|
Kisleav
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 07:32:56 AM |
|
Are you going to patent the ICC card in all regions? I've heard that's pretty costly, but profitable if other people start to pay for using your patent.
What is ICC? is there ICC plan? I think you mean IIC. Its Interactive Item Card; Info on website says its some kind of representation of the physical item that you want to sell. It looks like something very unique, and makes this project different than others. surely unique, and i am just waiting for the final product i see how this will look like, and work out maybe, but i am high on hopes that this is going to be one of its kind in the crypto system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
mike0182
|
|
October 03, 2017, 07:51:52 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
|
|
|
|
Jay2408
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:07:44 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
I think this is quite impressible, considering that there are so many ICOs at the moment and some of them are really struggeling to raise a decent amount of money. |
|
|
|
|
FIEX
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:12:15 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Indeed, already 14k ETH has been collected. Thats a huge amount of ETH and means a lot of investors already have trust in this project. This is a great project! Cant wait for the crowdsale! |
|
|
|
|
Sy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:16:28 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Yep your calculation is correct. Does anyone knows what's the contract address for the SOMA i tried searching on ethplorer but they were showing many addresses with SOMA. |
|
|
|
|
magisterr
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:33:01 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Its more than 4 million usd by current ETH price. Its good results I think... Their hard cap 36 millions.. But I cant find soft cap? Which soft cap? |
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:38:27 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Yep your calculation is correct. Does anyone knows what's the contract address for the SOMA i tried searching on ethplorer but they were showing many addresses with SOMA. Here you go: Contract 0x63b992e6246d88f07fc35A056d2C365E6D441A3D Symbol SCT Total Supply 60,000,000.00 SCT Decimals 18 You are welcome  |
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
October 03, 2017, 08:55:18 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Its more than 4 million usd by current ETH price. Its good results I think... Their hard cap 36 millions.. But I cant find soft cap? Which soft cap? I'm reading their whitepaper but I don't see there softcap and this one should be discuss by the dev since many people want to know more about it. I have participated many icos and watched more of it. In my opinion, there is not an ico would cancel after 4m $ funds. Even icos says their soft cap is higher at the end, if they got some million dollars, they just reduce it. So I am not worried about the soft cap. And I am almost sure that some soma representative will tell that we already hit the soft cap which was x million USD.  |
|
|
|
|
Rigorous
|
|
October 03, 2017, 09:11:30 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Its more than 4 million usd by current ETH price. Its good results I think... Their hard cap 36 millions.. But I cant find soft cap? Which soft cap? I'm reading their whitepaper but I don't see there softcap and this one should be discuss by the dev since many people want to know more about it. I have participated many icos and watched more of it. In my opinion, there is not an ico would cancel after 4m $ funds. Even icos says their soft cap is higher at the end, if they got some million dollars, they just reduce it. So I am not worried about the soft cap. And I am almost sure that some soma representative will tell that we already hit the soft cap which was x million USD. In the whitepaper I have read that for every 1,500 ETH they expand to a new region. I suppose that 1,500 ETH is the soft cap. With $4 million they have already enough for almost 9 regions. |
|
|
|
|
|
pynetx
|
|
October 03, 2017, 09:31:16 AM |
|
what is minimum CAP require? also what will happen to all token that left?
I want to know about this too, there is no explanation about this on the whitepaper. I don't think there's any minimum cap not that they mentioned about it on their token sale page. Even if there is one I think it must have been already met as they already raised 14k+ ETH which itself is a huge amount. Yes, they already have some investments outside of the ICO, and already a working app that soon will be in a closed beta release, that means that there will be only a hard cap, but even if the hard cap is not reached, the project will continue anyway, so is a win-win for all investors  , or it is what I understood. This only leaves the question, that what will happen to tokens that are not sold. It's a valid question since buy ratio is fixed. One would think that it's going to get burned, but strange that it isn't mentioned in anywhere. (Well anywhere where i can see it anyway) I hope they burn the unsold tokens. I would not want someone to sit on a large pile of unsold tokens who can control SOMA's future price. It can go both ways. They can burn or keep them. Burn would be good for investors, keep would be good for them. I prefer them to burn, but if I were them, I would keep then At this stage, they can not think of only their own benefits. Investors are far more important now. So, keeping them would make no sense at all. There's another option if they don't want to burn the tokens, to freeze them for a few years and then again make them available for an ICO. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mystic90
|
|
October 03, 2017, 09:39:52 AM |
|
hello dev, i still confused about this project, especially about the token iformation. There is no info about token distribution, token allocation
I found the team quite Active on slack. Might try to ask them there if you dont get response here within reasonable timeframe. its good when the devs are able to communicate with the community. Slack is a big part of that, but they could check here once in a while Lets see if that happens any time soon, or i will join their slack |
|
|
|
|
|
ubercool
|
|
October 03, 2017, 10:08:30 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Indeed, already 14k ETH has been collected. Thats a huge amount of ETH and means a lot of investors already have trust in this project. This is a great project! Cant wait for the crowdsale! 120k ETH is hard cap and it raised more than 14k ETH till now. The token sale will be going on for another 23 days. |
|
|
|
|
|
sesiah
|
|
October 03, 2017, 10:21:02 AM |
|
As I understand at the moment is collected 6405931/450=14235 ETH, this good amount or I'm wrong?
Indeed, already 14k ETH has been collected. Thats a huge amount of ETH and means a lot of investors already have trust in this project. This is a great project! Cant wait for the crowdsale! 120k ETH is hard cap and it raised more than 14k ETH till now. The token sale will be going on for another 23 days. thats really great, it is a brilliant start and on the best point, hope it succeeds because i want to see how it is going to work, the hard cap shall be realised for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
Islapdonkey
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:28:04 AM |
|
How do you maintain the integrity of the Interactive Item Card if the product is post traded on a different platform than soma?
|
|
|
|
|
Elkmar
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:31:18 AM |
|
That's good for the project. I'm still trying to understand everything from my side  |
|
|
|
|
|
Trrrt
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:32:14 AM |
|
Its always nice to have an active team, very good point for the communication, and investors like a good communication. 14k eth its already a big amount, and we have still 23 days to raise more. I think soma can have a big value, it’d really a bankable project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Islapdonkey
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:37:05 AM |
|
That's good for the project. I'm still trying to understand everything from my side Yet to see an ICO ranked low by that site. So in other words, their opinion don't mean shit |
|
|
|
|
Kennedy
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:39:41 AM |
|
That's good for the project. I'm still trying to understand everything from my side Yet to see an ICO ranked low by that site. So in other words, their opinion don't mean shit this is my first look this website ,who is owner ? i sure soma is a great project ,personal i will join . |
|
|
|
|
|
tubexc
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:42:38 AM |
|
I see an interesting concept here, consumers are not just shopping
|
|
|
|
|
|
Islapdonkey
|
|
October 03, 2017, 11:48:01 AM |
|
That's good for the project. I'm still trying to understand everything from my side Yet to see an ICO ranked low by that site. So in other words, their opinion don't mean shit this is my first look this website ,who is owner ? i sure soma is a great project ,personal i will join . Oh, i guess i should state that it's not a negative attribute on soma, just saying that the ICObench crew opinion shouldn't be considered when researching for an investment project |
|
|
|
|
