[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[batako]

this healthy related stuff, will get something big in future for sure.

yeah I think so too - I just found this project in here ill follow this thread for sure

if they manage to develop and promote the project properly. and get a lot of doctors on board with this.

Is not going to be easy but defenetely the team has the skills to pull it off imo

Health project will require a lot of work from the team since this sector is relatively hard. But, I am sure eHealth team can handle it properly.

[PS92]

Just read this article:

The app utilizes the most advanced in natural language processing technology and neural networks, and will be offered as an open platform so developers may create similar applications that apply to each and every medical speciality.

https://coinidol.com/blockchain-ai-and-medical-expertise-winning-combination-for-ico-success/

So, this is some like Ethereum plaform, but for medicine niche?

Great article, thanks!

[aveon]

this healthy related stuff, will get something big in future for sure.

yeah I think so too - I just found this project in here ill follow this thread for sure

if they manage to develop and promote the project properly. and get a lot of doctors on board with this.

Is not going to be easy but defenetely the team has the skills to pull it off imo

Health project will require a lot of work from the team since this sector is relatively hard. But, I am sure eHealth team can handle it properly.

I also wish them best of luck and hope they will create something incredible in healthcare system. Who knows, probably in a few years any disease or injury could be cured by nanorobots

[Fermin AK]

this healthy related stuff, will get something big in future for sure.

yeah I think so too - I just found this project in here ill follow this thread for sure

if they manage to develop and promote the project properly. and get a lot of doctors on board with this.

Is not going to be easy but defenetely the team has the skills to pull it off imo

Health project will require a lot of work from the team since this sector is relatively hard. But, I am sure eHealth team can handle it properly.

I also wish them best of luck and hope they will create something incredible in healthcare system. Who knows, probably in a few years any disease or injury could be cured by nanorobots

This is a hard industry sector but if they can success the profits will be huge.

[Piggy]

It happens quite often, that a doctor made a wrong diagnosis, because he didn't see the very rare tropical disease f.e..
Computer can make suggestions, so that the doctor don't overlook such rare diseases.
But also because of the very strong psychologic component of the most diseases (psychosomatic) a doctor, which will listen to you, will always have the basic place as a human in this business.

As i said before human interaction(i mean talking with patient, understanding the psychology of the patient etc.) is crucial. so no machine can do that(to my knowledge of course:) )
But besides that if ehealth delivers on decreasing wrong diagnosis with suggestions, that's also a plus.

This project comprehend telemedicine too, so you can be in contact with a doctor if needed.

[webwakko]

It happens quite often, that a doctor made a wrong diagnosis, because he didn't see the very rare tropical disease f.e..
Computer can make suggestions, so that the doctor don't overlook such rare diseases.
But also because of the very strong psychologic component of the most diseases (psychosomatic) a doctor, which will listen to you, will always have the basic place as a human in this business.

As i said before human interaction(i mean talking with patient, understanding the psychology of the patient etc.) is crucial. so no machine can do that(to my knowledge of course:) )
But besides that if ehealth delivers on decreasing wrong diagnosis with suggestions, that's also a plus.

This project comprehend telemedicine too, so you can be in contact with a doctor if needed.

I'm sure we all need to look at it and see the whole big picture behind it.
It's a joined venture between machine and men.. to complete eachother...

[niklasmato]

Machine logic for health might be a very dangerous thing.. Humans have a thing called nuance .. I don't expect devices to develop this soon.

But humans are also prone for errors, e.g. just overlooking an important result from a blood test. I also think doctors won't be completely redundant for diagnosises, but I am convinced that in future, they will only be needed to confirm a diagnosis.

Think of it like humans & machine working together, like it's always been but now it's getting more advanced ! )

The interaction between humans and machines (AI) has been up for debate for a few years now.
Read the waitbutwhy blog series, he talks about these kinds of things all the time. One of my favorite blogs !

Hey thanks for this.. I'll investigate these blogs.

[magisterr]

You can always do a live Q&A on facebook or youtube, it is better that way when interacting with potential investors

id def watch that!!

Oh.. probably im not read carefully. So, they dont have Q&A live sessions?

[aveon]

It happens quite often, that a doctor made a wrong diagnosis, because he didn't see the very rare tropical disease f.e..
Computer can make suggestions, so that the doctor don't overlook such rare diseases.
But also because of the very strong psychologic component of the most diseases (psychosomatic) a doctor, which will listen to you, will always have the basic place as a human in this business.

As i said before human interaction(i mean talking with patient, understanding the psychology of the patient etc.) is crucial. so no machine can do that(to my knowledge of course:) )
But besides that if ehealth delivers on decreasing wrong diagnosis with suggestions, that's also a plus.

This project comprehend telemedicine too, so you can be in contact with a doctor if needed.

Yes, as we talked previously about self-diagnosis, so it is logically that they will develop telemedicine as well. The only question is how accurate and correct this gonna be.

[haxllega]

Machine logic for health might be a very dangerous thing.. Humans have a thing called nuance .. I don't expect devices to develop this soon.

But humans are also prone for errors, e.g. just overlooking an important result from a blood test. I also think doctors won't be completely redundant for diagnosises, but I am convinced that in future, they will only be needed to confirm a diagnosis.

Think of it like humans & machine working together, like it's always been but now it's getting more advanced ! )

The interaction between humans and machines (AI) has been up for debate for a few years now.
Read the waitbutwhy blog series, he talks about these kinds of things all the time. One of my favorite blogs !

Hey thanks for this.. I'll investigate these blogs.

He is right I read some of them and they are very interesting. That are important questions people should think about.

[rendiuno]

It happens quite often, that a doctor made a wrong diagnosis, because he didn't see the very rare tropical disease f.e..
Computer can make suggestions, so that the doctor don't overlook such rare diseases.
But also because of the very strong psychologic component of the most diseases (psychosomatic) a doctor, which will listen to you, will always have the basic place as a human in this business.

As i said before human interaction(i mean talking with patient, understanding the psychology of the patient etc.) is crucial. so no machine can do that(to my knowledge of course:) )
But besides that if ehealth delivers on decreasing wrong diagnosis with suggestions, that's also a plus.

This project comprehend telemedicine too, so you can be in contact with a doctor if needed.

Yes, as we talked previously about self-diagnosis, so it is logically that they will develop telemedicine as well. The only question is how accurate and correct this gonna be.

it may not be certain how much accurate, we'll see the progress of this project, can not wait for the truth

[BY_ATOM]

Machine logic for health might be a very dangerous thing.. Humans have a thing called nuance .. I don't expect devices to develop this soon.

But humans are also prone for errors, e.g. just overlooking an important result from a blood test. I also think doctors won't be completely redundant for diagnosises, but I am convinced that in future, they will only be needed to confirm a diagnosis.

This issue is very acute in the whole world! And sometimes the words and actions of the doctor depends very much!

[ImTotya]

Machine logic for health might be a very dangerous thing.. Humans have a thing called nuance .. I don't expect devices to develop this soon.

But humans are also prone for errors, e.g. just overlooking an important result from a blood test. I also think doctors won't be completely redundant for diagnosises, but I am convinced that in future, they will only be needed to confirm a diagnosis.

This issue is very acute in the whole world! And sometimes the words and actions of the doctor depends very much!

You're right. Doctors is one of the most responsible professions, so a highly qualified specialist is very appreciated all over the world!

[batako]

It happens quite often, that a doctor made a wrong diagnosis, because he didn't see the very rare tropical disease f.e..
Computer can make suggestions, so that the doctor don't overlook such rare diseases.
But also because of the very strong psychologic component of the most diseases (psychosomatic) a doctor, which will listen to you, will always have the basic place as a human in this business.

As i said before human interaction(i mean talking with patient, understanding the psychology of the patient etc.) is crucial. so no machine can do that(to my knowledge of course:) )
But besides that if ehealth delivers on decreasing wrong diagnosis with suggestions, that's also a plus.

This project comprehend telemedicine too, so you can be in contact with a doctor if needed.

Yes, as we talked previously about self-diagnosis, so it is logically that they will develop telemedicine as well. The only question is how accurate and correct this gonna be.

it may not be certain how much accurate, we'll see the progress of this project, can not wait for the truth

The accuracy can not be gain in a night. It needs a long development. To be able to survive on this platform, eHealth need a good progress.

[mr.robot8]

It happens quite often, that a doctor made a wrong diagnosis, because he didn't see the very rare tropical disease f.e..
Computer can make suggestions, so that the doctor don't overlook such rare diseases.
But also because of the very strong psychologic component of the most diseases (psychosomatic) a doctor, which will listen to you, will always have the basic place as a human in this business.

As i said before human interaction(i mean talking with patient, understanding the psychology of the patient etc.) is crucial. so no machine can do that(to my knowledge of course:) )
But besides that if ehealth delivers on decreasing wrong diagnosis with suggestions, that's also a plus.

This project comprehend telemedicine too, so you can be in contact with a doctor if needed.

Yes, as we talked previously about self-diagnosis, so it is logically that they will develop telemedicine as well. The only question is how accurate and correct this gonna be.

sure that if a self-diagnosis seems showing some serious diseases  to have the opportunity to get in touch quickly with a doctor through telemedicine i think it's the right choice for ehf

[omwibya]

Machine logic for health might be a very dangerous thing.. Humans have a thing called nuance .. I don't expect devices to develop this soon.

But humans are also prone for errors, e.g. just overlooking an important result from a blood test. I also think doctors won't be completely redundant for diagnosises, but I am convinced that in future, they will only be needed to confirm a diagnosis.

This issue is very acute in the whole world! And sometimes the words and actions of the doctor depends very much!

You're right. Doctors is one of the most responsible professions, so a highly qualified specialist is very appreciated all over the world!

there's also a shortage of doctors in some areas of the world. so I wonder if remote diagnosis and treatment is possible.

[greatteager]

Machine logic for health might be a very dangerous thing.. Humans have a thing called nuance .. I don't expect devices to develop this soon.

But humans are also prone for errors, e.g. just overlooking an important result from a blood test. I also think doctors won't be completely redundant for diagnosises, but I am convinced that in future, they will only be needed to confirm a diagnosis.

This issue is very acute in the whole world! And sometimes the words and actions of the doctor depends very much!

You're right. Doctors is one of the most responsible professions, so a highly qualified specialist is very appreciated all over the world!

there's also a shortage of doctors in some areas of the world. so I wonder if remote diagnosis and treatment is possible.

remote diagnosis is necessary for hard-to-reach places in the world, for example, and this direction will develop.

[CryptoCutie]

aging is also a problem aground the word because an average age of a human being is increasing, so remote diagnosis is necessary for all of us

[greatteager]

Will the mobile application be available in 2020? And if the ICO will pass quickly then the timing will move?

[Trrrt]

Remote diagnostic start to be developped in many countries, I think it will be a big need due to the lack of doctors in many places. EHF can have a place in this industry i think, at least it’s the right timing to develop that kind of innovation.