Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 08:46:59 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 201 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #  (Read 418246 times)
finway
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714


View Profile
January 27, 2012, 01:47:21 AM
 #881

Leave Eligius!

It's against /P2SH/

1481402819
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481402819

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481402819
Reply with quote  #2

1481402819
Report to moderator
1481402819
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481402819

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481402819
Reply with quote  #2

1481402819
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481402819
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481402819

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481402819
Reply with quote  #2

1481402819
Report to moderator
1481402819
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481402819

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481402819
Reply with quote  #2

1481402819
Report to moderator
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 27, 2012, 01:56:52 AM
 #882

Leave Eligius!

It's against /P2SH/
Don't troll. Eligius is pro-P2SH (BIP 17).

jake262144
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
January 27, 2012, 02:05:55 AM
 #883

Don't troll. Eligius is pro-P2SH (BIP 17).

BIP17 is OP_CHV, not OP_P2SH - as you well know.
Be straight: Eligius is pro-BIP17 and therefore anti-BIP16, am I correct?
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 27, 2012, 02:09:00 AM
 #884

Don't troll. Eligius is pro-P2SH (BIP 17).

BIP17 is OP_CHV, not OP_P2SH - as you well know.
Be straight: Eligius is pro-BIP17 and therefore anti-BIP16, am I correct?
There is no OP_P2SH. BIP 12, 16, and 17 are all competing standards for P2SH. BIP 17 is the most sane, and BIP 16 the least.

BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2012, 03:04:02 AM
 #885

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.


Code:
#!/usr/bin/env python

import json, urllib2, datetime

address = 'YourNameCoinAddressHere'
url = 'http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/7/NMC/balances.json'

data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(url, timeout=5))
print "Address  : " + address
print "Balance  : " + str(data[address]['balance']/100000000.0)
print "Everpaid : " + str(data[address]['everpaid']/100000000.0)
print "Oldest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['oldest']))
print "Newest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['newest']))

Did you change the /5/ to /7/ in the python code?
Ah. Didn't even think of that. Now it works but the Everpaid has never worked for me. Or maybe it just doesn't work now since I haven't been paid since changed to /7/?

sharky112065
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 383



View Profile
January 27, 2012, 11:58:40 AM
 #886

What's up with the Namecoin transactions info? I just checked my NMC json info using the python tool and it now shows my address as not existing any more.

I checked on the Namecoin block explorer and it shows a payout on the 19th. Was this a flushing out of balances and reset? Just wondering because I didn't get those NMC in my address at CryptoXchange even though past ones worked fine.


Code:
#!/usr/bin/env python

import json, urllib2, datetime

address = 'YourNameCoinAddressHere'
url = 'http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/raw/7/NMC/balances.json'

data = json.load(urllib2.urlopen(url, timeout=5))
print "Address  : " + address
print "Balance  : " + str(data[address]['balance']/100000000.0)
print "Everpaid : " + str(data[address]['everpaid']/100000000.0)
print "Oldest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['oldest']))
print "Newest   : " + str(datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(data[address]['newest']))

Did you change the /5/ to /7/ in the python code?
Ah. Didn't even think of that. Now it works but the Everpaid has never worked for me. Or maybe it just doesn't work now since I haven't been paid since changed to /7/?

Correct, Everpaid will show a value when you get your first payment on the new server.

Donations welcome: 12KaKtrK52iQjPdtsJq7fJ7smC32tXWbWr
Gavin Andresen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2012, 07:23:33 PM
 #887

There is no OP_P2SH. BIP 12, 16, and 17 are all competing standards for P2SH. BIP 17 is the most sane, and BIP 16 the least.

<begin troll>

No it is not!  BIP 17 is bad for the network and will give you herpes!

<end troll>

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
EnergyVampire
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210



View Profile
January 28, 2012, 04:48:10 AM
 #888

Hello Luke-jr,

What is up with the pay at the pool? Sorry if you answered this already but I can't find any info on it. I was a bit disappointed with the payout for block # 164104.  Cry

Cheers!

Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
January 28, 2012, 05:00:52 AM
 #889

Upgrading to Eloipool, my new poolserver written in Python 3 this week seems to have gone mostly smooth. Hopefully it will solve the pushpool-related issues including however we were being DoS'd. However, I did notice that older versions of PhoenixMiner had trouble with the new longpolls, so I've special-cased them for now. Please report any problems here or on IRC, so I can investigate.

Thanks to lemmi who wrote the 'midstate' Python module in C to provide midstate to miners that can't make their own. If anyone else wishes to contribute (including other pools), please get in touch!

Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
February 01, 2012, 04:15:06 AM
 #890

Just upgraded to bitcoind next-test (pre-0.6 + working pull requests) on Eligius. Seems to have gone fine, but let me know if anything seems off.

Note that this upgrade means we cannot go back to pushpool at this point (without reverting it of course) since the bitcoind maintainers no longer support solomining via getwork (it requires a lot of patches, some Eligius-specific which I didn't take the time to add to 0.6).

49er
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52


View Profile
February 04, 2012, 09:12:46 PM
 #891

Namecoins that would otherwise be allotted to unregistered accounts will be distributed between miners who are interested in getting namecoins, and myself (as compensation for the time I put into our stable merged mining implementation).

Luke-Jr:  I have a question about your pool if you don't mind.  How do you decide on the split for the extra namecoins?  Obviously you pay out the PPS for namecoins for those interested, but then how do you split the remaining "that would otherwise be allotted to unregistered accounts" between the "miners who are interested in getting namecoins, and [yourself]"?

Is it 50/50?  75/25?  How do you calculate the bonus for those of us who are interested?  Is it PPLNS with N being since the last split?  Can we see somewhere what bonus we got on our NMC PPS?
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
February 04, 2012, 09:21:36 PM
 #892

Namecoins that would otherwise be allotted to unregistered accounts will be distributed between miners who are interested in getting namecoins, and myself (as compensation for the time I put into our stable merged mining implementation).

Luke-Jr:  I have a question about your pool if you don't mind.  How do you decide on the split for the extra namecoins?  Obviously you pay out the PPS for namecoins for those interested, but then how do you split the remaining "that would otherwise be allotted to unregistered accounts" between the "miners who are interested in getting namecoins, and [yourself]"?

Is it 50/50?  75/25?  How do you calculate the bonus for those of us who are interested?  Is it PPLNS with N being since the last split?  Can we see somewhere what bonus we got on our NMC PPS?
NMC uses SMPPS just like BC. The non-merged-miners are simply omitted from the algorithm entirely, which basically leaves an infinite buffer. Ergo, miners who have signed up for namecoins receive full PPS even when they would otherwise have received less due to the extra credit mode. This is especially important since we don't longpoll for Namecoin, and therefore, the stale rate is rather high - so unlike the BC side which has up till recently had a large buffer, Namecoin mining would simply have infinite growth of extra credit. My "share" is basically what I feel is comfortably not needed by the Namecoin buffer to pay miners during long "dry periods". The miners' "shares" are basically Eligius effectively paying for (a high rate of) stales.

Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
February 05, 2012, 06:42:59 AM
 #893

Since it seems a lot of pools have been hacked (and balances emptied) recently, I just thought I'd let everyone know that Eligius should be immune to this attack. Since we generally payout in generation, I can safely encrypt the pool wallet, and never unlock it on the actual pool server (ie, only create manual payout transactions on an offline system).

Gavin Andresen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2012, 04:30:41 PM
 #894

Since it seems a lot of pools have been hacked (and balances emptied) recently, I just thought I'd let everyone know that Eligius should be immune to this attack. Since we generally payout in generation, I can safely encrypt the pool wallet, and never unlock it on the actual pool server (ie, only create manual payout transactions on an offline system).

But what if somebody hacked into your server and modified the code that decides which addresses get paid out?

If they were smart, they'd shave just a little bit from everybody's payout and insert a payout to themselves... I imagine it could take quite a while before anybody noticed.

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
February 05, 2012, 06:35:58 PM
 #895

But what if somebody hacked into your server and modified the code that decides which addresses get paid out?

If they were smart, they'd shave just a little bit from everybody's payout and insert a payout to themselves... I imagine it could take quite a while before anybody noticed.
They'd need to be very smart to find all the safety checks in place Wink

At least nobody can lose their past week's worth of earnings.

Red Emerald
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile WWW
February 07, 2012, 12:59:41 AM
 #896

Pool seems down. Can't get to the website either Sad

Looks like the DNS still resolves though.

EpicBacon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94


View Profile
February 07, 2012, 01:22:39 AM
 #897

Same issue.

Pool seems down. Can't get to the website either Sad

Looks like the DNS still resolves though.

Tracing route to eligius.st [78.47.187.254]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.11.1
2 8 ms 7 ms 6 ms 7.39.188.1
3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 66.185.91.177
4 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms 69.63.250.210
5 14 ms 15 ms 16 ms 69.63.250.97
6 32 ms 32 ms 31 ms gw-init7.torontointernetxchange.net [206.108.34.
62]
7 100 ms 100 ms 100 ms r1lon1.core.init7.net [77.109.140.193]
8 112 ms 114 ms 112 ms r1fra1.core.init7.net [77.109.128.38]
9 113 ms 112 ms 113 ms gw-hetzner.init7.net [82.197.166.86]
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 * * * Request timed out.
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
February 07, 2012, 01:38:32 AM
 #898

It was a DDoS. Thanks go to ageis, and also James with BitVPS for locating the botnet controller and getting it taken offline.

BCMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527



View Profile
February 07, 2012, 11:04:07 AM
 #899

 When pool will be back to life?

Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100



View Profile
February 07, 2012, 02:41:05 PM
 #900

When pool will be back to life?
As soon as the datacenter reactivates our IP addresses. In the meantime, IPv6 is working fine.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 201 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!