[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[the_lovely]

As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it  they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.

never seen it in that way but you can be right!

[ershva]

The people who complain then who don't do anything and have nothing to do by waiting and Hold does not get involved but they manage to give moral and technical lessons lol

[cantdecide]

As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it  they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.

Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign.

[Frank37]

Someone seen this link from their website?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHiZjg4ukCn2vKGuLVGeJGHXwsHXHy7m/view

Looks like some sort of whitepaper to me I think the devs are maily active on other platform so keep an eye on those

This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it.

at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community

They should do an AMA on reddit or something

That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly.

Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here

Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information.

[omwibya]

As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it  they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.

Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign.

that's the point of having advisers on projects. they give respectability and credibility to them.

[cevap]

Someone seen this link from their website?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHiZjg4ukCn2vKGuLVGeJGHXwsHXHy7m/view

Looks like some sort of whitepaper to me I think the devs are maily active on other platform so keep an eye on those

This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it.

at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community

They should do an AMA on reddit or something

That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly.

Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here

Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information.

It's so hard to keep up sometimes, one project has updates here, another one there, go figure. Community managers really become a necessity.

[pizza_dev]

As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it  they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.

i think they are very professional, so it will be a good one

[pizza_dev]

Someone seen this link from their website?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHiZjg4ukCn2vKGuLVGeJGHXwsHXHy7m/view

Looks like some sort of whitepaper to me I think the devs are maily active on other platform so keep an eye on those

This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it.

at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community

They should do an AMA on reddit or something

That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly.

Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here

Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information.

It's so hard to keep up sometimes, one project has updates here, another one there, go figure. Community managers really become a necessity.

Twitter has a huge range of people therefore most people spend more time on that platform

[Bolovich]

Someone seen this link from their website?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHiZjg4ukCn2vKGuLVGeJGHXwsHXHy7m/view

Looks like some sort of whitepaper to me I think the devs are maily active on other platform so keep an eye on those

This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it.

at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community

They should do an AMA on reddit or something

That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly.

Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here

Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information.

It's so hard to keep up sometimes, one project has updates here, another one there, go figure. Community managers really become a necessity.

Twitter has a huge range of people therefore most people spend more time on that platform

That's why the work of community manager is so important, since you need at least one person dedicated exclusively to manage these things.

[webwakko]

Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential

For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week.

I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted(

I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field.

That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project.

Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ?

Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project.

These kind of confirmations are boosting the project. It's bringing trust into it which should only lead to a succesful deployment.
Always like good news about interesting projects

[matjas]

Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential

For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week.

I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted(

I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field.

That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project.

Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ?

Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project.

These kind of confirmations are boosting the project. It's bringing trust into it which should only lead to a succesful deployment.
Always like good news about interesting projects

I just wish they would make more public appearances and talked more about their project, maybe on some conferences or seminars, etc. This alone would be able to boost awareness.

[Piggy]

Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential

For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week.

I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted(

I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field.

That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project.

Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ?

Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project.

These kind of confirmations are boosting the project. It's bringing trust into it which should only lead to a succesful deployment.
Always like good news about interesting projects

I just wish they would make more public appearances and talked more about their project, maybe on some conferences or seminars, etc. This alone would be able to boost awareness.

I guess they are quite busy preparing  the whitepaper and making contacts with the investors

[cantdecide]

As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it  they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.

Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign.

that's the point of having advisers on projects. they give respectability and credibility to them.

Yep, if you know some trustworthy people out of the member or advisor board it gives the most trust for investors.

[helloal]

Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential

For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week.

I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted(

I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field.

That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project.

Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ?

Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project.

Any link to what discussions you've seen? I'm sure most of us here would be interested in seeing them

[pynetx]

Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done

The concept is done only in images but not technical aspect as of now.

[king_of_alts]

Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done

The concept is done only in images but not technical aspect as of now.

Given the many possible use cases of the project I expect the whitepaper to outline most of these. this would make the paper quite a few pages long.

[Bolovich]

As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it  they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.

Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign.

that's the point of having advisers on projects. they give respectability and credibility to them.

Yep, if you know some trustworthy people out of the member or advisor board it gives the most trust for investors.

That is a sign of the confidence they have in the project to move forward, otherwise it would not put their reputation in risk.

[premium_domainer]

Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done

They are not doing just a shallow project with 12 pages whitepaper. Their project has too many layers and too much technicality. I can understand why it is taking so long.

[Axcel-m]

Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done

They are not doing just a shallow project with 12 pages whitepaper. Their project has too many layers and too much technicality. I can understand why it is taking so long.

That's true. If you look at other project they cannot write 5 sites because of missing complexity. :-)
This project is giant and needs time to get a first version of whitepaper. Nevertheless there have to be a  overview about the workpackages early at the beginning of the
project. Here I miss some publications - but looking forward for the first ones

[Jay2408]

Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.

Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now.

a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done

They are not doing just a shallow project with 12 pages whitepaper. Their project has too many layers and too much technicality. I can understand why it is taking so long.

That's true. If you look at other project they cannot write 5 sites because of missing complexity. :-)
This project is giant and needs time to get a first version of whitepaper. Nevertheless there have to be a  overview about the workpackages early at the beginning of the
project. Here I miss some publications - but looking forward for the first ones

I'm sure white paper and the announced youtube videos with answers will come soon and in time for people that want to invest in pre-ICO is starting on Feb 18.