Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 11:18:09 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 201 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #  (Read 418141 times)
fizzisist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 720



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 01:48:11 AM
 #861

Ok, thanks for the answers.

1481325489
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481325489

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481325489
Reply with quote  #2

1481325489
Report to moderator
1481325489
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481325489

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481325489
Reply with quote  #2

1481325489
Report to moderator
1481325489
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481325489

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481325489
Reply with quote  #2

1481325489
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
SleeperUnit
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 01:57:45 AM
 #862

While I can clean out old shares from the core database, the webserver still requires a full history of shares for active servers.

That sounds like a pretty bad design flaw. So I have to assume it's more a case of using a product to perform a task it was never designed to do or even using it in a manner never envisioned by the developer.

The buffer was exhausted. Due to timing, I ended up with 0.20 BTC leftover. I don't consider this amount worth the time trying to figure out how to split it up.

Enjoy your $1.32  Grin
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 18, 2012, 02:13:29 AM
 #863

While I can clean out old shares from the core database, the webserver still requires a full history of shares for active servers.
That sounds like a pretty bad design flaw. So I have to assume it's more a case of using a product to perform a task it was never designed to do or even using it in a manner never envisioned by the developer.
No, we just never envisioned a pool server running on for months at the time. There were (multiple) plans to rewrite it by the original author and others, but nothing has come to fruit from them so far...

BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2012, 04:22:40 AM
 #864

I'm more concerned about the current state of "buffer empty". You mentioned that it is acting as if "proportional" now and the per-share price varies. How is this affected by pool-hopping? Since the share price is varying would this make the pool a target now?

Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 18, 2012, 04:36:38 AM
 #865

I'm more concerned about the current state of "buffer empty". You mentioned that it is acting as if "proportional" now and the per-share price varies. How is this affected by pool-hopping? Since the share price is varying would this make the pool a target now?
The share price isn't itself varying; the currency is. Since there aren't enough Bitcoins to go around, the pool issues its own fiat "currency" called "extra credit"; this has no value itself, but the pool tries to convert it to Bitcoins every block until it's gone.

Specific to pool hopping, the whole premise of hopping is being able to get more than the fair PPS price for shares. This is never possible with SMPPS.

Also, I'd like to note that we're gaining and will probably have a buffer again pretty soon. However, the law of large numbers means that in the long run, the buffer should get closer and closer to zero.

finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
January 18, 2012, 06:55:08 PM
 #866

The hashing speed drops, but cgminer shows there's no problem submitting shares, and cgminer don't switch to other pool.

Anyone noticed this?    Huh Huh

dunand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 625



View Profile
January 18, 2012, 07:30:16 PM
 #867

The hashing speed drops, but cgminer shows there's no problem submitting shares, and cgminer don't switch to other pool.

Anyone noticed this?    Huh Huh

Yes me, usually I mine at 700M/s but now I'm at 400M/s. No problem in the logs.
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 18, 2012, 08:25:47 PM
 #868

We're under a tight DoS attack. Been analyzing it, but not sure what the cause is yet.

finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 12:51:31 AM
 #869

I guess this is the new type of "dos attack"    

Under the old dos attack, if speed drops, then there should be some share submitting problems with cgminer,
and cgminer will automatically switch to other pools.

This new "dos attack" does not. It EAT shares,  Strange  Wink


Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 01:20:52 AM
 #870

I guess this is the new type of "dos attack"    

Under the old dos attack, if speed drops, then there should be some share submitting problems with cgminer,
and cgminer will automatically switch to other pools.

This new "dos attack" does not. It EAT shares,  Strange  Wink
Any shares accepted should be represented as usual. If that's not the case, please double check your miner isn't dropping the shares (eg, with Wireshark) and get in touch with me about it in our IRC channel.

rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
January 19, 2012, 01:22:36 AM
 #871

We're under a tight DoS attack. Been analyzing it, but not sure what the cause is yet.

The cause is you dumbass,

Lets see how you handle this pool from now on.

Classy, as usual. Even had the nerve to steal Inaba's profile picture.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
sadpandatech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 01:27:36 AM
 #872

We're under a tight DoS attack. Been analyzing it, but not sure what the cause is yet.

The cause is you dumbass,

Lets see how you handle this pool from now on.

Classy, as usual. Even had the nerve to steal Inaba's profile picture.

wow, that threw me off. I was thinking to myself, "What the hell crawled up Inaba's butt tonight?" =)

Seeing who it is, I am not surprised. Though, I can't really disagree with the sentiment. But the judges give it a 1 out of 10 for his approach.

cheers


P.S.  *offers Plastic.Elastic a hug*


On Topic;  Luke, is it the getworks that are slowing down the hash rate without tripping CGminer to fallback?  That parts seems a bit strange.

If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system. - GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
January 19, 2012, 01:30:51 AM
 #873

We're under a tight DoS attack. Been analyzing it, but not sure what the cause is yet.

The cause is you dumbass,

Lets see how you handle this pool from now on.

Classy, as usual. Even had the nerve to steal Inaba's profile picture.

wow, that threw me off. I was thinking to myself, "What the hell crawled up Inaba's butt tonight?" =)

Seeing who it is, I am not surprised. Though, I can't really disagree with the sentiment. But the judges give it a 1 out of 10 for his approach.

cheers


P.S.  *offers Plastic.Elastic a hug*


On Topic;  Luke, is it the getworks that are slowing down the hash rate without tripping CGminer to fallback?  That parts seems a bit strange.

Use the load balancing feature in cgminer and it'll help with that.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 19, 2012, 01:57:17 AM
 #874

On Topic;  Luke, is it the getworks that are slowing down the hash rate without tripping CGminer to fallback?  That parts seems a bit strange.
If I knew the problem, it'd be solved.

k9quaint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190



View Profile
January 20, 2012, 04:09:09 PM
 #875

Set up a private pool for your important miners. Only tell them the IP. Cheesy

Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
epsillion
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47


Shave and Save www.xtenda-blade.com


View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 01:42:49 AM
 #876

anyone tell me if the eligius pool is still down?

Shave and Save- www.xtenda-blade.com
         2 for $7.00
Schleicher
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630



View Profile
January 22, 2012, 05:01:09 AM
 #877

It's up.

Bitcoin donations: 1H2BHSyuwLP9vqt2p3bK9G3mDJsAi7qChw
Hotdog453
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120



View Profile
January 22, 2012, 09:37:45 AM
 #878

My miners have Eligius as a backup, and I'm seeing it down. YMMV.
BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2012, 05:06:39 AM
 #879

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.

sharky112065
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 383



View Profile
January 26, 2012, 12:22:44 AM
 #880

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.


Code:
#!/usr/bin/env python

import json, urllib2, datetime

address = 'YourNameCoinAddressHere'
url = 'http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/7/NMC/balances.json'

data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(url, timeout=5))
print "Address  : " + address
print "Balance  : " + str(data[address]['balance']/100000000.0)
print "Everpaid : " + str(data[address]['everpaid']/100000000.0)
print "Oldest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['oldest']))
print "Newest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['newest']))

Did you change the /5/ to /7/ in the python code?

Donations welcome: 12KaKtrK52iQjPdtsJq7fJ7smC32tXWbWr
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 201 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!