Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Utkaozero]

I think it is wrong to rely on the evaluation of various sites . I'm used to studying myself, never trust the estimates

[1714596206]

1714596206

[1714596206]

1714596206

[1714596206]

1714596206

[1714596206]

1714596206

[1714596206]

1714596206

[angelomoraaaa]

For an ICO bounty campaigns, hosting a third gathering rating your ICO implies getting profitable and legitimate data on the quality and the capability of the ICO. On the off chance that the result is sure, the aftereffects of the rating can be utilized for advertising purposes, since it transmits trust and straightforwardness. In spite of the fact that not all profoundly appraised ICO wound up sucessful. It is constantly better to make some self-resarch with respect to the poject that you will take an interest in.

[stynos]

 I always do my own research before investing in an ICO. I do not only trust certain websites which highlight some ICOs. If you want to make money in this sector, it is always about your own research and  information you gathered.

[kkamilov]

Yes, I believe, because it works, of course not 100%, but it works. It's better than if it were not for these ratings and it's easier for me to analyze projects

[Irkytsk38rus]

I think any rating can be bought and I once do not pay attention to the ratings of projects you need to study the project itself and not only it is rating

[TaylahSherriff]

I see that ICO is very magic and fanstatic and I also know that now one can predict the future of ICO. Therefore, I just see the change of rating but I do not believe in it.

[lagabara]

Not always a good ICO rating will make the ICO project a good one. Because I've followed a bounty campaign that has a good rating ICO but ultimately a scam too. So many factors other than the ICO rating that we should pay attention when following the ICO project.

[thaokhuyen03]

Perhaps I consider it a reference, because every criterion is just a factor. It is too risky for the ICO, ICO is a project for the future, the evaluation is just a valuation of the future

[vatanen]

Yes! One of the criteria and factor that is best to consider in joining ICO is having a good ICO rating most specially those well-known ICO review and rating websites. If it has good rating that gives a good impression to a specific ICO.

[dmerrifield9844]

I don't take it to the heart. There are some ICO with great rating and fail and ICO with a bad rating that succeeds.

[Rhaizan]

I use ICO ratings in my ICO researches, i believe them but i don't fully believe in any information at all, so i take a look at different opinions on different web sites every times.

There is nothing wrong if we believe in ico ratings but if you don't want to be victim by scam make your own research after looking at the ico ratings. Just always look at the website.

[KDjr]

I don't believe these sites that give ratings, simply because, on the whole, this sphere can not be honest, well, or because people have such an opinion and only a correct evaluation of projects can really fix the situation, but now my opinion is definitely not to believe these resources. Because they can be bought, or rather their opinion and their evaluation. 

[petergo13]

No, it's far too easy to manipulate the ratings, lots of the 'experts' just sell ratings to ICOs. They're ok for filtering out real shitty projects though.

[troiano9]

ICO ratings are BS.  Easy to manipulate.  You have to do your own research

[arkawa040]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I agree with your colleague, and I also do not really trust the site's ratings ICOBench, for example, I do not believe, they are a lot of good startups cut. In my opinion, strong projects do not need any evaluation, I know the projects that Hard Cap collected in 3 minutes, and they did not need any rating))) a good project can be seen from far away)

[AntF86]

Not at all, I think it's better to study the project and make up your own opinion on it.

[DonaldTramponald]

I periodically monitor ICO ratings.  But I do not really believe in their objectivity.  Since I already saw enough examples when these ratings were wrong.  But it's easy to look at new projects, I like how everything is structured.

[Arrbuz]

I trust only one site, this site icodrop ... other site I do not like and they have strange ratings for ico

[mariaana]

ICO rating is just one of the factor that contributes to the success of a project. Acceptance of the project in reaching softcap or hardcap is driven by the overall impact on how it could solve a current problem and the viability of the commodity being sold in particular. There are projects that reach softcap or hardcap but never continue to flourish in the future.

[anxioushoarder]

Talking about proper resources for most of us aiming to considering promising ICOs and ITOs are ICO Drops and renewed likely technical places.