the_lovely
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 2
|
|
January 24, 2018, 07:29:33 AM |
|
As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.
never seen it in that way but you can be right!
|
|
|
|
ershva
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2018, 07:35:49 AM |
|
The people who complain then who don't do anything and have nothing to do by waiting and Hold does not get involved but they manage to give moral and technical lessons lol
|
|
|
|
cantdecide
|
|
January 24, 2018, 08:04:19 AM |
|
As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.
Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign.
|
|
|
|
Frank37
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
January 24, 2018, 09:34:42 AM |
|
This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it. at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community They should do an AMA on reddit or something That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly. Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information.
|
|
|
|
omwibya
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
January 24, 2018, 09:39:17 AM |
|
As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.
Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign. that's the point of having advisers on projects. they give respectability and credibility to them.
|
|
|
|
cevap
Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
|
|
January 24, 2018, 09:46:46 AM |
|
This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it. at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community They should do an AMA on reddit or something That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly. Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information. It's so hard to keep up sometimes, one project has updates here, another one there, go figure. Community managers really become a necessity.
|
|
|
|
pizza_dev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2018, 09:50:22 AM |
|
As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.
i think they are very professional, so it will be a good one
|
|
|
|
pizza_dev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2018, 10:08:23 AM |
|
This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it. at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community They should do an AMA on reddit or something That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly. Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information. It's so hard to keep up sometimes, one project has updates here, another one there, go figure. Community managers really become a necessity. Twitter has a huge range of people therefore most people spend more time on that platform
|
|
|
|
Bolovich
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
January 24, 2018, 10:45:43 AM |
|
This is not still the whitepaper. Is mentioned at the end of it. at some points devs have to react to the needs of their community and we are the community They should do an AMA on reddit or something That would be good! Adding additional related info about the project would be critical to the projects success. Informational videos and related articles would also be fine to market the project accordingly. Have a look at their Twitter account, theyre posting updates and informations pretty regular. Sadly not here Thats often the case, many ICO's underestimate bitcointalk, they are posting on Telegram, where thousands of newbies are present and forget the in my opinion most important place, bitcointalk, where many investors are waiting for information. It's so hard to keep up sometimes, one project has updates here, another one there, go figure. Community managers really become a necessity. Twitter has a huge range of people therefore most people spend more time on that platform That's why the work of community manager is so important, since you need at least one person dedicated exclusively to manage these things.
|
|
|
|
webwakko
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
It's all about the cryptocoins
|
|
January 24, 2018, 10:58:54 AM |
|
Is this information official by the eHealth team? Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week. I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted( I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field. That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project. Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ? Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project. These kind of confirmations are boosting the project. It's bringing trust into it which should only lead to a succesful deployment. Always like good news about interesting projects
|
|
|
|
matjas
|
|
January 24, 2018, 11:33:28 AM |
|
Is this information official by the eHealth team? Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week. I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted( I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field. That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project. Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ? Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project. These kind of confirmations are boosting the project. It's bringing trust into it which should only lead to a succesful deployment. Always like good news about interesting projects I just wish they would make more public appearances and talked more about their project, maybe on some conferences or seminars, etc. This alone would be able to boost awareness.
|
|
|
|
Piggy
|
|
January 24, 2018, 11:44:53 AM |
|
Is this information official by the eHealth team? Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week. I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted( I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field. That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project. Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ? Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project. These kind of confirmations are boosting the project. It's bringing trust into it which should only lead to a succesful deployment. Always like good news about interesting projects I just wish they would make more public appearances and talked more about their project, maybe on some conferences or seminars, etc. This alone would be able to boost awareness. I guess they are quite busy preparing the whitepaper and making contacts with the investors
|
|
|
|
cantdecide
|
|
January 24, 2018, 11:48:44 AM |
|
As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.
Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign. that's the point of having advisers on projects. they give respectability and credibility to them. Yep, if you know some trustworthy people out of the member or advisor board it gives the most trust for investors.
|
|
|
|
helloal
|
|
January 24, 2018, 11:49:42 AM |
|
Is this information official by the eHealth team? Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week. I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted( I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field. That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project. Anyone making contacts with those names to enquire about this project and their affiliation ? Yes I've seen some discussion on another board with those advisors. They confirmed being a part of the project. Any link to what discussions you've seen? I'm sure most of us here would be interested in seeing them
|
|
|
|
pynetx
|
|
January 24, 2018, 12:14:25 PM |
|
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.
Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now. a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done The concept is done only in images but not technical aspect as of now.
|
|
|
|
king_of_alts
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
|
January 24, 2018, 12:24:22 PM |
|
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.
Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now. a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done The concept is done only in images but not technical aspect as of now. Given the many possible use cases of the project I expect the whitepaper to outline most of these. this would make the paper quite a few pages long.
|
|
|
|
Bolovich
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
January 24, 2018, 12:29:50 PM |
|
As discuss above the project advisers had a lot of big name behind it they are risking their reputation in this project that has a very risky outcome, but if they are confident enough i assume that it will be a very lucrative investment.
Well, that's true. People are putting their reputation into risk now, so I assume at least the project is trying for real and that is a good sign. that's the point of having advisers on projects. they give respectability and credibility to them. Yep, if you know some trustworthy people out of the member or advisor board it gives the most trust for investors. That is a sign of the confidence they have in the project to move forward, otherwise it would not put their reputation in risk.
|
|
|
|
premium_domainer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1012
|
|
January 24, 2018, 01:43:51 PM |
|
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.
Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now. a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done They are not doing just a shallow project with 12 pages whitepaper. Their project has too many layers and too much technicality. I can understand why it is taking so long.
|
|
|
|
Axcel-m
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2018, 02:06:55 PM |
|
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.
Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now. a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done They are not doing just a shallow project with 12 pages whitepaper. Their project has too many layers and too much technicality. I can understand why it is taking so long. That's true. If you look at other project they cannot write 5 sites because of missing complexity. :-) This project is giant and needs time to get a first version of whitepaper. Nevertheless there have to be a overview about the workpackages early at the beginning of the project. Here I miss some publications - but looking forward for the first ones
|
|
|
|
Jay2408
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
|
|
January 24, 2018, 02:23:37 PM |
|
Whitepaper should have been released with the release of the website.
Well yes, but as there is none we have to wait for it now. a Whitepaper is not that much work if the concept is already done They are not doing just a shallow project with 12 pages whitepaper. Their project has too many layers and too much technicality. I can understand why it is taking so long. That's true. If you look at other project they cannot write 5 sites because of missing complexity. :-) This project is giant and needs time to get a first version of whitepaper. Nevertheless there have to be a overview about the workpackages early at the beginning of the project. Here I miss some publications - but looking forward for the first ones I'm sure white paper and the announced youtube videos with answers will come soon and in time for people that want to invest in pre-ICO is starting on Feb 18.
|
|
|
|
|