BiblePay - New Coin Launch - Official Thread

[_Dawid_]

The idea of that coin is something new for me, but very exciting. Is bible coin related to any religion? I'm interested about impact on that currency whoch could it bring as a consequence. But hopefully wont be damaging.The fact that you count charity activity is very constructive, and for sure will bring much good for coin and needy. If that coin will help people, I hope we will be able to see more that projects, i approve it and your hard work.

[1715098538]

1715098538

[1715098538]

1715098538

[1715098538]

1715098538

[1715098538]

1715098538

[bible_pay]

but still isnt full power like on linux = ROBERT can you check continuously? there is still place for improvement

 

You and your Oliwer mate are such slave drivers... i wouldnt want to work for u =D =D

How about , pay him? And he "might" actually focus on what "you" want. =D

We only fight for our right;)
 isn't devs get a small amount of coins from each block?

BTW. Hash2 has rised, but vpu usage now is jumping. Before was stable.
P.S. Thank You Bible_pay

No- we dont get anything, and have to "create" the project.  We only get something after sactuaries go live if the IT expenses are approved.

[bible_pay]

So it looks like we made a little progress on the windows side today- the newest version seems to improve the hash speed on windows single processor machines (and Probably the Ryzen), but it does not improve the multiprocessor machines (like the xeon) yet, feel free to download v1.0.3.8:
www.biblepay.org

Ill keep working on the xeon hash speed next.

Is there a real problem or is it a reporting problem.

My two nearly identical machines (the Linux has 2GB more RAM and runs on USB vs my Win7) show dramatically different hashps on getmininginfo (1.0.3.7) but pretty much do within about 10-15% actual shares/ H2pS.  I'm going to spin up another Win7 that will be exactly the same setup (same router even) as the Linux box (minus it running from HDD vs USB) and see how they compare.

Maybe- Im checking that too.  I certainly see a similar net result, but, I dont see any errors in measurements in the code, so Ill keep checking.  Either way, the xeon multiprocessor is performing horribly.

[xxkaiwaxx]

Is bible coin related to any religion?

I think u just answered your own question ^^"

Or if your still confused.. maybe check out http://biblepay.org

[remtiwk]

 Either way, the xeon multiprocessor is performing horribly.

I have a dual processor setup with two Intel Xeon CPU E5-2620s.. and I can confirm that is horrible. My regular desktops are performing better than the Xeon's.

[616westwarmoth]

We only fight for our right;)
 isn't devs get a small amount of coins from each block?

BTW. Hash2 has rised, but vpu usage now is jumping. Before was stable.
P.S. Thank You Bible_pay

One of the strongest selling points of this coin is there was ZERO premine for the Dev, there is ZERO block reward for the Dev.  The only perk the Dev is getting (and I'm glad he changed his mind on this) is once Sanctuaries go live (i.e., Masternodes) the Sanctuaries get 10%, and the Orphan Fund goes from 10% to "expense" fund at 15%, of which a maximum of 5% can go for anything other than charity.  So he did finally carve out a small piece that could go to him, but the Sanctuaries will have to approve which shows a lot of either a) Character or b) Faith.

[slovakia]

but still isnt full power like on linux = ROBERT can you check continuously? there is still place for improvement

 

You and your Oliwer mate are such slave drivers... i wouldnt want to work for u =D =D

How about , pay him? And he "might" actually focus on what "you" want. =D

i really now 60dollars for 2 orphans   .... dont understand you  

[xxkaiwaxx]

but still isnt full power like on linux = ROBERT can you check continuously? there is still place for improvement

 

You and your Oliwer mate are such slave drivers... i wouldnt want to work for u =D =D

How about , pay him? And he "might" actually focus on what "you" want. =D

i paid now 60dollars for 2 orphans .... dotn understand you 

Who did u pay 60 dollars?

You paid the Dev?

Of course you dont understand me. You can only hear the noise in your own head 

[slovakia]

xxkaiwaxx i see that somebody do funny from my help to children...... is not the satisfaction of paying to someone whom I see and need my money as someone who doesnt not?  
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe

[xxkaiwaxx]

xxkaiwaxx i see that somebody do funny from my help to children...... is not the satisfaction of paying to someone whom I see and need my money as someone who doesnt not?  
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe

Ahh my bad. I thought u meant orphan "blocks" lol ^^".

Ill take your word for it then

But to me... that still doesn't give you a license to "rush" the Dev for your cause.

Your not the only one who donates to those in need here

[inblue]

xxkaiwaxx i see that somebody do funny from my help to children...... is not the satisfaction of paying to someone whom I see and need my money as someone who doesnt not?  
ach jaj,kam sme sa to dostaliv dnesnej dobe

Post a screenshot of your $60 "donation". You can blur the private details.

[jubayerjb25]

It's a good starting for christian community and it will also reduce waste of time and power and it will also provide highest technology and speed in present currency.

[616westwarmoth]

Maybe- Im checking that too.  I certainly see a similar net result, but, I dont see any errors in measurements in the code, so Ill keep checking.  Either way, the xeon multiprocessor is performing horribly.

I've got one Linux running and five running on Win 7.  All are identical except for the Linux is on a USB drive.  All are running single processor Xeon chips.  Linux shows with genmininginfo 49K, but it basically pulls 25K.  Windows shows 15K but pulls low 25K.  So the question becomes why does Linux show so high when it really doesn't perform at those levels.  Not saying it SHOULD be performing at that level, I'd say the chip is a 22-24K chip on high gen proc, but why does it show basically double what it really does while Windows shows a bit better than half what it really does?

[inblue]

I still don't understand one thing, if HPS is used for pool payouts (as is displayed in the block distribution page), what purpose does HPS2 have and why is the leaderboard sorted by HPS2 by default?

I know HPS2 has something to do with shares submitted and luck, but is it used in the pool calculation for payouts or not? If it is used, then why is it not displayed in the block distribution page and HPS is displayed instead?

[canonical]

I don't care about the lower hashrate/payouts, but it's not really "fair" when linux get 2x hashrate on the same hardware. Just wanted to know why

Guys-  Its not getting ignored- we were moving like a steamroller until F7000 hit, and the issue is things have to be prioritized.

Its a higher priority to address Prod issues than "hashrate" issues.

Now it appears the pool is running again without issues so now I can take a look at the hash rate issues across OS.

The pool is storing the OS flavor per miner now, so I should be able to go in and write a report of average speed per OS flavor.

I do see that windows appears to hash at a much slower rate than linux for some reason.
Im seeing 34,000 HPS on my vultr-debian vs 4,000 on my dual CPU xeon windows web server.  Quite a disparity there.  Definitely unintentional from our engineering standpoint.

bible_pay: Does Vultr allow a box to run such a high CPU process? Are you running your Vultr box as hard as it can?

[slovakia]

netDIFF= 8500

[inblue]

Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.

Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:

Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)

So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.

I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.

[seasonw]

Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.

Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:

Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)

So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.

I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.

I did notice it last week, but I thought this is not priority to fix, so I never raise up yet, just wanted to let Robert concentrate on fixing the other issues (because there are 2 impatient guys keep pushing dev, I think they must be paying dev a lot BTC, lol).

@inblue you remind me I think it is good time to discuss about this issue now, since wallet and pool are working great right now  

[kyvo]

why block subsidy go down to 11k and then go back to 17k today?

[inblue]

Nobody is talking (again) about the lack of found blocks. The average is 9.6 minutes instead of the intended 7 minutes, that is, around 150 blocks are found per day instead of ~205.

Here are the stats for the previous 7 days:

Sep 11: 7026-7201 (175)
Sep 12: 7202-7354 (152)
Sep 13: 7355-7503 (148)
Sep 14: 7504-7654 (150)
Sep 15: 7655-7805 (150)
Sep 16: 7806-7952 (146)
Sep 17: 7953-8105 (152)

So there was a noticable increase shortly after the F7000 (although still not enough), but then it went back to the slower block time.

I speculate this issue is closely related to a lot of other issues, so when one of the other issues is fixed, this may be fixed with it, or vice versa.

I did notice it last week, but I thought this is not priority to fix, so I never raise up yet, just wanted to let Robert concentrate on fixing the other issues (because there are 2 impatient guys keep pushing dev, I think they must be paying dev a lot BTC, lol).

@inblue you remind me I think it is good time to discuss about this issue now, since wallet and pool are working great right now  

Yes, I waited too because there were obviously more important issues then, and also to have at least 7 days to confirm the average.