Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[emily666]

I believe they don't take many factors into consideration. Metrics is really important and some people don't even consider metrics which is really important in my opinion.

[1714583100]

1714583100

[1714583100]

1714583100

[1714583100]

1714583100

[1714583100]

1714583100

[1714583100]

1714583100

[Hoxysado]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

yes, i th8nk i may say that i nelieve un them butni would not trust them much, so you need to be careful

[Hoxysado]

I believe they don't take many factors into consideration. Metrics is really important and some people don't even consider metrics which is really important in my opinion.

ico rstings are good things, btu i thinkmthat it is necessary for people to know that thsy nee to check this information

[teskostecenje]

I really believe, but only in some of them, in icodrops for instance, because they aren't payed shillers. even if they promote project for money, they mark out it with colour. If you are a newbie, stay away of  ICO bench, they promote scams and their rates mean nothing

[prechi]

Well, I don't totally believe them because they can also be paid to rate a project

[Nanagyasi]

I always have doubts with the ICO ratings. There are several projects with high ratings of which I followed but the project could not provide idea much. I think the ratings they give is highly subjective and has less bearing on the project success

[coinholic]

I do partly, because I still have some doubts. These ratings do have some truth in them since I believe the raters do make their research on a particular ICO. But most of these ratings are paid for so they kinda become sort of an advertisement rather than a reference for investment. But ratings still provide some good insights which we can still use in choosing an ICO.

[kent47400]

ICO rating is only part of the success factor of its token sales.

ICO can be said to succeed when touching hardcap numbers, and when touching softcap also still not say successful because its financial foundation is still weak.
Hopefully the project you handle touches all Hardcap. Amien

[boolean420]

No, IMO do your own research or you might get burned. Who knows how legit these websites are. Literally anyone could get a "good" rating from a website and turn out to be a scam. ICOs are never safe, do your research.

[brave77]

I am not so sure with the ICO rating given because it could be the Ico rating can be through the voting of the project campaign participants, because it has been proven ICO with a high rating also did not experience good sales and even with low ratings have good sales.Therefore the ICO rating can not be used as our benchmark to know whether the project is potential or not.

[Baby Doll]

If the ICO rating is given by a trusted website, we should consider it. They provide a possible rating based on the appreciation of the people who saw the ICO project. According to them, many people think the project is good. But the final result is certainly determined by the owner of the ICO. He must strive and work hard to keep the trust of people who have given good appreciation to their projects.

[suterum]

A large portion of individuals are checking ico evaluations as one of their reference on where they will contribute, however for me ico appraisals is only a guide and I am not by any stretch of the imagination accepting on how they rate some icos. Be that as it may, is still depends with the financial specialists how they will trust this appraisals.

[manggis97]

ICO bench given the rating for each ICO according to their review and analysis, and their analysis  can be wrong,  but so far they given that rating with fair according live product and professional of team member.  I can say ICO rating can be accurate 70%, but to know more about fundamental of the project is better we also make review and analysis by self.

[Hobbit698]

I've tried to trust the ratings of Ico . but unfortunately nothing good came out

[Btcirene88]

Sometimes i do believe in ICO ratings given by some known website but i actually differ to what kind of campaign is i working for in promoting project because sometimes it cannot hide there is scam ICO even though it was listed on website. That is why i double check before i participate in a campaign project.

[redhorsebeer1980]

Many people rely on the ratings of ICO on where they are going to invest their coin.If the ICO are successful in their project, many investor will like to invest because they feel they could gain more profit on it.

[greengate01]

How will i know which ICO is a liget because many investor rely on ICO as their reference on investment.

[mangle]

I trust only the ratings of one site - Icodrop, on other sites I do not trust

[jaja colleen]

ICO rating are one of our guide to choose a good project.but even though they are listed you still need your own research to make sure that the project is legit.sometimes even a project is listed in a ICO ratings we cannot guarantee because there are many scam projects so you need to be careful if you want to invest.

[steinkopf]

I do not trust these ratings completely. But I get a lot of information from them. For example, I find that very many interesting projects in which I invest.