Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[AndreLi]

I use ICO rating sites only as a first step. After I left only a few promising projects, I try to study them as deeply as possible. White paper, road map, team, website ...
In a word - this is a good criterion, but this is not enough. Just trust your own research.

[watchurstep45]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

i still trust the ICO rating sites like icobench and more, the highest percentage ICOs are those ICO that has been rated by experts in crypto currency but still not all rated experts are all successful ,it also depends on the specific project on how they manage and fix their website and so on.

[reztava]

it seems that for now ico is better to see from its merchant transactions, but seeing from the rankings on ico I think it can be trusted because it has been monitored by investors and scam things will be investigated by the CIA and a lot of international security.

[Kaller]

I do look at ICO ratings sometimes because at times they can help in telling you how good of a project an ICO is and if they are worth investing in. Although that is just one part of the research which I am doing into the ICOs that I am interested in investing in. I don't just base my conclusion on a single rating but instead read more into the project and see what it has to offer.

[kieuthikhanhlinh72]

Ir depends on people's rates because sometimes some other is just rnking that some project is not good even if it is really good but sometimes i believe with some rates because when they join icos they explain what are their experience in that projects

[Humpert]

ICO rating can be a guideline for us to choose the best projects. But yes, the result may differ from what we expected. At least ICO rating can make our researches more easier.

[metazort]

 I do not really know that because I did not read icoratings and icobench looking for some ico's because I don't think that they provide ico it will legit and successful so I really appreciated their beliefs to those ico that really matter but I don't really base my expectations to those site.

[Specialforce]

We can use it as a basis but yoy never know that kind of ICO is good for them but not for you the best to trust is the one that you research not others because you know what you want and get the information you want

[Zagor Tenay]

An ico rating website can be usee as a guide sometimes. But you still have to do your own research anyway cos some of them are being paid by the project developers to make their project look good.

[AshikurRahmanKhan16]

Icobench is a really very good ICO rating website. There are many options to see in ico bench. Like icobench research everything about the project, then icobench asked the ICO Project team to verify KYC. The gives ratings by seeing project's team member, ico profile, and verified kyc. Some project has 4.1 rating only for their ico profile but they haven't verified kyc. So, that project is not worthy of investment. Kyc verified but overall rating 3.5 is better than the 4.3 rating who got the rating only for ico profile. Basically, I believe in icobench.

[grchina]

Used to use those sites and did trusted them but now not so much as most off them are sell outs and those high rankings are payed for high ranking and not deserved.Now i just use them as a way to follow what new icos are coming out and some more details about them

[carrigan]

ICO rating assessed by a portal. And I think is a very honest assessment. because a portal must of course give our best in order not to disappoint the public. because the community is of course the hope is full so that the information provided is real.

[topchiiy86]

I usually check ratings on ICOdrops resource. They usually evaluate a project without being payed for this. So in most cases you can trust their ratings. Of course it doesn't mean that you should blindly trust and invest only according to the ratings. Good ICO rating means that you can pay attention on it an do you own investigation.

[Megashaw]

Yeah, I see the ratings by ico sites as a mere hype and not to be used as a yardastick or determinant to measure how successful the project would end up. I ve seen projects with low ratings perform extremely well while those with high rating end up flopping badly. So i just draw my judgement by my own personal research.

[NineBall]

Maybe the web like ICO rating is not all free, there are some paid ICO web sites. I think for the ICO rating web site that not free I less trust, because they issued a rating  it was paid, not because good ICO. But to this day I still use ICO web rating as a reference

[Sanugarid]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I do honestly believe on ICO rating because it measures the popularity of a certain ICO project. Also, popularity is equivalent with demand such that if something is popular, it will have a high demand which would make the success of that ICO more assured.I'm not saying that it always happen but the fact is that, this is what usually happen. So it will depend to you wether you will consider the rating of a certain ICO or not.

[Eugenar]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don't beleive on hype when it comes on finding a basis to whether an ICO will be successful or not. The mentioned case about Lalaworld is true and is already a proof that despite of having a low rating, it still managed to sold their tokens out. And some ICO despite of having a high rating are not able to sell all of their tokens on the crowdsale.

[raahi]

No I do not believe in ICO ratings and reviews because most of them are paid and ICO pay the site to give them good rating so in these scams ICO makes their rating good also so best is to do own research instead of relying on someone else because like this you will be easily able to find good ICOs.

[lavishlifing]

This is how I choose the right ICO to participate/invest on:

first is I filter ICOs by judging their ratings, second is by reading their whitepaper, third is their community.

[ROB18]

In a way, I do believe in ICO rating. I'm using ICO bench for this. I consider ICO rating as one factor before joining any ICO. It's a third party tool out there that did there own researched about the ICO/Project. But I'm not using it as a sole factor for my decision.