os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
February 26, 2014, 11:46:50 AM |
|
I'll add you to the list - but before I do, are you sure you want to go with proportional reward? It's a bit dangerous for any pool. There are only two pools left doing proportional rewards and neither of them are doing well. I think that I will change it to PPS . You could be putting yourself at financial risk by using PPS. Proportional would be safer for the pool.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 26, 2014, 11:57:43 AM |
|
I'll add you to the list - but before I do, are you sure you want to go with proportional reward? It's a bit dangerous for any pool. There are only two pools left doing proportional rewards and neither of them are doing well. I think that I will change it to PPS . You could be putting yourself at financial risk by using PPS. Proportional would be safer for the pool. PPLNS is also available for these pools. Proportional has a better record of killing pools than PPS, from what I can remember.
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
February 26, 2014, 12:05:25 PM |
|
I'll add you to the list - but before I do, are you sure you want to go with proportional reward? It's a bit dangerous for any pool. There are only two pools left doing proportional rewards and neither of them are doing well. I think that I will change it to PPS . You could be putting yourself at financial risk by using PPS. Proportional would be safer for the pool. PPLNS is also available for these pools. Proportional has a better record of killing pools than PPS, from what I can remember. From what I understand PPLNS could be safe for a pool too. I would just hate to see a new pool go into debt with PPS, unless they have really deep pockets to start with. But even then PPS would be too risky, in my opinion, which isn't really worth much
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
scratchy
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 03:32:46 PM |
|
Hello, Great List! Please add MuPool.com Pool: MuPool.com Website: https://MuPool.comPayout method: PPLNS Fee: 0% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: 16 to 1024 Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.01 Merge Mining: No
|
- Administrator of MuPool.com - MuPool.com a profesionell stable Multi Coin Pool (BTC,DRK,LTC,DOGE,PPC,FTC,TIT)
|
|
|
ronnie173
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 11:08:56 AM |
|
I'll add you to the list - but before I do, are you sure you want to go with proportional reward? It's a bit dangerous for any pool. There are only two pools left doing proportional rewards and neither of them are doing well. I think that I will change it to PPS . You could be putting yourself at financial risk by using PPS. Proportional would be safer for the pool. PPLNS is also available for these pools. Proportional has a better record of killing pools than PPS, from what I can remember. From what I understand PPLNS could be safe for a pool too. I would just hate to see a new pool go into debt with PPS, unless they have really deep pockets to start with. But even then PPS would be too risky, in my opinion, which isn't really worth much So which is the best one for a new pool? First I need some users lol. I may switch it back to prop because pplns has to be tweaked to the right settings to work good.
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
February 27, 2014, 12:32:39 PM |
|
So which is the best one for a new pool? First I need some users lol. I may switch it back to prop because pplns has to be tweaked to the right settings to work good.
PPLNS would probably be best. It is widely accepted now. If you were to use PPS your pool would be exploited by those who could care less if you took losses, especially with the 0 fee introductory period. But your plan of using Proportional then switching to PPLNS seems sound. Most do NOT like Proportional since it is hoppable even though, according to Organofcorti, pool hopping is not happening these days. It is still politically incorrect. Good Luck, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
tanzislam
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 10:39:14 PM |
|
I'll add you to the list - but before I do, are you sure you want to go with proportional reward? It's a bit dangerous for any pool. There are only two pools left doing proportional rewards and neither of them are doing well. I think that I will change it to PPS . PPS at 1% (where pool must credit miners as difficulty-1 shares are submitted, regardless of whether an actual block at current difficulty is found or not) is even riskier than Proportional or PPLNS[G] (where pool credits miners only when block is actually found at current difficulty).
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 01, 2014, 12:29:07 AM |
|
I'll add you to the list - but before I do, are you sure you want to go with proportional reward? It's a bit dangerous for any pool. There are only two pools left doing proportional rewards and neither of them are doing well. I think that I will change it to PPS . PPS at 1% (where pool must credit miners as difficulty-1 shares are submitted, regardless of whether an actual block at current difficulty is found or not) is even riskier than Proportional or PPLNS[G] (where pool credits miners only when block is actually found at current difficulty). According to Meni Rosenfeld's analysis in Chapter 2.2 here: https://bitcoil.co.il/pool_analysis.pdf ,the relationship between fee, probability of pool bankruptcy, starting reserve and the block reward is: R = B log(1/delta)/2F R = starting reserve B = block reward delta = probability of pool bankruptcy
So if you have a fee of 1% and you only want a one in a thousand chance of pool bankruptcy, then: R = 25 * log(1000) / 0.02 = 8634.694
So if you want to run a PPS pool with a 1% fee, you're going to need a starting reserve of over 8600 bitcoins. This is a huge, locked in reserve - you can't ever spend these coins while you run the pool. This means in the long term you'll lose money, since you won't be able to use the reserve for any other investment. Choosing the fee is a balancing act - how small a fee can you afford (to attract customers) against the largest reserve you can afford and the probability of bankruptcy. Say you charged a 10% fee, and were ok with a 1 in 100 chance of bankruptcy: R = 25 * log(100) / 0.2 = 575.6463
Even in this case you'll need a reserve of nearly six hundred coins. tl;dr current forms of PPS are not for the faint-of-heart.
|
|
|
|
martinbeek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2014, 01:24:42 AM |
|
Hello listkeeper. Here is my suggestion for a new entry. Pool: Angel Miners Website: https://www.angelminers.orgPayout method: PPLNS Fee: 25% (23% charities, 2% pool) Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: 16 to 2048 (float) Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.01 Merge Mining: No Thanks and kind regards, Martin Beek.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 01, 2014, 01:36:43 AM |
|
Hello listkeeper. Here is my suggestion for a new entry. Pool: Angel Miners Website: https://www.angelminers.orgPayout method: PPLNS Fee: 25% (23% charities, 2% pool) Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: 16 to 2048 (float) Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.01 Merge Mining: No Thanks and kind regards, Martin Beek. Hi Martin, is this your pool? If not, do you have permission from the pool op to post it here?
|
|
|
|
fligen
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
Crypto Pros
|
|
March 02, 2014, 06:42:35 AM |
|
We would like to request submission to your pool list. https://pool.cryptopros.comWe offer 2 Auto-switching pools (ASM) both Scrypt and SHA-256, 20 Scrypt coin pools and 5 SHA-256 pools. Our scrypt hash total is around 15k MH/s and 11 TH/s SHA-256. Information as follows: Name: Crypto Pros Pool Location USA, Eu, P2Pool TH/s: 11 Merged Mining: No Reward Type: Prop. Transaction fees: Shared PPS Fee: 0% Other Fee: 1.5% GWK: Yes STM: Yes GBT: No Launched: 2/1/2014 Variance: User Forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=494250.0Website: https://pool.cryptopros.comScrypt Coins Litecoin (LTC) DigitalCoin (DGC) PhenixCoin (PXC) DogeCoin (DOGE) Mooncoin (MOON) FeatherCoin (FTC) NovaCoin (NVC) MegaCoin (MEC) Diamond (DMD) Earthcoin (EAC) Mincoin (MNC) LuckyCoin (LKY) BottleCaps (CAP) Grandcoin (GDC) Lottocoin (LOT) WorldCoin (WDC) Argentum (ARG) Cryptogenic Bullion (CGB) FedoraCoin (TIPS) AuroraCoin (AUR) SHA-256 Coins Bitcoin (BTC) Freicoin (FRC) PeerCoin (PPC) Terracoin (TRC) Zetacoin (ZET)
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 03, 2014, 01:44:37 AM |
|
Updated. Let me know if I've made any mistakes or I didn't include you.
|
|
|
|
vnhyp0
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
March 08, 2014, 08:13:16 PM |
|
I didn't notice the listing of F2Pool anywhere so I thought I'd mention it. It is located at http://www.f2pool.com/ and is a 4% PPS pool (not sure exactly if/how the merged mining works; coins I am unfamiliar with). The pool is in Chinese language, but still usable without knowing the language (translate page to English). The pool has a minimum payout threshold of 0.0005 BTC and pays out daily at 0800 GMT. It also has an LTC pool and offers some other altcoin and merged mining (not dvx,ixc,nmc though). I have found it to be one of my favorite pools after looking around for a good PPS pool since the closing of the Dustcoin pool. Here is a pic of the dashboard interface (translated to English via Google chrome): https://i.imgur.com/9rvzMLU.pngHere is one without the translation (shows the graph details better): https://i.imgur.com/TTUZCsU.png
|
QQ: 2228207157
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 09, 2014, 11:43:04 AM |
|
I didn't notice the listing of F2Pool anywhere so I thought I'd mention it. It is located at http://www.f2pool.com/ and is a 4% PPS pool (not sure exactly if/how the merged mining works; coins I am unfamiliar with). The pool is in Chinese language, but still usable without knowing the language (translate page to English). The pool has a minimum payout threshold of 0.0005 BTC and pays out daily at 0800 GMT. It also has an LTC pool and offers some other altcoin and merged mining (not dvx,ixc,nmc though). I have found it to be one of my favorite pools after looking around for a good PPS pool since the closing of the Dustcoin pool. Here is a pic of the dashboard interface (translated to English via Google chrome): https://i.imgur.com/9rvzMLU.pngHere is one without the translation (shows the graph details better): https://i.imgur.com/TTUZCsU.pngThe operator of F2Pool asked me to hold off listing the pool for a little while. They'll contact me when they feel it's ready to be listed. Also: list updated.
|
|
|
|
bandit7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 12:19:43 PM Last edit: March 09, 2014, 12:33:37 PM by bandit7 |
|
Hi Pool: PolishPool Website: www.polishpool.plPayout method: PPLNS , PPS Fee: 0% PPS FEE 0% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Variance Dynamic Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: Yes Min Withdrawal: 0.005 (automatic payment every 15 minutes ) Merge Mining: Yes GWK: Yes STM: Yes GBT: Yes Other Info: added to the first payment of 25% of earnings that is, you earn 1 BTC get 1.25 BTC
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 09, 2014, 12:28:52 PM |
|
Hi Pool: PolishPool Website: https://www.polishpool.plPayout method: PPLNS , PPS Fee: 0% PPS FEE 0% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Variance Dynamic Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: Yes Min Withdrawal: 0.005 (automatic payment every 15 minutes ) Merge Mining: Yes GWK: Yes STM: Yes GBT: Yes Other Info: added to the first payment of 25% of earnings that is, you earn 1 BTC get 1.25 BTC Seems to be a landing page for fiberhost.pl? Also, is this your pool, and if not does the pool op mind it being posted here?
|
|
|
|
bandit7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 12:37:20 PM |
|
Hi Pool: PolishPool Website: https://www.polishpool.plPayout method: PPLNS , PPS Fee: 0% PPS FEE 0% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Variance Dynamic Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: Yes Min Withdrawal: 0.005 (automatic payment every 15 minutes ) Merge Mining: Yes GWK: Yes STM: Yes GBT: Yes Other Info: added to the first payment of 25% of earnings that is, you earn 1 BTC get 1.25 BTC Seems to be a landing page for fiberhost.pl? Also, is this your pool, and if not does the pool op mind it being posted here? www.polishpool.pl Without https
|
|
|
|
vnhyp0
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
March 09, 2014, 12:50:09 PM |
|
I didn't notice the listing of F2Pool anywhere so I thought I'd mention it. It is located at http://www.f2pool.com/ and is a 4% PPS pool (not sure exactly if/how the merged mining works; coins I am unfamiliar with). The pool is in Chinese language, but still usable without knowing the language (translate page to English). The pool has a minimum payout threshold of 0.0005 BTC and pays out daily at 0800 GMT. It also has an LTC pool and offers some other altcoin and merged mining (not dvx,ixc,nmc though). I have found it to be one of my favorite pools after looking around for a good PPS pool since the closing of the Dustcoin pool. Here is a pic of the dashboard interface (translated to English via Google chrome): https://i.imgur.com/9rvzMLU.pngHere is one without the translation (shows the graph details better): https://i.imgur.com/TTUZCsU.pngThe operator of F2Pool asked me to hold off listing the pool for a little while. They'll contact me when they feel it's ready to be listed. Also: list updated. Ok, thanks for the information! I was curious as to why it was not listed.
|
QQ: 2228207157
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 09, 2014, 12:55:10 PM |
|
Hi Pool: PolishPool Website: https://www.polishpool.plPayout method: PPLNS , PPS Fee: 0% PPS FEE 0% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Variance Dynamic Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: Yes Min Withdrawal: 0.005 (automatic payment every 15 minutes ) Merge Mining: Yes GWK: Yes STM: Yes GBT: Yes Other Info: added to the first payment of 25% of earnings that is, you earn 1 BTC get 1.25 BTC Seems to be a landing page for fiberhost.pl? Also, is this your pool, and if not does the pool op mind it being posted here? www.polishpool.pl Without https Ah, good-oh. I'm going to assume you have the pool op's permission to post this, please let me know if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
bandit7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2014, 01:00:37 PM |
|
Hi Pool: PolishPool Website: https://www.polishpool.plPayout method: PPLNS , PPS Fee: 0% PPS FEE 0% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Variance Dynamic Local Work: Stratum Pay Orphans: Yes Min Withdrawal: 0.005 (automatic payment every 15 minutes ) Merge Mining: Yes GWK: Yes STM: Yes GBT: Yes Other Info: added to the first payment of 25% of earnings that is, you earn 1 BTC get 1.25 BTC Seems to be a landing page for fiberhost.pl? Also, is this your pool, and if not does the pool op mind it being posted here? www.polishpool.pl Without https Ah, good-oh. I'm going to assume you have the pool op's permission to post this, please let me know if I'm wrong. so I have permission from the Admin mine
|
|
|
|
|