Change rules in bounty programs.

[DevilCredit]

of course, this sort of thing is very unfortunate if it did occur. a rule that is set out in the beginning and changed it will pose a lot of questions for participants and injustice for all parties.

[lenj]

Though i have not experience such change in campaign rules but i will be very sad because engaging in campaign day in day out require commitments to it and after putting all my time the rule was changed or was not given what i was promised. i will comply to them and also use the medium of which i use to excute their campaign to cry out a foul play to the general public

you noticed that conditions change often enough. It happens that during the fulfillment of certain conditions, by the end of the work the conditions change and your reports are not accepted. This is very unfortunate.

Actually manager decision is final so it will be our false if we dont follow it.
But sometime the change is not good for us but we must follow if we want to have the reward.
As my experience, in the first rule, we dont need to report our work but at the end the manager ask me to report.
I could not do it since i never save my work and i lose my work during the ico

[Sungeb_Gali]

I agree with your opinion, less supportive of the owners of the bounty company I think that the bounty companies keep true at the beginning of the promo until the end. if there is a problem like this the users become a loss

[anzhanbei1214068]

Very disappointed, if there is a project to change the rules, let us pay less or not to give this is very annoying thing.

I join the bounty of the company so far are good.

[semutracing]

Look, if you want to invest in ISO, you ask the bounties how they are a company, and if the company was honest and all paid - then it's worth the ISO. the truth at the pre-sale you can not see

There are indeed some campaigns that suddenly change their rules before the end of their campaign project which, of course, the majority of participants who participated in their bounty campaign, were mostly disappointed in it, but I have never experienced such a change so far in a campaign I had previously .

[Trancelator]

I find this to be quite normal with bounty campaigns. Each ICO project will distribute Token to members participating in bounty campaigns based on the number of tokens they sell at the ICO and count the tokens based on the total number of skates. This calculation is usually done after the ICO, and the bounty is over and will be published to everyone after the count, and there will be no fraud.

I wasn't talking about that. I referred to change of bounty allocation, for instance from 2% to 0.5%.

[Radzivill]

And how would you behave in place of the organizers, if, say, you would not have collected the necessary amount of money? They can not afford to pay at a loss. Especially everyone writes that they reserve the right to change the conditions. I think this is quite normal practice, I know what I'm signing

[Monta3002]

How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
 In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?

It is really disappointing, I have been with 3 different bounties and they are changing rules in the middle of the campaign or in the end. Changing the bounty allocation is really not fair because bounty hunters like us are trying our best to get a good price.

[YinShuiSiYuan]

Everyone who joins the campaign bounty accepts the regulations. Maybe it is not good practice to change the rules during the campaign. But unfortunately this is happening and we have to accept it. It seems to me that they do not change the rules without a reason.

[ozm0823]

Same here. Globitex is doing the same thing. They have changed tehir bounty Manager 3 times. Now they are saying they are not happy with the Quality of work. I just don't like it. We will see what is gonna happen

[carlfebz2]

Though i have not experience such change in campaign rules but i will be very sad because engaging in campaign day in day out require commitments to it and after putting all my time the rule was changed or was not given what i was promised. i will comply to them and also use the medium of which i use to excute their campaign to cry out a foul play to the general public

you noticed that conditions change often enough. It happens that during the fulfillment of certain conditions, by the end of the work the conditions change and your reports are not accepted. This is very unfortunate.

Actually manager decision is final so it will be our false if we dont follow it.
But sometime the change is not good for us but we must follow if we want to have the reward.
As my experience, in the first rule, we dont need to report our work but at the end the manager ask me to report.
I could not do it since i never save my work and i lose my work during the ico

This is just a basic thing which as a bounty participant we should normally follow the rules being set out by managers if we do really like to have a stake for that certain week but general speaking we are not talking about on those rules but we are talking on general or as a whole bounty program towards their allocation and rules which is being changed in the end of the campaign or when they do already hit their cap but suddenly changing out things after.If you would experience this then you will normally got pissed.

[Anhdienhg]

It is the wild wild west out there unfortunately. Personally I think as long as we get paid.

[Raufjoze]

Well honestly, it feels so worrying and sometimes it makes me sad, but we as bounty participants has agreed their rule and already know that anytime the bounty manager can change its rules whatever it is and we have nothing to do with that because we are just participants and just follow the new rule even it hurts us. 

It is necessary to follow the terms and regulations quietly and carry out all the duties but the fact that the company manager always warns that he has no right to change the rules and conditions of the campaign and therefore we can not do anything.

[Trancelator]

Everyone who joins the campaign bounty accepts the regulations. Maybe it is not good practice to change the rules during the campaign. But unfortunately this is happening and we have to accept it. It seems to me that they do not change the rules without a reason.

If at a normal job your boss decides to use your pay for something else, do you react similar, saying that he didn't do it without a reason?

[Trancelator]

And how would you behave in place of the organizers, if, say, you would not have collected the necessary amount of money? They can not afford to pay at a loss. Especially everyone writes that they reserve the right to change the conditions. I think this is quite normal practice, I know what I'm signing

Not raising enough money simply means not reaching the soft cap. Then the project may be discontinued and no bounties will be paid. But the situation is different when the soft cap has been reached. They all calculated it at the start. You never see the allocation for the founders or team lower; always for the bounty workers.

[tachi641]

This would be really disappointing. None would encourage such acts. It would be really appreciated if this has been priorly intimated before everyone either invest or joins in the respective companies. I would really suggest to study, analyze and then pitch into anything before investing in. Or thank god i still didn't join campaigns that changing 2 much, but still thinking that those changes unfair.

[Abdul Wafi]

changes in the path or rules in the campaign will cause disappointment to the participants, but if the change to the common good, of course be a very good thing as long as it does not change the gifts that have been obtained

[emmanmalaman]

The only thing we can do is to be disappointed because we can't do anything about it. We can't hold them responsible or liable since we're not protected by any laws concerning bounty campaigns of the ICOs. The best thing we can do is to study first an ICO before we proceed with the bounty so even though they may delay the release of our coins or tokens, at least they're legit to begin with. 

[Radzivill]

And how would you behave in place of the organizers, if, say, you would not have collected the necessary amount of money? They can not afford to pay at a loss. Especially everyone writes that they reserve the right to change the conditions. I think this is quite normal practice, I know what I'm signing

Not raising enough money simply means not reaching the soft cap. Then the project may be discontinued and no bounties will be paid. But the situation is different when the soft cap has been reached. They all calculated it at the start. You never see the allocation for the founders or team lower; always for the bounty workers.

Once again, all managers always write that they can change the conditions. The moral issue of the project developers is different. Of course, some change the rules, simply because they can and want to pay less. How to relate to this? Of course it's negative. Everything is on the conscience of the people, we can not influence this. Only humility =)

[amitkumratra]

Changing rules during the bounty campaigns are very common things.
But if they extend the campaign for long term without any notice on Bitcointalk thread or even on there site, then it is unfair thing with the participants.
According to me they tells about the changed rules one week before the start of next week campaign. Then it is very good for company as well as for the peoples who are participating in this bounty campaign.
I think this small thing shows that, what type of support companies will provide to there customers in future.