Any word on amd vega hash rates?

[l1xx]

Hey , can someone help me setting up my Vega rigs for xmr mining ?

I had a perfect setup using xmr-stak-amd , with 1407/1100 settings, all cards reg modded etc.

Now with the new XMR-STAK I am facing following problem - all shares are rejected by the pool, when using these settings even with a single thread. Pressing R shows low difficulty share errors , wtf?

Oddly enough, I am getting all good results using the ETH settings I am using - 875 core / 1100 memory. Hashrate is significantly lower of course.

Any idea how to set this up right?

what are you mining?  Have you updated your miner?  Few cryptonight coins have forked out to different variants of cryptonight algos

I just tried it on XMR . Using self compiled 2.3.1 xmr stak. Also tried the precompiled  nanopool 2.4.1 version - same result.
I have zero xp with this version of the  miner, like I said - I've been using the old xmr-stak-amd with bc drivers ever since I have the rigs (already 7 months).

So what can be wrong here? What are the optimal settings with this new miner?

[1714749272]

1714749272

[1714749272]

1714749272

[1714749272]

1714749272

[1714749272]

1714749272

[1714749272]

1714749272

[heavyarms1912]

I just tried it on XMR . Using self compiled 2.3.1 xmr stak. Also tried the precompiled  nanopool 2.4.1 version - same result.
I have zero xp with this version of the  miner, like I said - I've been using the old xmr-stak-amd with bc drivers ever since I have the rigs (already 7 months).

So what can be wrong here? What are the optimal settings with this new miner?

I haven't tried mining xmr recently.  Did you try running it from scratch and not using old config files? 1932 intensity and 2 threads used to give best results for cryptonight-normal algo.

EDIT: Just tried it on 2.4.2.  I get the same old 1960 H/s @ 1408/1100 clocks.

[amanda89]

any best dual-thread intensity setting for xmr stak cryptonote-heavy?

[Rumayanhi]

just wait for the consumer cards to get into the wild so the programmers can play with them before we know their real potential.  By all accounts it seems it will be incremental instead of revolutionary .

[djkice]

any best dual-thread intensity setting for xmr stak cryptonote-heavy?

I"m having same issue.

"gpu_threads_conf" : [
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 6,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

getting around 700 per vega 56
v64 bios and 1350/100


 has anyone been able to achieve better on cryptonote-h ?

[netmebtc]

any best dual-thread intensity setting for xmr stak cryptonote-heavy?

I"m having same issue.

"gpu_threads_conf" : [
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 6,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

getting around 700 per vega 56
v64 bios and 1350/100


 has anyone been able to achieve better on cryptonote-h ?

try this para:

"gpu_threads_conf" : [
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 10,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 10,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

[heavyarms1912]

any best dual-thread intensity setting for xmr stak cryptonote-heavy?

I"m having same issue.

"gpu_threads_conf" : [
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 6,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

getting around 700 per vega 56
v64 bios and 1350/100


 has anyone been able to achieve better on cryptonote-h ?

700 is too low.
I get 1500 on CNH.

[CobaltPH]

I am trying to mine cryptonight-heavy with my Vega 64 but the pools, despite accepting all the shares produced, only show about 10% of the hashrate that xmr-stak reports... I know it's not a visual bug because after 24 hours I mined 10% of what was to be expected.

If someone is not having this problem, please let me know the coin and the pool to try.

[cubbo]

Hey , can someone help me setting up my Vega rigs for xmr mining ?

I had a perfect setup using xmr-stak-amd , with 1407/1100 settings, all cards reg modded etc.

Now with the new XMR-STAK I am facing following problem - all shares are rejected by the pool, when using these settings even with a single thread. Pressing R shows low difficulty share errors , wtf?

Oddly enough, I am getting all good results using the ETH settings I am using - 875 core / 1100 memory. Hashrate is significantly lower of course.

Any idea how to set this up right?

I'm not sure if this is applicable to the problem you are having but i was experiencing the same "low difficulty share errors" when trying to mine stellite today.

The fix was to use the new version of Cast_xmr (version 092) and the --algo switch to tell it to use the new algorithm ( the --algo is not a mistype). It would not work until that switch was in the bat file. Here is a copy of my .bat file but please note that i am using 2 Vega 64 cards so you will have to change the -g switch to your own requirements. And i am still using the Blockchain version of the amd drivers.

cast_xmr-vega -S stellite.ingest.cryptoknight.cc:16223 -u Se3Az8q18VrRxivgz6W4JHHyBqSQtnBg3ck8Wj5Zf4s91yjLCD3qru3j1ukF3xh1mVA9WRL9fN63G6L niNd7yfWr19iVYLq3p PSW: x --algo=1 -G 0,1 -R --forcecompute

Hope this is of some help.

[heavyarms1912]

I am trying to mine cryptonight-heavy with my Vega 64 but the pools, despite accepting all the shares produced, only show about 10% of the hashrate that xmr-stak reports... I know it's not a visual bug because after 24 hours I mined 10% of what was to be expected.

If someone is not having this problem, please let me know the coin and the pool to try.

I am on fairpool and the hashrates reflected at pool side is similar.

[heavyarms1912]

Hey , can someone help me setting up my Vega rigs for xmr mining ?

I had a perfect setup using xmr-stak-amd , with 1407/1100 settings, all cards reg modded etc.

Now with the new XMR-STAK I am facing following problem - all shares are rejected by the pool, when using these settings even with a single thread. Pressing R shows low difficulty share errors , wtf?

Oddly enough, I am getting all good results using the ETH settings I am using - 875 core / 1100 memory. Hashrate is significantly lower of course.

Any idea how to set this up right?

what are you mining?  Have you updated your miner?  Few cryptonight coins have forked out to different variants of cryptonight algos

I just tried it on XMR . Using self compiled 2.3.1 xmr stak. Also tried the precompiled  nanopool 2.4.1 version - same result.
I have zero xp with this version of the  miner, like I said - I've been using the old xmr-stak-amd with bc drivers ever since I have the rigs (already 7 months).

So what can be wrong here? What are the optimal settings with this new miner?

did you change the currency to xyz? (eg. sumokoin) or still have it as cryptonight?  You need to change the appropriate currency in xmr-stak settings.  

[ntshb]

@heavyarms1912

do you use the same soft_pp mod for your vega 64s (if u have 64s ofc)?
Or do you have a different one for 64s? If so can u post that one too?

Yes.  Although mine's a Vega 56 BIOS modded to V64.


EDIT:  Got better results on xmr-stak for crytonight-heavy.  Now get 1500 H/s at 1408/1100 clocks and 160w power from wall
https://imgur.com/a/fT38L

so this is even if you disable enable the vegas, uploaded the reg mod, (basically the standard way)?

didnt know the hashrate dropped that much, I thought you should be getting 2kh/s just like before the fork

[Mohondoa]

ooohh that's too bad to hear that, i'm planning to try mining using vega gpu. btw thanks for the information. I will think again to use it. I still love rx 580 then. Instead of wasting money it's better to keep the old ones. 

[Archangel9999]

@heavyarms1912

do you use the same soft_pp mod for your vega 64s (if u have 64s ofc)?
Or do you have a different one for 64s? If so can u post that one too?

Yes.  Although mine's a Vega 56 BIOS modded to V64.


EDIT:  Got better results on xmr-stak for crytonight-heavy.  Now get 1500 H/s at 1408/1100 clocks and 160w power from wall
https://imgur.com/a/fT38L

Hello what miner settings you are using ?

Thanks

[kristikun]

heya i´v been looking for alternative for cryptonight for my vegas and i found Claymore´s neosrypt miner in  which vega can hit 2,2 mhrate any1 using it ? seems like more profitable atm

[rednoW]

heya i´v been looking for alternative for cryptonight for my vegas and i found Claymore´s neosrypt miner in  which vega can hit 2,2 mhrate any1 using it ? seems like more profitable atm

It will take 250-280 watt per properly downvolted card to achieve this speed. Not good at all ((

[heavyarms1912]

@heavyarms1912

do you use the same soft_pp mod for your vega 64s (if u have 64s ofc)?
Or do you have a different one for 64s? If so can u post that one too?

Yes.  Although mine's a Vega 56 BIOS modded to V64.


EDIT:  Got better results on xmr-stak for crytonight-heavy.  Now get 1500 H/s at 1408/1100 clocks and 160w power from wall
https://imgur.com/a/fT38L

so this is even if you disable enable the vegas, uploaded the reg mod, (basically the standard way)?

didnt know the hashrate dropped that much, I thought you should be getting 2kh/s just like before the fork

you won't get similar performance before the fork.  The algorithm isn't cryptonight anymore it's cryptonight-heavy (more memory intensive).

Hello what miner settings you are using ?
Thanks

Check few pages back.  I posted my views.

New results.  I have been testing on 18.3.4drivers and get 1460 H/s @ 1485/1100 clocks @ 906mV

[ntshb]

@heavyarms1912

do you use the same soft_pp mod for your vega 64s (if u have 64s ofc)?
Or do you have a different one for 64s? If so can u post that one too?

Yes.  Although mine's a Vega 56 BIOS modded to V64.


EDIT:  Got better results on xmr-stak for crytonight-heavy.  Now get 1500 H/s at 1408/1100 clocks and 160w power from wall
https://imgur.com/a/fT38L

so this is even if you disable enable the vegas, uploaded the reg mod, (basically the standard way)?

didnt know the hashrate dropped that much, I thought you should be getting 2kh/s just like before the fork

you won't get similar performance before the fork.  The algorithm isn't cryptonight anymore it's cryptonight-heavy (more memory intensive).

Hello what miner settings you are using ?
Thanks

Check few pages back.  I posted my views.

New results.  I have been testing on 18.3.4drivers and get 1460 H/s @ 1485/1100 clocks @ 906mV

so what kind of hashrate am i expecting from a vega 64 or 56 flashed to 64?

1.7-1.8k ?

[rednoW]

@heavyarms1912

do you use the same soft_pp mod for your vega 64s (if u have 64s ofc)?
Or do you have a different one for 64s? If so can u post that one too?

Yes.  Although mine's a Vega 56 BIOS modded to V64.


EDIT:  Got better results on xmr-stak for crytonight-heavy.  Now get 1500 H/s at 1408/1100 clocks and 160w power from wall
https://imgur.com/a/fT38L

so this is even if you disable enable the vegas, uploaded the reg mod, (basically the standard way)?

didnt know the hashrate dropped that much, I thought you should be getting 2kh/s just like before the fork

you won't get similar performance before the fork.  The algorithm isn't cryptonight anymore it's cryptonight-heavy (more memory intensive).

Hello what miner settings you are using ?
Thanks

Check few pages back.  I posted my views.

New results.  I have been testing on 18.3.4drivers and get 1460 H/s @ 1485/1100 clocks @ 906mV

so what kind of hashrate am i expecting from a vega 64 or 56 flashed to 64?

1.7-1.8k ?

In my tests my ref vega56 flashed to vega64 and running 1408/1150 was doing 1500-1540h/s on cryptonight heavy. But with original vega64 aio I cannot get more than 1450h/s. And all this have stability issues and hashrate drops when running together in a rig, not one by one. Very weird ((

[Permonik]

Hi,
I am just find out that new driver from 22.3. is a trouble maker for vega frontier edition (liquid cooling) - I am unable tu change the clocks, even the fan rpm. It´s just not working...
And one more thing, for normal vega 64 LC is a max fan rpm lowered from 3300 to 1500 for vega FE is the same. Why they are did this?
Anyone find out how to change clock? (Except soft power table)
THX