Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[yujli]

I never believed in ico ratings. I know the darkness behind it. As long as you give money or the rating agencies are on good terms. You can get a high grade.

[1714581665]

1714581665

[1714581665]

1714581665

[1714581665]

1714581665

[oludare1]

You need to understand how the rating is given before trust it or not. Some ratings site just use a check list to see whether certain items like telegram group, whitepaper exist or not. These are far less useful then sites that actually trying to understand what the project and potential is, such as crushcrypto and in some case even some youtuber are better. But it's best using ratings as reference, some youtuber could be ranking the coins as the best ICO because they already negotiated presale discount and invested a lot of money in it. End of day we make our own decisions. Personal opinions not financial advice

[djscreem01]

People always run in the crowd.
When people trust and refer to projects at the ICO website.
Then I think it is reasonable that investors always want to know about a project and it is appreciated by the knowledgeable people.
Undervalued projects will not be of interest to investors and vice versa.

[zhaviabieber405]

Most of them aren't very trustworthy, either the site itself or the guys rating them are taking bribes.

[islakevin]

Yes i do believe in ico ratings but those are just some people's insight how about other people , which means the coin is good but it doesn't mean that this will pump or this will moon .

[Doubleabc]

Honestly not because the rating from ico I think only a few predictions of a blockchain that is still not accurate in my opinion and this still needs a better update again for the future. other than that the rating of an ico does not guarantee the altcoin launched by ico is potentially despite its ico success.

[Libbbbbbb]

We also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest. So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project.

[boberpuper]

I'm assessing the company's prospects .I read carefully and study .  I believe in ICO rating .

[alttravel]

I do not trust sites that set ratings for crypto projects, but only make the decision, and it's better not to invest if you are not sure about the crypto project.

[SpringfieldM1A]

In most cases, the problem of rating web-sites is the questionable quality of the proposed analytics. Now all rating teams have the same difficulties associated with the lack of qualified personnel. Whichever figures the crypto-currency market operates with, we can see high-level analytics only when international rating brands enter this market. It is just one of references, i always do my own research on the project i want to invest in. But i think ico ratings site like ICOBench is good, you can check the summary and KYC project of the token. Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit. In a word - this is a good criterion, but this is not enough. Just trust your own research.

[19Nov16]

I think the ICO rating is the easiest clue to determine whether the ICO has good prospects or not, and I always make the ICO rating a measure and certainly not only from one source rating but at least 3 ratings.

[chocolaty]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

At first yes. But not anymore. Not all ICO ratings in those website are true. Have you read the news abour ICObench? There was an issue about ICO experts being bribed by developers for high ratings. Also, I have proved that not all ICOs with high ratings have good token values. I don't want to drop the names of the ICOs I have encountered but I know quite a few.

[Decrypto]

I only believe in doing more research about a certain project. Believing alone in ICO ratings as a basis to invest on an ICO of  a project is really suicide because a lot of ICO sites nowadays have paid reviewers and get paid to create positive review.

[e@symode]

I always said that you do not need to trust such rating sites. Because all such ratings are assigned only by people, and they can be bought, therefore the opinion of these rating sites can definitely be manipulated

[avrona]

I think websites like ICObench or ICOrating only rate based on the data they get. for success or failure of token sales I think teamwork and marketing strategies are very influential.

[Lukas Tarantas]

It seems to me that ratings are often not exhibited objectively. People who evaluate ICO, sometimes inattentively study the project or rate it highly for money. Therefore, I am skeptical about the ratings.

[Bitlife81]

Whenever there's a new ICO on the market, the first thing I look on them is their team members, and I would always scan their twitter accounts if they're attending any blockchain summits.

[sashulya7979]

I think that the rating is an addition to the analysis of a project! you must always analyze yourself any project! In the rating agency it is also very difficult to get to a bad project! In any case, of course, the solution for investment lies with every person, and we need to take this very seriously!

[cryptodigitz]

Sometimes the whole rating looks suspicious but who do we ask for the right ones

[USScrypto]

I always choose manually and according to my knowledge of the ICO project. But for ICO rating I feel is also very helpful to us and we have to be careful because not all ICO rating is correct. There are some projects which we check in ICO's rating was very good but in reality, the ICO is not successful.