[HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - 1,150 TH/S HASH RATE (1GH/S per Unit)

[Darkstone2]

Havelock is down a lot, but that is not something that is 'recent'. Havelock has server problems for quite some time now.

[EdoBcn]

Havelock is down a lot, but that is not something that is 'recent'. Havelock has server problems for quite some time now.

While I'm still a beliver of Peta, I'm quite concerned about Havelock. Yes, 2FA and other security measures, but they hold quite a high number of btc in their pockets and the up&down server is not a good sign at all. I mean... what's so complex in having a static decent website and let the trading part experience these issues? I'm just afraid that they will disappear one day. Sure, Crytpx has the shareholder list with shares/name, but... not sure how to feel about Havelock.

[ujka]

Hmm.. I checked yesterday in my browser what's the security status of a connection to havelock, and it said 'this site is not secure'? (Opera on Linux) Despite connection beeing 'https'. Has this something with them beeing behind that cloudfare?

[Vertikar]

Hmm.. I checked yesterday in my browser what's the security status of a connection to havelock, and it said 'this site is not secure'? (Opera on Linux) Despite connection beeing 'https'. Has this something with them beeing behind that cloudfare?

Looks fine on Win 7 Chrome for me, its possible that your browser doesn't recognise the issuer (CA) for the certificate they are using.
Cloudflare shouldn't cause any issues with SSL if its setup correctly, which it seems to be.
Here's what I see in Chrome
https://i.imgur.com/4qD41UG.png

[ujka]

Firefox reported secure connection: High-grade Encryption (RC4, 128 bit keys).
Went back to Opera, disabled TLS v1 Security protocol (left v1.1 and v1.2), and now Opera reports secure connection: TLS v1.2 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA-256)

[Vertikar]

Firefox reported secure connection: High-grade Encryption (RC4, 128 bit keys).
Went back to Opera, disabled TLS v1 Security protocol (left v1.1 and v1.2), and now Opera reports secure connection: TLS v1.2 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA-256)

That's strange, wonder if Cloudflare are actively disabling vulnerable protocols.

[karol]

I belive someone is making benefits from such low price. Someone drop price specially to probably buy more, making so much noise after last announcement from Cryptyx - which wasn't bad (and contains information about already designed and ready to develop own boards)
Too bad that I don't have founds to buy I belive now is the best prices after IPO, next weeks will be own designed boards and pricess will go up I assume.

[rdyoung]

Havelock is down a lot, but that is not something that is 'recent'. Havelock has server problems for quite some time now.

While I'm still a beliver of Peta, I'm quite concerned about Havelock. Yes, 2FA and other security measures, but they hold quite a high number of btc in their pockets and the up&down server is not a good sign at all. I mean... what's so complex in having a static decent website and let the trading part experience these issues? I'm just afraid that they will disappear one day. Sure, Crytpx has the shareholder list with shares/name, but... not sure how to feel about Havelock.

While I have no reason to trust or not trust them, they are likely under constant ddos attack same as the rest of the larger entities in this ecosystem.

[tsm13]

not sure if everyone saw this. This was posted in bitmine.ch main thread a while ago over in hardware section. I would make a good guess this is our operation, hence the uptick we saw in delivery from them.

This also links back to the suggestion made about "good intention".

Hello everyone!

Time has finally come for me to make things clear about past happenings and what you can expect from bitmine in the future. First of all I owe everyone an apology being that late clarifying things but I felt that explaining anything without first setting up, on one hand, a better production line that could catch up delayed orders, and on the other hand a competent customer support staff that could answer all of your inquiries, it would not be of much use. Adding to that, my insane work schedule never let me much time for the forum and your personal inquiries. That being said I want a couple of things to be clarified:

- We never, ever, favored "bigger" customers over "little" customers. It has happened that some partnering companies have payed us to have a different production line, where one fixed person stood in our production facility and made miners just for them. This never influenced the "main" production line and it is not the cause for other orders delays.

All these talks about bots/counter bots/etc. There is a way to trick the bots to get cheaper shares, i notice some people have been doing this already. BCmine i guesstimate you have made around a 8% loss, awwwww poor you....

[ujka]

Since Bitmine is 4 weeks late with the delivery of Rigs, CryptX should demand/press/whatever on them to put at least 3 or 4 persons on our production line and complete and deliver all our 165 rig units in a week:

It has happened that some partnering companies have payed us to have a different production line, where one fixed person stood in our production facility and made miners just for them.

[ujka]

Quick CoinCraft Rig update, as promised: all parts are here, we're just missing the motherboard. Tomorrow testing will begin and hopefully production will start in the following days.

[BiteMyShinyMetalAss]

Quick CoinCraft Rig update, as promised: all parts are here, we're just missing the motherboard. Tomorrow testing will begin and hopefully production will start in the following days.

So what was up untill now? I fought they were already producing equipment for us, just slowly. What are they going to test? Also, are we getting any bonus equipment for the delay?

[ujka]

They were producing Coincraft Desk units (up to 1Th/s per unit). Rigs are more powerful, up to 2Th/s, and more power efficient.
I think they have to test new motherboards for rig units. Revision 1 and Revision 2 boards had some problems (stability, power). They are waiting for Rev 3 boards coming in tomorrow.

BTW, 1 hour average hashrate now at 186 188 Th/s.

[mikemikemike]

They were producing Coincraft Desk units (up to 1Th/s per unit). Rigs are more powerful, up to 2Th/s, and more power efficient.
I think they have to test new motherboards for rig units. Revision 1 and Revision 2 boards had samo problems (stability, power). They are waiting for Rev 3 boards coming in tomorrow.

BTW, 1 hour average hashrate now at 186 188 Th/s.

its going up and up 

[hephaist0s]

They were producing Coincraft Desk units (up to 1Th/s per unit). Rigs are more powerful, up to 2Th/s, and more power efficient.
I think they have to test new motherboards for rig units. Revision 1 and Revision 2 boards had some problems (stability, power). They are waiting for Rev 3 boards coming in tomorrow.

BTW, 1 hour average hashrate now at 186 188 Th/s.

Hell. Yes.

[VonSpecht]

I don't know how much we really can trust to this new monitoring... It was just a moment ago over 200, right now 183... At least 15 min interval leaves a lot of inaccuracy.

[ujka]

I don't know how much we really can trust to this new monitoring... It was just a moment ago over 200, right now 183...

1 hour average does not fluctuate widely.
I dont even look at 15 minute monitor.

[karol]

Guys is havelock working properly?
I posted some orders but all are on pending status and are not visible on order book

[mikemikemike]

Guys is havelock working properly?
I posted some orders but all are on pending status and are not visible on order book

yea - something is wrong. there hasn't been any trades in hours. it should all be back up when they get online, they don't usually work out of hours.

sooo. i've got 22 at 0.05223 - what orders were you putting in? feel free to sell into them 

[EdoBcn]

Last transaction 2014-04-07 20:34:50 (EST), so yes... something is wrong.