Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[shoreno]

There's many ICO Rating websites, and most give unbiased ratings and reviews. You should be able trust their rating score because at the end of the day you can review their rating by adding a post below the ICO they have rated

You should not trust any of their rating score because you said that they were biased . instead, you can just review again the ico and give your own honest feedback and you can compare your own feedback to other feedback to see if what is right or wrong .

In my case i do not easily believe any ico rating because i am alaready aware that majority of ico are verry unrealistic .

Ratings are nothing and wont make them look legit.

[1714591275]

1714591275

[1714591275]

1714591275

[1714591275]

1714591275

[1714591275]

1714591275

[1714591275]

1714591275

[1714591275]

1714591275

[gwensarah1]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don’t believe in ICO ratings, I just believe in interest and if the project has got a working product and what it has to offer, then I can make my choice as whether to invest or not. Anyways you can check out my signature, you can get the latest updates on ICOS right on telegram from Investmentgists

[pacifista]

Sometimes ico rating will not determine if the project will become successful. I have seen many icos where they get the highest points in every ico rating site but the project didnt even reach the soft cap.

[edisystem]

Nope, because i think ICO ratings on some websites are really shady. I'm sure some of them (not all) get paid by the project to make the ratings good. I mean who are they, can make a rate on ICOs, are they professional on ICOs? haha. Also it's better to find out by yourself like check the information of the project on whitepaper, website etc.

[crypt0junkie28]

Not really. Especially that most of the time I only go for Airdrops and Bounty. Right now, I think this ICO is interesting and they have an ongoing Airdrop campaign. You, guys might want to check them out.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10OlnEzIE6RG6ZNd82JmxEBP-UMJT1eVCwSt_8S8MUDw/viewform?edit_requested=true&utm_campaign=Airdrop&utm_medium=BTT&utm_source=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2868750.0

[bitcub]

I usually base my bounty participation in high rating ICO. Because they tend to reach the quota thus it will give you a high bounty.

[hidrocop]

I don't think they're completely transparent. I see sided ratings but generally it's one of the best ICO tracking sites

[mr.zet]

Someone wrote that these ratings are easy to buy and correct. Posklko rating consists of an assessment of experts, paying one expert can increase the rating of the project.
Unfortunately did not find the link where it was written.

[ternyabin]

Someone wrote that these ratings are easy to buy and correct. Posklko rating consists of an assessment of experts, paying one expert can increase the rating of the project.
Unfortunately did not find the link where it was written.

This is a well-known fact. I also met an article about how a low-grade ICO got a high rating for a separate fee on one of the leading sites of ICOs trackers. It is better to do the analysis of projects.

[BlackCanary]

do not believe in absolute ICO rating pages only rated a small percentage. They rely on the team and the investor. white paper and roadmap. There is no guarantee that the project will scam

[superving]

Sometimes ico ratings is only a guide to a good investment but they do not recommend everyone to invest  on the coins were they give they ratings, they still need to make their own research.

[Pixstxbtm]

There are a lot of ICO rating websites, but I don't think they can be trusted, because I don't think any news or products that can be controlled by the team is worth believing!

[DEVIDIRUS]

No, i don't trust them at all. I know that there is a good website with ICO list, but still there's too much garbage sites, and i don't have time to check them

[JustBetweenUs]

You should never believe in anything, not in the stuff you hear from friends, in forums, on ICO sites, etc. Rather use them as indicators to form your own opinion. If you just act like a sheep at some point a wolf will find you.

[nowlscor18]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

For me I'm not an independent of an ICO ratings because theres a lot of an ICO project that they dont have listed in ICO bench but more legit and has a potential to grow.

[winspiral]

No,I believe not in ICO Rating because none can know in advance about...
So far it is possible to know that it is scam...it is too late.

[fly99]

Although I don't fully believe in the ICO rating website, I will use some ratings as a reference for my investment. When I am very satisfied with the project, I will check its rating on the rating website!

[mardaed]

Yes i believe because sometime i base on their ICO rating in order for me to join that project. Its a good sign or a good thing to those ICO has high rating. High rating ICO can be successful due to some investor might interested because of their rating.

[tampz]

Yes i believe because sometime i base on their ICO rating in order for me to join that project. Its a good sign or a good thing to those ICO has high rating. High rating ICO can be successful due to some investor might interested because of their rating.

ICO rating is just an advertisement. Companies that are really good, I've never seen in ratings.
This is not an indicator of success.

[Truong Thu]

I just believe in my own assessment of that project. If I see it grows well then I will join. Many of the wed sites rated are not standard because there are so many wrong judges