wallet_here>.$rigName -dpsw x -dcoin lbc -dcri 100 Note that this line is for ETH pool mining and LBRY nicehash mining, if you want to use eth at nicehash as well, you need to set the parameter "-esm 3".
|
|
|
|
mak013
|
|
October 20, 2017, 06:55:46 AM |
|
Hi all, I tried NiceHash yesterday (only for test) and their aplication mining 71Mh/s per 1080Ti for Lyra2rev2. With overclocking I never exceeded 61Mh/s with ccminer. Does anyone know, where is problem? Thank you. I think you don't have latest ccminer. I use the ccminer from OneClickMiner. Here it says version: "ccminer 1.8.3". Here I get about 71Mh/s https://github.com/vertcoin/One-Click-Miner/releasesLatest official ccminer is 2.2.1 latest ccminer is 2.2.2. https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releasesbut it`s not really good for different algo. using alexis, palgin, CP, sp versions for different algos.
|
|
|
|
Makak4R
|
|
October 20, 2017, 07:09:35 AM |
|
I wonder if there would be optimized miner for equihash for 1080ti? cause this is really will help to pump the hash rate - usually we can assume that one 1080ti is equivalent of two 1070s. one 1070 pushes 450 h/s in ZEC, so 1080ti should do about 900 h/s, but in reality 750-770 h/s, so we have potential for 20% imporval..
I wonder who can do that?
|
|
|
|
mak013
|
|
October 20, 2017, 07:23:01 AM |
|
I wonder if there would be optimized miner for equihash for 1080ti? cause this is really will help to pump the hash rate - usually we can assume that one 1080ti is equivalent of two 1070s. one 1070 pushes 450 h/s in ZEC, so 1080ti should do about 900 h/s, but in reality 750-770 h/s, so we have potential for 20% imporval..
I wonder who can do that?
i don`t think so. we have GDDRx on 1080ti. even 11GB can`t make it quick enough.
|
|
|
|
Temporel
|
|
October 20, 2017, 09:14:35 AM |
|
I wonder if there would be optimized miner for equihash for 1080ti? cause this is really will help to pump the hash rate - usually we can assume that one 1080ti is equivalent of two 1070s. one 1070 pushes 450 h/s in ZEC, so 1080ti should do about 900 h/s, but in reality 750-770 h/s, so we have potential for 20% imporval..
I wonder who can do that?
even 11GB can`t make it quick enough. size of memory has nothing to do with speed
|
|
|
|
|