Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 07:37:41 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 124 »
  Print  
Author Topic: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s  (Read 230783 times)
poppys
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 23, 2014, 10:02:28 PM
 #1421

I didn't read all the pages but did they manage to get the target of 2TH/s ? or they are still tweaking the prototype ? they still advertise 2 TH/s on their website so they still think they can do it I guess !


Nope, they're only hashing around 1.5TH. That's only 750Gh/sec per 2 chips. 250Gh/sec less per 2x goldstrike chips than what they said atm, however tweaking the software and chips are still a work in progress. Also looking at the cpu core temp 79c on the goldstrike they might not be able to hit 2TH per unit with out getting hardware errors.   It will be good to watch if they can pull it off.  







  You can view a shot of it here. http://imgur.com/Dvm0jc4      



Cointerra has not yet released their final specifications - the information above is outdated. However, an update is expected before the end of the week.

That's not outdated, it was taken a few day's ago and posted on the website.  lol you work for them?
Supercomputing
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 278
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 23, 2014, 10:31:29 PM
 #1422

I didn't read all the pages but did they manage to get the target of 2TH/s ? or they are still tweaking the prototype ? they still advertise 2 TH/s on their website so they still think they can do it I guess !


Nope, they're only hashing around 1.5TH. That's only 750Gh/sec per 2 chips. 250Gh/sec less per 2x goldstrike chips than what they said atm, however tweaking the software and chips are still a work in progress. Also looking at the cpu core temp 79c on the goldstrike they might not be able to hit 2TH per unit with out getting hardware errors.   It will be good to watch if they can pull it off.  







  You can view a shot of it here. http://imgur.com/Dvm0jc4      



Cointerra has not yet released their final specifications - the information above is outdated. However, an update is expected before the end of the week.

That's not outdated, it was taken a few day's ago and posted on the website.  lol you work for them?

Please be patient for the final specification which will be released shortly.

Electrical Engineering & Computer Science
http://www.eecs.mit.edu/
Powell
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486
Merit: 262

rm -rf stupidity


View Profile
January 24, 2014, 04:05:04 AM
 #1423

Are you all doing the Terrahosting service at Rackspace, Data Foundry or any of the other bigger name colo's in the surrounding area?  Or will you all be doing your own hosting in house?
CanadianGuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 25, 2014, 02:15:39 AM
 #1424

oh look no update
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 25, 2014, 02:48:14 AM
 #1425

oh look no update

because they don't have any common sense in the bunch of them...  here is some rational thought from their forum but more crickets..

"Ship the units without the PSU's then they wont need certifying , then ship the already certified PSU's seperately and customers can install them , this is how KNC got their orders out of the door so quickly. I would be shocked if these get through certification in 2-3 days Huh? How would that be possible surely these people know better than that ? I thought they had more experience UL testing can take forever "

http://forum.cointerra.com/threads/delivery-times-move-up-a-month-s.268/#post-1341

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
CanadianGuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 25, 2014, 03:18:42 AM
 #1426

I've already talked to my lawyer.  Their contract has a dozen flaws in it, and is so piss poor I'll be surprised if they survive the backlash we give them.
plato14
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 04:00:47 AM
 #1427

I've already talked to my lawyer.  Their contract has a dozen flaws in it, and is so piss poor I'll be surprised if they survive the backlash we give them.

If there is a lawsuit ill be on board immediately, so tired of these shitty asic companies.
aerobatic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 702
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 07:08:19 AM
 #1428

oh look no update

because they don't have any common sense in the bunch of them...  here is some rational thought from their forum but more crickets..

"Ship the units without the PSU's then they wont need certifying , then ship the already certified PSU's seperately and customers can install them , this is how KNC got their orders out of the door so quickly. I would be shocked if these get through certification in 2-3 days Huh? How would that be possible surely these people know better than that ? I thought they had more experience UL testing can take forever "

http://forum.cointerra.com/threads/delivery-times-move-up-a-month-s.268/#post-1341


minor change to what you said.. as far as I'm aware, knc don't usually ship any power supplies with their miners (many bitcoin miners are provided without puss...   my bitfurys also didn't come with power supplies.

knc does provide a power supply if you pay the multi thousand dollar hosting charge (which i did) but for delivery customers, psus aren't included..
trek27
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 172
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 07:32:45 AM
 #1429

Did someone with December batch order receive any info about shipping?
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 8440



View Profile WWW
January 25, 2014, 09:24:12 AM
 #1430

I've already talked to my lawyer.  Their contract has a dozen flaws in it, and is so piss poor I'll be surprised if they survive the backlash we give them.
Is your lawyer as real as your VMC mining hardware*?

Chilling out may be advised for the moment in any case— the assembly line pictures and demos show that there is actual progress being made, it doesn't seem like backlash could possibly make it move along any faster. Sadly early customers are already screwed on these systems. Sad

*For some context: CanadianGuy claimed to have received VMC mining hardware last month, this month it was disclosed that VMC was still working on RTL.
CanadianGuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 25, 2014, 01:31:07 PM
 #1431

Sorry.  The machine thing was a joke though, seriously.  Almost every ActM shareholder knew that, and I wasn't trying to fool anybody.  My intention was misinterpreted and I didn't mean for it to become a big thing.  I do have a lot of mining hardware but none of it is VMC, or CT unfortunately.
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1013


Be A Digital Miner


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 03:29:56 PM
 #1432

Sorry.  The machine thing was a joke though, seriously.  Almost every ActM shareholder knew that, and I wasn't trying to fool anybody.  My intention was misinterpreted and I didn't mean for it to become a big thing.  I do have a lot of mining hardware but none of it is VMC, or CT unfortunately.
I would suggest you change your name then because constantly posting that you had been shipped and received a machine from VMC/AMC when they have not even received a chip nor have any chance of delivering anything in the next three months, is not that funny.
Then bragging that someone paid you 5 BTC to make the fraudulent posts is also, not that funny.

ProfMac
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 25, 2014, 04:20:11 PM
 #1433

Sorry.  The machine thing was a joke though, seriously.  Almost every ActM shareholder knew that, and I wasn't trying to fool anybody.  My intention was misinterpreted and I didn't mean for it to become a big thing.  I do have a lot of mining hardware but none of it is VMC, or CT unfortunately.
I would suggest you change your name then because constantly posting that you had been shipped and received a machine from VMC/AMC when they have not even received a chip nor have any chance of delivering anything in the next three months, is not that funny.
Then bragging that someone paid you 5 BTC to make the fraudulent posts is also, not that funny.


A few decades ago, I was in a session with all the other new graduate students.  We were videotaped presenting the material for the first lab meeting.

Over and over the lead professor told us "never use sarcasm, it gets misunderstood."


I try to be respectful and informed.
plato14
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 04:38:34 PM
 #1434

Not surprised by this non-update, so lets get this straight, the miners are only hashing at 1.5 TH, they're over a month late on December batch, they say they're shipping by next week, but who knows what is really going to happen?  What happened to the dream team cointerra?  Seems like another asic company that couldn't hack it, should have went with KNC.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGArkvNXl1g
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2014, 04:48:10 PM
 #1435

Not surprised by this non-update, so lets get this straight, the miners are only hashing at 1.5 TH, they're over a month late on December batch, they say they're shipping by next week, but who knows what is really going to happen?  What happened to the dream team cointerra?  Seems like another asic company that couldn't hack it, should have went with KNC.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGArkvNXl1g

nearly the same scam scheme as HashFast. both companies are U.S. based.

CanadianGuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 25, 2014, 06:14:59 PM
 #1436

Sorry.  The machine thing was a joke though, seriously.  Almost every ActM shareholder knew that, and I wasn't trying to fool anybody.  My intention was misinterpreted and I didn't mean for it to become a big thing.  I do have a lot of mining hardware but none of it is VMC, or CT unfortunately.
I would suggest you change your name then because constantly posting that you had been shipped and received a machine from VMC/AMC when they have not even received a chip nor have any chance of delivering anything in the next three months, is not that funny.
Then bragging that someone paid you 5 BTC to make the fraudulent posts is also, not that funny.


Alright.. but if i was in charge of millions of dollars of customers funds I would treat them with so much respect, my employees would be working around the clock.  If I saw that I was going to be late, I would hire more man power.  Anything to live up to my word.  We aren't talking about a $20 VMC machine here.. that's for another thread.  Isn't attacking someones opinion due to their credibility considered to be flawed logic for an argument?? I'm sure it is.. my opinion is just as valid as anybody elses, so my history has nothing to do with it.
NicholasB54
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 07:42:51 PM
 #1437

Anyone know how many miners CT took pre-orders for, or how many in any particular month ?
Just to help guesstimate the impact on hashrate when/if they start shipping product
ujka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 07:50:44 PM
 #1438

Anyone know how many miners CT took pre-orders for, or how many in any particular month ?
Just to help guesstimate the impact on hashrate when/if they start shipping product
There is a thread over there at mining speculation - Total Hashrate Forecast Q1, Q2 2014 (Community work)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=387533.0

Edit: just checked over there, no info for cointerra:
Quote
[10]   No figure availabe; following batch 1; CT is currently selling batch 5; Cointerra has without a doubt massive capacities; any ideas?
NicholasB54
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 08:17:50 PM
 #1439

Anyone know how many miners CT took pre-orders for, or how many in any particular month ?
Just to help guesstimate the impact on hashrate when/if they start shipping product
There is a thread over there at mining speculation - Total Hashrate Forecast Q1, Q2 2014 (Community work)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=387533.0

Edit: just checked over there, no info for cointerra:
Quote
[10]   No figure availabe; following batch 1; CT is currently selling batch 5; Cointerra has without a doubt massive capacities; any ideas?
Thanks ujka
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 25, 2014, 10:01:06 PM
 #1440

Not surprised by this non-update, so lets get this straight, the miners are only hashing at 1.5 TH, they're over a month late on December batch, they say they're shipping by next week, but who knows what is really going to happen?  What happened to the dream team cointerra?  Seems like another asic company that couldn't hack it, should have went with KNC.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGArkvNXl1g

nearly the same scam scheme as HashFast. both companies are U.S. based.

hashfast, cointerra, BFL typical American scam artists filled with ego and arrogance.. bombard you with marketing doublespeak, flowery press releases and no update updates. overpromise and under-deliver order of the day.

Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 124 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!