[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Gasai Yuno]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch  

[1715349406]

1715349406

[1715349406]

1715349406

[1715349406]

1715349406

[corsaro]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch  

h2o is surely reading this thread and he well knows our problems. He is actually trying to fix eu servers instability.

[MarcoPon]

I'm just trying SMOS 1.3 with 2 x 7950 @ 1000 MHz, and was getting about 600KHs each.

Then I run the script to get & compile Kalroth modified version of cgminer 3.7.2.
I modified a couple of parameters ("xintensity" : "4" instead of intensity, and "gpu-thread" : "2"), but I'm getting just about 450Khs.
I think there are obviously other parameters to tweak.

Can someone with a similar, well working, configuration post his cgminer.conf?
Thanx!

---

D'HO! Missed the 's'" on "gpu-threads"! Now it's at 610Khs each.
Still, it would be nice to see another complete cgminer.conf for comparision.

[jimlite]

Why all the "I'm going to wafflepool" comments.
I did a side by side run and Hashcows beats wafflepool.
If you are going to split miners, you should go there.

[jedimstr]

I'm just trying SMOS 1.3 with 2 x 7950 @ 1000 MHz, and was getting about 600KHs each.

Then I run the script to get & compile Kalroth modified version of cgminer 3.7.2.
I modified a couple of parameters ("xintensity" : "4" instead of intensity, and "gpu-thread" : "2"), but I'm getting just about 450Khs.
I think there are obviously other parameters to tweak.

Can someone with a similar, well working, configuration post his cgminer.conf?
Thanx!

---

D'HO! Missed the 's'" on "gpu-threads"! Now it's at 610Khs each.
Still, it would be nice to see another complete cgminer.conf for comparision.

SMOS 1.3 is not very good for the older 7950's. You're better off with SMOS 1.0 with the older CGMiner 3.2.1.  SMOS 1.3 works better for the newer R9 series cards.  In fact a lot of the newer updates like Kalroth's CGMiner fork and SGMiner tend to like the newer R9 280 and 290 cards.  I'd stick with the ancient but working CGMiner versions for the 7950's.

I've got 4 MSI 7950's running between 680 and 710 on SMOS 1.0 with CGminer 3.2.1 using the undervolted .962 bios and Lantis' scrypt bin files:

[wen9x88]

payout missing,what should i do ?

[ndevices]

my total balance was raised for 1 hour on 0.001 BTC with 8.7mhs  WTF!

[The Fat Miner]

Payout is getting worse and worse , And no the I unexchanged isn't getting higher like lot of users magically do. Middlecoin has been good to me so I will give it another week and I'm off, Cheers H2o

[MarcoPon]

SMOS 1.3 is not very good for the older 7950's. You're better off with SMOS 1.0 with the older CGMiner 3.2.1.  SMOS 1.3 works better for the newer R9 series cards.  In fact a lot of the newer updates like Kalroth's CGMiner fork and SGMiner tend to like the newer R9 280 and 290 cards.  I'd stick with the ancient but working CGMiner versions for the 7950's.

I've got 4 MSI 7950's running between 680 and 710 on SMOS 1.0 with CGminer 3.2.1 using the undervolted .962 bios and Lantis' scrypt bin files:

Thanks jedimstr! Interesting, and nice to see that the GPU clock could be pushed even with V < 1000.
Lantis bin file is this one?
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=6058.0

Can you share the cgminer.conf file? Or can I ask what you use for intensity & thread-concurrency?
Thanks!

[dsgx1]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch 

I split my hashing power 50/50 between Middlecoin and Hashcows.

[zSprawl]

I'm just trying SMOS 1.3 with 2 x 7950 @ 1000 MHz, and was getting about 600KHs each.

Then I run the script to get & compile Kalroth modified version of cgminer 3.7.2.
I modified a couple of parameters ("xintensity" : "4" instead of intensity, and "gpu-thread" : "2"), but I'm getting just about 450Khs.
I think there are obviously other parameters to tweak.

Can someone with a similar, well working, configuration post his cgminer.conf?
Thanx!

---

D'HO! Missed the 's'" on "gpu-threads"! Now it's at 610Khs each.
Still, it would be nice to see another complete cgminer.conf for comparision.

http://zsprawl.com/iOS/2014/02/scrypt-coin-mining-with-two-threads-on-an-amd-7950/

[jedimstr]

SMOS 1.3 is not very good for the older 7950's. You're better off with SMOS 1.0 with the older CGMiner 3.2.1.  SMOS 1.3 works better for the newer R9 series cards.  In fact a lot of the newer updates like Kalroth's CGMiner fork and SGMiner tend to like the newer R9 280 and 290 cards.  I'd stick with the ancient but working CGMiner versions for the 7950's.

I've got 4 MSI 7950's running between 680 and 710 on SMOS 1.0 with CGminer 3.2.1 using the undervolted .962 bios and Lantis' scrypt bin files:

Thanks jedimstr! Interesting, and nice to see that the GPU clock could be pushed even with V < 1000.
Lantis bin file is this one?
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=6058.0

Can you share the cgminer.conf file? Or can I ask what you use for intensity & thread-concurrency?
Thanks!

Yup, that was the original thread... you'll still find copies floating about for MSI TFIII's and Sapphire Vapor-X's around.
Here's a partial copy from my cgminer.conf file... minus the pool info:

Code:

"intensity" : "19,19,19,19",
"queue" : "1",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "24000",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-network" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1130,1090,1130,1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-fan" : "85",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"scan-time" : "1",
"scrypt" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"temp-target" : "80,80,80,80",
"temp-cutoff" : "95,95,95,95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3"

http://zsprawl.com/iOS/2014/02/scrypt-coin-mining-with-two-threads-on-an-amd-7950/

The two threads method you posted got me approximately 50Khs SLOWER on average than my regular setup that has been stable for months.  So I went back to my old backup and chugging along nicely.
I think you have some more tweaking to do

[zSprawl]

The MSI's run better than most 7950s and anyone that has tried the two threads sees worse results with the MSI cards, it seems.

[jedimstr]

The MSI's run better than most 7950s and anyone that has tried the two threads sees worse results with the MSI cards, it seems.

Yup!  I miss the days when you could buy a MSI TFIII for $180 on eBay.

[sgsdebruijn]

yes really bad payouts. is there any recommend to switch pool? i love middlecoin (but i love my money more than mdcoin) but i earn low and low day by day. its time to switch  

h2o is surely reading this thread and he well knows our problems. He is actually trying to fix eu servers instability.

Pff how do you know that, because he says? i eat shit, do you believe me 

We are waiting for a long time for stable non beta servers, but nothing changed as far is i know, only more unstable servers with low profit.
Till now H2O is just speaking than taking any action, at least he didn't communicate so much.

Believing sunday in church please

[sgsdebruijn]

So USEast is either disconnecting or not accepting shares, USWest is overloaded and giving 12% rejects. EU/Amsterdam/Asia are disconnecting and giving lower profits than US. We're fucked, this pool is/has been growing to fast... Back to renting out again, just like yesterday and the past days before, too bad renting prices on betarigs.com are dropping also.

I am sure h2o will fix everything very soon

Yeah, I've been hoping the same for the last 5 weeks. 

+5 

[asdosoasd]

I split my hashing power 50/50 between Middlecoin and Hashcows.

and? there are results?

[coinGeek]

can anyone explain me this graph?

why negative bitcoins on <sat Feb 01 ?

This is when H20 processes all the payments for people under 0.01BTC i believe

I think negative is an artefact

It's not a negative sign, it's just a continuation of the graph. There were two payouts that day with about three hours between them.

[MarcoPon]

Thanks both zSprawl & Jedimstr.
Will experiment a bit with both old cgminer & kalroth versions and see where it's going. 

[fyff]

Thanks both zSprawl & Jedimstr.
Will experiment a bit with both old cgminer & kalroth versions and see where it's going.  

+1 Thanks a bunch seems to work alot better and my WU is up from 470 to 530 Hashrate is at 570, 545 with the old version  at stock clocks