Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 11:49:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 [481] 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]  (Read 771070 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
mainline
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 12:26:36 AM
 #9601

Also Ken, can you give me access and moderator privileges to this thread please?

I would be happy to quit my day job and spend 24 hours a day deleting the trolls in here.  I would be totally biased and delete anyone who spoke out of turn and would find it very therapeutic indeed.  Grin

Yes, and you may wear the hall monitor sash Smiley
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
kslaughter (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 07, 2014, 12:42:55 AM
 #9602

Sure, we are just looking into it.  We would only go to that if it makes since, which means GH/s, Power, and time to market.  With time to market being the most important.  Yes, I try to do that, but sometime when we are working on deals I forget.  I been thinking about a professional PR person; however, it is not on the top of my list of things to do.  As far as eASIC, they are working with us to get the most out of our 28nm custom chip.

Ken, will your engineering team be making the final decision on whether we go with a 28nm or a 20nm? I see this as an engineering issue first and foremost. We need to be sure that a 20nm chip is capable of being designed and manufactured in good time and that it will show definite benefits over a 28nm chip. The problem is 20nm tech is an incredibly complex undertaking and is still an unproven technology from what I've read. You need to make sure we are following not just  say TSMC's predictions about chip timelines and specs, but also independent expert advice too (some of which questions the benifits of 20nm over 28nm). Thanks.

I would make the decision; however, taking in to account all the factors including the engineering teams input.  I wouldn't worry to much about the 20nm, as all I said was that we were looking into it.
zumzero
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


myBitcoin.Garden


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2014, 12:53:33 AM
 #9603

Thanks Ken, this will reassure many shareholders.

https://mybitcoin.garden
Bitcoin game where you can earn up to 220% on each planted garden!
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 01:06:23 AM
 #9604

I would make the decision; however, taking in to account all the factors including the engineering teams input.  I wouldn't worry to much about the 20nm, as all I said was that we were looking into it.

No probs, I'm not against anything that pushes us forwards (at some point we will need to go to 20nm) but just want to be sure we are making the right decisions and are not putting ourselves in a position of being 100% reliant on an unproven technology which may yet encounter industry-wide delays.
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 01:26:32 AM
 #9605

Can we trade soon?
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 07, 2014, 02:08:01 AM
 #9606

Can we trade jump off this burning ship soon?

arousedrhino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 03:59:42 AM
 #9607

Ken,

Any chance you can explain where the 320620 Outstanding shares came from that are on CT?

I believe Ukyo's shares were only ~220K so that means theres an extra ~100K on the CT side. Can you please shed some light into what occurred to make this happen?

Thanks,
A longtime silent shareholder
gjpminingco
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Co-Owner Of DCMCo-Op Mining Farm at 3.5 th/s


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2014, 04:04:56 AM
 #9608

Also Ken, can you give me access and moderator privileges to this thread please?

I would be happy to quit my day job and spend 24 hours a day deleting the trolls in here.  I would be totally biased and delete anyone who spoke out of turn and would find it very therapeutic indeed.  Grin


LoL you are toooooo much sometimes Zum you crack me up

VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2014, 09:01:01 AM
 #9609

And now crypto-trade is down...

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 09:28:44 AM
 #9610

Mr KSlaughter, when are you going to enlighten us of ActM fiancial situation by publishing PL statement and proper balance sheet?
Please publish one for the year of 2013 (as of 31 December) and give us a deadline for a proper January statement. You have jerked us (investors) around for way too long.
 
Excuses are unacceptable.

While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
nyc77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 10:05:55 AM
Last edit: February 07, 2014, 10:18:07 AM by nyc77
 #9611

Mr KSlaughter, when are you going to enlighten us of ActM fiancial situation by publishing PL statement and proper balance sheet?
Please publish one for the year of 2013 (as of 31 December) and give us a deadline for a proper January statement. You have jerked us (investors) around for way too long.
 
Excuses are unacceptable.

Welcome to the world of ActM. Please draw a number at our IntelliTicket(TM) system and exit on the left. Thank you!

SPECIAL OFFER ALERT, before you leave: Please consider investing even more by taking a look at Ukyo's discounted shares on CT. Please take one for the team and buy them up. We will release "your" shares shortly after, if we feel like it. After that, TO THE MOON!
VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2014, 10:20:44 AM
 #9612

Ken I too would like a ban hammer please... children demanding things, generally trolling... soooo counter productive and frankly fucking irritating.

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
btcrun
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10



View Profile
February 07, 2014, 10:24:55 AM
Last edit: February 07, 2014, 10:41:15 AM by btcrun
 #9613

Ken,

Any chance you can explain where the 320620 Outstanding shares came from that are on CT?

I believe Ukyo's shares were only ~220K so that means theres an extra ~100K on the CT side. Can you please shed some light into what occurred to make this happen?

Thanks,
A longtime silent shareholder

I know it's not an answer from Ken, but let me give it a shot:

If anyone takes a closer look on the books, you can see that right now there are ~120k shares for sale. Most of them should be the ones from UKYO (@.0005, @.0006 and @.001). The rest seem to be shares from folks who bought shares of off these UKYO walls and try to sell these for a profit.
About the last 100k shares: these are the ones that were never sold at the IPO's before the CT-time (See BF and BTCT) and Ken issued these on CT at first to test the system (see the first (test) trades @.01 from I think Ken himself or someone who would pay 0.01 right at the time).
So right now those 100k shares are NOT in the sell book and are not traded! Ken is keeping them right now (they belong to ActM) but they need to be issued to receive dividends later(which go into ActM's pocket, maybe to buy more hashing Power) and that they don't vanishe somehow (dividends would be wrong if those shares weren't issued on any trading site).

That's what I think is going down right now.

EDIT: sorry, quote corrected, am on mobile
nyc77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 10:41:30 AM
Last edit: February 07, 2014, 11:38:04 AM by nyc77
 #9614

Ohai. Been living under a rock since September.

Are we hashing yet? I don't see any dividends coming in... ? How is the company doing, financially? Where can I sell my shares?

EDIT: Oh... sorry! Sad
VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2014, 10:45:47 AM
 #9615

Ken,

Any chance you can explain where the 320620 Outstanding shares came from that are on CT?

I believe Ukyo's shares were only ~220K so that means theres an extra ~100K on the CT side. Can you please shed some light into what occurred to make this happen?

Thanks,
A longtime silent shareholder

I know it's not an answer from Ken, but let me give it a shot:

If anyone takes a closer look on the books, you can see that right now there are ~120k shares for sale. Most of them should be the ones from UKYO (@.0005, @.0006 and @.001). The rest seem to be shares from folks who bought shares of off these UKYO walls and try to sell these for a profit.
About the last 100k shares: these are the ones that were never sold at the IPO's before the CT-time (See BF and BTCT) and Ken issued these on CT at first to test the system (see the first (test) trades @.01 from I think Ken himself or someone who would pay 0.01 right at the time).
So right now those 100k shares are NOT in the sell book and are not traded! Ken is keeping them right now (they belong to ActM) but they need to be issued to receive dividends later(which go into ActM's pocket, maybe to buy more hashing Power) and that they don't vanishe somehow (dividends would be wrong if those shares weren't issued on any trading site).

That's what I think is going down right now.

EDIT: sorry, quote corrected, am on mobile

This ^^ You've explained it in much more detail than I had the patience to.

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 10:58:45 AM
 #9616

Ohai. Been living under a rock since September.

Crumbs, you're a funny little fellow.

Ohai to you too!
EduardoDeCastro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 12:13:52 PM
 #9617

...
Crumbs, you're a funny little fellow.

Ohai to you too!

^I see you dabble in text analytics when you're not too busy being boss trader.
Who would have thought a good little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness?
keepinithamsta
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 12:29:19 PM
 #9618

At this point, I bet Ken lost the asset list.
nyc77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 07, 2014, 01:11:14 PM
 #9619

At this point, I bet Ken lost the asset list.

lol

"Thanks for buying up all of Ukyo's shares. We regret to inform you that trading will still be postponed..."
BitcoinBaBa
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 225
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 07, 2014, 01:17:05 PM
 #9620

What's the deadline given by Ken for trading to commence?
Pages: « 1 ... 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 [481] 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!