|
x0rcist
|
 |
January 17, 2014, 07:14:55 PM |
|
Can someone do a dump on coinedup please? I'm waiting till my orders are getting filled  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BorisTheSpider
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:20:45 PM |
|
Can someone do a dump on coinedup please? I'm waiting till my orders are getting filled No-one selling at these prices bro! |
|
|
|
|
|
ecliptic
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:25:39 PM |
|
Does this work with BAMT?
|
|
|
|
|
|
BorisTheSpider
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:29:18 PM |
|
Does this work with BAMT?
Not unless you patched up BAMT with the modded cgminer. See the OP for links to the modded cgminer, maybe someone should release a vertcoin-BAMT, that would be a good way to help linux guys get started quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
x0rcist
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:34:19 PM |
|
Does this work with BAMT?
Not unless you patched up BAMT with the modded cgminer. See the OP for links to the modded cgminer, maybe someone should release a vertcoin-BAMT, that would be a good way to help linux guys get started quickly. btw anyone thought of modding the pre-fork of poolers cpuminer? This one is without assambly so should be easy to adapt for vert https://github.com/ArtForz/cpuminer |
|
|
|
|
|
ecliptic
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:35:04 PM
Last edit: January 17, 2014, 07:48:02 PM by ecliptic |
|
I can't belive this network is only 40Mh/sec (aka 80 Mh/sec normal scrypt)
since ASICs are here and scrypt is officially dead and has FAILED in its explicit purpose, it seems pretty damn obvious to move over to the new gpu-only algo.
edit : ok more like 35%-40% aka ~110Mh/sec normal scrypt. still pretty low for the ONLY gpu-only coin/algo in existence
|
|
|
|
|
|
spiffcow
|
|
January 17, 2014, 07:54:34 PM |
|
I can't belive this network is only 40Mh/sec (aka 80 Mh/sec normal scrypt)
since ASICs are here and scrypt is officially dead and has FAILED in its explicit purpose, it seems pretty damn obvious to move over to the new gpu-only algo.
edit : ok more like 35%-40% aka ~110Mh/sec normal scrypt. still pretty low for the ONLY gpu-only coin/algo in existence
I don't think the full impact of the scrypt ASICs is being felt yet.. In a month or two this may be a very different story. |
|
|
|
|
|
mattbigblue
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:15:35 PM |
|
how much coins You can get with current diff and 1Mh/s GPU mining (normal scrypt) per 24h??
|
|
|
|
|
spiffcow
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:21:33 PM |
|
how much coins You can get with current diff and 1Mh/s GPU mining (normal scrypt) per 24h??
~150-200 at current difficulty. |
|
|
|
|
ahnonamis
Member
 Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:39:52 PM |
|
I'm interested in mining Vertcoin with the modified CGMiner. Can anyone tell me what command I use in CGminer's start file to tell it which of my two GPUs to mine with? I have a second GPU I installed specifically to mine; so I want it to use that, not my primary GPU (which I obviously use to run my computer).
|
|
|
|
|
pdaddy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:42:15 PM |
|
And there goes my trust in this coin, great doing.  Network Hash rate: 37.730514 Mhash/s VTC.POOL.PM - Hashrate: 24 Khash/s - Workers: 4 LA.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 5 Khash/s - Workers: 1 HK.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 28 Khash/s - Workers: 0 NY.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 1.278 Mhash/s - Workers: 5 EU.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 1.978 Mhash/s - Workers: 20 VTC.KILOVOLT.CO.UK - Hashrate: 6.11 Mhash/s - Workers: 12 VERT.BITCRUSH.INFO - Hashrate: 22.055 Mhash/s - Workers: 33 Warning, mining on the largest pool can cause problems with the coin. Please choose one of the smaller pools. The smaller pools are automatically moved to the top of the list every 3 minutes. |
|
|
|
|
lucky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:47:53 PM |
|
And there goes my trust in this coin, great doing. Warning, mining on the largest pool can cause problems with the coin. Please choose one of the smaller pools. The smaller pools are automatically moved to the top of the list every 3 minutes. I'm running a small pool at skadi.nawk.net:8000 which could use a few more miners. Spread out, people! |
|
|
|
|
|
ecliptic
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:06:06 PM |
|
And there goes my trust in this coin, great doing. Network Hash rate: 37.730514 Mhash/s VTC.POOL.PM - Hashrate: 24 Khash/s - Workers: 4 LA.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 5 Khash/s - Workers: 1 HK.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 28 Khash/s - Workers: 0 NY.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 1.278 Mhash/s - Workers: 5 EU.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 1.978 Mhash/s - Workers: 20 VTC.KILOVOLT.CO.UK - Hashrate: 6.11 Mhash/s - Workers: 12 VERT.BITCRUSH.INFO - Hashrate: 22.055 Mhash/s - Workers: 33 Warning, mining on the largest pool can cause problems with the coin. Please choose one of the smaller pools. The smaller pools are automatically moved to the top of the list every 3 minutes. If the 2nd largest wasn't .co.uk i'd have used it. I'm not using a pool that's like <10% of the network, and i'm not using a pool that doesn't have US servers. that's probably why info is so high up. Also who fucking cares, scrypt altcoins always have pools that are like 40-80% of the hashrate sometimes more during their initial week or two. especially when multicoin pools switch on they can be like 90%+ (granted this wont happen immediately for this because a different algo but still) nobody freaks out about >50% when a coin just launched within the last week or two nobody is trading or using the coin for anything except mining so double spends aren't even a threat |
|
|
|
|
XBATTO
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:11:21 PM |
|
And there goes my trust in this coin, great doing. Network Hash rate: 37.730514 Mhash/s VTC.POOL.PM - Hashrate: 24 Khash/s - Workers: 4 LA.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 5 Khash/s - Workers: 1 HK.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 28 Khash/s - Workers: 0 NY.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 1.278 Mhash/s - Workers: 5 EU.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 1.978 Mhash/s - Workers: 20 VTC.KILOVOLT.CO.UK - Hashrate: 6.11 Mhash/s - Workers: 12 VERT.BITCRUSH.INFO - Hashrate: 22.055 Mhash/s - Workers: 33 Warning, mining on the largest pool can cause problems with the coin. Please choose one of the smaller pools. The smaller pools are automatically moved to the top of the list every 3 minutes. If the 2nd largest wasn't .co.uk i'd have used it. I'm not using a pool that's like <10% of the network, and i'm not using a pool that doesn't have US servers. that's probably why info is so high up. Also who fucking cares, scrypt altcoins always have pools that are like 40-80% of the hashrate sometimes more during their initial week or two. especially when multicoin pools switch on they can be like 90%+ (granted this wont happen immediately for this because a different algo but still) nobody freaks out about >50% when a coin just launched within the last week or two nobody is trading or using the coin for anything except mining so double spends aren't even a threat Why are you only mining on US pools ? What's wrong with uk ? |
|
|
|
|
|
spiffcow
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:12:27 PM |
|
I know code changes lead to hard forking can really screw with things, but it might be a good idea to set the difficulty retarget a bit lower. Th mining dropped off and we're looking at 5 minute block times for the next several days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ecliptic
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:20:57 PM |
|
And there goes my trust in this coin, great doing. Network Hash rate: 37.730514 Mhash/s VTC.POOL.PM - Hashrate: 24 Khash/s - Workers: 4 LA.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 5 Khash/s - Workers: 1 HK.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 28 Khash/s - Workers: 0 NY.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 1.278 Mhash/s - Workers: 5 EU.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 1.978 Mhash/s - Workers: 20 VTC.KILOVOLT.CO.UK - Hashrate: 6.11 Mhash/s - Workers: 12 VERT.BITCRUSH.INFO - Hashrate: 22.055 Mhash/s - Workers: 33 Warning, mining on the largest pool can cause problems with the coin. Please choose one of the smaller pools. The smaller pools are automatically moved to the top of the list every 3 minutes. If the 2nd largest wasn't .co.uk i'd have used it. I'm not using a pool that's like <10% of the network, and i'm not using a pool that doesn't have US servers. that's probably why info is so high up. Also who fucking cares, scrypt altcoins always have pools that are like 40-80% of the hashrate sometimes more during their initial week or two. especially when multicoin pools switch on they can be like 90%+ (granted this wont happen immediately for this because a different algo but still) nobody freaks out about >50% when a coin just launched within the last week or two nobody is trading or using the coin for anything except mining so double spends aren't even a threat Why are you only mining on US pools ? What's wrong with uk ? It's just that i'm in the US (as probably most are, or at least many) I don't trust the overseas connection for mining. i mean, some pools even have USEAST and USWEST servers. latency seems to play a key role, i know it sure as fuck does for solomining stuff |
|
|
|
|
XBATTO
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:56:17 PM |
|
And there goes my trust in this coin, great doing. Network Hash rate: 37.730514 Mhash/s VTC.POOL.PM - Hashrate: 24 Khash/s - Workers: 4 LA.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 5 Khash/s - Workers: 1 HK.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 28 Khash/s - Workers: 0 NY.VERTCO.IN - Hashrate: 1.278 Mhash/s - Workers: 5 EU.VERTCOIN.ORG - Hashrate: 1.978 Mhash/s - Workers: 20 VTC.KILOVOLT.CO.UK - Hashrate: 6.11 Mhash/s - Workers: 12 VERT.BITCRUSH.INFO - Hashrate: 22.055 Mhash/s - Workers: 33 Warning, mining on the largest pool can cause problems with the coin. Please choose one of the smaller pools. The smaller pools are automatically moved to the top of the list every 3 minutes. If the 2nd largest wasn't .co.uk i'd have used it. I'm not using a pool that's like <10% of the network, and i'm not using a pool that doesn't have US servers. that's probably why info is so high up. Also who fucking cares, scrypt altcoins always have pools that are like 40-80% of the hashrate sometimes more during their initial week or two. especially when multicoin pools switch on they can be like 90%+ (granted this wont happen immediately for this because a different algo but still) nobody freaks out about >50% when a coin just launched within the last week or two nobody is trading or using the coin for anything except mining so double spends aren't even a threat Why are you only mining on US pools ? What's wrong with uk ? It's just that i'm in the US (as probably most are, or at least many) I don't trust the overseas connection for mining. i mean, some pools even have USEAST and USWEST servers. latency seems to play a key role, i know it sure as fuck does for solomining stuff Yeah you are right it could make a difference, I am from Canada and I think I will return my 1,5Mh/s to Bitcrush instead of Kilovolt... Or should I solomine ? |
|
|
|
|
|
spiffcow
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:26:44 PM |
|
I think the root conf node is in Germany, right? So the UK pool should be better for latency, since the latency of the pool is much more important than the latency of your miner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vertcoin (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:33:12 PM |
|
I think the root conf node is in Germany, right? So the UK pool should be better for latency, since the latency of the pool is much more important than the latency of your miner.
Root conf node is in New York. |
VTC Stealth Address : vJmt8sF4iySr2RnJdZJdqk7CbJMQzwPwQwUsQwKF27qPE7qv9gfhjYqD6VapALi6jv8j6VKUvXYEto6 xmtxoq9oUyBXbV9XsYdt6sA
Please contact us via contact[at]vertcoin.org only, do not PM.
|
|
|
Bufius
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:46:03 PM |
|
faster CPUminer for vertcoin is done, based on pooler-cpuminer. Source only, no more changes from my side. It is my fear this will be used by botnet operators. https://github.com/Bufius/cpuminer-vertMore speed than the existing CPU miner for Vertcoin? -> yes, nearly 4 times faster (with AVX, AMD A4 4000@3Ghz) accepted: 51/51 (100.00%), 4.89 khash/s (yay!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
