El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 26, 2013, 11:06:01 PM |
|
When btc was 5 cents everyond thought it was dead. Then $6....
This time to $30?
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 26, 2013, 11:25:34 PM |
|
When btc was 5 cents everyond thought it was dead. Then $6....
This time to $30?
Lets be honest; LTC will never worth 1000$, In the end everyone will reject all cryptocurrencies and accept only btc. LTC is good now but later i doubt so
|
|
|
|
rumlazy
|
|
November 26, 2013, 11:38:20 PM |
|
When btc was 5 cents everyond thought it was dead. Then $6....
This time to $30?
Lets be honest; LTC will never worth 1000$, In the end everyone will reject all cryptocurrencies and accept only btc. LTC is good now but later i doubt so I remember people saying this about btc. I also remember hearing LTC would never hit $1, $5, $10, ect.
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 26, 2013, 11:39:47 PM |
|
When btc was 5 cents everyond thought it was dead. Then $6....
This time to $30?
Lets be honest; LTC will never worth 1000$, In the end everyone will reject all cryptocurrencies and accept only btc. LTC is good now but later i doubt so I remember people saying this about btc. I also remember hearing LTC would never hit $1, $5, $10, ect. we will see
|
|
|
|
skleven
|
|
November 26, 2013, 11:45:38 PM |
|
mcxNOW will probably mean the death of a few altcoins (if you can't trade them with BTC, you can be sure there will be zero interest), as some of them had almost no existence outside. Litecoin wasn't big there. http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/#jump-ltc-btc BTC-e is incredibly dominant Off topic but I have to confess that every time I read one of your posts I think "hey, this guy must know shit, he is Art Vandelay, he is an architect" I belive Vandaley industries was into Latex.. but still, he might know something.
|
|
|
|
Yurizhai
|
|
November 27, 2013, 12:09:15 AM |
|
When btc was 5 cents everyond thought it was dead. Then $6....
This time to $30?
Lets be honest; LTC will never worth 1000$, In the end everyone will reject all cryptocurrencies and accept only btc. LTC is good now but later i doubt so This is becomming more unlikely by the minute. There's really no reason places won't accept more than just Bitcoin. When Bitcoin hits $10,000 each I don't see why LTC can't be $500-1000, or hell other coins as well.
|
|
|
|
manfred
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
November 27, 2013, 12:30:12 AM |
|
When btc was 5 cents everyond thought it was dead. Then $6....
This time to $30?
Lets be honest; LTC will never worth 1000$, In the end everyone will reject all cryptocurrencies and accept only btc. LTC is good now but later i doubt so Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it. Because of this there will always be people who will not touch BTC even with a 10-foot pole. A lot of people dont like it at all its as simple as that. LTC has got Scrypt so its free of that burden, truly open source. Cant see a much hope for other alts. The one or other may do alright, but not much more than picking up leftovers.
|
|
|
|
manfred
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
November 27, 2013, 12:51:44 AM |
|
Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it. LTC has got Scrypt so its free of that burden, truly open source.
Oh my god. If you need a reason to stay away from Litecoin, it's this. Its absolutely ignorant, clueless, users. lol..... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240677.0
|
|
|
|
kju
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2013, 12:58:36 AM |
|
Lets be honest; LTC will never worth 1000$, In the end everyone will reject all cryptocurrencies and accept only btc. LTC is good now but later i doubt so
If everyone will use BTC we might end up at a point where even 1 Satoshi is too much of value for at least some micropayment. Unless the bitcoin protocol is then changed (and the network will agree to do so) that lower units are made possible there would be a place for at least one other coin with lesser value.
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
|
November 27, 2013, 01:24:27 AM |
|
And the shit title of the year goes to...
|
|
|
|
FiiNALiZE
|
|
November 27, 2013, 05:29:52 AM |
|
Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it. LTC has got Scrypt so its free of that burden, truly open source.
Oh my god. If you need a reason to stay away from Litecoin, it's this. Its absolutely ignorant, clueless, users.lol..... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240677.0I lol'd
|
|
|
|
kju
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
November 27, 2013, 05:46:00 AM |
|
what you seem to ignore is that the 8 decimals are arbitrary and more can be added later with very simple protocol changes.
What you seem to ignore is that i mentioned that in my post. But if the network gets that big it might no longer work out to have the majority of the network adopt such a protocol change. Certainly people holding on to LTC or other altcoins might have an interested to prevent such a change happening. I'm not promoting altcoins in any way but just saying that I see reasons why at least one might stay despite the existence of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 27, 2013, 07:51:51 AM |
|
Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it. LTC has got Scrypt so its free of that burden, truly open source.
Oh my god. If you need a reason to stay away from Litecoin, it's this. Its absolutely ignorant, clueless, users.lol..... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240677.0I lol'd me too
|
|
|
|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:06:39 AM |
|
Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it.
SHA-256 closed source? Tell us more...
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:27:37 AM |
|
ooops to LTC haters
|
|
|
|
manfred
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:50:36 AM |
|
Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it.
SHA-256 closed source? Tell us more... Easy, show me the code for the function. The NSA does not publicly display its work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2
|
|
|
|
beetcoin
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:53:11 AM |
|
eh, i wanted to buy in at $9 last saturday.. was waiting for my coinbase transaction to go through, but nope.. i guess i missed the last call. at this point, i feel it's too speculative since there's no infrastructure to justify its current price point.
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:54:21 AM |
|
Lets not forget BTC has got that ugly NSA (National Security Agency) produced closed source function sha-256 sitting right at in the heart of it.
SHA-256 closed source? Tell us more... Easy, show me the code for the function. The NSA does not publicly display its work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2I could be completely clueless here but this was the first Google hit: https://polarssl.org/sha-256-source-code
|
|
|
|
manfred
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
November 27, 2013, 09:59:15 AM |
|
Well thats that sorted thanks for the link
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
|
November 27, 2013, 10:08:01 AM |
|
Actually, there is no source code for either SHA256 or scrypt, they're mathematical algorithms, they're known, and they have thousands of implementations in various licenses, closed or open source.
I will add that Scrypt is a newer Algo but not used widely as SHA-2, but this doesn't mean that SHA-2 is more secure than Scrypt, basically the wide use of SHA-2 comes from years of experience so it is safe somehow. Scrypt is working well for Litecoin, infact it proved to be a win and major factor for the existence of Litecoin. and it is still serving its purpose.
|
|
|
|
|