[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Gamer67]

Teamviewer works great for me.

[1715294612]

1715294612

[ckoeber]

Because RDP screws up your temp monitoring. I use RDP only for my BAMT-based rigs, and TightVNC to administer the Win7 rigs. CGRemote for a quick overview at a glance.

Weird, is it a problem with the application(s) used or RDP itself?

[locksmith9]

Because RDP screws up your temp monitoring. I use RDP only for my BAMT-based rigs, and TightVNC to administer the Win7 rigs. CGRemote for a quick overview at a glance.

Weird, is it a problem with the application(s) used or RDP itself?

Has to do with how RDP accesses the video drivers I believe. Try it. When I try to use TRIXX or see temp and fan speeds per GPU in CGMiner, I get nothing. VNC equivalents don't have the same issue. I've heard good results with Teamviewer as well, though I've not tried it.

[dgross0818]

Another vote for Teamviewer here... works great on Windows 7/8 as well as the BAMT distro of Linux (plus many other mining distros)

[Doom4535]

I've been away from the forum for awhile and have noticed several posts that make it sound like several new servers have been added (and a couple hundred pages worth of posts...).  I have the original and eu.middlecoin servers, could someone verify if the posts about some of the other servers are correct?

[ButterBread]

I've been away from the forum for awhile and have noticed several posts that make it sound like several new servers have been added (and a couple hundred pages worth of posts...).  I have the original and eu.middlecoin servers, could someone verify if the posts about some of the other servers are correct?

Try here : Middlecoin unofficial faq

[gsrcrxsi]

I understand fluctuations in WU and reject rate when starting out a fresh run of cgminer, but what Im talking about is fluctuations in hashrate appearing after running for 24 hrs. For example on a fresh run my 7950s get stable as a rock 640khs, but when I check them at the end of the day they are fluctuating between 590-635 constantly, I also thought I may be because of coin/difficulty changes, but the fluctuations continue even during a specific coin. One strange thing is that one of the cards doesn't seem to fluctuate at all and stays at 640, btw the rig Im talking about has 6 - 7950's in it, running Windows 7 headless. And all this fluctuation immediately stops when I restart cgminer. 

It's pretty simple. Your rig isn't as stable as you think it is. You need to tweak your settings to see what's going on. I bet you're seeing GPU usage % is fluctuating too.

You likely have one or more of the following going:
-interference between cgminer and a memory intensive CPU miner (PTS for example)
-your clock/voltage settings of one or more of your video cards is not recovering properly following a driver crash
-your OC isn't stable causing the driver crash in the first place
-your PSU is underpowered for the power requirements.

--------------------------------------------

Next thought.  Can everyone please stop referring to WU in terms of MH/s. WU is not measured in MH/s, it's measured in shares/min.

---------------------------------------------

Next thought. It seems the useast server is having troubles. My miners keep failing over to the default west (middlecoin.com) server.

[rahrahrah]

Because RDP screws up your temp monitoring. I use RDP only for my BAMT-based rigs, and TightVNC to administer the Win7 rigs. CGRemote for a quick overview at a glance.

Weird, is it a problem with the application(s) used or RDP itself?

Has to do with how RDP accesses the video drivers I believe. Try it. When I try to use TRIXX or see temp and fan speeds per GPU in CGMiner, I get nothing. VNC equivalents don't have the same issue. I've heard good results with Teamviewer as well, though I've not tried it.

I can vouch for this too. CGMiner just freezes when using standard remote desktop. VNC works perfectly on all my rigs

[Test User]

Next thought.  Can everyone please stop referring to WU in terms of MH/s. WU is not measured in MH/s, it's measured in shares/min.

WU/min and MH/s are the exact same thing, just slightly different units.

For Scrypt 1 WU = 655536 hashes. 1 WU/min = 1.09 kH/s (Different numbers are used in SHA-256)

Cgminer averages the WU and MH/s numbers differently, so they don't quite line up exactly on the display - but they are the exact same thing.

Share difficulty does not affect the WU number. However, share difficulty is measured in WU. So a share with 1024 difficulty needs on average 67,108,864 hashes to solve.

[Kalroth]

Because RDP screws up your temp monitoring. I use RDP only for my BAMT-based rigs, and TightVNC to administer the Win7 rigs. CGRemote for a quick overview at a glance.

Weird, is it a problem with the application(s) used or RDP itself?

RDP plugs into the Windows graphics system the same way a real display driver does, except that, instead of being a driver for a physical video card, RDP is a virtual display driver.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rds/archive/2009/03/03/top-10-rdp-protocol-misconceptions-part-1.aspx

Windows RDP installs a virtual driver when you connect, and this messes with the order of the physical video cards.
This is why TeamViewer or VNC works, they don't mess with the video devices.

[elpsycongro]

does anyone know the best way to remotely manage BAMT? 

[ckoeber]

Because RDP screws up your temp monitoring. I use RDP only for my BAMT-based rigs, and TightVNC to administer the Win7 rigs. CGRemote for a quick overview at a glance.

Weird, is it a problem with the application(s) used or RDP itself?

RDP plugs into the Windows graphics system the same way a real display driver does, except that, instead of being a driver for a physical video card, RDP is a virtual display driver.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rds/archive/2009/03/03/top-10-rdp-protocol-misconceptions-part-1.aspx

Windows RDP installs a virtual driver when you connect, and this messes with the order of the physical video cards.
This is why TeamViewer or VNC works, they don't mess with the video devices.

Thanks, new knowledge is always good!

[luxuria]

important:
at Middlecoin, in some accounts statistics is disturbed and no withdrawals can be made​​.
Here's the proof:
http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Who else is affected and does not get paid?

@ Middlecoin.
If the missing payments replaced?
Or is the money lost?
When will the error-corrected in the statistics?
When will again money paid for sent Hashrate?



http://s7.directupload.net/images/140127/x3z4n2g3.jpg


the 100 MH/s Rigs in the same Location works fine .... hmmm

http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1BtzFDErNKMMFeCSkho9tK7Cr8eus64x5K.html

but one rig go to an other Bitcoin Adress and dont work...
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

[ckoeber]

important:
at Middlecoin, in some accounts statistics is disturbed and no withdrawals can be made​​.
Here's the proof:
http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Who else is affected and does not get paid?

@ Middlecoin.
If the missing payments replaced?
Or is the money lost?
When will the error-corrected in the statistics?
When will again money paid for sent Hashrate?






the 100 MH/s Rigs in the same Location works fine .... hmmm

http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1BtzFDErNKMMFeCSkho9tK7Cr8eus64x5K.html

but one rig go to an other Bitcoin Adress and dont work...
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Seems more like you are having intermittent network issues between your system and Middlecoin's.

[Capttech08]

I have 2 rigs running - 1 with 4 R9 290's (not 290x's), a with 3 5870's and 1 6970. For the 290's I run 512 as the work size. Should I run 1024 on these? I saw someplace to use 1024 for the 290's and leave the other cards with 256 worker size. Can anyone verify this is the best setting for MC? I know it depends on the pool you are mining as well. Just want to make sure my settings are optimized for max payout.

Thanks for helping a noob with a noob question.   

[Gamer67]

I agree, it does not seem like a chart/stats issue. It looks more like an issue with that system.

[hobbymd]

important:
at Middlecoin, in some accounts statistics is disturbed and no withdrawals can be made​​.
Here's the proof:
http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Who else is affected and does not get paid?

@ Middlecoin.
If the missing payments replaced?
Or is the money lost?
When will the error-corrected in the statistics?
When will again money paid for sent Hashrate?






the 100 MH/s Rigs in the same Location works fine .... hmmm

http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1BtzFDErNKMMFeCSkho9tK7Cr8eus64x5K.html

but one rig go to an other Bitcoin Adress and dont work...
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

I have a similar situation see my post earlier, still several hours after that i still dont have a hash showing at all  

here is a link to my add http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1CNX6jzABVxVLqBnLYNqSGfTAToMyn21hY.html

very strange, my rig was down for only 6 hours on Saturday but been running since with cgminer accepting shares but no stats?  

Hi guys, I need someone with more experience than me with this pool comment on my situation. It's quite a bizarre one.

so basically my rig was down on Saturday from 4:40 pm est for about 5-6 hours since then the rig has been back up and running ( cgminer shows accepted or rejected shares)  but my hashrate on the pool still shows as zero ( even tried 3rd party sites for MC stats) and my stats hasn't changed at all.

TBH, it feels like the cgminer been submitting the shares to a black hole for a day and half now. dunno what to do any more, tried using a new address and hash with that new address still when I try to find the new address, it is not even in data base.

any explanation/help is greatly appreciated  

[bitter_miner]

important:
at Middlecoin, in some accounts statistics is disturbed and no withdrawals can be made​​.
Here's the proof:
http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Who else is affected and does not get paid?

@ Middlecoin.
If the missing payments replaced?
Or is the money lost?
When will the error-corrected in the statistics?
When will again money paid for sent Hashrate?



http://s7.directupload.net/images/140127/x3z4n2g3.jpg


the 100 MH/s Rigs in the same Location works fine .... hmmm

http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1BtzFDErNKMMFeCSkho9tK7Cr8eus64x5K.html

but one rig go to an other Bitcoin Adress and dont work...
http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

There's 2 identical addresses that can be found in the all user's list, but different case:
17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6nFUCu
17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu

make sure the case is correct.. probably a typo..

[hobbymd]

important:
at Middlecoin, in some accounts statistics is disturbed and no withdrawals can be made​​.
Here's the proof:
http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Who else is affected and does not get paid?

@ Middlecoin.
If the missing payments replaced?
Or is the money lost?
When will the error-corrected in the statistics?
When will again money paid for sent Hashrate?

There's 2 identical addresses that can be found in the all user's list, but different case:
17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6nFUCu
17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu

make sure the case is correct.. probably a typo..

no mostly likely something is wrong with the system

[bitter_miner]

important:
at Middlecoin, in some accounts statistics is disturbed and no withdrawals can be made​​.
Here's the proof:
http://middlecoin2.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu.html

Who else is affected and does not get paid?

@ Middlecoin.
If the missing payments replaced?
Or is the money lost?
When will the error-corrected in the statistics?
When will again money paid for sent Hashrate?

There's 2 identical addresses that can be found in the all user's list, but different case:
17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6nFUCu
17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu

make sure the case is correct.. probably a typo..

no mostly likely something is wrong with the system

there's definitely something wrong with the setup, but the payout issue could be a result of this.. he was getting paid, at least..