mainline
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:35:15 AM |
|
Awesome news, Ken!
I see the eAsic NRE is down the flush, since you're getting offers from them along with everyone else. I see you've lied about eAsic working on the 28nm chip. I see you tossed a new twist into the plot - da regulators are after you. B- for creativity if lie, the end to this sideshow if truth.
Anyhow, you never fail to entertain. Solid effort. Sidenote: A bit sad that i won't see this failscam trade, was looking forward to that...
|
|
|
|
shaofis
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:36:01 AM |
|
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running.
Active-Mining PR
First time we've heard that...
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:40:05 AM |
|
On Crypto-Trade:
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
Active-Mining PR
In other words, no trading any time soon due to being investigated.
|
|
|
|
st4nl3y
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:42:17 AM |
|
just another meaningless update packed with lies and fake promises. oh, and thanks for clarifying the easic deal.
|
|
|
|
DeadwoodDan
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:50:22 AM |
|
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
1) Is this guy a native English speaker? 2) Good thing we got Ukyo's shares transferred and sold while we could! 3) I thought all your legal issues were worked out weeks ago. 4) Also, minerpart said you had already been investigated and cleared by the SEC, what happened? 5) Should we blame the trolls? I'm going to blame the trolls. Are we blaming the trolls?
|
|
|
|
RickJamesBTC
|
|
February 13, 2014, 12:53:06 AM |
|
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
Active-Mining PR
Can't wait for them to report back that "shares" are worth exactly nothing and the idea violates multiple laws.
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:19:44 AM |
|
On Crypto-Trade:
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
Active-Mining PR
In other words, no trading any time soon due to being investigated. What a fucken bald faced lie that is, this is a flat out scam. Ken's been scraping off yuko's shares to milk every last vestige of what he can now it's done.
|
|
|
|
MilkyWayMasta
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:23:13 AM |
|
On Crypto-Trade:
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
Active-Mining PR
In other words, no trading any time soon due to being investigated. What a fucken bald faced lie that is, this is a flat out scam. Ken's been scraping off yuko's shares to milk every last vestige of what he can now it's done. What country do you think he flies out to?
|
|
|
|
DeadwoodDan
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:23:32 AM |
|
Damn, it's too bad there's not going to be any trading.
I really wanted some of those cheap shares.
I was planning to send my pseudoanonymous, irreversible cryptocurrency to an unlicensed stock exchange run by shady foreigners in Hong Kong and purchase lots of unenforceable shares in this unregulated virtual identity representing both itself and its profits, based in Belize. Because they'd be so cheap.
|
|
|
|
drawingthesun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:25:02 AM |
|
Weekly Update 2/12/2014
On the 55nm project:
This week has had a number of developments, our project manager is working on wrapping up all the detail of our 55nm project. We are expecting to receive our first 55nm wafers on April 10th, with next batch due on April 29th, May 5th and May 8th for a total of ~104 wafers. It will take 1-2 weeks to have the chips packaged and then shipped to our board manufacturers.
So at minimum with no delays we are expecting the first chips in 10 weeks. We will be selling and mining with these chips and boards, depending on what makes the most since at the time. The tape-out was done on Peoples ASIC account for a shuttle run of 50 prototype chips, we have canceled the shuttle run and changed to a full production run of the chips on VMC own account. Peoples ASIC IP has been signed over to VMC and the FAB has all the legal paper work to start VMC's production run of wafers.
I'm still wondering how much 'People's ASIC' cost us. On the 28nm project:
We are getting quotes from a number of vendors including eASIC. After the project is started we expect it to be completed in 8 weeks, after which we will tape-out.
So we have nothing at all. Nothing. If eASIC is simply another vendor then please tell us what happened to the $900,000+ we paid them. It seems the new 28nm is an entirely new project. On Crypto-Trade:
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
Active-Mining PR
What deadline have the MSD given you? Can you at least pay out our dividends. It's the last money any shareholder will ever get from this company.
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:29:01 AM |
|
Weekly Update 2/12/2014
On the 55nm project:
This week has had a number of developments, our project manager is working on wrapping up all the detail of our 55nm project. We are expecting to receive our first 55nm wafers on April 10th, with next batch due on April 29th, May 5th and May 8th for a total of ~104 wafers. It will take 1-2 weeks to have the chips packaged and then shipped to our board manufacturers. We will be selling and mining with these chips and boards, depending on what makes the most since at the time. The tape-out was done on Peoples ASIC account for a shuttle run of 50 prototype chips, we have canceled the shuttle run and changed to a full production run of the chips on VMC own account. Peoples ASIC IP has been signed over to VMC and the FAB has all the legal paper work to start VMC's production run of wafers.
On the 28nm project:
We are getting quotes from a number of vendors including eASIC. After the project is started we expect it to be completed in 8 weeks, after which we will tape-out.
On Crypto-Trade:
I am hoping to get shareholders shares transferred ASAP and get full trading up and running. We have received a letter from the Missouri Securities Division asking for information on Active Mining Corportation, at this point we have ask for more time to respond and have seeked legal advice.
Active-Mining PR
so NO SHARES… and NO PROOF WHATSOEVER THAT ANY OF US CONTRIBUTED MONIES TO THIS JOKER, NO MINING, NO PROOF OF ANYTHING RESEMBLING A REAL BITCOIN MINING OPERATION.
man this just gets worse and worse every fucking week, such a fucken joke at this point.
Ken either admit this is in the trash or admit it's a scam but for you to act like things are moving right along is just too much anymore. FUCK YOU.I'd say it's about time we all start looking into some kind of class-action movement against Ken&Co. because this is looking really bad… I'd like to recoup at least some of what I've wasted dumping into this fake-ass company.
|
|
|
|
shaofis
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:29:27 AM |
|
If eASIC is simply another vendor then please tell us what happened to the $900,000+ we paid them. It seems the new 28nm is an entirely new project.
This
|
|
|
|
EduardoDeCastro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:30:13 AM |
|
Maybe the Belize army will drop by to defend Ken? I hear those guys are pretty hardcore when defending business interests of Belize-registered virtual identities?
@guy experimenting with various fonts and text effects: too little too late, but try 90pt ChopinScript - mah favorite.
|
|
|
|
RickJamesBTC
|
|
February 13, 2014, 01:31:26 AM |
|
STOP SAYING 'WE' !!
Damn, there is no WE. You all use the term when you should be saying YOU, because ken and his secret partners are the only ones with any money or valid stake in this scam.
|
|
|
|
kslaughter (OP)
|
|
February 13, 2014, 02:08:47 AM |
|
Ken,
A couple of follow ups to the Wednesday report:
1. How much do you anticipate the Missouri Securities Division investigating ActM will damage the company?
I can't say at this time, as we just got the letter. I have not talked with a Missouri securities lawyer as I am being referred to one at this time by my general business lawyer. 2. Are we putting multiple die per package? Are you getting 1.9GH per die or per package?
1.9 GH/s per die and one die per package. To elaborate, Shaofis expressed the following concern regarding the die/package question on IRC:
<shaofis1> and my worry that I wanted to get cleared up is <shaofis1> if you put in 10 square mm into the calculator it comes out like 6850... which fits his numbers of 6800 <shaofis1> I'd expect a 10mm x 10mm die to package into 11mm x 11mm (at least my mind can make sense of that) <shaofis1> so I'm worried that Ken might have plugged in 10 into the calculator to get 6800 <shaofis1> (really hoping I'm wrong) <shaofis1> because if the die size is 10mm x 10mm then we are looking at 600 die per wafer instead of 6800 <shaofis1> so either the die is 3.16mm x 3.16mm and we will get 6800ish per wafer... or it's 10mm x 10mm and his numbers are off
Our engineers have calculated 170,000 chips per lot of 25 wafers. 3. Since it looks that eASIC is no longer involved at all with ActM, what came of the raised NRE money? Did anything of value come out of our previous partnership with eASIC?
We are still working with eASIC, we are getting multiple quotes on our Full Custom 28nm project.
|
|
|
|
DeadwoodDan
|
|
February 13, 2014, 02:22:47 AM |
|
3. Since it looks that eASIC is no longer involved at all with ActM, what came of the raised NRE money? Did anything of value come out of our previous partnership with eASIC?
We are still working with eASIC, we are getting multiple quotes on our Full Custom 28nm project. Lol, seriously, what happened to the money, man? What was that near million dollars used FOR?
|
|
|
|
kingcrimson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2014, 02:34:34 AM |
|
Missouri SEC isn't contacting you for coffee, would get outta the country ASAP at this point. It's over. No way in hell the operation will be able to continue. Turns out investors don't like being lied to and mocked, and actually take action when treated like dirt, who would've thought.
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
February 13, 2014, 02:49:23 AM |
|
Ken,
A couple of follow ups to the Wednesday report:
1. How much do you anticipate the Missouri Securities Division investigating ActM will damage the company?
I can't say at this time, as we just got the letter. I have not talked with a Missouri securities lawyer as I am being referred to one at this time by my general business lawyer. 2. Are we putting multiple die per package? Are you getting 1.9GH per die or per package?
1.9 GH/s per die and one die per package. To elaborate, Shaofis expressed the following concern regarding the die/package question on IRC:
<shaofis1> and my worry that I wanted to get cleared up is <shaofis1> if you put in 10 square mm into the calculator it comes out like 6850... which fits his numbers of 6800 <shaofis1> I'd expect a 10mm x 10mm die to package into 11mm x 11mm (at least my mind can make sense of that) <shaofis1> so I'm worried that Ken might have plugged in 10 into the calculator to get 6800 <shaofis1> (really hoping I'm wrong) <shaofis1> because if the die size is 10mm x 10mm then we are looking at 600 die per wafer instead of 6800 <shaofis1> so either the die is 3.16mm x 3.16mm and we will get 6800ish per wafer... or it's 10mm x 10mm and his numbers are off
Our engineers have calculated 170,000 chips per lot of 25 wafers. 3. Since it looks that eASIC is no longer involved at all with ActM, what came of the raised NRE money? Did anything of value come out of our previous partnership with eASIC?
We are still working with eASIC, we are getting multiple quotes on our Full Custom 28nm project. Blah blah blah what a buncha horse shit. We didn't invest in actm to get a pile of go-nowhere weekly updates man! Come on!! You sir are full of SHIT. Give us our money back Ken, this is done.
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
February 13, 2014, 03:14:17 AM |
|
At what point does this farce officially qualify to be deemed a SCAM?
How do we go about getting a scammer tag on kenslaghter?
|
|
|
|
DeadwoodDan
|
|
February 13, 2014, 03:17:18 AM |
|
scammer tag on kenslaghter
Apparently "we" don't do this anymore, but I never understood why in God's name this was ever any sort of a priority for anyone anyway. What do you think Ken having a scammer tag would accomplish?
|
|
|
|
|