Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[infinity33]

Most of people are checking ico ratings as one of their reference on where they will choose to invest, but for me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos.

For me, I really do not believe in the trust ratings of sites, I often believe in the good reviews and high attendance and positive reviews of the projects. Having a good ICO ratings will definitely bring good profit.

[1714597535]

1714597535

[CAPT.DEADPOOL]

yes I believe in ico ratings that are also the basis to find out if ico is legit and I know it's important because other investors and comments on the ico ratings have good reviews of ico so much it's nice to share the high ratings.

[babsjoe]

ICO rating have not influence my decision to invest or not since I believe these rating can be bought hence I devide to do my investigations and research myself!  ICO is a good way to invest, if you ate going to make profit however, you must choose quality ICO!

[edinorogka]

I don't believe in the ratings of ICO . This is not the best source of information .  It is better to study and read . Even if the rating is high, it does not mean that the project will be successful .

[skylighters]

Some of them are really legit to be fair and they do the research. That's how I found the Monnex project http://monnex.online/ that I'm planning to invest in right now. However, no one can be guaranteed that the investment will pay off even if it is a good project.

[beddyyy]

Really there are a lot of paid ratings now.
But there are such ratings that experts put on the basis of their own experience.
And before completely trusting other people's ratings, we need to learn all the information about the project independently.

[vin1103]

i think ico ratings its help us to know about ico, but not fix 100% ico ratings is correct to know what this ico will success or not, ico ratings just help, what to make ico success is popularity and the target sale is reach

[ElianaMaria]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I think they are not the end all be all, but they give a nice starting point for evaluating a project. We are hitting our ICO in September and still getting the MVP finalized, so all our scores are low. If you take a look at a rating and it turns you off but you are still interested, keep doing your research.

[xKillMooR]

Not much, I think that ICOs that have a high rating, have paid for it. This is my personal opinion, don't judge me, please

[kulakvlad]

Previously, I only believed them, now I learned to analyze projects myself and look at the ratings very rarely.

[arifteguhr]

Not on the whole. but the existence of ico rating actually helps everyone in seeing information about ico better and also can become preference an our investment. regardless it can be manipulated or not

[SnapFX]

I think many ICO ratings purchased. But if some ICO could redeem good rating, then it already speaks about something.

[makerst]

There are a lot of different theories about what ranking sites and kakub use they are. My personal opinion will not change, because I understand that people take part in the rating and these people form the opinion of investors. But they can be bought.

[dimon_btc11]

I did not believe that at all because ICO who are in ratings usually pay some money to get the good ratings. They are not objective and shouldn't be use as a reference

[jademacoy]

Yes of course this is one way to identify that the ICO project being introduced to the community is good. THe ratings of these ICO are coming from the community and after the community seeing the project that is good able to perfrom successfully in the near future then the community will going to rate the ICO project. However, it is not also the way we should take to invest in an ICO. It is still to conduct a study and research on the project before investing which means you can do feasibility study of it if it will success.

[Fqure3]

I can find on icodropds.com website. It is very convenient to use this website, cause you can find all the necessary information and links. The information about bounty campaigns and airdrops is also there. But there are lots of such websites, but I, personally, prefer this one. Besides, lots of telegram channels devoted to ico analysis are out there. Lots of information, lots of opportunities, you just have to be able to spend time reading and to make conclusions.

[katak mercat]

I believe in crypto rating but I still see the quality of the projects I support, the ICO rating only helps a lot of people in assessing a project, the value is according to their version, so sometimes my version is personally different.

[kukuxam]

I usually make a decision with my personal criteria as well as this ICO site rating. The more resources the better, but within the site I'm only looking for ICO, I also read the description of these ico

[Gfdety9]

In the previous year once I've been asked to help one ICO to send some e-mails to different ICO related websites (including listings) and I've discovered that a pretty big part of the ICO ratings are require payments to get your project listed on their website. That comes especialy about the local websites.

[ooxtcoo]

When analyzing ISO projects, first of all, I look at the team and the idea. As a rule, ICO ratings show the popularity of the project, which is also an extremely important factor, because it is the interest of buyers that will play the main role!