Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Sevaev]

I think that now it is not necessary to fully trust the ratings of ICO projects. Because in most cases they are evaluated by the advisors that participate in the project. Rating is the beginning of the ICO analysis, and it's best to check everything yourself.

[1714604595]

1714604595

[jaggijagjit]

I see many other criteria for finding a successful project because the ICO rating is not enough to believe in any project. I also check the team behind the projects,Road map of the company, Whitepaper of the company and product of the company. In my views ICO rating is just help to find a good project.

[RaspoBTC]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

After the stories about the possibilities to buy a rating, you can't trust ICOs ratings.
You can only only trust yourself, so Do Your Own Research.

[farland7]

We have to believe something. I want to believe that icobench, for example, have criteria such as team members, project quality, whitepaper, etc for conducting their reviews. I trust icobench, but I still do my own research if I want to invest.

[Nnedaddy1]

I don't believe the rating of some of these ICO review platforms, as I think many of them collects money from the developers and then give their ICO projects good rating.
That's fraud!

[TropicalDog17]

Higher ICO ratings is not a guarantee that the coin will be successful, but higher ratings also can give you a clue if the project can give you good returns.

[Silverstone79]

I check out their ratings on some of these ICO rating sites. So far only maybe one or two ICOs have performed well. The several otherICOs have flopped massively upon listing on exchanges. It might be caused by the general bloodbath though.

[Qurilio]

I accept on the ICO evaluations yet even they have high appraisals, despite everything I don't confide in their appraisals. Each ICO I took an interest is brimming with inquire about by mine, I simply don't viewing the evaluations of each ICO, I additionally think about the specialized side of the venture and their innovation behind moreover. A large portion of ICOs these days are trick.

[jerrry moor]

I think they are good resources, but no one place should be your only source of info. I think they provide a great initial perspective though.

[Julskybtc1]

There are a lot of ICO review company right now, and the best way to get the objective assessment of a project is to do our research by crosschecking it on multiple ICO reviews and asking directly to the team behind it on their telegram group.

[CaptainCaptcha]

Personally, I think most of them are being paid to promote them, I'd rather just go to the bounties section of this forum and judge for myself the team behind the project and the whitepaper of it.

[Ikay]

I think none of that rating website will give some success in project because even if you listed your project in that rating websites and you got high rating and you don't have product to your project would you think you got a successful ending? No. because a lot of investors now are depending on project that will last and have product no matter low his rating is.

[Tstar]

When analyzing ISO projects, first of all, I look at the team and the idea. As a rule, ICO ratings show the popularity of the project, which is also an extremely important factor, because it is the interest of buyers that will play the main role!

Yes, you should check the ratings and use all the information you can, but it is not recommendable to relay on ICO ratings only, in my opinion. Not all of them are selling ratings, but they are without control, too.

[banks38]

I was just thinking about this.  I was using ICO bench to judge ICO's but that nasty thought about back door deals and fake ratings.  We really have no idea what's going on with these and can only read the opinion but not base solely on it.

[poodle63]

There are a lot of ICO review company right now, and the best way to get the objective assessment of a project is to do our research by crosschecking it on multiple ICO reviews and asking directly to the team behind it on their telegram group.

There's many of them because many ICO are paying them to advertise their ICO by giving a good rating while it is actually paid review. I dont trust ICO rating that much because of that reason, sometimes they just giving 5 stars because the ICO are paying them and as it turns out, not as good as what they have reviewed, ICO rating is created to be a money generator not a real thing to help people.

[jacafbiz]

Please never trust any rating sites, they are set up to do their jobs and there are doing it, I have seen so many rubbish projects getting ridiculously high rating from some of these rating sites then you ask yourself what criteria do they use to get to this high point, the answer I do get is that capitalism is in play.

[Anzal RK]

ICO Rating

yes, i believe with ICO Rating.
because ICO Rating is make me so easy to looking a good ICO to invest my asset.
when we know the best ICO, so why we just talking about believe. that is so waer guys.
i believe and until now ICO Rating is never make me get a loss.

[gabriela1999]

All is for reference only so do not over-rely on the reviews of those websites.  Each site has a different rating and I think they have been bribed to do this.  I have seen a lot of ICO just garbage that is also top rated

[xiaoY]

I don't believe in these rating websites, I just use these rating websites as one of the reasons for my reference investment, because I think ICO's fraud rate is very high!

[SearchingforS]

Those cites just collect the information to show you how's the situation with ICOs. It would be harder to choose ICO without the ratings because you'd have to search for that info yourself.