[ICO] It's not an idea, it's a BETA product ▐░░VoxelX-The DICOM-Platform░░▌

[gogok]

Hi Devs, I've got a question for you. What is the target audience of this Project, what is its sphere of implementation? Is it only medicine? For whom this project is designated? Who will be able to get profit from it, instead of radiologists?

The first phase of the project is designed for students, specialists, learners and teachers in the medical field

In short, given that we have already written this on several occasions, the project is intended exclusively for medical purposes, can be used by radiologists and students of medicine, and in relation to profit, I consider that the biggest profit has a society considering that the project is related to preogress of medicine

I believe that this is very important when society has a profit in the form of such working projects. I think that many people understand this.
And to the same, I think that such a service can be used not only for training, but also as an application to help during practice.

[1715110790]

1715110790

[Vargistkrieg]

Hi Devs, I've got a question for you. What is the target audience of this Project, what is its sphere of implementation? Is it only medicine? For whom this project is designated? Who will be able to get profit from it, instead of radiologists?

The first phase of the project is designed for students, specialists, learners and teachers in the medical field

And it wouldn't be bad if it stayed that way. I kinda like the idea that not everything has to be open for everyone to know how to use. Specialisation is key here, that's why this project makes sense.

[KojiCar]

Hi Devs, I've got a question for you. What is the target audience of this Project, what is its sphere of implementation? Is it only medicine? For whom this project is designated? Who will be able to get profit from it, instead of radiologists?

The first phase of the project is designed for students, specialists, learners and teachers in the medical field

In short, given that we have already written this on several occasions, the project is intended exclusively for medical purposes, can be used by radiologists and students of medicine, and in relation to profit, I consider that the biggest profit has a society considering that the project is related to preogress of medicine

I believe that this is very important when society has a profit in the form of such working projects. I think that many people understand this.
And to the same, I think that such a service can be used not only for training, but also as an application to help during practice.

Projects such as this, aimed at advancing some science, based on the block chain platform still are generally rare, but I believe that this will change soon

[VoxelX]

Hi Devs, I've got a question for you. What is the target audience of this Project, what is its sphere of implementation? Is it only medicine? For whom this project is designated? Who will be able to get profit from it, instead of radiologists?

The first phase of the project is designed for students, specialists, learners and teachers in the medical field

In short, given that we have already written this on several occasions, the project is intended exclusively for medical purposes, can be used by radiologists and students of medicine, and in relation to profit, I consider that the biggest profit has a society considering that the project is related to preogress of medicine

I believe that this is very important when society has a profit in the form of such working projects. I think that many people understand this.
And to the same, I think that such a service can be used not only for training, but also as an application to help during practice.

Projects such as this, aimed at advancing some science, based on the block chain platform still are generally rare, but I believe that this willing change soon

We believe also in this

[chocopapaya]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:




Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

Ahhhh, ok.  I understand.  Then the first suggestion about wikipedia is of no concern.

For the second, I was thinking that it was probably just large files loading so its ok.  And also, since it is only in beta and more code can be rewritten, the second issue is of no concern either.

I gotta say, your product is great then! Seriously.  Especially in the ico world where so many companies do their fundraising when they don't even have an MVP.

Oh, and for those of you that want to try it out like I did.  There is a task on Crowdholding.com that asks you to go check it out (there's a link there).

[VoxelX]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:




Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

Ahhhh, ok.  I understand.  Then the first suggestion about wikipedia is of no concern.

For the second, I was thinking that it was probably just large files loading so its ok.  And also, since it is only in beta and more code can be rewritten, the second issue is of no concern either.

I gotta say, your product is great then! Seriously.  Especially in the ico world where so many companies do their fundraising when they don't even have an MVP.

Oh, and for those of you that want to try it out like I did.  There is a task on Crowdholding.com that asks you to go check it out (there's a link there).

Thanks again for the detailed information.  You are doing a great job

[VoxelX]

How is sale going so far,if you can share that info?

We are still 1 day away from the start of the pre sale

Can anybody put some reminder or countdown consider about this? Thanks

I will notify you, don't worry

[thedarkk]

Hi Devs, I've got a question for you. What is the target audience of this Project, what is its sphere of implementation? Is it only medicine? For whom this project is designated? Who will be able to get profit from it, instead of radiologists?

The first phase of the project is designed for students, specialists, learners and teachers in the medical field

Thanks for your answer. I hope it will be as successfull as it was planned to be. I sincerely wish you good luck and hope it will be both useful and profitable

[Lognak]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:


http://

Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform

It's good to know you already have integrated some verified resources but probably also have long-term plans of integrating more.

[DOBARLOSZAO]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:


http://

Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform

It's good to know you already have integrated some verified resources but probably also have long-term plans of integrating more.

It is likely that the goal is to link the platform with as many credible sources as possible to make the data as accurate as possible

[VoxelX]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:




Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform

It's good to know you already have integrated some verified resources but probably also have long-term plans of integrating more.

It is likely that the goal is to link the platform with as many credible sources as possible to make the data as accurate as possible

exactly and all these linking are updatable and referenced with most recent medical publications

[ekurtovic]

VoxelX got >650 votes on crowdholding!!!

https://www.crowdholding.com/project/230/voxelx

now is over 700... thumb up

[VoxelX]

VoxelX got >650 votes on crowdholding!!!

https://www.crowdholding.com/project/230/voxelx

now is over 700... thumb up

👍��👍👍👍

[nnekic86]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:




Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform

It's good to know you already have integrated some verified resources but probably also have long-term plans of integrating more.

It is likely that the goal is to link the platform with as many credible sources as possible to make the data as accurate as possible

exactly and all these linking are updatable and referenced with most recent medical publications

how you can say who is credible sources? is there be some test or similar?

[VoxelX]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:




Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform

It's good to know you already have integrated some verified resources but probably also have long-term plans of integrating more.

It is likely that the goal is to link the platform with as many credible sources as possible to make the data as accurate as possible

exactly and all these linking are updatable and referenced with most recent medical publications

how you can say who is credible sources? is there be some test or similar?

in medicine every publication is rated according to the impact factor of the publisher, this a little complex but you read about it. All learners in the medical field know this and this what is called the modern medicine or evidence based medicine

[Tyrannah]

Do you have any information about amount of people that are currently testing your platform?

[GREATKINGRAT]

So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.

I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is.  This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:


http://

Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:

- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.

Some things that stood out that could be improved:

- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.

- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories.  I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with.  If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable.  However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time.  With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.

Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta.  You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors.  It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.

Thanks for the review
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software

But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this

other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform

It's good to know you already have integrated some verified resources but probably also have long-term plans of integrating more.

It is likely that the goal is to link the platform with as many credible sources as possible to make the data as accurate as possible

exactly and all these linking are updatable and referenced with most recent medical publications

how you can say who is credible sources? is there be some test or similar?

in medicine every publication is rated according to the impact factor of the publisher, this a little complex but you read about it. All learners in the medical field know this and this what is called the modern medicine or evidence based medicine

I guess that today every branch in science has its own credible sources and each source is based on the rules of a particular profession

[Vindizzle]

Do you have any plans for live AMA in the near future?

[MrSlave]

Do you have any information about amount of people that are currently testing your platform?

I think there is some kind of registration required, am I right? If so then they have an approximate number of participants, but with open testing, you can never be really sure what part of the user community is really testing and exploring the app and how many of them have just registered to have a quick look.

[KojiCar]

Do you have any information about amount of people that are currently testing your platform?

I think there is some kind of registration required, am I right? If so then they have an approximate number of participants, but with open testing, you can never be really sure what part of the user community is really testing and exploring the app and how many of them have just registered to have a quick look.

As far as I understand, testing is open to everyone, it is only a condition to be a professionals in the field to work on the platform so the results can be as accurate as possible.