[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade

[mcphervi]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

[Netnox]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Good read

[niothor]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

[dragonseer]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Do you have a clue how to use emoticons? Have a look at passive aggressive communication, and think about how you come across - unless you like being a psychopath that disrupts every thread you post in

[niothor]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Do you have a clue how to use emoticons? Have a look at passive aggressive communication, and think about how you come across - unless you like being a psychopath that disrupts every thread you post in

I was a critic of quark long before you made your account;).
I didn't like the distribution curve nor it's so called cpu friendly algorithm.

Right now ,I couldn't care less about the premine if it was any or it's projects or future
It just shows me how weak a coin with practical no rewards and no transaction fees is

[mcphervi]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

I'm well aware that double spend attacks are not the only attacks that can be executed with a 51% attack. The point is that we are relatively secured against that particular one. I started off the post saying that I recognize that it is not a substitute - ie. I'm aware there are other problems. We are looking into a variety of options to combat this, and frankly this is still very early in the game. Additionally, the point stands - we are not the only coin that could be attacked, especially with the advent of scrypt asics.

I'm not going to argue with someone that admits to being closed minded on alternative distribution patterns and different hashing algorithms. Not everything has to be a carbon copy of bitcoin.

[dragonseer]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Do you have a clue how to use emoticons? Have a look at passive aggressive communication, and think about how you come across - unless you like being a psychopath that disrupts every thread you post in

I was a critic of quark long before you made your account;).
I didn't like the distribution curve nor it's so called cpu friendly algorithm.

Right now ,I couldn't care less about the premine if it was any or it's projects or future
It just shows me how weak a coin with practical no rewards and no transaction fees is

How nice of you to tell us all what you don't like. Constantly.

Let me guess, you were an early adopter of Bitcoin and did well enough to quit your job, and now, you spending your time 'protecting your investment' by trolling messageboards and posting FUD about the competition. How sad.

[niothor]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Do you have a clue how to use emoticons? Have a look at passive aggressive communication, and think about how you come across - unless you like being a psychopath that disrupts every thread you post in

I was a critic of quark long before you made your account;).
I didn't like the distribution curve nor it's so called cpu friendly algorithm.

Right now ,I couldn't care less about the premine if it was any or it's projects or future
It just shows me how weak a coin with practical no rewards and no transaction fees is

How nice of you to tell us all what you don't like. Constantly.

Let me guess, you were an early adopter of Bitcoin and did well enough to quit your job, and now, you spending your time 'protecting your investment' by trolling messageboards and posting FUD about the competition. How sad.

I am not an early adopter , I haven't quit my job and It's my pleasure to remind quark fanatics that their coin is 1/10 of the value they bought in December.

Also , unlike you zealots I had a bet with cryptohunter and I admitted in this board and pm'd him that I lost it and for the the 7 days trading time quark was a better choice than btc.

But , you're the type of blinkered commie zealot "who's not with us" is an enemy! Stone him to death!

Competition? If bitcoin needs trolls to protect it from qrk , then bitcoin deserves to die.

[dragonseer]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Do you have a clue how to use emoticons? Have a look at passive aggressive communication, and think about how you come across - unless you like being a psychopath that disrupts every thread you post in

I was a critic of quark long before you made your account;).
I didn't like the distribution curve nor it's so called cpu friendly algorithm.

Right now ,I couldn't care less about the premine if it was any or it's projects or future
It just shows me how weak a coin with practical no rewards and no transaction fees is

How nice of you to tell us all what you don't like. Constantly.

Let me guess, you were an early adopter of Bitcoin and did well enough to quit your job, and now, you spending your time 'protecting your investment' by trolling messageboards and posting FUD about the competition. How sad.

I am not an early adopter , I haven't quit my job and It's my pleasure to remind quark fanatics that their coin is 1/10 of the value they bought in December.

Also , unlike you zealots I had a bet with cryptohunter and I admitted in this board and pm'd him that I lost it and for the the 7 days trading time quark was a better choice than btc.

But , you're the type of blinkered commie zealot "who's not with us" is an enemy! Stone him to death!

Competition? If bitcoin needs trolls to protect it from qrk , then bitcoin deserves to die.

You just posted in the Isracoin forum that no crypto-currencies will survive other than Bitcoin, 'except maybe Namecoin', and I'm a zealot?? I'm posting here because I own Quark and want to follow the progress of this coin, that's all.

But you just want to derail any productive conversation and start fights for no reason - I'm pressing ignore and I won't respond to your posts again, nothing can be gained from indulging 'your pleasure' with pointless arguments.

[reRaise]

If Bitcoin really takes off and is accepted mainstream (which it seems its going that way) than no doubt it could reach $10k. At 10k quark would be around $.40 at its current price. If quark keeps the momentum and discipline with it's projects i could see it breaking ath if Bitcoin starts to move up into the k's, which for quark its around 0.0003 giving it a value of $3 each (btc at $10k) with a market cap of around 750m while Bitcoins market cap would be 130B, so it's pretty realistic to me. Quark just needs to stay in the game.

Now quark will be implemented in ShaqFu which is a pretty big game in the making and will be available for consoles going live in 2015 which i'm personally looking forward too and a pretty convincing factor that quark will be around for a long while + bitcoins possible break out in 2015 makes me believe that the alts will boom even more.

[cryptohunter]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

I kind of agree in part. QRK should have added POS a while ago to give more security to the blockchain. However i still like qrk and i really like the ideas from the qrk foundation. The coin tech is very important but the vision for the coins usage is also very important ... i think qrk has some good people at the core. I am not 100% sure but i hear the QRK algo is rather more asic resistant than many others.

Although asic is good for some reasons stated and also i think money spent on asics is money into crypto that will not leave so i like that idea. However you will always have the gpu owners that want to mine and want to have a fair go at a coin during it's pow phase.

The POW mining stage of qrk was also angelic compared to a lot of new coins.

I sold a lot of QRK in the 20k range out of need more than anything else. I have since bought a quite a bit back since i think it could be a good bet. To be fair a lot of the last wave have been crushed in price even the darlings are way down. I guess i'm more of a collector rather than investor. I could have been rich by now had i sold even half my coins at their peak or near peak. Perhaps there will be collectors for rare shitcoins in the future   i hope so.

I think all coins are waiting for the next big wave. Let's hope there is one.

[dragonseer]

If Bitcoin really takes off and is accepted mainstream (which it seems its going that way) than no doubt it could reach $10k. At 10k quark would be around $.40 at its current price. If quark keeps the momentum and discipline with it's projects i could see it breaking ath if Bitcoin starts to move up into the k's, which for quark its around 0.0003 giving it a value of $3 each (btc at $10k) with a market cap of around 750m while Bitcoins market cap would be 130B, so it's pretty realistic to me. Quark just needs to stay in the game.

Now quark will be implemented in ShaqFu which is a pretty big game in the making and will be available for consoles going live in 2015 which i'm personally looking forward too and a pretty convincing factor that quark will be around for a long while + bitcoins possible break out in 2015 makes me believe that the alts will boom even more.

I don't see Bitcoin taking off unless there is a consensus on what it actually does. Everyday articles talk about bitcoin as a revolutionary idea, an amazing investment, a payment system, and on and on it goes. But sometimes when you mention it to someone, the first thing they'll think of is Mt Gox or some other scandal. Because of this baggage, and some other shortcomings (like transaction speed) Bitcoin has to find it's niche like every other coin out there, or it will collapse. There are plenty of people that won't ever want to use Bitcoin, but another coin might appeal to them. Maybe finding that niche for Bitcoin means shoring up its investment status and paying for big ticket items like cars, real estate and so on.

But something like Quark is better for buying coffee, and small businesses shouldn't need big payment processor gateways to start using digital currencies. In short, if we don't start recognizing what needs different coins address then none of these things will take off. But as for Quark, I can just say I intuitively KNOW it will be big, and it will be everywhere. I don't know when, but I'm prepared to wait.

[digitalindustry]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Look out guys niothor the destroyer is back ha ha , how's world of warcraft treating you ?

Getting out much these days ?

[xtsjyfx]

anyone have compiled on linux? I got error  

you can try complie again,there is no problem with it

[digitalindustry]

Yes they do .
Those asic farms make sure no 10 yo with 1000$ on this father cc can buy a botnet and play with the chain as he wants .
So , what is protecting quark against this kind of attack?

While it is not a substitute for a strong network, Quark is protected by its checkpointing. Every 12 blocks, the blockchain is signed by the checkpoint - meaning that every 12 blocks, the blockchain becomes hard-coded. Therefore, if a person wanted to double spend, all the accepting party would have to do to prevent that from occurring and seeing that they in fact did not send payment and are trying to commit fraud is to wait for 6 minutes or 12 blocks, at which time they would see that the transaction that they are accepting in fact has been removed from the blockchain. At that time the accepting party would simply have to not send the purchased material since there was non-payment.

The Foundation would not allow a "10 y/o with $1000" to successfully attack the network - we have a lot more devoted resources than that. Many other coins could be attacked by someone with enough means - that is not isolated to Quark. Theoretically one of the ASIC manufacturers for sha256 or scrypt could simply run a large proportion of their production line of ASICs themselves and play the same sort of havoc you're describing. The whole system is based on some element of trust - which will be reduced as the whole landscape evolves. Quark is less than 1 year old - we are at the start of our life-cycle, not the end.

Vic

Do you have a clue what a 51% or a 90 % attack can do?
Do a bit of research , you're getting the wrong idea .

Do you have a clue how to use emoticons? Have a look at passive aggressive communication, and think about how you come across - unless you like being a psychopath that disrupts every thread you post in

I was a critic of quark long before you made your account;).
I didn't like the distribution curve nor it's so called cpu friendly algorithm.

Right now ,I couldn't care less about the premine if it was any or it's projects or future
It just shows me how weak a coin with practical no rewards and no transaction fees is

How nice of you to tell us all what you don't like. Constantly.

Let me guess, you were an early adopter of Bitcoin and did well enough to quit your job, and now, you spending your time 'protecting your investment' by trolling messageboards and posting FUD about the competition. How sad.

I am not an early adopter , I haven't quit my job and It's my pleasure to remind quark fanatics that their coin is 1/10 of the value they bought in December.

Also , unlike you zealots I had a bet with cryptohunter and I admitted in this board and pm'd him that I lost it and for the the 7 days trading time quark was a better choice than btc.

But , you're the type of blinkered commie zealot "who's not with us" is an enemy! Stone him to death!

Competition? If bitcoin needs trolls to protect it from qrk , then bitcoin deserves to die.

Typical retarded logic above , using the same argument to attack or semi passively threaten confidence would give a fat loser like this a hard on.

How scared do we all look ?

He kind of reminds me of the main stream media that is still trying to "shape opinion" while all the time people continue to tune out.

It's that sort of misplaced ego, the failing empire type.

" how you going mum yeah today I threatened some people on a forum, but you'd be real proud of the way I did it , I kind done it with a smile icon ....."

" wow son that's great , how's world of warcraft ..."

"have the NSA or in-q-tel offer you a job yet , like a real one ? "


#BringBackOurLOLs

[digitalindustry]

anyone have compiled on linux? I got error  

you can try complie again,there is no problem with it

Post the error .

[techsolution]

i was thinking about using qrk as payment in store, in todays prices of qrk it is risky for qrk, for cheap items we have to spend o lot of qrk, seller will want to get money for sale so will dump qrk to get his fiat, mostly of sellers? will it be good for qrk price? we need more people who want to spent quark to buy something then sellers to accept qrk, otherway price will follow down, or maybe i am wrong?

example: 1 million holder will buy gold online using his qrk, seller of gold will try to get fiat for his sale so will sell quark on exchange, so he will be for long time dump it and price will not rise.

before we try to spend qrk on buying price should be higher i think or am i wrong?

[niothor]

i was thinking about using qrk as payment in store, in todays prices of qrk it is risky for qrk, for cheap items we have to spend o lot of qrk, seller will want to get money for sale so will dump qrk to get his fiat, mostly of sellers? will it be good for qrk price? we need more people who want to spent quark to buy something then sellers to accept qrk, otherway price will follow down, or maybe i am wrong?

example: 1 million holder will buy gold online using his qrk, seller of gold will try to get fiat for his sale so will sell quark on exchange, so he will be for long time dump it and price will not rise.

before we try to spend qrk on buying price should be higher i think or am i wrong?

It won't happen that way.
If 1000 merchants wil start accepting quark and 10 000 people will spend quark daily I'm willing to bet that the price won't go down but in fact will go x10 times in a flash.

[techsolution]

i was thinking about using qrk as payment in store, in todays prices of qrk it is risky for qrk, for cheap items we have to spend o lot of qrk, seller will want to get money for sale so will dump qrk to get his fiat, mostly of sellers? will it be good for qrk price? we need more people who want to spent quark to buy something then sellers to accept qrk, otherway price will follow down, or maybe i am wrong?

example: 1 million holder will buy gold online using his qrk, seller of gold will try to get fiat for his sale so will sell quark on exchange, so he will be for long time dump it and price will not rise.

before we try to spend qrk on buying price should be higher i think or am i wrong?

It won't happen that way.
If 1000 merchants wil start accepting quark and 10 000 people will spend quark daily I'm willing to bet that the price won't go down but in fact will go x10 times in a flash.

yes, correct if 10 000 people will buy quarks again

[niothor]

i was thinking about using qrk as payment in store, in todays prices of qrk it is risky for qrk, for cheap items we have to spend o lot of qrk, seller will want to get money for sale so will dump qrk to get his fiat, mostly of sellers? will it be good for qrk price? we need more people who want to spent quark to buy something then sellers to accept qrk, otherway price will follow down, or maybe i am wrong?

example: 1 million holder will buy gold online using his qrk, seller of gold will try to get fiat for his sale so will sell quark on exchange, so he will be for long time dump it and price will not rise.

before we try to spend qrk on buying price should be higher i think or am i wrong?

It won't happen that way.
If 1000 merchants wil start accepting quark and 10 000 people will spend quark daily I'm willing to bet that the price won't go down but in fact will go x10 times in a flash.

yes, correct if 10 000 people will buy quarks again

you're looking at the whole picture in a too simplistic view.
This panic or merchants dumping their coins happened with BTC also and nothign happend.

Trust me , it's far better for quark to start being used than waiting for the price to go up... because...


Also , you can't have 10 000 users with one shop , but if 10 000 shops appear out of the lue , the 1 million users will follow.