Bitcoin Forum
February 23, 2019, 10:13:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner (ver 1.28).  (Read 76847 times)
Keko Fdez
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 6


View Profile
June 02, 2018, 10:26:13 AM
Last edit: June 02, 2018, 12:40:46 PM by Keko Fdez
 #241

After running the miner for like 6 hours + I do not seem to be getting the performance whattomine and crypt0zone say I should. It is supposed to be 380 coins in 24 hrs so about 15.7 coins per hour with 77 MH/S and It doesn´t seem to be getting there.

Anything I am doing worng? This is my bat file:

z-enemy -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://us.ravenminer.com:5678 -u address -p worker1,d=24 -i 21

As I mention before I run 6 GTX 1070 Ti with V1.10 on windows 10 64bit Nvidia drivers 391.35
per my own experience this is not the most accurate calculator and actuals earnings are less.
also you allways need to consider that network hashrate is allways fluctuating so you will never ever get accurate result as any calculation, the calculations itself are only presumptions

Yeah your are right about that and the difficulty has gone up as well so the earnings go down a bit. I still think is too much because by now I should have 30 coins more than what I have so that is 10% less pretty much.

How you guys doing with the rejected shares? I have 0.65% rejected which I belive it is really low.
1550916786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550916786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550916786
Reply with quote  #2

1550916786
Report to moderator
1550916786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550916786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550916786
Reply with quote  #2

1550916786
Report to moderator
1550916786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550916786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550916786
Reply with quote  #2

1550916786
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1550916786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550916786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550916786
Reply with quote  #2

1550916786
Report to moderator
1550916786
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550916786

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550916786
Reply with quote  #2

1550916786
Report to moderator
lordvek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2018, 01:44:56 PM
 #242

Keeping the powerlimit at 90% or above is essential for high performance for z-enemy.

In addition, try comparing -i 20 with -i 21. For some cards -i 20 is the threshold above which performance actuall degrades.
darkneorus
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 02, 2018, 04:50:55 PM
 #243

what's the logic behind lowering the cards power limit, guys?
it's obvious that the card will force to downclock itself when hitting the limit and lose performance because of it Roll Eyes

I've personally never touched the power limit, but I've always lowered the core voltage, with proper overclock it won't restrict your hashrate at all.
Keko Fdez
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 6


View Profile
June 02, 2018, 07:24:23 PM
 #244

Keeping the powerlimit at 90% or above is essential for high performance for z-enemy.

In addition, try comparing -i 20 with -i 21. For some cards -i 20 is the threshold above which performance actuall degrades.

Thanks for the info

I understand regarding intensity that 20 could be good but 21 will degrade the performance so means lower hash? I have tried before with 22 and 23 and both crashed so only 20 and 21 good for me and seems to be ok wit 21 (it has never crashed)

Power limit to 90% sounds to much unless you do not have to pay for electricity. And the description says it will be more stable between 90-110% PL but that doesn’t mean more efficient or higher performance. For me stability is about crashing and rejected shares but I could be wrong so please correct me by all means
Keko Fdez
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 6


View Profile
June 02, 2018, 07:51:20 PM
Last edit: June 02, 2018, 08:15:41 PM by Keko Fdez
 #245

what's the logic behind lowering the cards power limit, guys?
it's obvious that the card will force to downclock itself when hitting the limit and lose performance because of it Roll Eyes

I've personally never touched the power limit, but I've always lowered the core voltage, with proper overclock it won't restrict your hashrate at all.

I do not totally agree with your description. In my case I have GTX 1070 Ti and been mining ZEC for 2 months.

In my little experience if I keep the power limit to 100% with +200 clock and + 700 men I get pretty much 40-50 sols/s extra mining ZEC but power draw from the wall it’s really high like 180W each card plus the CPU, motherboard, SSD, PSU and RAM so about 1180W. That in money for me means 849,6 KW per month and I pay 0.0840389 €/kw so around  72 euros in electricity per month.

By lowering the PL or TDP I try to find the sweet spot for the card to run full power with the overclocking settings without any downclock because it has reached the limits. For my cards (and my make MSI and EVGA) 70% TDP with +200 clock and +700 mem seems to be it so basically I only lose those 40-50 sols/s extra on ZEC but the power draw from the wall goes down to 870W which means 626,4 KW per month so 52,65 euros.

That all means I lose 4/5 euros per month with the lower hashrate but save 20 on electricity so overall I win 15 euros. To that you can add lower card temperatures lower fan settings and more life expectancy I would say.

Maybe you do exactly the same with the voltage but that’s unknown to me, never played with it and would need some mentoring to learn how to use it properly.

If I said something wrong please anyone feel free to correct me. I have used ZEC as an example because that is what I have been mining so far so can’t say anything about RVN and zealot enemy miner.

I have seen videos on YouTube, rigs with same cards as mine and everyone seems to be getting around 77mh/s using similar settings so I am not really that far off. My average now in ravenminer.com is 80 MH/S so can’t complain.

I think the lower performance is due to the fact that I am in Europe and connected to US server so more ping, and sometimes more rejected shares, the difficulty on RVN has gone up since yesterday and the pool hashrate fluctuates from 270 to 420 GH/s plus as someelse mentioned, X16R has different algos so my cards go from 10.5 MH/S with slow all the way to 24 MH/S with fast.

Anyway I have only been mining RVN for 24hrs so have to wait a bit more to see real numbers. The only thing I do not fully understand is why whilst the miner is submitting shares constantly (like 6-18 per minute) sometimes I can mine for 25 minutes without a single payment on the pool.

Any hints are appreciated
Cuem
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2018, 01:38:55 AM
 #246

I don't lose any significant hashrate by lowering to 75% of power so I am lowering it.

lordvek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 04, 2018, 12:58:59 PM
 #247

Lowering the PL can result in much nicer temperatures as well as power draw from the socket, yes,
you need to find the balance. For Xevan algo I got a 5 C temp drop when I switched from 100% to 90% PL with
almost zero hashrate drop. However being at 80% PL got me significantly lower hashes.
The most optimized and/or capable GPU is 1080ti as I have seen. For it drastic improvements are observed with z-enemy.
With my 1080 and 1070 I don't get that much relative +, sob.
vipsvvvv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 04, 2018, 09:14:08 PM
 #248

where is the post for the new z enemy 1.11 ?
xyburcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 05, 2018, 05:46:10 AM
 #249

where is the post for the new z enemy 1.11 ?

maybe someone just want to scam others no official post yet

Life is ours, we live it our way.
lordvek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 05, 2018, 05:08:59 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2018, 11:58:55 AM by lordvek
 #250

- post removed due to dev. request -
igotfits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 04:52:08 AM
 #251

Quote
Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v2) For Windows (Cuda 9.1) zealot/enemy-1.11 (z-enemy)
From: Dk & Enemy -
Performance improvements:

x17 (+4-8%), x16r&s (+1-3%) and other ...
- Fast start on multi gpu-rigs
- GPUs limit increased to 24
- AeriumX(AEX) - the miner supports Aerium new swap algo (-a aeriumx), starting 4th June.
- Added: C11(-a c11) basic , Skunk(-a skunk) basic , improved TimeTravel8(-a timetravel) and Polytimos (-a poly)

Windows Prime build: https://mega.nz/#!FOADSBib!X7Qi08UWKY6_boMNVxas_z3t0A_5oskziDQUTxfw6hw

Linux (Ubuntu, HiveOS)
Cuda 8.0: https://mega.nz/#!JT40EIIZ!slc37LldnF1k-a3rifO60T6OJpHw7p5ljbLzuxX1SKM
Cuda 9.0: https://mega.nz/#!wfB3XY5A!V1xQawvqZfKx6qkyylRJu3BzbF7-jS164UgkQbFsb3I
Cuda 9.1: https://mega.nz/#!paxXQYrb!NjY8CICeTHsjX74wClWhKDU6inuCofhg4pIRIyMvg1U

You can check out the links in the Zealot Team Discord, link's in the first Enemy post.

sorry i must be blind, is there an official release? this official thread only shows 1.10
@enemy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 16


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 06:51:27 AM
Last edit: June 06, 2018, 10:41:16 AM by @enemy
 #252

Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4)

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.11 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Performance improvements: x17 (+4-8%), x16r&s (+1-3%) and other ...

- Fast start on multi gpu-rigs

- GPUs limit increased to 24

- AeriumX(AEX) - the miner supports Aerium new swap algo (-a aeriumx), starting 4th June.

- Added: C11(-a c11) basic  , Skunk(-a skunk) basic , improved TimeTravel8(-a timetravel) and Polytimos (-a poly)


P.S. Please  do not post  here download links from our discord. Build was not tested and ready.   Due to technical issues, c11 hashing function was disabled in the first release ...

RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
lordvek
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 11:57:55 AM
 #253

Sorry! It stated PUBLIC release so I rushed it in. I removed my post not to make confusion.
cryptodunno
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 12:34:02 PM
 #254

Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4)

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.11 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Performance improvements: x17 (+4-8%), x16r&s (+1-3%) and other ...

- Fast start on multi gpu-rigs

- GPUs limit increased to 24

- AeriumX(AEX) - the miner supports Aerium new swap algo (-a aeriumx), starting 4th June.

- Added: C11(-a c11) basic  , Skunk(-a skunk) basic , improved TimeTravel8(-a timetravel) and Polytimos (-a poly)


P.S. Please  do not post  here download links from our discord. Build was not tested and ready.   Due to technical issues, c11 hashing function was disabled in the first release ...
launched for tests, great  job as usual!
keep doing what you are doing man!

der.Dude
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 05:06:21 PM
 #255

In your description you write Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4) and in the filename is ***puplic-final_v3
Is it the correct file?
Siolim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 05:44:16 PM
 #256

Z-ENEMY what are you fellows! In version 1.10, I found at least three viruses. In version 1.11 even when downloading it is detected Fuerboos.A! Cl, I'm afraid to imagine what will happen after unpacking your shit miner. You will not go so far.
Keko Fdez
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 104
Merit: 6


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 06:48:14 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2018, 07:44:45 PM by Keko Fdez
 #257

In your description you write Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4) and in the filename is ***puplic-final_v3
Is it the correct file?


Same problem here.

Also, I have tried your version 1.11 and there’s something weird about it so I have switched back to 1.10

Have a look at this pic and you’ll see 3 different connectiosn to the pool when I have only one miner running. I do not really understand what’s going on so hope you can explain it.



And as I said before, how is it possible that the miner is submitting shares constantly but there is no payout for more than 25 min?

Please do not take it as a complain. I am just trying to understand what’s happening
lightwz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 08:44:04 PM
 #258

Why on 1.10, using official raven pool the miner uses 1% of cpu (ryzen 5 1600), and on zergpool it uses 40%?
skablast
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 06, 2018, 08:58:02 PM
 #259

Inshort , latest version 1.11:

Timetravel very good,Polytomos very good, X17 good,


C11, Skein well behind Alexis 78


Skunk, behing Tpruvot

4 GTX 1070 , stock, 24 hours switching algos on Ahashpool, not one stop

Now I am using it with 7 algos and increasing
@enemy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 16


View Profile
June 07, 2018, 08:54:16 AM
 #260

In your description you write Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4) and in the filename is ***puplic-final_v3
Is it the correct file?

All ok.

Slow X64 ver4 was removed, we will add asap. Now  only C11 +3% vs _v3

RVN: RFQXKVKpHMwyJ86YqQUJSZK1S8m8oRbC5h
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!