i3lome
|
|
September 04, 2013, 10:15:02 AM |
|
is this all you need to do to get minerd running on vps, I can get it mining sudo apt-get install automake build-essential git sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev git clone git://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-cpuminer.git cd cpuminer ./autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" make then type this to mine right ./minerd -a quark -t 8 -o http://qrk.mine-pool.net:8372 -u <YouQRKWallet> -p xxx using My Ubuntu 13.04 Profile (Latest 64 bit (3.9.3-x86_64-linode33)) Please help
|
|
|
|
Promethium
|
|
September 04, 2013, 10:15:50 AM |
|
Are the Quarkcoin developers from the Future?
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
September 04, 2013, 10:24:45 AM |
|
Using: https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerE3-1230 (quad-core, HT) 90khash per thread, 540khash on six of eight threads. i5-3570S (quad-core) 130khash per thread, 400khash on three of four threads. i7-3770S (quad-core, HT) 80khash per thread, 520khash on six of eight threads. Xeon X3440 (quad-core, HT) 66khash per thread, 400khash on six of eight threads. i3-2130 (dual-core, HT) 100khash per thread, 300khash on three of four threads. the i3 is quite impressive there really.
|
|
|
|
stonefoz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
September 04, 2013, 11:11:17 AM |
|
Repost. Updated AMD Bulldozer optimized client Win64bit and maybe some intels ---===---===---===--- built from StoneFoz version1 Which doubled speed and beyond v2 was having many issues (+reject, +orphan for me) , bin below is version 1 8150 Stock 8 cores = .8~1.1 mhash 8350 Stock 8 cores = 1~?? mhash 4300 Stock 4 cores = .46+ mhash=+Bulldozer 1 (more compatable) and Bulldozer gen 2 (more specialized) https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/Tips appreciated: QRK: QQVzchEu7aqAfc71NZa1TYi3toih6abCtkRe-posting because this is not AMD bulldozer only, and may in fact work on the newer intels as well. this is not the uber optimized client, will post when over 2mhash per chip and i'm telling you AGAIN it crashes on my Intel CPU (both versions in the archive) i downloaded it before and tried them all and i re-downloaded just now and tried them all.. arguing doesn't make code run lol Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 = fail / crash on start up - win 7 x64 and yeah i checked and these are 64bit builds not x86 and your welcome for the constructive feedback and time and effort i took to test this everyone edit: I'd love to know how that guy is compiling code from GitHub.. all its giving me is compiler errors with mingw on windows i can get various previous version of the code to run just fine.. i often see "get the tarball" but how am i suppose to find that ? all i can see on the github page is the button that says download zip or that other page with the .zip + targz and that can't be the tarball because i see these devs constantly telling people asking for help compiling it code to not use it and use the tarball when autogen.sh fails etc.. so obviously the tarball should have more files inside the archive in it so you don't have to run that command right ? this quark miner stuff is severe pain in the ass for a noob to come along and get the newest version and compile. these miners should have dedicated topic or do they already ? bottom line: I'm figuring it all out on my own anyway, so whatever keep scrolling guys lol started in on linux and c/c++ well over a decade ago and its sucks balls i can't use VS as an ide so yes i am a noob but no i am not.. i may start a new thread soon with a tutorial on building this on windows for people.. Sorry, I'm not quite the wizard with autotools. Anyway, compile it on either linux, or someone has been successful with mingw or cygwin. Autotools doesn't do MSVS. SO HERE: git clone https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer.git cd quarkcoin-cpuminer sh autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS="-msse2" make -msse2 is not optional, should be built into the build scripts. However, I've avoided getting good with autotools this long, might as well not start now. Really anyone have a simple examples for autotools? They seem to all turn into a huge pita quickly. Step two might be cmake or anything else. really though, the code at: http://stonefoz.myfastmail.com/ is probably the best, first release where fast is first. I've been monkeying around with stuff on github, should be faster later, just not anytime soon. Rewriting large bits and it's going to be broken some times.
|
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
September 04, 2013, 02:18:47 PM |
|
@stonefoz right on man thanks for your advice the git build yesterday had compile errors for me i mentioned already if needed i could do it again log them if anyone wants to see them, myself i just ignored them it looked like a mess.. especially compared to Visual Studio's build output lol i first tried to port the program to VC++ on VS 2010 and almost got it working before i gave up. i have already made a GUI version of cudaminer (another Pooler CPU miner fork) on VS using MFC so i kinda think its doable to support GCC and MSVC. your comment on SSE2 was intriguing and so is that other guys test build "minerd64_CHEAT.exe" i have hex compared the first v2 build uploaded that came with different Instruction sets and then compiled my own and compared. i some experience using IDA, OllyDBG etc patching programs over the years so i know some asm.. never used it much in c/c++ code though. point being i took one of the builds last not (not the newest) and tried -msse2 and msee4.1 and did see they produced different code.. using -O3 also which turns out via google search enables the highest level of optimizations. Anyway the SSE4.1 build has been yielding me a noticeable increase in speed running it over night.. max high of 202 for me now to 215 regularly and all i did was turn off AVX, AVX2 and XOP in the cpuminer.h config and rebuild with sse4.1 (the max my Intel C2D supports) and i didn't do anything yet lol for now all i did was add all the files to a project in Visual Studio and use GCC to compile.. that way i get best of both for now What i'm really wondering right now is what is with that guy that said we all need to patch our miners a few pages back ? He was saying something about it fixing reporting to P2Pools ? something to do with pseudo-share settings ? 215.09 on my C2D E7500 using both cores -s 1 mofo's I can get more I KNOW it lol
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Joerii
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1050
|
|
September 04, 2013, 03:29:02 PM |
|
Congratulations folks !
QRK is now tradeable on PhenixEx.
|
Hypercube - get the attention you deserve
|
|
|
Neisklar
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 04, 2013, 03:53:33 PM |
|
What i'm really wondering right now is what is with that guy that said we all need to patch our miners a few pages back ? He was saying something about it fixing reporting to P2Pools ? something to do with pseudo-share settings ?
I don't know if this miner is actually "patched". The original code had a problem with very low diffs. The problem was that it did a fast pre check which only allowed diffs 0f 0.0039... or higher. Thus when a fresh p2pool was set up, the pool did give out lower diff. But the miner only reported back hashed above 0.0039. Thus the p2pools speed calculations was wrong, as well it may happend that valid pool shares was thrown away (ONLY poolshares, NEVER valid block hashes) This commit beside some other thing has the fix in it: https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-cpuminer/commit/b1af442712ee82fe9764df3812d134a99e11e3f2
|
BTC: 1LZQkJCojCiomDb1FdFXN5g1Gtc6n95acB - QRK: QRrcffSmb6jqw6RmZLtJ6skg71AXRG3S6y
|
|
|
|
Vlad2Vlad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
|
|
September 04, 2013, 10:27:05 PM |
|
I have great news for everyone here:
I like this coin and have started accumulating it. It's third on my list so far.
This should be an interesting experiment as to what will happen with other coins such as ixCoin once they reach their terminal output.
Personally I expect a massive (relative) deflationary cycle which should lead to a large uptick in value compared to its peers. We'll soon find out.
Good luck!
|
iXcoin - Welcome to the F U T U R E!
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
|
|
September 05, 2013, 07:31:12 AM |
|
Personally I expect a massive (relative) deflationary cycle which should lead to a large uptick in value compared to its peers.
What does it mean ?
|
|
|
|
darkproton
|
|
September 05, 2013, 08:23:48 AM |
|
Think he speaks of the halving every three weeks, from~2000 to ~1000 to ~500 to ~ 200 and so on til I believe 1. Soooo log base 2 of 2048 is 11....meaning in 33 weeks we shall see a block reward of 1. 9 weeks we will be at 50 block rewards
|
|
|
|
captainfuture
|
|
September 05, 2013, 08:26:01 PM |
|
is there a miner for mac ?
|
|
|
|
Orrechorre
|
|
September 05, 2013, 08:46:38 PM |
|
which is the best miner for a i5 3570k? cant find any
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
September 05, 2013, 09:31:47 PM |
|
Using: https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerE3-1230 (quad-core, HT) 90khash per thread, 540khash on six of eight threads. i5-3570S (quad-core) 130khash per thread, 400khash on three of four threads. i7-3770S (quad-core, HT) 80khash per thread, 520khash on six of eight threads. Xeon X3440 (quad-core, HT) 66khash per thread, 400khash on six of eight threads. i3-2130 (dual-core, HT) 100khash per thread, 300khash on three of four threads. you should be able to get faster on the i7-3770s my i7-960 gets 600khash on 8 threads (on turbomode), i7-4770k gets like 1mhash if it gets to 100oC it'll start to throttle itself
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
September 06, 2013, 06:13:17 AM |
|
Using: https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerE3-1230 (quad-core, HT) 90khash per thread, 540khash on six of eight threads. i5-3570S (quad-core) 130khash per thread, 400khash on three of four threads. i7-3770S (quad-core, HT) 80khash per thread, 520khash on six of eight threads. Xeon X3440 (quad-core, HT) 66khash per thread, 400khash on six of eight threads. i3-2130 (dual-core, HT) 100khash per thread, 300khash on three of four threads. you should be able to get faster on the i7-3770s my i7-960 gets 600khash on 8 threads (on turbomode), i7-4770k gets like 1mhash if it gets to 100oC it'll start to throttle itself 100C? thats a horrible cooling system...
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
sva_h4cky0
|
|
September 06, 2013, 06:13:57 AM |
|
Sorry, I'm not quite the wizard with autotools. Anyway, compile it on either linux, or someone has been successful with mingw or cygwin. Autotools doesn't do MSVS. SO HERE: git clone https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer.git cd quarkcoin-cpuminer sh autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS="-msse2" make -msse2 is not optional, should be built into the build scripts. However, I've avoided getting good with autotools this long, might as well not start now. Really anyone have a simple examples for autotools? They seem to all turn into a huge pita quickly. Step two might be cmake or anything else. really though, the code at: http://stonefoz.myfastmail.com/ is probably the best, first release where fast is first. I've been monkeying around with stuff on github, should be faster later, just not anytime soon. Rewriting large bits and it's going to be broken some times. when i run ./configure CFLAGS="-msse2" i get ./configure: line 5577: syntax error near unexpected token `,' ./configure: line 5577: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,' but i have curl 7.32.0 installed any idea??
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
September 06, 2013, 07:38:20 AM |
|
Sorry, I'm not quite the wizard with autotools. Anyway, compile it on either linux, or someone has been successful with mingw or cygwin. Autotools doesn't do MSVS. SO HERE: git clone https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer.git cd quarkcoin-cpuminer sh autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS="-msse2" make -msse2 is not optional, should be built into the build scripts. However, I've avoided getting good with autotools this long, might as well not start now. Really anyone have a simple examples for autotools? They seem to all turn into a huge pita quickly. Step two might be cmake or anything else. really though, the code at: http://stonefoz.myfastmail.com/ is probably the best, first release where fast is first. I've been monkeying around with stuff on github, should be faster later, just not anytime soon. Rewriting large bits and it's going to be broken some times. when i run ./configure CFLAGS="-msse2" i get ./configure: line 5577: syntax error near unexpected token `,' ./configure: line 5577: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,' but i have curl 7.32.0 installed any idea?? are you on a debian based system (ubuntu, mint, etc), if so: sudo apt-get install -y libcurl4-openssl-dev otherwise look for a libcurl dev(eloper) package. for compiling you need the headers of given libs. ie, if you have a library libfoo, you need to install libfoo-dev if you want to use it in your code.
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
Guido
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1061
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 06, 2013, 09:48:19 AM |
|
@quarkcoin @Guido outstanding! simply outstanding whats your qrk wallet addy? think will add to site whatever its amazing cheers
|
I am Bonkers BTW Crypto OG + Digital Artist
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
September 06, 2013, 09:49:16 AM |
|
Using: https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminerE3-1230 (quad-core, HT) 90khash per thread, 540khash on six of eight threads. i5-3570S (quad-core) 130khash per thread, 400khash on three of four threads. i7-3770S (quad-core, HT) 80khash per thread, 520khash on six of eight threads. Xeon X3440 (quad-core, HT) 66khash per thread, 400khash on six of eight threads. i3-2130 (dual-core, HT) 100khash per thread, 300khash on three of four threads. you should be able to get faster on the i7-3770s my i7-960 gets 600khash on 8 threads (on turbomode), i7-4770k gets like 1mhash if it gets to 100oC it'll start to throttle itself 100C? thats a horrible cooling system... right, but i know that's when i7's start to throttle, pretty sure it's the same for i5's and i3's
|
|
|
|
|