zSprawl
|
|
January 31, 2014, 01:19:33 AM |
|
Extremely high reject rates all of a sudden...wtf
Me too, I am on useast and it climbed to 8%. I'm on the original server, and have seen a rise today. Normally it's less than one for me, and I've been running for days on end. Today it shows 4%. Not the end of the world considering the DOGE days profits are among us, but I hope it don't get worse.
|
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
January 31, 2014, 02:24:38 AM |
|
The CGminer guy is not interested in scrypt mining and even seems to go out of his way to phase it out. /shrug Use sgminer or I recommend Kalroth's version: http://k-dev.net/cgminer/
|
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2014, 02:28:50 AM |
|
The CGminer guy is not interested in scrypt mining and even seems to go out of his way to phase it out. /shrug Use sgminer or I recommend Kalroth's version: http://k-dev.net/cgminer/Makes no sense; ASIC miners have completely taken over the SHA-256 mining arena to the point where it is laughable for anyone to suggest they'll mine a SHA-256 coin with a graphics card. Without scrypt cgminer is a complete waste of electricity to run.
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
|
January 31, 2014, 02:43:52 AM |
|
Highest I get on my Toxic 280x Tri-X OC TOXIC.... Is 805-815/Khz, But yeh Stability and heat = Not that good... Id rather have them at 755K/h Going 24/7 No issue. How do you reach 765K/h? I mean I can keep tweaking but I just dont know when to stop how long have you tested this 765KH/ It is summer here also Im from Sydney - land of OZ
|
|
|
|
TurdHurdur
|
|
January 31, 2014, 02:49:25 AM |
|
Curd have you read any other part of the cgminer thread?
|
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
January 31, 2014, 02:53:28 AM |
|
Makes no sense; ASIC miners have completely taken over the SHA-256 mining arena to the point where it is laughable for anyone to suggest they'll mine a SHA-256 coin with a graphics card.
Without scrypt cgminer is a complete waste of electricity to run.
That is why he removed scrypt support in 3.8. From what I read, the developer of cgminer does not believe in altcoins, and does not want to support them or the code behind it. So 3.7.2 was the last version with scrypt support. cgminer is focused purely on SHA-256 for ASIC miners. I don't know that is why the compiled versions are removed from the site, but it wouldn't surprise me. Regardless, other people have forked the code and support scrypt, Kalroth and whoever is doing sgminer. http://k-dev.net/cgminer/http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/1va8g2/ann_sgminer_400_release/I dig Kalroth's version so far because of the better reconnect times, but SGMiner seems solid too.
|
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
salientlucidity
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:07:25 AM |
|
Highest I get on my Toxic 280x Tri-X OC TOXIC.... Is 805-815/Khz, But yeh Stability and heat = Not that good... Id rather have them at 755K/h Going 24/7 No issue.
How do you reach 765K/h? I mean I can keep tweaking but I just dont know when to stop how long have you tested this 765KH/
It is summer here also Im from Sydney - land of OZ [/quote]
1800 / 1500 8192 I13 with 2 gpu is more stable than I19 with single and high thread concurrency for me. That improved bin file I linked to got me an extra 10 a card. I was at 755 as well before I tried it. in office at work (NZ) - can't wait till they are keeping me warm in winter. Running a couple weeks rock solid at 765 - no restart now in over 14 days.
Back on topic - I can't get over the amount we're making in this pool considering the size we've got to. As much as I wish there was more information coming out of middlecoin the payouts kinda speak for themselves
|
|
|
|
Caze
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:20:35 AM |
|
Back on topic - I can't get over the amount we're making in this pool considering the size we've got to. As much as I wish there was more information coming out of middlecoin the payouts kinda speak for themselves
Indeed. Just took a look at wafflepool and it seems they are finally starting pick up the pace with 660MH/s on the pool and daily payouts of around 0.013BTC/MH, which is pretty good in my opinion. Though in comparison here on middlecoin I made today almost 0.015BTC with just 750-800kh/s.
|
|
|
|
CraftyMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:23:52 AM |
|
Highest I get on my Toxic 280x Tri-X OC TOXIC.... Is 805-815/Khz, But yeh Stability and heat = Not that good... Id rather have them at 755K/h Going 24/7 No issue.
How do you reach 765K/h? I mean I can keep tweaking but I just dont know when to stop how long have you tested this 765KH/
It is summer here also Im from Sydney - land of OZ
1800 / 1500 8192 I13 with 2 gpu is more stable than I19 with single and high thread concurrency for me. That improved bin file I linked to got me an extra 10 a card. I was at 755 as well before I tried it. in office at work (NZ) - can't wait till they are keeping me warm in winter. Running a couple weeks rock solid at 765 - no restart now in over 14 days. Back on topic - I can't get over the amount we're making in this pool considering the size we've got to. As much as I wish there was more information coming out of middlecoin the payouts kinda speak for themselves [/quote] Ha, also in NZ and also waiting until I can turn my rigs into heaters.
|
|
|
|
sykal
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:32:21 AM |
|
Wow this reject rate is absolutely ridiculous. It's def from the coin switches. We are detecting new blocks literally every 2-3 seconds tonight. wtf.
Please limit those switchest at least by a minute or two, it's a complete waste of accepts.
|
|
|
|
ckoeber
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:50:45 AM |
|
Wow this reject rate is absolutely ridiculous. It's def from the coin switches. We are detecting new blocks literally every 2-3 seconds tonight. wtf.
Please limit those switchest at least by a minute or two, it's a complete waste of accepts.
I am not sure I agree; look at the un-exchanged That means even bigger payouts in the next few days...
|
|
|
|
interupted
|
|
January 31, 2014, 04:14:53 AM |
|
I was around 5-10% rejects but Ive been messing with my settings today, managed to get it down to 2% reject with I-18
Today was 0.0162 BTC per MH .... I like it
|
|
|
|
HumbleMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 05:37:03 AM |
|
Unusually high rejects for me too. It's normally around 3-4%, today it's closer to 6-8%. No changes on my side.
Great payout though.
|
|
|
|
sgsdebruijn
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2014, 06:15:51 AM |
|
3x Sapphire Vapor-X was 0.039 BTC yesterday with this rig. Running around 2/2.2Mh/s 1,5% rejection rate
|
|
|
|
dgross0818
|
|
January 31, 2014, 06:25:07 AM |
|
Unusually high rejects for me too. It's normally around 3-4%, today it's closer to 6-8%. No changes on my side.
Great payout though.
Same numbers here as well...usually 4-5% for me, however, recently it's been closer to 8% I'm on USEast with EU and then West as my backups.
|
|
|
|
glon
|
|
January 31, 2014, 08:11:59 AM |
|
Is the EU.middlecoin.com server still DOGE-only? Or is it now the same as the other beta servers?
|
|
|
|
glon
|
|
January 31, 2014, 08:37:51 AM |
|
To the folks who suggested Kalroth's cgminer with the xintensity feature, you have my thanks. His version is better in pretty much every way, near as I can tell. I have increased hash rates across the board. And I can run my Linux desktop on top of a 7950 doing 600kh/s without it seeming lagged.
Incidentally, I have my 7950's running with xintensity 4, gpu-threads 2, and shaders 1792. 280x's the same except shaders 2048.
Oh, and with this version, I can underclock the memory on my 7950's all the way down to 900Mhz with no change in hash rate, which saves a significant amount of power according to my kill-a-watt. The 280x's wouldn't accept anything but the default memory clock without throwing a fit, however.
Wait a minute, you are getting 600KH on a 7950 @stock? Can you please post all your settings and setup? I am barely getting 550KH @1050/1500. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
iqacid
|
|
January 31, 2014, 08:40:34 AM |
|
To the folks who suggested Kalroth's cgminer with the xintensity feature, you have my thanks. His version is better in pretty much every way, near as I can tell. I have increased hash rates across the board. And I can run my Linux desktop on top of a 7950 doing 600kh/s without it seeming lagged.
Incidentally, I have my 7950's running with xintensity 4, gpu-threads 2, and shaders 1792. 280x's the same except shaders 2048.
Oh, and with this version, I can underclock the memory on my 7950's all the way down to 900Mhz with no change in hash rate, which saves a significant amount of power according to my kill-a-watt. The 280x's wouldn't accept anything but the default memory clock without throwing a fit, however.
Wait a minute, you are getting 600KH on a 7950 @stock? Can you please post all your settings and setup? I am barely getting 550KH @1050/1500. Thanks! im getting 660kh with this setup setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 cgminer --scrypt -w 256 --shaders 0 --intensity 20 -v 1 -g 1 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 21712 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-memdiff 0 --gpu-powertune 20 --temp-cutoff 90 --auto-fan -o address -u username -p password
|
|
|
|
glon
|
|
January 31, 2014, 08:52:46 AM |
|
To the folks who suggested Kalroth's cgminer with the xintensity feature, you have my thanks. His version is better in pretty much every way, near as I can tell. I have increased hash rates across the board. And I can run my Linux desktop on top of a 7950 doing 600kh/s without it seeming lagged.
Incidentally, I have my 7950's running with xintensity 4, gpu-threads 2, and shaders 1792. 280x's the same except shaders 2048.
Oh, and with this version, I can underclock the memory on my 7950's all the way down to 900Mhz with no change in hash rate, which saves a significant amount of power according to my kill-a-watt. The 280x's wouldn't accept anything but the default memory clock without throwing a fit, however.
Wait a minute, you are getting 600KH on a 7950 @stock? Can you please post all your settings and setup? I am barely getting 550KH @1050/1500. Thanks! im getting 660kh with this setup setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 cgminer --scrypt -w 256 --shaders 0 --intensity 20 -v 1 -g 1 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 21712 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-memdiff 0 --gpu-powertune 20 --temp-cutoff 90 --auto-fan -o address -u username -p password That's fine because you're at intensity 20 and also overclocked. I'd like to know how he's getting 600KH at stock. I forgot to mention my card is Sapphire...
|
|
|
|
|