Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 08:45:10 PM |
|
Bitcoin with the current block size has an ability to process ~7 transactions per second.
What about NXT? Haven't see this info anywhere posted.
Current limit is 255 payments per minute.
|
|
|
|
laowai80
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 08, 2013, 08:46:21 PM |
|
Current limit is 255 payments per minute.
Can this be raised in the future? Would this be easy to do?
|
|
|
|
nelisky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 08, 2013, 08:47:05 PM |
|
How does one safely detect orphans?
If I have the block at tip it will not have a 'nextblock', so checking 'nextblock' on that block's 'previousblock' will detect if it got orphaned, but what if the last two blocks get orphaned, i.e. a blockchain reorg? Is that even possible to happen in NXT?
If all orphaned blocks get stripped of 'nextblock' then I can safely walk back until I find one that has that property, but with 2 orphans in a row will the older one still point to the next?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 08:49:39 PM |
|
Current limit is 255 payments per minute.
Can this be raised in the future? Would this be easy to do? Yes. As easy as changing "255" to some other value.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 08:52:59 PM |
|
How does one safely detect orphans?
If I have the block at tip it will not have a 'nextblock', so checking 'nextblock' on that block's 'previousblock' will detect if it got orphaned, but what if the last two blocks get orphaned, i.e. a blockchain reorg? Is that even possible to happen in NXT?
If all orphaned blocks get stripped of 'nextblock' then I can safely walk back until I find one that has that property, but with 2 orphans in a row will the older one still point to the next?
Yes, a blockchain reorg will produce orphans. To check if it's an orphaned block, simply compare "lastBlock" returned by "getState" and id of the checked block. Yes, 2 orphans in a row will be "double-linked" via "previousBlock" and "nextBlock".
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 08:56:17 PM |
|
Without complicating the network in any noticeable way? What exactly would the peripheral effects of this be?
If u "just" change this value, ur block will be rejected by the others. If it's legit changes then blockchain will be growing faster, fees will be smaller, people will be happier.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 09:00:29 PM |
|
Without complicating the network in any noticeable way? What exactly would the peripheral effects of this be?
If u "just" change this value, ur block will be rejected by the others. If it's legit changes then blockchain will be growing faster, fees will be smaller, people will be happier. With blockchain pruning seems like we could have a very healthy, scalable, flexible network. Esp Vs. BTC. It's not pruning. BCNext called this "shrinking". Is there any difference btw? I'm not a native English speaker.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 09:15:17 PM |
|
Hmm, couldn't say without a white paper/ source code. I would assume its similar to pruning, but "shrinking" could be interpreted as a type of compression.
Actually it's supposed to be such a way: 1. Take all non-zero balances. 2. Generate a new genesis block. 3. Start a new blockchain. 4. Put old blockchain to somewhere for those who wish to check that new genesis block is legit.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 09:31:50 PM |
|
Edit: I believe you posted earlier that this shrinking mechanism would be up to a POS vote. Is it automated or is someone expected to steward the blockchain?
I don't know details, sorry.
|
|
|
|
xibeijan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 08, 2013, 09:37:16 PM |
|
What is the hallmark? How's colored coins debugging coming along?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 08, 2013, 09:40:34 PM |
|
What is the hallmark?
How's colored coins debugging coming along?
No idea, BCNext works on that.
|
|
|
|
DiCE1904
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:37:03 PM |
|
when I'm putting in my hallmark code do i need to have {"hallmark":" in from the code?
|
|
|
|
Jean-Luc
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:40:11 PM |
|
when I'm putting in my hallmark code do i need to have {"hallmark":" in from the code?
No, just the very long string of characters after that. Without the quotes.
|
|
|
|
DiCE1904
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:43:04 PM |
|
when I'm putting in my hallmark code do i need to have {"hallmark":" in from the code?
No, just the very long string of characters after that. Without the quotes. Done, thanks. I see my IP shows, how do I get my dns to be the one thats showing instead of my IP? Can you explain the weighted thing more? Should I transfer more of my coins to my dedicated VPS for whatever the weighted reason might be?
|
|
|
|
Jean-Luc
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:44:18 PM |
|
I had to clear the browser cache to get to see the peer weights. Indeed too few have added it. Clearing the peers.nxt file may also be a good idea at this release, to remove the blacklisted. The disappearing balance bug is unfortunately still present.
|
|
|
|
gnuberg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:47:38 PM |
|
What is the tietoiseen and why the http://nextcoin.org waiting for secure connection on the 80th port with self-singned cert from by tietoiseen
|
|
|
|
Jean-Luc
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:51:07 PM |
|
Done, thanks. I see my IP shows, how do I get my dns to be the one thats showing instead of my IP?
I just put the hostname there instead of the IP. Both under myAddress in the web.xml file, and also when generating the hallmark. Can you explain the weighted thing more? Should I transfer more of my coins to my dedicated VPS for whatever the weighted reason might be?
Not sure what you mean transfer the coins. You never need to unlock your account at the VPS. If you have several accounts, and only one public IP (the VPS), use the account with the highest balance when generating the hallmark. I don't know if CfB provided a way to combine the balance of several accounts to vouch for one node, probably not.
|
|
|
|
gnuberg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2013, 10:55:10 PM |
|
What is the tietoiseen and why the http://nextcoin.org waiting for secure connection on the 80th port with self-singned cert from by tietoiseen Now all looks fine. I don't know what it was that... But still on 443 port I see self-singned cert from by tietoiseen. Is it normal?
|
|
|
|
DiCE1904
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1118
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 08, 2013, 11:05:26 PM |
|
Done, thanks. I see my IP shows, how do I get my dns to be the one thats showing instead of my IP?
I just put the hostname there instead of the IP. Both under myAddress in the web.xml file, and also when generating the hallmark. Can you explain the weighted thing more? Should I transfer more of my coins to my dedicated VPS for whatever the weighted reason might be?
Not sure what you mean transfer the coins. You never need to unlock your account at the VPS. If you have several accounts, and only one public IP (the VPS), use the account with the highest balance when generating the hallmark. I don't know if CfB provided a way to combine the balance of several accounts to vouch for one node, probably not. great I see the dns now on the active peers. Thank You
|
|
|
|
|