[ANN] Decentralized Machine Learning

[yuansuyi]

Wow decentralized machine learning. It sounds very impressive. Now this area is really in demand and popular. I understand in the future this technology will develop with more force, it's great that the developers of this product understand this and are promoting their developments in this area.

Now this area is engaged in absolutely everything, including large companies such as Google and Apple. Do you think this project can bring something new to this area? I think not.

Why do you think so? Yes, large companies are engaged in this area, but nevertheless no one has implemented this technology in the field of blockchain. This is the first project I see with the implementation of this. In fact, to provide encouragement to users for network training is a great idea that really will work.

Do you really think that this will work?

Yes of course. This is to make this network mass and effective. It is due to the reward. If large companies have to spend a lot of money on data centers and create it all on their own, then modern decentralized technologies allow it to be realized in this way at a lower cost.

Well, in principle, it makes sense, if the system is really scalable and its power can constantly grow and increase

That's the way, the more that the developers declare the possibility of using not only personal computers but also smartphones for this. That is, the opportunity to make a truly large-scale computer network is amazing.

Okay, I understand that this is really cool, but why. That is, for whom this network and what functions it will implement?

Everything is very simple. Machine learning technologies are used in many areas of business and technology. But it costs a lot of money and in the context of this service, many companies and organizations will have the opportunity to use this technology. That is, in fact, this is a b2b solution. in some sense.

Well, yes, I agree. In this context, it looks very profitable and cost-effective. Perhaps this will be a really good business decision.

[mine777]

I went to the github and read about what the latest modifications of the project were made by the authors of the project. I do not understand, the project will run, or not?

[Sovietaced]

I went to the github and read about what the latest modifications of the project were made by the authors of the project. I do not understand, the project will run, or not?

How did you decide that the project will not be launched? To be honest, I do not follow the updates on the githaba, but I'm wondering why you decided that the project will not develop?

[imginy]

Maybe because of the lack of updates from March 2 this year .. but it does not change anything. If the development team already has a prototype

[dazuixia456]

So far I have not seen the working prototype of the project. If the engine on which the calculations were made were ready, and we could see its work

[mine777]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

[Sovietaced]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

[imginy]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

I agree! it may very well be that the developers are not as comfortable with the github as you are talking about, and therefore all the latest modifications to the project were made locally

[dazuixia456]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

Yes, the project has not really been finalized for a long time, and the video with the prototype work has already been done for a long time, so we do not see any changes.

[mine777]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

[Sovietaced]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

[imginy]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

[dazuixia456]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it?

[mine777]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it?

Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product

[QCT]

Does the project already have competitors in this area?

[Sovietaced]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it?

Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product

You should understand that in order to provide the engine for testing - you need to write a separate shell for it. Exactly for the functionality that is available at the moment

[imginy]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it?

Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product

You should understand that in order to provide the engine for testing - you need to write a separate shell for it. Exactly for the functionality that is available at the moment

I believe that this is not a problem, because of this, too, is the salary of the engineer-developer. Competent testing includes, among other things, the need to present the product to end users

[CravenEconomics]

Who will be the main buyers of algorithms ? Is machine learning so much in demand today?

[dazuixia456]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it?

Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product

You should understand that in order to provide the engine for testing - you need to write a separate shell for it. Exactly for the functionality that is available at the moment

And for what we pay money? we invest in some obscure platform that abstractly should help businessmen with market analysis through machine learning

[mine777]

But the team has a ready-made prototype, see the video of his work on the site. Among other things, the github has not been updated for a long time, so it seems to me that such a project can not last long

This is a wrong conclusion. Despite the fact that the project was not edited on the github, it does not mean that it was not edited at all!

Software changes in any case are made on the local device, but if the developer makes a public project such as this one - he needs to report on the work done, and, as far as possible, fill the code with the github

Are you saying that here is the case when the developer lazily upload changes to the github?

He wants to say that developers do not change anything and do not improve the project in any way, so it can stop functioning after a while due to vulnerabilities

And what if the developers just took care of everything and at the moment there are no vulnerabilities? with some exception this also happens, is not it?

Yes, it may be, but why in this case we can not provide a demo version of the work of the engine of the system? This would allow users to get better acquainted with the product

You should understand that in order to provide the engine for testing - you need to write a separate shell for it. Exactly for the functionality that is available at the moment

And for what we pay money? we invest in some obscure platform that abstractly should help businessmen with market analysis through machine learning

The project description is available in the white paper of the project. Read it, please, and you will not have questions about what exactly this project does. Visualization here does not hurt, I agree ..