Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Collider]

I am using ICOBench site and for me it is a good source of information.
I think that experts on this site provide really good reviews, I know that also they promoted some scams, but this could happen to everyone .

[1714571162]

1714571162

[1714571162]

1714571162

[1714571162]

1714571162

[cuo]

I don' t really believe, because rating can be manipulated anytime and by anyone. to see the truth of a rating we must be carefully to see ICO project planning and team, hopefully can help.

[Titus Maximus]

I'm thinking, ICO Ratings help us make the right choice, but we do not need to rely on them completely, because it is only an auxiliary tool that allows us to narrow the range of search.

Exactly, I use them as one of many benchmarks in the process of deciding which ICO to choose. If you rely on one single source it‘s like having all your eggs (coins) in one basket and never a good idea. People who do that go from „when lambo“ to „when homeless“ very quickly, you don‘t wanna go down that route.

[luciferon]

I don't believe in ICO ratings. Some very good projects have given very low scores. I think there is an ulterior secret between these rating companies and ICO companies, so I don't believe them.

[mtrxhasu]

I only believe in my own ratings and insight about ICOs. In all financial tools and derivates - one rule is very important.

LLC "Do Your Own Research" 

[biksa]

I don't think that you should take seriously ICO Ratings when choosing where to invest. The rating can only create an impression when you first get acquainted with the draft of the presentation, and then you should dig further the information, learn product, the team, whitepaper and road map.

[Gnommag]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

i tyink you can rely on the information on some sites, but still the final decision id yours in my opinion

[Gnommag]

I don't think that you should take seriously ICO Ratings when choosing where to invest. The rating can only create an impression when you first get acquainted with the draft of the presentation, and then you should dig further the information, learn product, the team, whitepaper and road map.

the final decision should he yours in any case, bit you can consult with ico ratings, why jot, so i think that it is good

[tondenga2122]

I think most of them are already paid by their project itself before listing on there.
Even a good project that has a perfect rating can also be a scam project. Not needed a proof, there are so many of them

[hohuan101]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Those sites are pretty good. However, they will be judged on the owner's point of view, which is not entirely true. So you should only use them for reference.

[pinoycryptoes]

It would best if you will just do your own research since a lot of websites are cannot be trusted. You know, a lot of project manager can just pay them and use their system to manipulate the ratings.

[hySyn17]

In my opinion those ratings can be an advisors. But I always do my own research before investing in an ICO. I do not only trust certain websites which highlight some ICOs. If you want to make money in this sector, it is always about your own research and our own information you gathered. Long story short: Do not trust random people from the internet.

[laynequinten]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I absolutely do not believe in the reviews because I have seen highly rated projects fail and underestimated projects have been successful beyond expectations. Is it due to luck?

[kptn.sgt]

Not in all. Some ratings are not trustworthy.

[rnifield]

I think it depends on the elements used by the ICO rating platform to rank the projects. Also, how transparent the process is. We know  cases of rubbish projects paying for a high ranked ICO.

[ugur2222]

although not much , I think it's worth listening such sites as ICO Bench, ICO Bazaar, ICO rating - in the trends they always have only cool projects

[kipozer]

Of course not, and those who believe in such services will soon understand that they are being deceived. In any case, all these assessments of such services very well affect our psyche and we already think that the project really has value.

[Arderd]

I think it depends on the elements used by the ICO rating platform to rank the projects. Also, how transparent the process is. We know  cases of rubbish projects paying for a high ranked ICO.

Yup, the problem is not knowing which is which in a lot of cases for sure.

[titulng]

I do not trust all ICO rating websites. I trust some of the ICO rating web sites. There are several criteria for the ICO project to be successful. I also read the ideas of crypto money experts. but be careful. ICO projects with a high rating ratio have the potential to fail.

[karramov]

I think the rating is not quite accurate. As far as I know you can buy this rating. This can be perceived as a primary filter to pay attention to the project but not more